Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 21 issue 3 (september 2001) : 179 - 181

HOST RANGE AND FOOD PREFERENCE OF THE RED PUMPKIN BEETLE, AULACOPHORA EOVE/COLLIS LUCAS (CHRYSOMELIDAE: COLEOPTERA)

Dinesh Chandra Rajak
1l.l.S.R. (ICAR) Bio-control Centre. K.C.5.F., Nellore - 52'1 005, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Rajak Chandra Dinesh (2024). HOST RANGE AND FOOD PREFERENCE OF THE RED PUMPKIN BEETLE, AULACOPHORA EOVE/COLLIS LUCAS (CHRYSOMELIDAE: COLEOPTERA). Agricultural Science Digest. 21(3): 179 - 181. doi: .
Studied on the host range and food preference of red pumpkin beelle, A. foveicollis Lucas revealed that 10 cucurbitaceous vegetables were its host range except bitter gourd. Of major 11 cucurbitaceous crops, musk melon (Cucumis melo L.) was the most preferred food. It causes more damage to the crops of Zaid season than kharif.
    1. Atwal, A.S. and Dhaliwal, G.S. (1997). Agricultural Pests of South Asia and Their Management. Kalyani Publishers.
    2. Ludhiana, pp. 268-269.
    3. Bogwat, J.K. and Panday, S.N. (1967), Indian J.£nt. 29: 349-352,
    4. Cotes, E.C. (1891). Indian Museum Notes, 2.
    5. Pati!, S.P. and Pokharkar, R.N. (1979). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 2:222-223
    6. Pavlakos, J. (1983). Ziang. £nt. 30:78.
    7. Rajamma, P. (1984). Agric. Res. J. Kerala, 20: 84-88.
    8. Sandhu, G,S. and Grewal, S.S. (1986). Punjab Hart. J. 26:1-6.
    9. Venkatarayappa, T. and Govindan, R. (1978). CUrT. Res. 7: 17-18.
    10. Vishwanath and Agarwal, R.A. (1982): Insect-pests of Crops and Their Control, Bharat Publications. Delhi 135 p.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)