Effects of breed, sex, DBE, birth seasons, age and parity of dam on birth weight
The results from the MLR model were significant in identifying the effects of breed, sex, DBE, birth season, age and parity of the dam on birth weight (
F=14.166,
p<0.001) (Table 1). The explanatory power of the MLR model was 37.6% (
R2=0.376,
adj R2=0.350). The tolerance, VIF and D–W statistic results indicated no multicollinearity and no autocorrelation between the errors. Significance testing of the regression coefficients revealed that breed, sex, DBE and birth in summer influenced birth weight (
p<0.05). White Hanwoo breed (
β=-0.404) had the largest impact, followed by Chikso breed (
β=-0.347), DBE (
β=0.25), sex (
β=0.229), Heugu (
β=-0.118) and birth in summer (
β=0.117). In terms of breed, White Hanwoo (
β=-0.404), Chikso (
β=-0.347) and Heugu (
β=-0.118) calves were born with less weight than Hanwoo calves. Additionally, calves were born later than the estimated due date in summer and a male calf had considerable weight at birth.
Effects of breed, sex, DBE, birth season, age and parity of dam and birth weight on weaning weight
The MLR model was used to identify the effects of breed, sex, DBE, birth season, age and parity of dam and birth weight was statistically significant (
F=14.209,
p<0.001) (Table 2). The MLR model explanatory power of 50.2% (
R2=0.502,
adj R2=0.467). Multicollinearity and autocorrelation between errors were not identified. Breed, sex, DBE, winter birth, dam parity and birth weight significantly influenced weaning weight (
p<0.05). Birth weight (
β=0.413) had the largest impact, followed by dam parity (
β=0.312), Heugu (
β=-0.283), Chikso (
β=-0.274), birth in winter (
β=0.27), White Hanwoo (
β=-0.248), DBE (
β=0.151) and sex (
β=0.147). Calves with heavy weights at birth weighed much more at weaning. Furthermore, high-parity cows delivered and raised heavier calves. Hanwoo weighed more at weaning than White Hanwoo, Chikso and Heugu. Calves that were born in winter, later than the estimated due date and male calves weighed more at weaning.
Correlation between body measurements at weaning
We investigated the correlations between body weight, withers height, rump height, body length, chest depth, chest width, rump length, rump width, pelvic width, hipbone width and chest girth at weaning (Table 3). Body weight at weaning strongly correlated with chest girth (
r=0.939), body length (
r=0.827), withers height (
r=0.816), rump height (
r=0.814), pelvic width (
r=0.788), rump width (
r=0.782), chest width (
r=0.752) and chest depth (
r=0.714). The correlations between body weight at weaning and rump length (
r=0.610) and hipbone width (
r=0.596) were moderate (
p<0.001). Strong correlations were identified between withers and rump heights (
r=0.998) and between rump and pelvic width (
r=0.879).
In the present study, breed, sex, DBE and season (summer) were associated with birth weight in indigenous Korean cattle. Furthermore, breed, sex, DBE, season (winter), dam parity and birth weight were associated with their weaning weight, which was strongly correlated with chest girth, body length, withers height, rump height, pelvic width, rump width, chest width and depth.
The findings of the current study are consistent with those of previous studies that identified the effects of breed, sex and DBE on birth and weaning weights in indigenous Korean cattle breeds.
Choi et al., (2015) reported that breed affects birth and weaning weight; this study compared White Hanwoo, Chikso and Heugu, except for most indigenous Korean cattle breeds, Hanwoo. The current study is the first to report that Hanwoo cattle are heavier than other Korean indigenous cattle breeds at birth and weaning. Moreover, as in a previous study, male calves were heavier than female calves at birth and at weaning
(Kayastha et al., 2008; Park et al., 2022). Gestational length is associated with weight at birth and weaning
(Hwang et al., 2008, Coleman et al., 2021).
