Banner

Chief Editor:
Arvind kumar
Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 23 issue 1 (march 2003) : 69 - 70

STUDIES ON HERITABILITY AND GENETIC ADVANCE OF SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN YELLOW SARSON (BRASSICA CAMPESTRISLINN. VAR. YEllOWSARSONPRAIN)*

Dharmendra Singh··, V.K. Mishra
1Department of Agricultural Botany Janata Mahavidyalaya Ajitmal, Auraiya (Uttar Pradesh) -206121, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh·· Dharmendra, Mishra V.K. (2025). STUDIES ON HERITABILITY AND GENETIC ADVANCE OF SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN YELLOW SARSON (BRASSICA CAMPESTRISLINN. VAR. YEllOWSARSONPRAIN)*. Agricultural Science Digest. 23(1): 69 - 70. doi: .
Narrow sense heritability and genetic advance were studied for yield and its components of 20 parents partial diallel for F 1 and F 2 generations in yellow sarson. High heritability estimates were observed for days to flower, days to maturity, siliqua length and siliquae/plant in both the generations. High genetic advance was recorded for days to flower, siliquae/plant and seed yield/plant in both the generations. The days to flower and siliquae/piant had high heritability coupled with high genetic advance (%mean) indicated that heritability was due to additive gene effects and progress can be achieved by selection in segregating populations.
    1. Hayman, B.L. (1963). Statistical Genetics and Plant Breed. NA5-NRS Pub!. 982: 571-578.
    2. Johanson, H.w. etal (1955). Agron. J., 47: 477-483.
    3. Kempthorne, O. and Curnow,R.N. (1961): Biometrics, 17: 229-250.
    4. Rao, I.S. (1977). Genetic lber., 29: 219-227.
    5. Robinson, H.E eta! (1949). Agron. J., 41: 352-359.
    6. Sharma, J.K et al (1992). Crop. Improv., 19: 113-115.
    7. Uddin, M.J. etal (1995). Ann. Bangladesh Agric. Univ., 5: 51-54.
    8. . Yadav, T-.P. et al (1981). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 51: 374-378.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)