Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Reviews, volume 42 issue 4 (december 2021) : 478-482

​Effects of Addition of Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) Pulp on the Physico-chemical and Sensory Properties of Burfi and its Cost Structure

Rahul Govinda Kolwate1, Ashish Ashok Uikey1,*, S.R. Shegokar2
1Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Agricultural University, Akola-444 104, Maharashtra, India.
2Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani-431 402, Maharashtra, India.
Cite article:- Kolwate Govinda Rahul, Uikey Ashok Ashish, Shegokar S.R. (2021). ​Effects of Addition of Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) Pulp on the Physico-chemical and Sensory Properties of Burfi and its Cost Structure . Agricultural Reviews. 42(4): 478-482. doi: 10.18805/ag.DR-1685.
Background: During present investigation burfi was prepared from different combinations of cow milk khoa and pumpkin pulp [viz., 100:00 (T1), 75:25 (T2), 70:30 (T3), 65:35 (T4) and 60:40 (T5)] and the samples were subjected to sensory evaluation, chemical analysis and cost was computed considering the ingredients and processing costs. The pumpkin pulp (as per treatments) and sugar (30% by weight of khoa) were mixed with khoa at different stage of khoa preparation. Then, the mixture was heated till burfi was obtained.

Methods: For preparation of burfi fresh cow milk was obtained from Livestock Instructional Farm, Akola. The milk was standardized to 4.0 per cent fat and 9.0 per cent SNF for the preparation of burfi. The khoa blended with pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) pulp at different ratios, the product without using pumpkin pulp served as control. The burfi was analyzed for chemical composition (viz., fat protein, total sugars, ash and total solids). The organoleptic attributes of burfi were analyzed in terms of its flavor, body and texture and color and appearance, wherein the total score was out of 100; the judging panel comprised on 5 members.

Result: The total sensory scores of burfi obtained were 87.81, 90.46, 95.46, 92.99 and 84.30 for the treatment T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 respectively. The burfi prepared from various combinations involving use of up to 70 per cent cow milk khoa in blend with pumpkin pulp was found acceptable. The fat content of burfi’s was 19.61, 15.40, 14.38, 13.40 and 12.37 per cent, protein content was 14.89, 12.64, 12.11, 11.61 and 11.04 per cent, total sugar content was 32.78, 36.73, 37.59, 38.45 and 39.31 per cent, ash content was 2.69, 2.55, 2.53, 2.49 and 2.45 per cent, total solids content was 69.94, 67.30, 66.60, 65.94 and 65.17 per cent for the treatment T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 respectively. The fat, protein, ash and total solids of burfi tended to decrease while total sugar and moisture content tended to increase with an increase in the level of pumpkin pulp used as additive. The per kg cost of production of pumpkin based burfi decreased with increasing level of incorporation of pumpkin pulp in burfi formulation i.e. ₹ 240 (100:00 khoa), ₹ 204.51 (75:25, khoa: pulp), ₹ 199.11 (70:30 khoa: pulp), ₹ 194.33 (65:35 khoa: pulp), ₹ 189.25 (60:40, khoa : pulp) for the treatment T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 respectively. The most acceptable burfi i.e. T3 was computed to be priced at ₹ 199.11 per kg.
Burfi is one of the most popular khoa based sweet, prepared from cow or buffalo milk. Burfi is prepared by heating the mixture of khoa and sugar to a near homogenous consistency followed by cooling and cutting it into small cuboids (Chetana et al., 2010). It basically has mild caramelized flavour. Its colour may vary from light off white to creamy to light brown. Good quality burfi is characterized by moderately sweet taste, soft and slightly greasy body and smooth texture. Due to unique adaptability of khoa in terms of its flavor, body and texture to blend with wide variety of food, various forms of burfi are available with different additives depending on regional preferences viz. plain, mawa, chocolate, fig, rawa, cashewnut, coconut. Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. Ex Poir), commonly known as kashiphalor Pumpkin belongs to the family cucurbitaceae and the genus cucurbita. The genus cucurbita include various varieties such as Cucurbita moschata (winter squash), Cucurbita pepo (summer squash), Cucurbita mixta, Cucurbita facifola, etc. Out of these Cucurbita moschatais and Cucurbita pepo have commercial importance and are extensively grown in summer and rainy seasons throughout the country. Pumpkin fruit are rich source of carotenoids, vitamins, minerals and dietary fibres.
        
