Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Unique Characteristics of Camel Body Systems: Adaptation to Harsh Conditions, Productive and Reproductive Performances: A Review

A.A. Mohammed1,*, A. Almuyidi1, H. Almarri1, H. Alkhalifah1, A. Alhmad1, H. Alali1, O. AlHuwaish1, M. AlKhawaher1
1Department of Animal and Fish Production, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 402, Al-Ahsa 31982, KSA.

Dromedaries have been evolved a remarkable array of adaptations that enable them to live in harsh desert environments. These adaptations are evident in their body systems, which are specifically designed to conserve water, regulate temperature and withstand extreme conditions. The unique characteristics of camel body systems were described to withstand extreme environmental conditions. Furthermore, growth and reproductive performances in addition to milk and urine secretion and unique characters under harsh condition were presented. Therefore, the articles concerning unique characteristics of camel body systems resulting in adaptation to harsh condition in addition to growth, reproduction, milk and urine secretion were used for writing the manuscript and they were collected from google scholar, ScienceDirect, PubMed databases. The results indicated that camel body systems have unique features indicated in anatomical, physiological and behavioral adaptation that enable them to survive in harsh environmental conditions. The camel’s respiratory system has several adaptations including long and convoluted nasal passages, a large lung surface area and low respiration rate to conserve water. Lifespan of camel RBCs lasts 90-150 days and they are oval-shaped with special plasma membrane characters resulted in high tolerance to osmotic stress and efficient oxygen transport. Camels’ forestomach have unique pouch-like structures contributed to conserve water. It is worth noting that there are no seminal vesicles in Camelidae family and the ejaculated semen is viscous. She-camels are seasonal breeding animals with induced ovulation and diffused placenta. Growth and reproductive performances in addition to milk and concentrated urine secretion occur during these extreme harsh conditions. Intensive management system resulted in significant improvement in both  productive and reproductive performances. It could be concluded that dromedaries is well-adapted to withstand extreme conditions in addition to their abilities to produce and reproduce.

The global population is expected to increase to almost 10.0 billion by 2100 due to longer lifespans and lower death rates. This growth poses a challenge to food and water security, which can only be addressed through efficient and sustainable agriculture. To meet the growing demand for human food, livestock and crop production must be intensified and expanded (Mohammed and Alshaibani et al., 2024a,b; Mohammed et al., 2024a). Camels are well-suited to survive in harsh environments and can produce milk, meat and births, making them valuable livestock for arid regions (Kakar et al., 2008; Mohammed and Mahmoud 2011; Djenane and Aider 2024) (Fig 1.). Applying assisted reproductive techniques in camels resulted in increased reproductive and productive performances, improved genetic traits in addition to diseases control (Mohammed 2014a,b, 2018; Al Zeidi et al., 2022a,b; Al Aljubran​ et al., 2023; Mohammed et al., 2024a-f).

Fig 1: Unique characteristics of camel body systems to withstand extreme conditions in addition to growth, reproduction and milk production.

       
Camels have evolved a remarkable array of adaptations that enable them to survive in harsh desert environments. These adaptations are evident in their body systems, which are specifically designed to conserve water, regulate temperature and withstand extreme environmental conditions (Tibary and El Allali 2020). The characteristics of hump, rumen, kidney and blood cells were adapted to conserve water (Kandeel et al., 2022). In addition, the coat, sweating and respiration and behavioral adaptations were adapted to regulate temperature (Samara, 2019). Furthermore, sensory adaptations of eyes, nostrils and feet were evolved to shield them from sand and dust and to search for food in the desert environment (Fesseha and Desta, 2020). Collectively, these adaptations in body systems, combined with their strong physical endurance, make camel breeds remarkable creatures that can survive and breed in the harsh challenging environments as desert (Fig 2). Therefore, this review aims to collect and discuss the specific features of camel body systems that enable them to thrive in harsh environments, leading to their growth, reproduction and milk production.

Fig 2: Mejham she-camel breed in extreme desert environment.


       
The study were approved by the research committee of King Faisal University [KFU-REC-2024-OCT-KFU242590]. The majority of articles in the last ten years concerning unique characteristics of body systems, their contribution to harsh conditions, growth, reproduction, milk and urine secretion and unique characters were collected form Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and PubMed databases. In addition, forty percent of references were selected in the last five years. Therefore, our targets were to highlight key aspects of unique characters of body systems related to adaptation to harsh environmental conditions and their contributions in productive and reproductive performances.
 
Camel’s unique reproductive traits
 
Camels are seasonal breeds mating during the cooler months to give births during optimal conditions for offspring survival (Al-Bulushi et al., 2019). The functions of the female and male reproductive systems are production of oocytes and spermatozoa, respectively, over puberty and sexual maturity followed by insemination during the breeding season. Both males and females exhibit oestrous and rutting behavior during the breeding season (Padalino et al., 2015). Male sexual maturity occurs 3-4 years of age (Skidmore 2005). It is worth noting that there are no seminal vesicles in camel male reproductive system (Abdullahi Mahmud et al., 2016). Reproductive activity of males continues until the age of 20 years, which may vary due to breeds, genetics, nutrition and climatic changes (Gherissi et al., 2020). A male camel can inseminate 20-50 she-camels during the breeding season in good environmental condition (Yakubu et al., 2022). Testicular weight and dimensions were increased with age until 10-15 years of age and decreased thereafter (Ismail 1982). Testicular weight and sperm count in the epididymis were reached their peak during the breeding season (Zeidan et al., 2001 Samatar et al., 2022). In addition androgen secretion increased in blood and urine in addition to the increase of poll gland secretion (El-Khaldi and Homeida 2020).
       