Although the effects of birth season on birth and weaning weights are controversial owing to various factors, such as rearing and pasture conditions, several studies have verified the effects of birth season in cattle (
Szabó et al., 2006;
Wakchaure and Meena, 2010;
Cho et al., 2021; Park et al., 2022). In this study, we observed that calves born in summer were heavier at birth and those born in winter were heavier at weaning. One of the possible explanations for seasonal effects may be the fluctuation in cattle hormones, such as insulin and glucagon. Insulin concentrations in dairy cattle are higher in winter than in summer
(Herbein et al., 1985; De Rensis et al., 2002;
Denbow et al., 1986), which leads to elevated glucose levels in summer. Insulin promotes anabolic processes in the muscles and liver, thereby enhancing carbohydrate and lipid metabolism
(Dimitriadis et al., 2011). Maternal glucose concentration was positively correlated with neonatal birth weight
(Breschi et al., 1993). Thus, low insulin concentrations in summer that lead to high glucose concentrations in dams might result in heavy calves at birth, whereas high insulin levels in winter may contribute to heavier weaning weights by promoting anabolism in calves. Although further mechanistic studies are needed, our results suggest that seasonal metabolic variations may underlie the effects of birth season.
The parity of dams has also been reported to influence calf growth. Several studies have shown that higher dam parity positively affects calf body weight at birth and weaning
(Kertz et al., 1997; El-Nazeir et al., 2015;
Habtamu et al., 2012). The body weights of Hanwoo steer calves at birth and weaning were positively associated with the parity of dam
(Lee et al., 2024). However, the effect of dam parity on calves’ birth weight remains controversial.
Willis and Wilson (1974) reported that dam parity did not influence birth weight. In this study, the birth weight of calves was not associated with the parity of the dams, although calves born to cows with high parity had a much higher weaning weight. These results may be due to the nourishing experiences of the dams. For instance, a study on sheep
(Lv et al., 2015) revealed that lamb birth weight was not associated with ewe parity, but weaning weight was associated with the experience and maternal behavior of the ewes. Multiparous ewes exhibited more positive maternal behaviors towards their lambs, such as increase grooming, better udder acceptance, low-pitched bleats and lower udder refusal. The positive association observed between lamb weight and their ewe parity may also apply to cattle. The parity of cows might influence the nourishing behavior towards their offspring; high parity cows have improved maternal behavior, leading to heavy weights at weaning. The results of the present study on dam age support our estimation. Overall, these findings suggest that the greater weaning weights observed in calves from higher parity dams may be attributed to the more practiced nourishing experiences of the dams rather than simply an increase in the age of the dam.
The initial birth weight strongly influences growth performance. Previous studies demonstrated that calves with higher birth weights had grater weaning weights and higher pre-weaning average daily gain
(Rahnefeld et al., 1980). Calves with specific haplotype in locus of the bovine growth hormone gene had lower body weights at birth and 30 days of age
(Ishida et al., 2020). Organ development also plays a role, as calves with heavier birth weights had heavier livers, supporting their greater metabolic capacity
(Jacobsen et al., 2000). Together, these findings indicate that higher birth weights may enhance growth potential through both genetic and nutritional mechanisms, which aligns with the results of the present study. Future studies incorporating genomic information may further clarify the genetic basis of these growth traits.
Previous study that examined different cattle breed, such as Brahman and Bali confirmed positive correlations between various body measurements and body weight. These studies reported that the chest girth had the highest correlation with body weight (
Kamprasert et al., 2019;
Gunawan and Jakaria, 2010). The present results demonstrated the same tendency in Hanwoo cattle.
A limitation of our study was that it was conducted on a single farm; therefore, we could not include diverse environmental rearing conditions. However, this study was conducted on identical farms over a long period, which allowed us to control for other factors affecting calf weight, such as staff, feed and management. Future studies should expand to multiple farms and regions to validate our findings across diverse environments and production systems. Moreover, our findings have practical implications: understanding the interplay of breed, parity and seasonal effects can help optimize calf management, improve productivity and contribute to the conservation and sustainable use of Korean indigenous cattle breeds.