It is found that the smooth, slightly sweet taste of cooked pumpkin is actually quite delicious. Pumpkin is also considered a versatile vegetable and it can be used to make delicious soups, stews, cakes and muffins and of course the famous pumpkin pie (Rahman et al., 2019). Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) pulp is a good supplement of protein, carbohydrate and fat with low anti nutrient. This coupled with high mineral content which is advantageous for man and animals (Adebayo et al., 2013). Pumpkin has a range of fantastic benefits, including being one of the best-known sources of beta carotene. Beta carotene is a powerful antioxidant that gives orange vegetables and fruits their vibrant color. The body converts any ingested beta carotene into vitamin A. Consuming foods with high volumes of beta carotene may have the benefits like reducing the risk of developing certain types of cancer, offering protection against asthma and heart disease, decreasing the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Including pumpkin in the diet may help people control diabetes and their blood sugar levels. Pumpkins are a fantastic source of fiber (Ware, 2019). According to the United States Department of Agriculture’s (Food Data Central, 2019) database, 1 cup or 245 g of cooked, boiled, or drained pumpkin, without salt, contains: 1.76 g of protein, 2.7 g of fiber, 49 calories (kcal), 0.17 g of fat, 0 g of cholesterol, 12 g of carbohydrate. Pumpkin also provides a range of essential vitamins and minerals, including: vitamin A, C, E, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6 and B9, potassium, copper, manganese, iron, magnesium and phosphorus.
        
Pumpkin provides valuable source of carotenoids that have a major role in the nutrition in the form of pro-vitamin A. Being rich source of carotenoids pumpkin-based food products can help in preventing skin diseases, eye disorders and cancer. Incorporation of beta carotene rich ingredients in the development of food products is considered a cost-effective approach to vitamin-A related health problems. Moreover, the anti-diabetic properties and anti-cancerous properties of pumpkin have generated interest in consuming this fruit and utilizing it as a source of various bio-actives for the development of value added products and nutraceuticals (Dar et al., 2017).
        
Cucurbita pepo has been reported for their use as traditional medicine with antidiabetic, anti-hypertensive, anti-tumor, immune modulation, anti-hypercholesteralemia, anti-inflammation activities and anti-bacterial (Fu et al., 2006). Pumpkin is used as a medicinal plant for prostate and bladder problems and as an anthelmintic, galactogogue and antiemetic (Magdeleine et al., 2011). Looking to the diversification nutritive benefits of pumpkin and concentrated milk product, burfi was prepared from milk and pumpkin pulp. The present study was planned to add value to burfi through incorporation of pumpkin pulp.
Preparation of pumpkin pulp
 
The pumpkin was procured from local market. It was cleaned and skin was removed. Then, the pumpkin was chopped into small pieces, boiled on medium flame for 10 minutes, cooled to room temperature and mashed.
 
Composition of pumpkin pulp (Table 1)
Treatment details
 
T1 - 100 part of khoa (control)
T2 - 75:25 khoa: pumpkin pulp
T3 - 70:30 khoa: pumpkin pulp
T4 - 65:35 khoa: pumpkin pulp
T5 - 60:40 khoa: pumpkin pulp
 
In all treatment sugar was added at the rate of 30% by weight of khoa.
 

Table 1: Composition of pumpkin pulp.


 
Preparation of burfi
 
For preparation of control burfi and experimental burfi fresh cow milk was obtained from Livestock Instructional Farm Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola. The milk was standardized to 4 per cent fat and 9 per cent SNF before preparation of burfi. The burfi samples were prepared by using the standard procedure described by Aneja et al., (2002) with suitable modifications.
 
Process flow chart for the preparation of burfi is given in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Flow diagram for preparation of burfi containing pumpkin pulp.


 
 Chemical analysis
 
The burfi prepared with and without use of pumpkin pulp were analyzed for fat by Gerber’s method as described in IS: 1224 (part II) 1977, Protein by the Microkjeldahl’s method as described in IS: 1981, Total sugars by the spectrophotometer method, ash by standard method (BIS, 1981), Total solids by standard method (BIS, 1961).
 
Organoleptic evaluation
 
The organoleptic attributes of burfi were analyzed in terms of its flavor, body and texture and color and appearance, by offering sample to the panel of 5 judges from the Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. P.D.K.V., Akola using 100 point scale prescribed by (Pal and Gupta, 1985).
 
Statistical analysis
 
The observations were analyzed as per the completely randomized design (CRD) in which five treatments were replicated four times. Data was analyzed by giving the statistical treatments to the findings describe by (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).
 
