Banner

Chief Editor:
Arvind kumar
Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 22 issue 4 (december 2002) : 295 - 296

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT DATES OF SOWING ON THE INCIDENCE OF GRAM POD BORER (HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA) ON DIFFERENT CULTIVARS OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIENtINUM)

Harpal Singh, Inderjit Singh, Gulshan Mahajc;m
1P.A.U., Regional Research Station, Gurdaspur - 143521, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh Harpal, Singh Inderjit, Mahajc;m Gulshan (2025). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT DATES OF SOWING ON THE INCIDENCE OF GRAM POD BORER (HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA) ON DIFFERENT CULTIVARS OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIENtINUM). Agricultural Science Digest. 22(4): 295 - 296. doi: .
Studies on the effect of different dates of sowing of two cultivars of chickpea viz., 10th, 20th, 30th October and 10th and 20th November on the incidence of Helicoverpa armigera was made during the years 1999 and 2000. Both the cultivas of chickpea showed similar pattern of infestation under all the dates of sowing during both the years. The later sown crop of chickpea suffered most from the H armigera and yielded less than earlier sown crop.
    1. Anonymous (1978). The Ye~ Book of Agricultural Statistics Bangladesh, 1976-77, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka Bangladesh 97-125.
    2. Atwal (1991). Agricultural Pests of India and South-East Asia. Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi-Ludhiana pages: 188.
    3. Dhandapani, N. and Balsubramanian, M. (1980). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sec. B (Animal Science) 89:575-578.
    4. Garg, DK (1990). Chickpea News1., 23: 14-15.
    5. Mandai, S.M.A. and Mishra, BK (1996). J. Insect Sci., 9: 189-190.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)