Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 24 issue 1 (march 2004) : 75 - 76

. EVALUATION OF PROMISING SORGHUM GENOTYPES FOR THEIR YIELD AND QUALITY

v.v. Gabhane, S.S. Wanjari, K.P. Dhamdhere
1Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth. Akola - 444104, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gabhane v.v., Wanjari S.S., Dhamdhere K.P. (2024). . EVALUATION OF PROMISING SORGHUM GENOTYPES FOR THEIR YIELD AND QUALITY. Agricultural Science Digest. 24(1): 75 - 76. doi: .
A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 1999–2000. For obtaining higher grain and fodder yield, better protein content, application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P 2O 5 ha −1 was found to be the best. The most promising genotypes in respect of yield and protein content are SPH-964 and SPH-981, and most promising genotype in respect of reducing and non-reducing sugar content is CSV-15.
    1. Anonymous (1998). Epitome of Agriculture in Maharashtra state. pp 121.
    2. Khuswaha, S.S. and Khuswaha, B.B. (1991). Sorghum Newsl, 32: 64-65.
    3. Pati!, A.S. et al (1984). Sullindian Soc. 5(JiISci., 13: 351-355.
    4. Rao, B.A. and Reddy, P.R. (1973). Indiari J. Agric. Sci., 43: 138.
    5. Vashistha, RP. and Dwivedi, OK (l994).lndian J. Agron., 42: 112.
    6. Warsi, A.S. and Wright, Bill C. (1973). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 43: 702.
    7. Wanjari S.S. et al (1992). Agric. Sci. Digest., 12: 183-184.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)