Cost structure
 
Cost structure of burfi was calculated considering the market cost of ingredients used for burfi making.
Effect of incorporating pumpkin pulp on the chemical composition of Burfi
 
The effect of varying levels of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) pulp viz., fat, protein, total sugar, ash and total solids of burfi was shown in Table 2. There was a significant (P<0.05) decrease in the fat, protein, ash and total solids content of burfi was observed with increasing the level of pumpkin pulp. Whereas, increase in total sugar was noted in burfi when the level of pumpkin pulp was raised in the blend. Decrease in fat and protein content was in consonance with the findings of Singh et al., (2017) who observed that with an increase in apple pomace levels led to proportionate decrease in the fat and protein content of burfi; such effect was found to be significant (P<0.05). The control burfi had significantly (P<0.05) higher fat, protein, ash and total solids than any of the experimental burfi samples. The fat, protein, ash and total solids content of burfi prepared using 30 parts of pumpkin pulp were highest (Table 2).

Table 2: Effect of addition of pumpkin pulp on chemical composition of burfi.


 
Effect of addition of pumpkin pulp on the sensory attributes of Burfi
 
The effect of varying levels of pumpkin pulp on the sensory scores viz., flavour, body and texture, colour and appearance and overall acceptability of burfi as shown in Table 3. The highest score (43.50 out of 45.00) for flavour was obtained for burfi prepared with 30 parts of pumpkin pulp (T3). This result was comparable to that of Dhande and Bhosale (2017) who observed that, the highest score (43.87 out of 45.00) for flavour was obtained by treatment with 80 parts of khoa + 20 parts of ash gourd pulp which was at par with the score (42.53 out of 45.00) of treatment 85 parts of khoa +15 parts of ash gourd pulp. The highest score (33.23 out of 35.00) for body and texture was obtained for burfi prepared with 30 parts of pumpkin pulp (T3). This result was comparable to that of Talekar et al., (2015) who reported that, the burfi made with 85 parts of buffalo milk khoa + 15 parts of coconut paste secured the highest score (8.82 out of 9.0) for body and texture and it was liked very much by the judges among the treated samples. The highest score (18.52 out of 20.00) for colour and appearance was obtained for burfi prepared with 30 parts of pumpkin pulp (T3). This result was comparable to that of Ramteke et al., (2018) who reported that, The highest score (18.50 out of 20) for colour and appearance was obtained by burfi prepared with 90 parts of cow milk khoa + 10 parts of potato flour. The lowest score (15.75 out of 20) was obtained by burfi prepared with 80 parts of cow milk khoa + 20 parts of potato flour. The highest total sensory score (95.56 out of 100.00) was noted for burfi prepared with 30 parts of pumpkin pulp (T3) (Table 3).

Table 3: Effect of varying levels of pumpkin pulp on the sensory scores of burfi.


 
Cost structure for 1 kg pumpkin based burfi prepared under various treatments
 
The cost of production of 1 kg burfi under various treatments was calculated by considering cost of the finished product, the cost of the ingredients used in the preparation of pumpkin based burfi was calculated as per the prevailing (2018-19) market price of ingredients (Table 4). The data showed that the cost of production 1 kg burfi decreased as the level of pumpkin pulp was increased in the blend formulation. The miscellaneous charges were required 25 per 1 kg. The cost of burfi would be lower when large scale or industrial scale production of burfi is considered. The present investigation indicated that on the basis of sensory evaluation and chemical characterization, good quality burfi can be prepared from blend comprising of 70:30, khoa: pumpkin pulp; the product was computed to be priced at 199.11/kg. The cost of cow burfi containing pumpkin pulp per kg tended to decrease as the quantity of pumpkin pulp increased in the initial blend. Such result was comparable to that of Bhosale et al., (2017) who reported that the cost of production of burfi decreased when the level of bottle gourd added to khoa increased. The cost of production for burfi produced using 0 part of bottle gourd was 354.02 per kg while burfi prepared from blend comprising of khoa: bottle gourd paste (85:15) was 312.48 per kg (Table 4).

Table 4: Cost structure for 1 kg pumpkin pulp burfi prepared under various treatments.

From the result obtained in the present investigation, it can be evident that, good quality burfi can be prepared using blend of 70 parts of khoa + 30 parts of pumpkin pulp. The resultant burfi had a light yellowish colour, pleasant flavor and appreciable total sensory score. The burfi tended to contain lower amount of fat, protein, ash and total solids while total sugar tended to increase as the proportion of pumpkin pulp was increased in the mix blend for khoa preparation. The cost of the recommended burfi involving use 70 parts of khoa: 30 parts of pumpkin pulp was ` 199.11 per kg. Production of value-added burfi with highly acceptable sensory score is feasible through addition of 30 parts of pumpkin pulp to 70 parts of khoa with cost benefit too.