Puberty in Arabian she-camels occurs at two years of age and different factors as nutrition, season and breeds determine the age of sexual maturity (Gherissi et al., 2020). Full reproductive capacity of she-camels was reached at 3-6 years and they might be bred until 30 years of age (Belina et al., 2021).She-camels are seasonal breeding animals with induced ovulation. Ovulation occurred in most she-camels within 36-48 hours following copulation (El Allali et al., 2017). The camel’s uterus has a longer left horn and a shorter right horn, connected by a relatively long uterine body (Monaco et al., 2024). This unique structure is believed to be an adaptation to the camel’s reproductive strategy, with embryos typically implanting in the left uterine horn (Fig 3A). Camel twins are very rare (0.1-0.4%) might be due to the unique reproductive biology of camels. When twin pregnancies do occur, they often don’t last long, as one pregnancy usually becomes dominant, leading to the loss of the other (Fig 3B). The placenta in camels is diffuse and therefore twin pregnancy cannot continue due to the lack of space in the placenta for two feti. However, there have been documented in recent years cases of successful twin births.

Fig 3: Camel reproductive system traits.


       
The camel germinal vesicle oocyte maturation in vitro lasts 44-48 hours (Fig 4). The oocyte maturation is the most important step for further embryo development (Mohammed et al., 2008, 2010, 2019, 2024a-f). This longer time of camel oocyte maturation in vitro compromised the developmental competence of the resulting embryos when compared to 24h time maturation of bovine, ovine and caprine oocytes (Mohammed et al., 2005; Mohammed and Mahmoud 2011; Mohammed and Alshaibani 2024b).

Fig 4: Camel’s in vitro matured oocyte.


 
Poll glands
 
Poll glands are a unique feature of male camels located on the back of the neck, behind the ears and secrete a yellowish, offensive-smelling substance, especially during the breeding season. These glands are presented even in the newborn but they only become active over puberty. The poll glands can be easily distinguished from the surrounding skin because they are darker in appearance, slightly raised and covered with short and sparse hairs. The poll glands resemble histologically endocrine glands. The activity of the poll glands is linked to the reproductive activity of the male camel. When the level of testosterone level is high, the poll gland secretion is abundant. The secretion is dark brown and has a pungent odor to attract females (Dai et al., 2024). These glands show maximum activity during the breeding season, when testicular activity is also at its peak, while the lowest activity has been recorded during the hot summer months. The poll glands are classified as compound tubulo-alveolar glands. Each gland consists of lobules and alveoli separated by a dense connective tissue (Ebada et al., 2012). A number of septa extended from the connective tissue into the glandular parenchyma and divided it into lobules of varying sizes.                        

The poll glands are inactive before puberty and outside the breeding season and consist mainly of scattered groups of lobules and alveoli with connective tissue. The amount of connective tissue decreases when these glands become active during the breeding season (Ibrahim et al., 2020).
 
Camel’s oestrous cycle
 
Female camels are seasonally polyestrous, exhibiting cyclical estrous cycles that are incomplete compared to ungulates. The average duration of these cycles has been documented as 28 days in Sudan, 24.2 days in Egypt and 11-30 days in Saudi Arabia. This variability in cycle length is attributed to factors such as cyclic ovarian activity and the presence or absence of copulatory stimuli. Additionally, age significantly impacts follicular development, with 6-10-year-old females exhibiting the highest number of ovarian follicles (Ashour et al., 2017).
       
The ovarian activity in camels encompasses three stages: follicular growth, maturation and atresia (Ghallab et  al., 2024). The follicular growth phase extendsfor approximately 10.5 ± 0.5 days, during which follicles grow at a rate of 1 mm/day. Subsequently, the growth rate accelerates to 1.8 mm/day until the follicles attain their maximum size, ranging from 10 to 25 mm. The follicles persist at this maximum size for 2-3 days before entering the atresia stage, which lasts around 11.9 ± 0.8 days (Mohammed and Alshaibani 2024b). A positive correlation exists between follicular size and plasma 17-α estradiol concentration. In the absence of ovulation, mature follicles can continue to grow to sizes between 25 and 75 mm. Approximately one-third of anovulatory follicles undergo hemorrhagic and partial luteinization, leading to divergent perspectives on female management for superovulation. Anovulatory follicles typically regress within 8-45 days and may not consistently inhibit the development of a new follicular wave (Anouassi and Tibary 2013).
 
