Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 23 issue 3 (september 2003) : 175 - 178

GENETIC VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION STUDY AMONG QUALITY CHARACTERS IN SCENTED RICE

GENETIC VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION STUDY AMONG QUALITY CHARACTERS IN SCENTED RICE
1Central Rice Research Instit\.lte, Cuttack - 753006, Orissa, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- RICE SCENTED IN CHARACTERS QUALITY AMONG STUDY CORRELATION AND VARIABILITY GENETIC (2024). GENETIC VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION STUDY AMONG QUALITY CHARACTERS IN SCENTED RICE. Agricultural Science Digest. 23(3): 175 - 178. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Two hundred scented rice varieties including one non scented check Ratna were evaluated to know the genetic variabilities and correlation among different quality characters. The genetic parameters were moderate to high for all the characters studied. The hulling and milling percentage had significant positive correlation with headrice recovery percentage. Water uptake and elongation ratio had significant positive correlation with alkali spreading value and significant negative correlation with amylose content. The alkali spreading value showed significant negative correlation with amylose content.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. AI- Jibouri, H.A. et al (1958). Agron. J., 50: 633-636.
    2. Azeez. M.H. and ShaH, M. (1966). Quality in Rice, Technical Bulletin 13, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of West, Pakistan, Lahore, 50 PP. .
    3. BeacheII.H.M. and Stansel, J.W. (1963). Int. RicfI Comm. Nflwsl (Spl Issue) 12: 25-40.
    4. Burton, G.W.and Devane, E.H. (1952). Agron. J.,45: 478 - 481.
    5. Chauhan, J.S. and Nanda, J.S. (1983). Oryza., 20(4): 209 -215.
    6. Chauhan, J.S. et al (1994). Oryza., 31: 50-52.
    7. Chauhan. J.S. etal (1995). Oryza., 32: 79-82.
    8. Ghosh, AK flta/. (1971). Oryza., 8: 87-93.
    9. Hussain, A.A. etal (1987).lndianJ. Genet., 47: 145-152.
    10. Johnson, H.W. eta/. (1955). Agron. J., 47: 314-318.
    11. Juliano, 8.0. (1971). Cerea/Sci. Today. 16: 334-339. 178 AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE DIGEST
    12. Juliano, B.O. and Pascual, C.G. (1980). IRRIRes. paper series, No. 48.
    13. Little, R.R. eta! (1958). CereaIChem., 35: 111-126.
    14. Singh. VP. eta! (1997). Int. Rice Res, News!, 22(1): 22.
    15. Sharma, A. et a! (1998). National Symposium on Rice Research for 21" Century, Challenges, Priorities, Strategies. 5-7 Feb 1998 at CRR/, Cuttack.
    16. Somrith, B. et a! (1979). IRRI Res. paper series, No. 35.
    17. Tomar, J.B and Nanda, J.S. (1982). Oryza., 19: 13'16.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)