Discriminate knowledge level bivoltine technologies
Discriminate knowledge level of moriculture trained and untrained
Table 1 revealed a non-significant relationship with trained farmers’ soil testing and reclamation 0.493, planting spacing 0.828, pruning method 0.536, IPM 0.064, and IDM 0. 077. The result of the study is consistent with
Hadimani et al., 2017. Highly significant with mulberry variety 0.00, INM 0.00, IWM 0.04, and harvesting of mulberry at the right time 0.00 in trained farmers. The study results are consistent with Beula Priyadarsini and Vijayakumari. 2013. The untrained farmers’ non-significant planting spacing is 0.045, pruning method 0.640, INM 0.286, IWM 0.07, IPM 0.387, IDM 0.356, and Use of mulberry at the right time 0. 071. The study results are consistent with
Hadimani et al., 2017. a highly significant relationship is between soil testing and reclamation 0.005, and mulberry variety 0.001. R-value in mulberry cultivation is highly associated with trained farmers at 0.67 and untrained associated with 0.16. This substantiated similar findings by Ravi
Kant et al., 2023 and
Beula et al., 2016.
Discriminate between silkworm technologies that are trained and those that are untrained
Table 2 revealed that the non-significant relationship between trained farmers’ rearing shed 0.625, disinfection 0.631, late age feeding 0.275, moulting care 0.018,IDM 0.846, IPM 0.247, marketing 0.247, cocoon harvesting 0.413 and crop/year 0.480 and untrained farmers rearing shed 0.309,disinfection 0.909, late age feeding 0.334, moulting care 0.162, IDM 0.904, IPM 0.711, marketing 0.547, cocoon harvesting 0.519 and crop/year 0.102. The highly significant trained and untrained farmers 0.000.R-value in silkworm technologies is highly associated with trained farmers at 0.85 and untrained associated with 0.72.
Discriminate adoption of level bivoltine Technologies
Discriminate adoption level of moriculture trained and untrained
Table 3 revealed that non-significant relationship between trained farmers’ soil testing and reclamation 0.672, planting spacing 0.019 pruning method 0.527, IPM 0.417, and IDM 0.536 Highly significant with the use of mulberry at the right time 0.000 in trained farmers. The result of the study is consistent with
Hadimani et al., (2017); Choudhury et al., (2017) and
Deepa et al. (2007). The untrained farmers’ non -significance to planting spacing 0.650, pruning method 0.364,INM 0.969, IWM 0.082, IPM 0.609,IDM 0.502 and Use of mulberry at the right time 0.529 and highly significant relationship is soil testing and reclamation 0.005 and mulberry variety 0.001. R-value in mulberry cultivation is highly associated with trained farmers at 0.98 and untrained at 0.64.
Discriminate adoption level of silkworm technologies trained and untrained
Table 4 revealed that the non-significant relationship between the silkworm technologies trained farmers’ late age feeding 0.996, moulting care 0.406, IPM 0.247, marketing 0.605 and untrained farmers’ rearing shed 0.788, IPM 0.245, marketing 0.096 and crop/year 0.102. The highly significant relationship in adopted silkworm.
Technologies is by trained rearing house, disinfectant, cocoon harvest at the right time, crop/per /year and reared silkworm annum. The result of the study is supported by the findings of
Deepa and Sujathamma (2007) and
Kumaresan et al., (2009). Untrained farmers had rearing shed, disinfection, moulting care, IDM, cocoon at right time harvest and reared silkworm annum. Cocoons at the right harvest had a direct effect on price during auctioning. The study findings
Krishnamurthy, (2012). R-value in silkworm technologies are highly associated with trained farmers at 0.67 and untrained associated with 0.52.
Discriminate knowledge level bivoltine technologies
The trained farmers in revenue = - 27.297 +2.837 (soil testing) - 41.643 (Mulberry variety) +9.785(Planting space)-6.194(Pruning method) +17.249 (INM)+4.799(IWM)+ 5.687 (IPM)+ 4.061 (IDM)+23532.365 (Harvesting right time) Based on the r2 value independent variables are 98% defined over dependent variables. The above is moderately correlated and has a linear trend. Untrained farmers’ revenue = +989.308 +83.667 (Soil testing) + 24.876 (Mulberry variety) -62.056 (Planting space)-2.849(Pruning method) +123.758 (INM)+48.331(IWM)-40.130 (IPM)- 71.283 (IDM)-31.960 (Harvesting right time). Some kinds of studies were done by
Elumalai and Murugesh, 2019;
Harish et al., (2022) and
Tayade et al., 2016. Based on the r2 value independent variables are 64% defined over dependent variables. The rest of the variables do not show a significant impact over the dependent variable. Fig 1 (a) the trained farmers, histogram showing the bell-shaped curve which represented normal distribution in revenue. Fig 1 (b) the untrained farmers, histogram shows the slight bell-shaped curve which represents the normal distribution in revenue.