Characteristics of semen during breeding and non-breeding seasons
 
The volume and characteristics of semen varied according to the collection method, semen collection frequency, age and breeding or non-breeding season (Al-Bulushi et al., 2018). The ejaculated semen volume of dromedary camels range from 2.0-10.0 ml as there is great variation between males after a copulation time of 11-36 minutes (Mansour 2023). The ejaculated semen volume was found to be 7.82, 8.12 and 7.94 ml at ages 2.50–5.0,>5.0–10.0 and >10.0–20.0 years, respectively (Zeidan, 1999; Zeidan et al., 2001; Sarhan et al., 2024). The ejaculated semen volume ranged from 5.3 ml in the reproductive season to 3.5 ml in the sexually inactive period (Rai et al., 1997). The ejaculated semen volume collected by camel semen collection kit (CSCK) showed lower volume, gross activity, sperm concentration, total sperm motility and percentage of live sperm cells compared to electrical stimulation and artificial vagina (Mansour 2023). The percentage of motile sperm also varied according to the age of the animal and the reproductive season (Elsharnoby et al., 2021). The pH of camel semen is alkaline with a range of 7.20-8.80 with an average of 7.80 (Zeidan et al., 2001). The pH was insignificantly different in both non-rutting and rutting seasons at different ages (Sarhan et al., 2024). The highest pH value was recorded at 5.0-10.0 years of age versus the lowest pH value recorded at 2.5-5.0 years of age.
 
Male and female sexual behaviors
 
Male camels are easily controlled, but during sexual activity “rutting” they become aggressive towards other males and humans. Male camels display many physiological and behavioral characteristics of masculinity during sexual activity or rutting (Padalino et al., 2015). In mixed herds, a dominant male camel becomes dominant due to his size or high fighting ability, while subdued males quickly exit rut or show a decrease in sexual activity (Marai et al., 2009; Fatnassi et al., 2021). At the peak of sexual activity, male camels exhibit a range of behavioral and physical signs. The behavioral signs include increased aggression, vocalizations, tail flapping, urine spraying and mounting behavior. The physical signs include increased testosterone levels, poll gland activity and changes in body condition. She-camel sexual behavior includes 0actual heat period, which lasts about 3-4 days and is characterized by frequent urination, swollen vulva with small amounts of mucus, tail movement up and down in rapid succession, searching for the male and standing next to male (Padalino et al., 2016).
 
Unique features of digestive system and nutritional efficiency
 
Camels are pseudo-ruminant herbivores that are able to utilize high-fiber forages. The ability of camels to survive and produce under the harsh desert conditions is thought to be due to their specific feeding habits, unique digestive system and other adaptive traits (Hinsu et al., 2021). The digestive tract is a muscular tube that extends from the mouth to the anus and may be up to 60 meters long. The amount of saliva secretion varies between 30 liters per day in camels. The parotid gland is the largest salivary gland in camels, producing 12-21 liters of saliva per day depending on the type of feeding. Amyloytic activity of the parotid gland has been confirmed (Almansour et al., 2024). The mandibular glands are less than half the size of the parotid gland. The gland produces a rapid secretion during feeding and a slow secretion during rumination.
       
The esophagus in camels is a long muscular tube with a large capacity that transports food from the pharynx to the stomach. The esophagus length in camels can range from 165 to 215 cm due to the length of the neck (Thanvi and Joshi 2019). The esophageal wall consists of four distinct layers: the mucosa, the submucosa, the muscularis and the outer layer (adventitia or serosa). The mucosa consists of keratinized, stratified squamous cells along the length of the esophagus. The keratinized cells consist of about 7-10 layers of cells (Hussein et al., 2016).
       
The forestomach in camelids is dilations and modifications of the esophagus. The camel’s forestomach is more than one meter long with different functions. It includes three main compartments: the rumen, the reticulum and the abomasum. These organs are designed to host a specific type of microorganisms that breaks down plant material into short-chain fatty acids and others (Hinsu et al., 2021). Furthermore, camel forestomach have unique pouch-like structures (Gelberg 2017).These specialized structures contribute to the camel’s ability to efficiently digest tough plant material and conserve water in harsh desert conditions.
       
Camels, like ruminants, ferment their feed in their forestomach using microbes. This process breaks down carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids (acetic, propionic and butyric acids) and proteins into amino acids. The resulted amino acids are then used to create microbial protein, which is further digested to amino acids. The resulting nutrients, including amino acids and fatty acids, are absorbed and reached the liver for further metabolism. The resulting nutrients of digestion can vary depending on the season, camel species and consumed feed intake (Gharechahi et al., 2022; Kandeel et al., 2022).
 
Efficiency of nitrogen consumption in camels
 
It has been known that camels are remarkably efficient in utilizing nitrogen from their diets. This efficiency is due to several factors including efficient microbial digestion, selective absorption, water conservation and efficient protein synthesis. The efficiency of nitrogen utilization is averaging H”25% in ruminants and camels. Camels exhibit higher digestion capacities compared to sheep when fed on low-protein diets (Khattab et al., 2023), which is crucial for their survival in nutrient-scarce habitats.
       
Camels fed on low-protein diets conserve nitrogen by recycling urea in their forestomach and reducing urine nitrogen (Homeida and AL-Shami 2009). Camels excrete in the urine about 40% of blood urea filtered in the glomeruli when they fed a balanced nitrogen diet (H” 33 g nitrogen/day; 206 g crude protein/day) compared to 1-2% of excreted blood urea when they fed a low nitrogen diet (H” 15 g nitrogen/day; 94 g crude protein/day). Additionally, it was found that giving a blood urea injection to camels fed a low nitrogen diet did not increase urinary nitrogen excretion and the nitrogen injected was retained in the body. Furthermore, Homeida and AL-Shami (2009) found that the rate of urea excretion increased with increasing nitrogen intake. Plasma urea concentration increased linearly with increasing dietary protein intake. The effect of water restriction and complete water deprivation on nitrogen balance and urea cycling was also studied in camels, sheep and desert goats fed a low-quality desert grass containing 3.2% crude protein (Mousa et al., 1983). All animals lost weight during both water restriction and total water deprivation. Although camels showed a decrease in dry matter intake (0.75 g/kg) and a decrease in apparent dry matter digestibility, the animals showed less weight loss (% of initial weight) and an increased urea recycling rate. The rate of increase in urea recycling in camels with low nitrogen intake resulted in a negative nitrogen balance accompanied by a decrease in urine and dung nitrogen (mg/kg 0.75) compared to sheep. The results of several studies (Mousa et al., 1983; Homeida and AL-Shami 2009) supported that camels fed low nitrogen diets were more efficient than ruminant species in recycling urea and decomposing it in the foregut. This partly explains the continued survival and production of camels under very harsh desert conditions compared to other ruminant species.
 
