Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 58 issue 6 (june 2024) : 959-969

Caveolae Disassembly using Methyl-β-cyclodextrin Causes the Abolition of Coupling of the Caveolae and the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in the Rat Femoral Artery

Ashraf Albrakati1,*
1Department of Human Anatomy, College of Medicine, Taif University, 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Cite article:- Albrakati Ashraf (2024). Caveolae Disassembly using Methyl-β-cyclodextrin Causes the Abolition of Coupling of the Caveolae and the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum in the Rat Femoral Artery . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58(6): 959-969. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1772.

Background: Caveolae are essential in regulating signal transduction mechanisms of ion channels in vascular tissue, including BKCa channels (maxi-K). The current study investigated the localization of maxi-K channels within caveolae.

Methods: Sixteen rats were divided into two groups: A control group and a treated group, where arteries in the treated group were incubated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) to disassemble caveolae from artery tissue. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunocytochemistry (ICC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Western blot techniques were used in this study. 

Result: IHC of intact arteries showed colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 in smooth muscle and endothelial cells and colocalized of maxi-K channels with caveolin-3 in smooth muscle cells only. These findings were also corroborated with ICC in a single smooth muscle cell. TEM revealed caveolae covering most plasma membranes of smooth muscle and endothelial cells and showed that caveolae sit close to the sarcoplasmic reticulum only in smooth muscle cells. TEM showed incubating arteries with MβCD led to the disassembly of caveolae from artery tissue. This study concluded that maxi-K channels localize to caveolae and that caveolae abolishment by MβCD led to the abolition of the coupling of caveolae and the sarcoplasmic reticulum.

Caveolae cover most plasma membranes of the vascular tissue (Parton and Del Pozo, 2013). Many vital ion channels and proteins with functions related to cellular signaling are located in caveolae (Isshiki and Anderson, 1999). These structures are instrumental in modulating various functions, including the critical process of vasoconstriction in blood vessels. Vasoconstriction in muscular arteries initiates through smooth muscle contraction due to increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration (Brozovich et al., 2016).
 
Maxi-K channels, also known as Slo1 or BKCa, are one type of calcium-activated potassium channel (Marty, 1981). The maxi-K channel can be activated by several factors, such as Ca2+ transients released from the peripheral sarcoplasmic reticulum (Bolton and Imaizumi, 1996). In the blood vessels, maxi-K channel activation act to induce membrane hyperpolarization, leading to the L-type channel switching off (Baruah and Deka, 2022). Thus, reducing intracellular Ca2+ concentration and hence vascular relaxation (Lohn et al., 2000). The caveolins regulate intracellular calcium ions via the effective influence of maxi-K channels on L-type Ca2+ channels in smooth muscle cells to maintain vascular tone (Pereira da Silva et al., 2022). Several recent studies point out the colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1/caveolin-3 in various vascular tissues to understand the association between caveolin and maxi-K channels (Alioua et al., 2008; Riddle et al., 2011).
 
Endothelial BKCa channels and eNOS work in harmony to control vascular function together. BKCa channels activate membrane hyperpolarization and vasodilation, whereas eNOS generates NO to increase it. In this regard, caveolae house endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), an enzyme that produces NO (Ramadoss et al., 2013). At the same time, caveolae integrity is essential for regulating NO production from the endothelial cells (Razani et al., 2002). In contrast, caveolae disruption can lead to endothelial dysfunction, which is a common sign for many cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and heart failure (Xu et al., 2007).
 
Caveolae in blood vessels have significant clinical importance due to their involvement in vascular functions such as regulating endothelial function, smooth muscle contraction and signaling pathways. In this regards, cholesterol is essential for the integrity of caveolae structure (Matthaeus et al., 2019). In addition, several ultrastructural studies indicate that caveolae are located close to the peripheral sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle cells (Sweeney et al., 2006). Caveolae disruption using a cholesterol-depleted agent such as MβCD has many effects on arteries, involving impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxation and close link between voltage-gated calcium channels and the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Xu et al., 2008). Accordingly, this causes a decrease in local Ca2+ spark frequency released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which leads to the deactivation of the maxi-K channel and hence induces smooth muscle cell contraction. In contrast, opening the maxi-K channel inhibits the L-type Ca2+ channel, reducing Ca2+ influx into smooth muscle cells, thus vasodilation (Taggart, 2001).
 
Understanding the function of caveolae in blood arteries is essential in improving targeted medicines to treat and prevent different diseases. So, caveolae disruption using a cholesterol-depleted agent such as MβCD represents a useful model for understanding the relationship between the maxi-K channels and caveolins in the caveolar domain and investigating the juxtaposition of maxi-K channels with the sarcoplasmic reticulum (Dreja et al., 2002). However, the relationship between the maxi-K channels within the caveolae and the sarcoplasmic reticulum has not been studied yet in rat femoral arteries. Therefore, the current study was designed to investigate the localization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 and/or caveolin-3 in smooth muscle and endothelial cells of the rat femoral artery using IHC and ICC. Also, to assess the topological relationship between caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticulum before and after caveolae disassembly using MβCD inhibitors by TEM.
Animal groups and experimental procedures
 
In this study, sixteen adults male Wistar rats were divided into two groups; eight rats in each group (n= 8) and only one femoral artery was collected from each animal. All rats in both groups were killed by cervical dislocation,  and femoral arteries were quickly dissected and collected for IHC, ICC, TEM and Western blot.
 
Research period
 
The current study was achieved between 2021-2022.
 
Control group
 
In this group, rat femoral arteries were incubated with normal saline and used as controls.
 
Treated group
 
In this group, rat femoral arteries (5-mm) were incubated with 5 mM MβCD for one hour to disassemble the caveolae from the plasma membrane of smooth muscle and endothelial cells.
 
