Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 25 issue 4 (december 2005) : 260 - 262

EFFECT OF GA3 AND NM ON YlElD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF ONION CV. N-53

Subimal Mondal-, N. Shukla
1Department of Horticulture. Indira Gandhi Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Raipur. Chhaltisgarh - 492 012, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mondal- Subimal, Shukla N. (2024). EFFECT OF GA3 AND NM ON YlElD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF ONION CV. N-53. Agricultural Science Digest. 25(4): 260 - 262. doi: .
In a field experiment onion crop was treated with GA3 and NAA each with three different doses (200, 300 and 400 ppm of NAA and 20, 40 and 60 ppm of GA3) and each does was applied through three different methods (soaking of seeds for 8 hours, seedling root dipping for 18 hours and foliar spray). All the treated plants produced higher bulb diameter than control (no PGR) treatment whereas bulb length did not differ total yield and marketable bulb yield (each bulb weighing > 20 gram) of bulbs were positively influenced by the application of GA3 specially in root dipping treatments.
    1. Chadwick. L.c. (1938). Onion Agric. Sta. Spec. Citc., 54: 63-64.
    2. Deore. BP. and Bharud. R.w. (1991). Maharastra J. Hort.. 5: 64-67.
    3. Nandekar. D.N. and Sawarkar. S.D. (1992). indian J. Hort., 49: 267-269.
    4. Nirmal. S.v. et a1. (1994). J. Maharastra Agric. Univ.• 19: 136-137.
    5. Tillford. P.E. (1938). Proc. Nat1. Shade Tree Con£., 14: 51-57.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)