Milk secretion
 
Camel milk production varies depending on factors such as breed, age and environmental conditions (Mohammed and Alshaibani 2024a). However, she-camel can produce 2-10 liters of milk per day. Some Arabian camels can produce even higher milk yields, up to 20 liters per day. The lactation stage typically lasts 6-12 months. Camel milk has several unique nutritional properties that make it a valuable food source (Mohammed and Alshaibani 2024a). Camel milk contains high protein content, low fat and lactose contents, rich in vitamins and minerals and unique immunoglobulins. Camel milk contains unique immunoglobulins that can boost the immune system and protect against various infections. Due to its unique nutritional profile and potential health benefits, camel milk has gained popularity in recent years (Ganzorig et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2023) and its production and consumption are on the rise in many parts of the world (El-Hanafy  et al., 2023; El Alia et al., 2023).
 
Body growth and meat production
 
The birth weight of one-humped camels ranges from 30-40 kg and the weight at one year of age is about 150-180 kg, while the weight of the mature body is 500-600 kg on average, which is reached at the age of 6-7 years (Bene et  al., 2020). The Arabian camel is a good source of meat, especially in areas where the climate adversely affects the performance of other meat-producing animals. The average birth weight of camels varies widely between regions, breeds and within the same breed. Camels are limited to moderate growth rates (500 g/day). Camels, however, produce meat mostly under traditional extensive systems at levels of malnutrition and most are slaughtered at an advanced age after work, racing or milk production. Camels yield carcasses weighing 124 to 400 kg with a dressing percentage of 55% to 70%. Camel carcasses contain approximately 57% muscle, 26% bone and 17% fat with the front halves (from skull to rib 13) being significantly heavier than the hind halves. The red, lean camel meat contains about 78% water, 19% protein, 3% fat and 1.2% ash with a small amount of intermuscular fat, which makes it a healthy food for humans (Kadim et al., 2008). The color of camel meat has been described as ranging from raspberry red to dark brown and camel fat is white. Camel meat is similar in taste and texture to cattle meat. The amino acid and mineral contents of camel meat are often higher than cattle meat, probably due to the lower levels of intramuscular fat (Baba et al., 2021). Camel carcasses can provide a significant amount of meat for human consumption with certain parts of the carcass such as the hump and liver being a favourite delicacy in Middle Eastern markets (Kadim et al., 2014). Although camel meat marketing systems are not well organized, there is evidence of a high demand for fresh camel meat and camel meat for use in blended meat products even among non-camel-keeping communities. Camel meat can be an inexpensive option to meet the growing meat needs in developing countries, especially for low-income populations (Saparov and Annageldiyev 2005).
 
Unique features of blood profiles
 
Camel blood profiles exhibit several unique features that reflect their remarkable adaptations to harsh desert environments.   Camel red blood cells are oval-shaped, unlike the circular shape found in most mammals, to allow them to pass through narrow capillaries more easily, improving oxygen delivery, especially during dehydration. Camels have a higher concentration of red blood cells (3.80 x l06 to 12.6 X l06 RBCs/µL) compared to many other mammals. This increased oxygen-carrying capacity is crucial for their survival in low-oxygen environments and during periods of physical exertion. The lifespan of camel RBCs can vary depending on environmental conditions and the camel’s hydration status and it generally ranges from 90 to 150 days (Pesen et al., 2023).Camel hemoglobin has a higher affinity for oxygen than human hemoglobin, allowing for efficient oxygen uptake, even in low-oxygen conditions. Hemoglobin value was 10.61 – 15.29 g/dL, packed cell volume was 19.93 – 32.51 % and white blood cells was 7.35 – 18.36 X103/µL (Martín-Barrasa et al., 2023). Camels have the ability to regulate their blood volume to conserve water during dehydration. They can significantly reduce blood volume without compromising vital functions. Camels have specialized mechanisms to maintain electrolyte balance, particularly sodium and potassium, which are essential for various physiological processes. These unique blood features contribute to the camel’s remarkable ability to survive and thrive in harsh desert environments.
 