The trained farmers in Revenue = -17748.771 + 7442.940 (Silk) + 5654.433 (Disinfection) – 20895.473 (Late age feeding) + 20073.881 (Moulting care) + 2084.247 (IDM) + 7730.331 (IPM) – 12176.365 (Marketing) + 967.971 (Crop/Year) +197.335 (Reared of Dfls annual). Based on the r2 value independent variables are 85% defined over dependent variables. The above is moderately correlated and has a linear trend. Among the variables Moulting care and rearing of annual DFLs showed significant impact over the dependent variable. The rest of the variables do not show a significant impact over the dependent variable. Fig 2(a) The histogram shows the bell-shaped curve which represents the normal distribution in yield in trained farmers.
The untrained farmers Revenue = 126880.500 - 5106.638 (Silk) - 487.815 (Disinfection) - 8766.105 (Late age feeding) - 8131.983 (Moulting care) - 386.669 (IDM) + 1092.509 (IPM) + 4259.713 (Marketing) -2126.197 (Crop/Year) +78.442 (Reared of Dfls annual). Based on the r2 value independent variables are 72% defined over dependent variables. Moderately correlated. Among the variables, the Rearing of Annual DFLs only shows a significant impact on the dependent variable. The results of the study are supported by the findings of
Mani et al., (2006) and
Hiriyanna et al., 2009. The rest of the variables show no significance over the dependent variable. The above Model shows that the intercept has a Positive value and Spacing, Irrigation, Shoot Harvesting, IPM and IDM have shown negative impacts over the dependent value. Soil, variety, INM, IWW, and Reared of Dfls have a positive impact over the depen-dent variable. [Fig 2 (b)] The histogram does not show the bell- shaped curve which represents an abnormal distribution in revenue. The result of the study is supported by the findings of
Meenal, (2006) and
Lakshmanan et al., 2007.
Discriminate adoption level trained and untrained farmers
The study revealed that trained farmers Cocoon yield = -27.297 + 2.837 (Soil) - 41.643 (Variety) + 9.785 (Spacing) - 6.194 (Shoot Harvesting) + 17.249 (INM) + 4.799 (IWW) + 5.687 (IPM) + 4.061 (IDM) + 0.834 (Reared of Dfls annual). Based on the r2 value independent variables are 98 % defined over dependent variable. Highly correlated and has a linear trend. Among the variable’s variety, INM and Rearing of DFLs annually have significant impacts on the dependent variable. The above results are in line with the findings of
Ravi et al., (2023) and
Ovais Ahmed Hajam et al., 2021. Spacing, irrigation, shoot harvest, IWW, IPM and IDM do not impact significantly over dependent variable. Some kinds of the results were given by
Parthasarathi, (2002), IPM in trained farmers was much higher on biological and physical identification of pests and predators. The training positive effect on farmers. The above Model shows that the intercept has a Negative value and variety, Irrigation has shown negative impacts over the dependent value. Soil, Spacing, Shoot Harvesting, INM, IWW, IPM, IDM, and Reared of Dfls have a positive impact over the dependent variable. Fig 3 (a) the trained farmers, histogram showing the bell-shaped curve which represented normal distribution in yield. Fig 3 (b) the untrained farmers, histogram shows a slight bell-shaped curve which represents abnormal distribution in yield.
The study revealed that untrained farmers Cocoon yield = 989.308 + 83.633 (Soil) + 24.876 (Variety) - 24.876 (Spacing) - 62.056 (Irrigation) - 2.849 (Shoot Harvesting) + 123.758 (INM) + 48.331 (IWW) - 40.130 (IPM) -71.283 (IDM) – 31.960 (Harvesting Mulberry at right time) + 0.016 (Reared of Dfls annual). Based on the r2 value independent variables are 64%. Defined over the dependent variable. Highly correlated and has a linear trend. Among the variables, Garden Spacing shows a significant impact on the dependent variable. The rest of the variables do not show a significant impact over the dependent variable. The above Model shows that the intercept has a Positive value and Spacing, Irrigation, Shoot Harvesting, IPM, CRC garden, and IDM have shown negative impacts over the dependent value. Soil, variety, INM, IWW, and Reared of Dfls have a positive impact over the dependent variable. Fig 4 (a) the trained farmers, histogram shows the bell-shaped curve which represents the normal distribution in yield. Fig 4 (b) The untrained farmers, histogram showed a slight bell-shaped curve which represented an abnormal distribution in yield. The above results are in line with the findings of
Harishkumar et al., (2022).