Growth performance
The results showed that liquid feeding had a positive effect on promoting the growth of pigs (Table 3). From the 33rd day, the weight of the two groups showed a significant difference (
P<0.05) and by the end of the experiment, the difference between the two groups was extremely significant (
P<0.01). The ADG of pigs in the LF group was significantly increased from days 14 to 33, 33 to 61, 0 to 82 and 0 to 105 (
P<0.01). There were some differences in ADFI between the two groups. The ADFI of the LF group significantly increased, except for the days 61 to 82 (
P<0.05). F/G between the LF group and the DF group also exhibited some differences, with the LF group showing lower values than the DF group from days 33 to 61 and days 0 to 82 (
P<0.1). However, the F/G of the LF group from days 82 to 105 was significantly higher than that of the DF group (
P<0.01).
Many reports have shown that liquid feeding could improve growth performance and feed efficiency
(Soo et al., 2015; Hurst et al., 2020; O’Meara et al., 2020). This study was consistent with the results of previous studies. These findings are beneficial for lowering the feed cost per kilogram of weight gain in production. However, some research results were inconsistent with this study, suggesting that the impact of liquid feeding was not as effective as that of dry feeding
(Lawlor et al., 2002; Tostenson, 2017). This may be due to differences in water-to-feed ratio, feeding methods and even the growth stage of the pigs used in various studies. The F/G increased significantly from 130 kg to 150 kg, which might be related to its lower feed conversion efficiency. It was found that when the quantity of food provided was reduced and the frequency of feeding was increased, wastage from the feeders was negligible
(l’Anson et al., 2013). It might be beneficial to restrict feeding to control the feed-to-gain ratio during the large weight stage. In the existing studies, there were also some inconsistencies in reports found that liquid feeding didn’t affect the feed-to-gain ratio of pigs, which may be related to the waste of feed during feeding
(Choct et al., 2004; l’Anson et al., 2012). At the same time, it was also necessary to pay attention to the abnormal fermentation of feed when the feeding amount was not appropriate. The residual feed was easy to ferment, resulting in a decrease in nutrients and an increase in the number of harmful microorganisms, which further affected the growth performance of pigs, such as feed intake and threatened the health, especially during the piglet stage
(Plumed-Ferrer et al., 2009; O’Meara et al., 2020a;
Cullen et al., 2021).
Slaughter performance
The results showed no significant differences in slaughtering performance between the LF group and the DF group (Table 4). The L-value of LDM at 45 minutes in the LF group was higher than the DF group, but the L-value of LDM at 24 hours in the LF group was lower than the DF group (
P<0.05). The a-value of PM at 24 hours in the LF group was lower than in the DF group (
P<0.05).
The growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality in pigs are considerable economic traits
(Chen et al., 2023). However, an excessively high water-to-feed ratio negatively impact the slaughtering performance of pigs and reduce dressing percentage. Compared with previous studies, it was observed that there was no adverse effect on slaughtering performance when the water-to-feed ratio was 3.5:1. However, the dressing percentage decreased when the water-to-feed ratio exceeded 4.1:1. This decrease might be associated with the increase in gastrointestinal volume and weight, as well as the reduction in dressing percentages due to high water intake (
Llop, 2016;
O’Meara et al., 2020b). In our study, there were no significant differences in dressing percentage, backfat thickness, dripping loss, cooking loss, shear force and other indexes between the LF group and the DF group, which indicates that liquid feeding did not have adverse effects on slaughter performance and meat quality. The result was consistent with those of the previous study
(Soo et al., 2015).
Ammonia emission
It was found that during the selected trial period for analysis, the ammonia concentration in the DF group was significantly higher than that in the LF group (Fig 1). In the LF group, the ammonia concentration was below 5 ppm for 77.51% of the trial time, below 10 ppm for 93.01% of the time and above 10 ppm for only 6.99% of the time. In the DF group, the percentage of time above 10 ppm was 26.06% and the percentage above 20 ppm was 7.27% (Table 5). A specific day was selected for comparison based on the ammonia change situation. It was observed that the ammonia concentration of the LF group was significantly lower than that of the DF group, especially during lower nighttime temperatures. When the noon temperature was at its peak, the detected levels of ammonia gas in both groups were the lowest, showing no significant difference (Fig 2).
Ammonia was not only a major contributor to haze but also enter the respiratory tract and directly impact the health of humans and animals. Exposure to 20 ppm of ammonia induced a pro-inflammatory response involving T cells. Exposure to 50 ppm of ammonia caused oxidative damage to DNA, ultimately resulting in the apoptosis of ATII cells. Oxidative stress-mediated ammonia-induced inflammatory response and apoptosis in pig lungs
(Li et al., 2023). Diet type also affect gut microbiota structure, reduce the number of ammonia producing bacteria and decrease ammonia emissions
(Chinnaman et al., 2024). In previous studies, it has been shown that liquid feeding can improve the digestibility and reduce ammonia emissions during manure accumulation
(Soo et al., 2015; Nahm, 2010). One study found that liquid feeding could significantly reduce the concentration of ammonia components from the slurry when the ratio of water-to-feed was 4:1
(Hobbs et al., 1997). This method helped in reducing the odorous substances produced by nutrient fermentation in the manure
(Brooks et al., 2001). In this experiment, the ammonia concentration of the LF group was significantly lower than that of the DF group, which was consistent with previous studies. At present, there are relatively few studies on the correlation between liquid feeding and ammonia emission, indicating a need for further research in the future.