Unique features of urine traits
 
Camel urine has several unique features that distinguish it from other animals including high concentration of urea and uric acid, alkalinity and presence of unique metabolites (Fig 5). Our unpublished work on camel urine indicated differences in urine total protein recorded by refractometer device due to management systems (Mohammed et al., unpublished). These unique features of camel urine have led to its use in traditional medicine for centuries (Mohammed and Alshaibani 2025).Camel urine has been shown to possess various health benefits, including antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties. It has also been found to be effective in protecting the liver and gastrointestinal tract, as well as in fighting cancer cells in vitro (Salamt et al., 2021; Tharwat et al., 2023).The unique compounds present in camel urine, such as metabolites, hormones. The unique compounds present in camel urine, such as metabolites, hormones, corticosteroids and urea, contribute to its therapeutic effects. These compounds can help kill bacteria, viruses and fungi and promote recovery from various ailments (Sumia et al., 2016; Amina et al., 2024a,b). This suggests that camel urine and its compo-snents have a broad spectrum of activity against a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms and diseases (Khedr and Khorshid 2016; Ali et al., 2019).

Fig 5: Variations in physical characters of camel urine over species and management systems.

Dromedaries have been evolved a remarkable array of adaptations that enable them to live in harsh desert environments. These adaptations are evident in their body systems, which are specifically designed to conserve water, regulate temperature and withstand extreme conditions. Furthermore, dromedaries bred under extensive harsh conditions can produce births, meat and milk. Further researches are still needed to fully understand the physiological and ecological implications of camel body systems in addition to the potential health benefits of camel products to human body.
The authors want to thank and acknowledge Deanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia for funding and support (KFU 242768).
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
Not applicable.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abdullahi Mahmud, M., Josephat, O., Sani Abdullahi, Sh., Muhammadu Aminu, U., Abdurrahman, B., Hena Akawu, S., Abubakar, D. and Shehu, S. (2016). Species variation on gross morphology and gross morphometry of accessory sex glands in one-humped camel bull (Camelus dromedarius), uda ram and red sokoto buck. World’s Veterinary Journal. 6(2): 53-58.

  2. Al Zeidi, R., Al Masruri, H., Al Mufarji, A., Mohammed, A.A. (2022a). Role of cumulus cells and follicular fluid on oocyte maturation and developmental competence of embryos: Intact and reconstructed oocytes. Advances Animal Veterinary Sciences. 10(6): 1219-1226.

  3. Al Zeidi, R., Al Masruri, H., Al Mufarji, A., Mohammed, A.A., Mohammed, H. (2022b). Changes in nucleus and cytoplast during oocyte maturation: Involvement in embryo production. Advances Animal Veterinary Sciences. 10(9): 2081-2089. 

  4. Al-Bulushi, S., Manjunatha, B.M., Bathgate, R., Rickard, J.P., de Graaf, S.P. (2018). Effect of semen collection frequency on the semen characteristics of dromedary camels. Animal Repro- duction Science. 197: 145-153. 

  5. Al-Bulushi, S., Manjunatha, B.M., Bathgate, R., Rickard, J.P., de Graaf, S.P. (2019). Artificial insemination with fresh, liquid stored and frozen thawed semen in dromedary camels. PLoS One. 14(11): e0224992.

  6. Ali, A., Baby, B., Vijayan, R. (2019). From Desert to Medicine: A Review of Camel Genomics and Therapeutic Products. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019: 10.

  7. Aljubran, S., Al-Suwaiegh, S., Alyousef, Y., Alhajri, S., Alghareeb, M., Mohammed, A.A. (2023). Roles of assisted reproductive techniques in mammals: Developmental competence of oocytes and embryos. Advances Animal Veterinary Sciences. 11(2): 252-263.

  8. Almansour, M., Jarrar, B., Faye, B., Al-Doaiss, A., Shati, A. and Meriane, D. (2024). The salivary glands of the camel: An element of adaptation to desert conditions and mitigation of climate change impacts. 17(1): 99-108.

  9. Amina, R., Habiba, R., BarguiguaAbouddihaj, B. (2024a). Camel urine as a potential source of bioactive molecules showing their efficacy against pathogens: A systematic review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 31(5): 103966.

  10. Amina, R., Rafik, A., Habiba, R., Asmaa, D., Abouddihaj, B. (2024b). Ethnopharmacological survey of the therapeutic use of camel urine in the Guelmim-Oued Noun and Laayoune- Sakia El Hamra regions of Morocco. Scientific African. 26: e02377.

  11. Anouassi, A., Tibary, A. (2013). Development of a large commercial camel embryo transfer program: 20 years of scientific research. Animal Reproduction Science. 136: 211-221.

  12. Ashour, A.M., Zeidan, A.E.B., Badr, M.R.Z., Amer, A.M., Fatma, R., El-Aziz, A. and Al-Akhras, A.A.M. (2017). Influence of the different ages during breeding and non-breeding seasons on ovarian activity of the dromedary she-camels. Egyptian Journal. Applied Science. 2(9): 73-90. 

  13. Baba, W.N., Rasool, N., Selvamuthukumara, M., Maqsood, S. (2021). A review on nutritional composition, health benefits and technological interventions for improving consumer acceptability of camel meat: An ethnic food of Middle East.  Journal of Ethnic Foods. 8: 18.

  14. Belina, D., Eshetu, A., Alemu, S., Shasho, B., Mohammed, T., Mohammed, A., Mummed, B., Regassa, D. (2021). Reproductive Diseases and Disorders of Female Camels: An Assessment and Patho- logical and Bacteriological Study in Eastern Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine International. 2021: 6641361. 

  15. Bene, S., Szabó, F., Polgár, J.P., Juhász, J., Nagy, P. (2020). Genetic parameters of birth weight trait in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius). Tropical Animal Health Production. 52(5): 2333-2340.