  1. Adebayo, O.R., Farombi, A.G. and Oyekanmi, A.M. (2013). Proximate, mineral and anti-nutrient evaluation of pumpkin pulp (Cucurbita pepo). IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry. 4 (5): 25-28. https://doi.org/10.9790/5736-0452528. 

  2. Aneja, R.P., Mathur, B.N., Chandan, R.C. and Banerjee, A.K. (2002). Technology of Indian Milk Products, Dairy India Year Book Publications, New Delhi. ISBN: 8190160303.

  3. Bhosale, S., Ingole, A.S., Atkare, V.G., Mane, R.L. and Patil, L. (2017). Effect of bottle gourd pulp on sensory quality and proximate composition of cow milk burfi. Journal of Soils and Crops. 28(1): 132-135. https://www.journalofsoilsandcrops.com/ Download/Jun2018/21.pdf.

  4. BIS (1981). Handbook of Food Analysis, XI; Dairy Products, SP:18. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

  5. Chetana, R., Ravi, R. and Yella Reddy, S. (2010). Effect of processing variables on quality of milk burfi prepared with and without sugar. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 47(1): 114-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0005-5.

  6. Dar, A.H., Sofi, S.A. and Rafiq, S. (2017). Pumpkin the functional and therapeutic ingredient: A review. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition. 2(6): 168-170. http://www.food sciencejournal.com/archives/2017/vol2/issue6/2-5-50. 

  7. Dhande, S.S. and Bhosale, S. (2017). Effect of ash gourd pulp on sensory quality and chemical composition of cow milk burfi. Trends in Biosciences. 10(32). 6933-6936. http:// trendsinbiosciencesjournal.com/upload/49-8886_(S_S__ Dhande).pdf. 

  8. Food Data Central. (2019). https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/ food-details/168449/nutrients. 

  9. Fu, C., Shi, H. and Li, Q. (2006). A review on pharmacological activities and utilization technologies of pumpkin. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 61(2): 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11130-006-0016-6. 

  10. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, John Wiley and Sons. New York, pp: 241-266.

  11. IS: 1224 (1977). Determination of Fat by Gerber’s Method, part II: Indian Standard Institution, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.

  12. IS: 1479, (Part II) (1961). Method of Test for Dairy Industry. Chemical Analysis of Milk. Indian Standard Institution, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.

  13. ISI: (1981). Hand Book of Food Analysis Dairy Products Part (XI) Indian Standards Institution, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.

  14. Marie-Magdeleine, C., Mahieu, M. and Archimède, H. (2011). Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne ex Poir.) Seeds as an Anthelmintic Agent? In: Nuts and Seeds in Health and Disease Prevention, [Preedy, V.R., Watson, R.R. and Patel, V.B. (Eds.)], 1st ed., Academic Press. pp. 933-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375688-6.10110-0. 

  15. Pal, G.V. and Gupta, M.S. (1985). Sensory evaluation of burfi using 100 point hedonic scale. Indian Dairyman. 48(8): 422.

  16. Rahman, M.M., Juahir, H., Islam, M.H., Khandaker, M.M., Ariff, T.M. and Nik, W.M.N. (2019). Prophetic vegetable Pumpkin, its impressive health benefits and total analysis. Bioscience Research. 16(4): 3987-3999. https://www.isisn.org/BR16 (4)2019/3987-3999-16(4)2019BR19-526.pdf. 

  17. Ramteke, V.M., Atkare, V.G. and Khupse, S.M. (2018). Studies on preparation, sensory evaluation and cost configuration of potato (Solanum tuberosum) flour burfi. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7(8): 1610-1615. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018. 708.184.

  18. Singh, T., Pathak, V. and Goswami, M. (2017). Development and quality evaluation of apple pomace incorporated burfi. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 70(2): 162-166. http:// epubs.icar.org.in/ejournal/index.php/IJDS/article/view/ 55759/pdf. 

  19. Talekar, S.S., Dodake, S.R. and Bainwad, D.V. (2015). Organoleptic properties of khoa burfi blended with coconut. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 33(2): 309-312. https:// serialsjournals.com/abstract/60709_27.pdf.

  20. Ware, M. (2019). What are the health benefits of pumpkins? https:/ /www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/279610#benefits. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)