Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 23 issue 1 (march 2003) : 57 - 58

FIELD EVALUATION OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) GENOTYPES AGAINST WHITE RUST (ALBUqO CRUCIFERARUMS.F. 'GRAy)

J.P. Khunti·, P.R. Khandar, M.E Bhonmiya
1Department of Plant Pathology Gujarat Agricultural University, Sardar Krushinagar-385 506, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Khunti· J.P., Khandar P.R., Bhonmiya M.E (2024). FIELD EVALUATION OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) GENOTYPES AGAINST WHITE RUST (ALBUqO CRUCIFERARUMS.F. 'GRAy). Agricultural Science Digest. 23(1): 57 - 58. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Field experiment was conducted under artificial inoculation conditions to evaluate the 284 mustard genotypes for their source of resistance against the white rust caused by Albugo cruciferarums Gray, none was found immune, only 29 were rated as resistant, 54 as moderately resistant, 128 as moderately susceptible, 44 as susceptible and 29 as highly susceptible to the white rust pathogen.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous (1988). Proc. Annual RauJOilseeus Workshop held at Cullege of Agriculture, MPAU, Pune.
    2. Gupta, AK. (1988). IndianJ Mycul Pathol., 18 ~123-324.
    3. Kolte, c.J. and Awasthi. R.P. (1985). IndJimJ. ;\.iycol. PI. Pathol, 15: 211-213.
    4. Saharan, G.S. et al. (1988). Indian Phytopath.. 41 96-99.
    5. Srivastava, L.S. and Verma. R.N. (1987). Indian J Mycol PI. Pathol, 17: 46.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)