  16. Dai, L., Yuan, B., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Yuan, X., Liu, X., Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, X. (2024). Gas/liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry analysis of key functional substances regulating poll gland secretion in male camels during Seasonal Estrus. Animals. 13: 2024.

  17. Djenane, D., Aider, M. (2024). The one-humped camel: The animal of future, potential alternative red meat, technological suitability and future perspectives. F1000Res. 11: 1085.

  18. Ebada, S., Helal, A., Alkafafy, M. (2012). Immunohistochemical studies on the poll gland of the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) during the rutting season. Acta Histochemica. 114(4): 363-369.

  19. El Alia, O.A., Zine-Eddine, Y., Kzaiber, F., Oussama, A., Khalid Boutoial, K. (2023). Towards the improvement of camel milk consumption in Morocco. Small Ruminant Research. 219: 106888.

  20. El Allali, K., El Bousmaki, N., Ainani, H., Simonneaux, V. (2017). Effect of the Camelid’s Seminal Plasma Ovulation-Inducing Factor/ â-NGF: A Kisspeptin Target Hypothesis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 4: 99. 

  21. El-Hanafy, A.A., Saad, Y.M., Alkarim, S.A., Almehdar, H.A., Alzahrani, F.M., Almatry, M.A., Uversky, V.N., Redwan, E.M. (2023). Yield and Composition Variations of the Milk from Different Camel Breeds in Saudi Arabia. Sciences. 5: 2.

  22. El-Khaldi, A.T. and Homeida, A.M. (2020). Effects of androgens and rutting season on drug metabolizing enzymes in dromedary camels. Animal Reproduction. 17(2): e20190119. 

  23. Elsharnoby, H.A., Kandil, O.M., Abu-Elnaga, N.A.  (2021). Dromedary camel epididymal sperm characteristics at breeding and non-breeding seasons. Al-Azhar Bulletin of Science: Section. C. 32(1): 1-9.

  24. Fatnassi, M., Padalino, B., Monaco, D., Khorchani, T., Lacalandra, G.M., Hammadi, M. (2021). Effects of two different management systems on hormonal, behavioral and semen quality in male dromedary camels. Tropical Animal Health Production. 53(2): 275.

  25. Fesseha, H., Desta, W. (2020). Dromedary camel and its adaptation mechanisms to desert environment: A review. International Journal of Zoology Studies. 5(2): 23-28.

  26. Ganzorig, K., Urashima, T., Fukuda, K. (2020). Exploring potential bioactive peptides in fermented bactrian camel’s milk and mare’s milk made by Mongolian Nomads. Foods. 9: 1817.

  27. Gelberg, H.B. (2017). Alimentary System and the Peritoneum, Omentum, Mesentery and Peritoneal Cavity. Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease. 2017: 324-411.

  28. Ghallab, R.S., Hassan, M.A.N., Askar, A.R., Rashad, A.M.A., El- Shereif, A.A. (2024). A comparative study of follicular dynamics, hormonal profiles, ovarian measurements and endometrial thickness between well-fed nulliparous and multiparous dromedary she-camels during the breeding season. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research. 14(4): 754-759.

  29. Gharechahi, J., Sarikhan, S., Han, J.L., Ding, X.Z., Salekdeh, G.H. (2022). Functional and phylogenetic analyses of camel rumen microbiota associated with different lignocellulosic substrates. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 8(1): 46.

  30. Gherissi, D.E., Monaco, D., Bouzebdaa, Z., Bouzebdaa, F.A., Gaouar, S.B.S., Ciani, E. (2020). Camel herds’ reproductive perfor- mance in Algeria: Objectives and thresholds in extreme arid conditions. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 19: 482-491.

  31. Hinsu, A.T., Tulsani, N.J., Panchal, K.J., Pandit, R.J., Jyotsana, B., Dafale, N.A., Patil, N.V., Purohit, H.J., Joshi, C.G., Jakhesara, S.J. (2021). Characterizing rumen microbiota and CAZyme profile of Indian dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) in response to different roughages. Scientific Reports. 11(1): 9400.

  32. Homeida, A. and AL-Shami, S.A. (2009). Urinary urea following feeding of low and high protein diets to camels (Camelus dromadarious). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 8(5): 893-895.

  33. Hussein, A.J., Cani, M.M., Hussein, D.M. (2016). Anatomical and histological studies of oesophagus of one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). MRVSA 5 (Special issue) 1st Iraqi colloquium on camel diseases and management. 11-18.

  34. Ibrahim, Z.H., Al-Kheraije, K.A. and El-Tigani-Asil, E.A. (2020). Seasonal studies on morphology and immunohistochemical localisation of s-100 and alpha smooth muscle actin proteins in poll glands of dromedary camel. Journal of Camel Practice and Research. doi : 10.5958/2277-8934. 2020.00006.5

  35. Ismail, S.T. (1982). Studies on the Testis and epididymis of the one- humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Ph. D. Thesis, Veterinary Medical College, Cairo University, Egypt. 

  36. Kadim, I.T., Mahgoub, O. and Mbaga, M. (2014). Potential of camel meat as a non-traditional high quality source ofprotein for human consumption. 4(4): 13-17.

  37. Kadim, I.T., Mahgoub, O., Purchas, R.W. (2008). A review of the growth and of the carcass and meat quality characteristics of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedaries). Meat Science. 80(3): 555-569. 

