Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 24 issue 4 (december 2004) : 248 . 251

EFfECltOFPOST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES ON WE£D'RePulATlONAND VJaD OF SOYBFAN

GadcIeppBgoudar, ~, V.S. Gidnavar, H.B. Babalad, G.S. Meti
1Department of Agronomy. Unlwrsity of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad - 586 101, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- GadcIeppBgoudar, ~, Gidnavar V.S., Babalad H.B., Meti G.S. (2024). EFfECltOFPOST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES ON WE£D'RePulATlONAND VJaD OF SOYBFAN. Agricultural Science Digest. 24(4): 248 . 251. doi: .
Weed population was significantly reduced by all the weed control treatments Over weedy check. At harvest, application of Fenoxprop-p-ethyl + eactofen @ (70+90) g ai/ha at 14 DAS, recorded lower weed population (6.33/m 2) as compared to rest of the other treabnents. Significantly higher seed yield (1600 Icg/ha) was observed in Fenoxprop-p-ethyl + lactofen @ (70+90) g a.i./hili at 14 DAS, as compared to other weed control treatments
    1. Aslam. M.et al. (1989). Progress Farming, 92: 12-16.
    2. Camilo, E. and Spindsa, N. (1995). Revista Cere-, 42: 10-24.
    3. Higgins, J.M. (1988). Weed Sci., 36: 345-353.
    4. Manjeet Singh (1995). Indian J. Agron., 40: 55-58.
    5. Satao, R.N. (1994). Indian J. Agron., 39: 676-677.
    6. Vellaso, J.A. (1983). Centre Nacional de Trig.. 66-71

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)