Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 23 issue 4 (december 2003) : 297 - 299

EFFECT OF FOLIAGE APPLIED AGROCHEMlCALS AND BALANCED FERTIUZATION ON GROWTH YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF INDIAN MUSTARD (BRASSelA JUNCEA L.) PRODUCTION

Preeti Daniel, V. Nepalia
1Department of Agronomy, Maharana Pratap University of Agricuhure and Technology, Udaipur-313 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Daniel Preeti, Nepalia V. (2024). EFFECT OF FOLIAGE APPLIED AGROCHEMlCALS AND BALANCED FERTIUZATION ON GROWTH YIELD AND ECONOMICS OF INDIAN MUSTARD (BRASSelA JUNCEA L.) PRODUCTION. Agricultural Science Digest. 23(4): 297 - 299. doi: .
Field study was conducted to assess the effects of agroc hemicals and NPK fertilization on productivity of Indian mustard. Application of cycocel 100 ppm resulted in greatest crop dry matter accumulation. It also brought about maximum increase in seed yield (30.1%) over control as wen as highest net returns (Rs. 16790 ha−1). Conective application of 60 kg N + 40 kg P 2O 5 + 20 kg K 2O ha −1 brought about 49.9 per cent increase in mustard seed yield over unfertilized control.
    1. Hovoland, A.S. (1972). Dissertation Abstracts fnternationalB (cf. ReldCropAbstr. 27: 5915).
    2. Kumar, S. etal (1999). Agric. Sci. Digest, 19: 87-88.
    3. Mehriya, M.L. and Khangarot, S.S. (2000). Ann. AridZone, 39: 81-82.
    4. Michael, G. et al. (1970). Z. PII Ernahr Bodenk 125:24-35 (et.ReId CropAbstr. 24: 2076.)
    5. Patel, J.J. and Singh, RM. (1980). IndianJ. Agron. 25:122-128

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)