  38. Kakar, A., Muhammad, Y., Kakar, M.A. (2008). Camel a potential dairy animal in difficult environments. Pakistan Journal  of Agricultural Sciences. 45(2): 2008.

  39. Kandeel, M., Al-Taher, A., Venugopala, K.N., Marzok, M., Morsy, M., Nagaraja, S. (2022). Camel proteins and enzymes: A growing resource for functional evolution and environmental adap- tation. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 9: 911511.

  40. Khattab, I.M., Abdel-Wahed, A.M., Anele, U.Y., Sallam, S.; El-Zaiat, H.M. (2023). Comparative digestibility and rumen fermentation of camels and sheep fed different forage sources. Animal Biotechnology. 34(3): 609-618.

  41. Khedr, A. and Khorshid, F. (2016).Characterization and Deter- mination of Major Bioactive Acids in Camel Urine Using Gas Chromatography Mass-spectrometry. Indian Journal Pharmaceutical Sciences. 78(5): 680-687.

  42. Liu, C., Liu, L.-X., Yang, J., Liu, Y.-G. (2023). Exploration and analysis of the composition and mechanism of efficacy of camel milk. Food Bioscience. 53: 102564.

  43. Mansour, N. (2023). A novel, patented method for semen collection in dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Repro- duction in Domestic Animals. 58(2): 238-245.

  44. Marai, I.F.M., Zeidan, A.E.B., Abdel-Samee, A.M., Abizaid, A. and Fadiel, A. (2009). Camels’ reproductive and physiological perfor- mance traits as affected by environmental conditions. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 10: 129-149.

  45. Martín-Barrasa, J.L., Tejedor-Junco, M.T., Cabrera, S., Morales, M., Melián, A., Corbera, J.A. (2023). Haematological and bioche- mical blood reference values for Canary Island camels (Camelus dromedarius), an endangered dromedary species. Saudi JournalBiolpgical Science. 30(6): 103677.

  46. Mohammed, A.A. (2014a). Is nucleo-cytoplasmic incompatibility the reason of acceleration polar body extrusion.International Journal of Current Research  in  Science,  Engineering  and  Technology. 4(1): 287-291. 

  47. Mohammed, A.A. (2014a).Maturation and developmental competence of selectively enucleated germinal vesicle oocytes of mammals upon nuclear transfer. International Journal of Current Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 4(1): 292-299.

  48. Mohammed, A.A. (2018). Ovarian tissue transplantation in mice and rats: Comparison of Ovaries Age. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 50(2): 481-486.

  49. Mohammed, A.A. and Alshaibani, N. (2024b). The Potential Impacts of Assisted Reproductive Techniques in Camel Development and Future Prospects: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1875.

  50. Mohammed, A.A. and Alshaibani, N. (2025).Camel Urine Charac- teristics and its bioactive molecules on potential impacts against diseases and pathogenic microorganisms. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1908. 

  51. Mohammed, A.A., Al Suwaiegh, S., Al-Gherair, I., Al-khamis, S., Alhujaili, W., Mohammed, A., Mohammed, A. (2024b). Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Maturation of Intactand Reconstructed Oocytes Controlling the Developmental Competence of Embryos. Pakistan Journal Zoology. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/ journal.pjz/20240214054643.

  52. Mohammed, A.A., AlGherair, I., AlSuwaiegh, S., Al-Awaid, S., Mohammed, A. and Mohammed, A. (2024c). Do the Mammalian Artificial Oocytes Repair Reproductive Dysfunctions in Mammalian Species?: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58(8): 1253-1259. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1771.

  53. Mohammed, A.A., AlGherair, I., AlSuwaiegh, S., Alshaibani, N., Alsenayin, F., Alsaleem, R., Alsaif, M., Alsayed, B., Alsfran, A., Alarfaj, K., Alghafli, Z., Mohammed, A. and Mohammed, A. (2024d). New Perspectives of Embryo Sexing Through Morphological Criteria and Sperm Fertilizing Parameters in Mammalian Species: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1765.

  54. Mohammed, A.A., AlGherair, I., AlSuwaiegh, S., El-Moaty, Z.A., Alhujaili, W., Mohammed, A. and Mohammed, A. (2024e). Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and  Transplantation:  It is a Noble Goal  for Mammalian Species?: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58(8): 1260-1265.

  55. Mohammed, A.A., Alshaibani, N. (2024a). Camel milk yield and com- position and its adjuvant potential impacts on health of consumers: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1872.

  56. Mohammed, A.A., Al-Suwaiegh, S. and AlGherair, I. (2024f). An insight into the roles of zona pellucida in growth and development of mammalian ocytes and embryos: Changes of age-related and cryopreservation: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1812.

  57. Mohammed, A.A., Al-Suwaiegh, S., AlGherair, I., Mohammed, A., Mohammed, A. (2024a). The potential impacts of selecting viable oocytes on further embryonic development in mammals: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58(9): 1435-1443.

  58. Mohammed, A.A., Karasiewicz, J., Kubacka, J., Grêda, P.,Modlinski, J.A. (2010). Enucleated GV oocytes as recipients of embryonic nuclei in the G1, S, or G2 stages of the cell cycle. Cellular Reprogramming. 12(4): 427-435.

  59. Mohammed, A.A., Karasiewicz, J., Modlinski, J.A. (2008). Developmental potential of selectively enucleated immature mouse oocytes upon nuclear transfer. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 75(8): 1269-1280.

