Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 23 issue 1 (march 2003) : 61 - 62

FIELD EVALUATION OFSESAMUM GENOTYPES FOR MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE

Shamarao Jahagirdar, K.N. Pawar, M.R. Ravikumar, S.T. Yenjerappa, B.G. Prakash
1Regional Research Station, Bijapur - 586101, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Jahagirdar Shamarao, Pawar K.N., Ravikumar M.R., Yenjerappa S.T., Prakash B.G. (2024). FIELD EVALUATION OFSESAMUM GENOTYPES FOR MULTIPLE DISEASE RESISTANCE. Agricultural Science Digest. 23(1): 61 - 62. doi: .
Nine entries of Sesamum were evaluatetf for their multiple resistances to diseases during 1998–99 and 1999–2000. The entries MT-15, DS-15 DS-10 shown moderately susceptible reaction to powdery midew. The entries MT-15, DS-7, DS-14, E-8 showed moderately resistant type of reaction against bacterial leaf blight. The genotypes MT-15, DS-14 and DS-10 recording 3.2, 4.0 and 4.0 disease grade respectively showed moderately resistant type of reaction against alternaria blight. The genotypes MT-15, DOR5–102, DS-14, DS-10 showed multiple disease resistance against powdery mildew, alternaria blight and bacterial leaf blight diseases
    1. Anonymous (1999). In: Indian Agriculture 1.999. Indian Economic Oata Research Centre. 8-713. New Oelhi.
    2. Fawzi, K. et al (1991). Egyptian J. Agric. Res., 69: 685-693.
    3. Mayee, C.O and Oatar, Y. (1986). In: Phytopathometry. Bulletin, Marathawada Agric. University, Parbani.
    4. Praveen Kumar, K. eta/. (1998). Curr. Res., 27: 62.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)