Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 23 issue 2 (june 2003) : 88 - 91

INFLUENCE OF CULTIVARS AND LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON YIELD, NUTRIENT UPTAKEAND RESIDUAL NUTRIENT STATUS OF SOIL IN SEMI DRY RICE

G. Sudhakar, A. Solaimalai, N. Ravisankar
1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sudhakar G., Solaimalai A., Ravisankar N. (2024). INFLUENCE OF CULTIVARS AND LEVELS OF NITROGEN ON YIELD, NUTRIENT UPTAKEAND RESIDUAL NUTRIENT STATUS OF SOIL IN SEMI DRY RICE. Agricultural Science Digest. 23(2): 88 - 91. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted for two successive years on sandy loam soil in order to evaluate the yield, nutrient uptake and residual nutrient status of semi dry rice as influenced by the rice cultivars and N levels. The result reveals that rice cultivar PMK 1 produced higher grain yield due to the higher uptake of N, P2O5 and K2O. Residual nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium status of soils were less where the cultivars PMK 1 and ACM 37 were raised. Application of higher level of 125 kg N ha−1 to semi dry rice improved grain yield, nutrient uptake and higher residual post harvest soil fertility status as compared to application of nitrogen at lower levels.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Behera, U.K and Jha, KP. (1992). Indian Frog., 42(4): 4-10.
    2. Bhattacharya, H.C. and Singh, KN. (1992). Indian J. Agron., 37(4): 681-685.
    3. Biswas, C.R. eta! (1989).IRRN, 14(6):18-19.
    4. Moorthy, B.T.e. and Mitra, B.N. (1990). Crop Res., 3: 144-150.
    5. Narendrapandey, N. eta! (1992). Ann. Agric. Res., 13: 372-317.
    6. Prasad, B. and Rokima, J. (1991). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 39: 783-785.
    7. Prasad, M. and Rao, MV (1989). Oryza, 26: 187-189.
    8. Sambasivam, A. (1986). M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore - 641003.
    9. Tandon, H.L.S. (1994). Methods of Soil, Plant and Water Analysis. FEDCO, New Delhi.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)