  60. Mohammed, A.A., Karasiewicz, J., Modlinski, J.A., Papis, K. (2005). Oocyte maturation in the presence of randomly pooled follicular fluid increases bovine blastocyst yield in vitro. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 14 (3): 501-512.

  61. Mohammed, A.A., Mahmoud, G.B. (2011). Some reproductive parameters of growing, adult non-pregnant and pregnant she camel slaughtered in Assiut Governorate. Egyptian Journal Animal Production. 48: 75-84.

  62. Mohammed, A.A.,Al-Suwaiegh, S., Al-Shaheen, T. (2019). Do the cytoplast and nuclear material of germinal vesicle oocyte support develop- mental competence upon reconstruction with embryonic/ somatic nucleus. Cellular reprogramming. 21(4): 163-170.

  63. Monaco, D., Castagnetti, C., Lanci, A., Osman, T.K., Lacalandra, G.M., Fusi, J. (2024). On-field gross morphology evaluation of dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) fetal membranes.  Animals (Basel). 14(11): 1553.

  64. Mousa, H.M., Ali, K.E. and Hume, I.D. (1983). Effect of water deprivation and urea metabolism in camels, desert sheep and desert goats fed dry desert grass. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology. 74A. 3: 715-720.

  65. Padalino, B., Monaco, D. and Lacalandra, G.M. (2015). Male camel behavior and breeding management strategies: How to handle acamel bull during the breeding season? Emirates  Journal of Food and Agriculture. 27(4): 338-349.

  66. Padalino, B., Rateb, S.A., Ibrahim, N.B., Monaco, D., Lacalandra, G.M., El-Bahrawy, K.A. (2016). Behavioral indicators to detect ovarian phase in the dromedary she-camel. Therio- genology. 85(9): 1644-1651. 

  67. Pesen, T., Haydaroglu, M., Capar, S., Parlatan, U., Unlu, M.B. (2023). Comparison of the human’s and camel’s red blood cell deformability by optical tweezers and Raman spectroscopy. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports. 35:101490.

  68. Rai, A.K., Sharma, N., Manivannan, B. and Khanna, N.D. (1997). Camel semen during breeding and non-breeding seasons. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 67: 397-399. 

  69. Salamt, N., Idrus, R.B.H., Kashim, M.I.A.M., Mokhtar, M.H. (2021). Anticancer, antiplatelet, gastroprotective and hepato- protective effects of camel urine: A scoping review. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.  29(7): 740-750.

  70. Samara, E.M. (2019). Unraveling the relationship between the topographic distribution patterns of skin temperature and perspiration response in dromedary camels. Journal of Thermal Biology. 84: 311-315.

  71. Samatar, A.M., Ashour, A.M. and Zeidan, A.E. (2022). Influence of seasons of the year and ages on the testicular measure- ments and semen characteristics of the male dromedary camels. Al-Azhar Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(1): 89-98.

  72. Saparov, G., Annageldiyev, O. (2005). Meat Productivity of the Camel Arvana Breed and ways to Increase it. In B. Faye and P. Esenov (Eds.), Desertification Combat and Food Safety (pp. 211–214). IOS Press. 

  73. Sarhan, D.M.A., Daader, A.H., El-Darawany, A., Zeidan, A.E.B. (2024). Testicular measurements and semen characteristics of the male Magherbi camels with different ages during the rutting and non- rutting seasons of the year. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(1): 77-89.

  74. Skidmore, J.A. (2005). Reproduction in dromedary camels: An update. Animal Reproduction. 2(3): 161-171.

  75. Sumia, A.D., Ali, A., Majid, Muna E.A. (2016) Antimicrobial activity of Camels (Camelus dromedarius) and Sheep urine on some pathogenic bacteria. IOSR-JAVS 9: 65-71.

  76. Thanvi, P.K. and Joshi, S. (2019). Gross and scanning electron microscopic studies on oesophagus of camel (Camelus dromedarius). Journal of Camel Practice and Research. 27(1): 135.

  77. Tharwat, M., Almundarij, T.I., Sadan, M., Khorshid, F., Swelum, A. (2023). Is camel’s urine friend or enemy? Review of its role in human health or diseases. Open Veterinary Journal. 13(10): 1228-1238.

  78. Tibary, A. and El Allali, K. (2020). Dromedary camel: A model of heat resistant livestock animal. Theriogenology. 154: 203-211.

  79. Yakubu, A., Okpeku, M., Shoyombo, A.J., Onasanya, G.O., Dahloum, L., Çelik, S., Oladepo, A. (2022). Exploiting morphobiometric and genomic variability of African indigenous camel popu- lations-A review. Frontiers in Genetics. 13: 1021685.

  80. Zeidan, A.E.B. (1999). Effect of age on some reproductive traits of the male one-humped camels (Camelus dromedarius). Zagazig Veterinary Journal. 27: 126-133.

  81. Zeidan, A.E.B., Habeeb, A.A.M., Ahmadi, E.A.A., Amer, H.A. and Abd El-Razik, A. (2001). Testicular and physiological changes of the male dromedary camels in relation to different ages and seasons of the year. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Animal Production and Health in Semi-Arid Areas, El-Arish, North Sinai, Egypt. pp 147-160.

Editorial Board

View all (0)