Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 25 issue 4 (december 2005) : 293 - 295

EFFICACY OF FUNGICIDES AS SEED TREATMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BLAST DISEASE OF RICE IN NURSERY BED

Ali Anwar, M. Shafi Bhat
1Division of Plant Pathology. SK University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir. Shalimar. Srinagar - 191 121 (J&K).lndia
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Anwar Ali, Bhat Shafi M. (2024). EFFICACY OF FUNGICIDES AS SEED TREATMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BLAST DISEASE OF RICE IN NURSERY BED. Agricultural Science Digest. 25(4): 293 - 295. doi: .
Evaluation of few fungicides viz., Fuji-one (Isoprothiolene), Tricyclazole, Edifenphos, Hexaconazole and Mancozeb as seed treatment at two varying doses revealed that Fujione (Isoprothiolene) and Tricyclazole 75WP were most effective in combating the nursery blast disease, exhibiting no incidence and severity at both the doses tested at 35 DAS and a seedling vigour index of 4.0, whereas the Mancozeb 45WP proved inferior resulting in an incidence of 2.0 and 2.7% a severity of 0.9 and 1.6 per cent at both the levels of doses respectively with a seedling vigour index of 5.0.
    1. Ali. Anwar and Bhat, M. ShaH (2003). National Seminar on Recent Advances in Plant Science Research. 12-14 Oct. 2003, University of Kashmir.
    2. Ali, Anwar etal. (2003). Agric. BioI. Res.. 19(2): 100-103.
    3. IRRI (1979). The International Rice Testing Programme.IRRI. Manila. Philippine. pp. 72.
    4. IRRI (1980). Standard Evaluation System for Rice (second edition). International Rice Research Institute. Manila. Philippine, pp. 81

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)