Administration of
E. papillata to mice significantly affected the vertical (p<0.01) and horizontal (p<0.05) motor activity as compared to the control mice (Fig 1,2, respectively). Treatment mice with
T. polium extract significantly (P<0.01) modulated the vertical (Fig 2) the horizontal motor impairment (Fig 1).
The total latency time and number of crossing during the shock of
E. papillata -exposed mice were significantly (p<0.05) declined compared to the control mice (Fig 3,6, respectively), On the contrary, the number of inertial crossing and number of reinforced crossing during the shock were significantly (p<0.05) increased in the
E. papillata-administered group as compared to controls (Fig 4,5), respectively.
Treatment of
E. papillate-administered mice with
T. polium extract improved learning and memory in the treatment group compared to the infected group.
Regarding antioxidant and oxidative stress, there were no changes between the different study groups (Fig 7,8, 9,10), respectively.
HandE-stained sections from different brain regions of mice exposed to
E. papillata reflected the normal cells of the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. where there are no obvious changes in these areas (Fig 11,12, respectively).
All living things in the natural world are constantly exposed to a complex environment and run the risk of being attacked by pathogenic bacteria. So, organisms need to be able to identify diseases and put up a strong defense against them in order to survive. Also, animals that are ill have changes in their behavior and physiological responses, which can be caused by either host- or pathogen-dependent mechanisms
(Lopes et al., 2016). Since the brain controls behavior, alterations in brain physiology brought on by an illness may result in behavioral changes. According to
Kent et al., (1992), infections cause the immune system to release pro-inflammatory cytokines, which disrupt brain function and result in illness-related behavior.
In biomedical research, the evaluation of behavioral changes during infection is essential, especially when assessing the pharmacological and toxic effects of new anti-parasitic drugs. Where changes in locomotor activity should be assessed before doing other behavioral characterizations since it is necessary for a number of distinct behavioral characterizations
(Karl et al., 2003). Here,
E. papillata led to an increase in locomotor activity when compared with the control group.in contrast, the treatment with
T. polium improved the locomotor activity.
Parasites are known to alter a wide range of characteristics of their hosts, including behavior
(Barber et al., 2000; Gegear et al., 2006; Barber and Dingemanse, 2010). Behavior changes in infected hosts may be non-adaptive and the consequence of the host’s response to the infection or its harmful effects. Numerous behaviors, including those related to memory and motor activity, have been demonstrated to be impacted by cytokines (
Dantzer and Kelley, 2007). In contrast to animals that were not infected, we found that
E. papelata infection reduced latency time in the inhibitory avoidance task, which may indicate memory impairment. This study supports previous research that links depressed people to cognitive deficits, such as memory problems
(Bearden et al., 2006; Vasic et al., 2008).
Eimeria protozoan parasites are the source of coccidiosis, one of the most serious diseases threatening the commercial chicken industry. Currently, anticoccidial medicines derived from plants are added to chicken and animal feed
(Muthamilselvan et al., 2016). Whereas, numerous parasites cause specific behavioral alterations in their hosts that promote the spread of their infectious stages from one host to another
(Stepanka et al., 2000).
Because certain intestinal illnesses could send a signal to the neurological system that controls behavior, the behavior was studied (
Singh and Aballay 2019a,
2019b), where they found a brain pathway that sets off the host’s defensive behavior against infection.
In this study, only locomotor activity, learning and memory were changed after infection and treatment with TP. The present findings imply that the behavioral alterations in infected mice that have been reported by numerous authors and seen in our experiments.
The results of our current study are consistent with the findings of
Martin et al., (1995), who found that infection with the
Eimeria parasite led to memory impairment. Where there was no obvious motor, visual, or motivational deficits, nor were there any signs of illness or malaise to explain this reduction in spatial learning. These impairments in spatial learning brought on by parasitic infection are probably the result of the host’s immunological and neuromodulator responses and they could be viewed as a fitness cost of the infection response
(Martin et al., 1995).
It has been suggested that parasites have an impact on the decision-making and behavioral responses of their hosts. These effects may originate indirectly from or reflect the physiological and energetic restrictions that the parasite imposes on the host (
Holmes and Zohar, 1990;
Milinski, 1990). Thus, changes in an animal’s spatial performance caused by parasites may have a direct impact on a range of distinct behavioral responses. Therefore, it is unlikely that the parasite uses the declines in spatial learning and memory shown in this study as a means of aiding in transmission. Rather, it suggests that the host’s reaction to the parasite infection could be the cause of the changes in spatial learning.
It is unknown if the parasite can change the behavior of its natural host. Among other impacts, a number of studies have revealed that neurotransmitter levels in the brain are altered by parasite brain infections
(Prandovszky et al., 2011; Skallová et al., 2006). Nevertheless, the precise mechanism responsible for altering host behavior is still unclear.
The results of our current experiment are similar to the results of
Tayyeb et al., (2019), which mentioned that
T. polium includes active chemical components that can improve memory in a Morris water maze (MWM) setting and may have neuronal survival properties in hippocampus tissue. The effects of this plant extract have been attributed by several researchers to one or more of its active components, including tannin, saponin, sterol, b-caryophyllene, diterpenoids
(Niazmand et al., 2008; Niazmand et al., 2007) flavonoid, terpenoid, iridoid and phenilpropanoid glycosides
(Galstyan et al., 1992).
Phytoestrogens are estrogen-like compounds derived from plants that mimic the neuroprotective effects of endogenous estrogen with the fewest negative side effects. These compounds act through their alpha and beta receptors, which are specifically distributed in the CA3 intrahippocampal region. It is possible that these receptors will mediate cell survival signaling and memory-enhancing responses (
Simonyan and Chavushya, 2016).