Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 26 issue 1 (march 2006) : 15 - 18


D.R. Mehta, L.K. Dhaduk, K.D. Patel
1Vegetable Research Station, Gujarat Agricultural University, Junagadh - 362 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mehta D.R., Dhaduk L.K., Patel K.D. (2024). GENETIC VARIABILITY, CORRELATION AND PATH ANALYSIS STUDIES IN OKRA {ABELMOSCHUS ESCULENTUS (L.) MOENCH}. Agricultural Science Digest. 26(1): 15 - 18. doi: .
The genetic variability, correlation and path coefficients analyses were studied in 22 diverse genotypes of okra for fruit yield and its component traits during summer 2003. The values of PCV were higher than that of GCV values for all the seven traits indicating influence of environmental effects in expression of these traits. The GCV, heritability and genetic advance as percentage of mean were higher for fruit yield, average fruit weight, plant height and fruit length which might be attributed to additive gene action resulting their inheritance. The fruit yield was significant and positively correlated with fruit length and average fruit weight. Path coefficients revealed that fruit girth had the maximum direct effect followed by fruit length towards fruit yield. Thus, the fruit yield in okra can be improved by selecting for higher fruit length, fruit girth and average fruit weight simultaneously.
    1. Allard, R.W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons., Inc. New York.
    2. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.G. (1959). Agron J., 15: 513-518.
    3. Dhankhar, B.S. and Dhankhar, S.K. (2002). Veg. Sci., 29(1): 63-65.
    4. Panda, P.K. and Singh, K.P. (1997). Madras Agric. J., 84: 136-138.
    5. Patil, Y.B. et al. (1996). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 9: 289-293.
    6. Rajani, B.R. and Manju, P. (1997). South Indian Hort., 45(1-2): 61-62.
    7. Sagar Prem (1992). Crop Improv., 19: 8-41

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)