Primary and secondary antibodies
 
Mouse anti-α-actin (1:300) and rabbit anti-von Willebrand factor (1:500). Mouse monoclonal anti-caveolin-1 (1:200); caveolin-1-scaffolding domain peptide (SDP) was mapped to amino acids 82-101 (DGIWKASFTTFTVTKYWFYR). Mouse monoclonal anti-caveolin-3 (1:500); caveolin-3 SDP was mapped to amino acids 55-74, (DGVWRVS YTTFTVSKYWCYR). Rabbit polyclonal anti-maxi-K channels (1:500) were also utilized. All primary antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA, except Rabbit polyclonal anti-maxi-K channels were purchased from Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel. All primary antibodies were diluted with Tris-buffered saline mixed with Tween 20 (TBST; 1% milk). Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488/Alexa Fluor 594 and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488/ Alexia Fluor 594 secondary antibodies (dilution 1:500) were purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, USA).
 
Immunohistochemical preparation of rat femoral arteries
 
A small piece of the femoral arteries (5 mm in length) was embedded on a cork disk and then frozen in isopentane and cooled in liquid nitrogen. The blocks were cut into 12 μm-thick tissue sections and mounted on glass slides. The sections were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). The sections were then permeabilized using 0.1% Triton ´100 in PBS. Next, the blocking solution (1% BSA) was applied to block the non-specific binding of antibodies for 30 min at room temperature. The slides were incubated overnight at four °C with primary antibodies, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 hour. After mounting, slides were examined under a confocal microscope (Leica SP5 white laser, Leica, Germany).
 
Preparation of individual smooth muscle cells isolated from the rat femoral artery
 
A small piece of the femoral artery (2-4 mm) was incubated in a low-concentration Ca2+ buffer for 40 min at 35°C. After the artery was digested, single cells were dispersed in this solution by trituration of the digested tissue using a fire-polished Pasteur pipette, as previously reported.
 
Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy
 
For immunofluorescence confocal microscopy, cryosections (12 µm-thick) of rat femoral arteries were fixed and permeabilized as described previously by Allen (2007). Double-immunofluorescence labeling was applied in this study to assess the colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 in smooth muscle and endothelial cells of rat femoral tissue using two different methods: (i) double labeling of primary antibodies from different host species; and (ii) double labeling of primary antibodies from the same host species as described . Coverslips were mounted with an antifade mounting medium (Biomeda, Foster City, CA) and imaged using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica).
 
Transmission electron microscopy
 
Small segment (0.5-mm) was collected from each rat from both groups. Artery segment from treated group treatment with 5 mM MβCD for one hour. Whereas artery segments from control group were collected and prepared without treatment. The segments were fixed in PBS containing 2% glutaraldehyde and 1% paraformaldehyde for two hours. Samples were stored in PBS at 4°C until post-fixation for 1 hour with 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for another hour. This was followed by a dehydration step in graded ethanol and embedded in resin. Ultrathin sections were cut with a thickness of 80 nm from each group and mounted on copper grids. Sections were then stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate for 5 min, then with 0.1 M lead citrate for 5 min and left to dry at room temperature. The grids were examined using TEM (JEOL-JEM-1010, Liverpool, UK) .
 
Western blot
 
Western blotting was performed to confirm the protein expression of caveolin-1, caveolin-3, maxi-K channels and á-actin in rat artery tissues. A total of 1 gram of the arterial tissue was mixed in lysis buffer and protease inhibitors (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX). After that, the protein mixture was homogenized on ice using a blender for 8 min. The samples were then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min at four °C. The supernatant was stored at -80°C for further use. Briefly, 20 μg of femoral arterial protein extracts were separated on 10% polyacrylamide gels by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-caveolin-1 (dilution 1:200), mouse monoclonal anti-caveolin-3 (dilution1:500), rabbit polyclonal anti-maxi-K channels and (dilution 1:300) mouse monoclonal anti-α-actin (dilution1:300). The membranes were incubated with the designated secondary antibodies for two hours at room temperature. α-actin was used as a positive control for smooth muscle cells. The developed protein signal was detected using auto-radiographic Hyperfilm.
 
The fluorescence intensity of α-actin, von Willebrand factor, caveolin-1, caveolin-3 and maxi-K channels
 
The mean fluorescence intensity of all proteins (α-actin, von Willebrand factor, caveolin-, caveolin-3 and maxi-K channels) in endothelial and smooth muscle cells of the rat femoral artery and individual smooth muscle cells isolated was determined by ImageJ as described by Scott et al. (2018).
 
Approval ethics
 
This study and all experimental procedures were performed according to the principles of the Ethics Committee of Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia (Approval No. T-2023-523) which are in line with the Declaration of Helsinki.
 
Statistical analysis
 
All results were expressed as the means ±SD. For comparison of caveolae per micrometer in smooth muscle and endothelial cells, the mean was calculated from 8 independent samples. For comparison of fluorescence intensity of α-actin, von Willebrand factor, caveolin-1, caveolin-3 and maxi-K channels, the mean was calculated from 8 independent samples. Data for multiple variable comparisons were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test, using the statistical package SPSS. The acceptable level of significance was set at p<0.05.
Effect of the luteolin treatment against the oxidant/antioxidant status following acetamiprid exposure of the cerebral cortex
 
The stained sections with anti-α-actin showed an unequivocal red signal localized in the smooth muscle cell layer but completely absent in the endothelial cell layer (Fig 1A “a”). The stained sections with the von Willebrand factor showed a strong green signal observed only in the endothelium cell layer (Fig 1A “b”). As expected, rat artery tissues had no overlapping between α-actin and von Willebrand factor (Fig 1A “c”). In addition, the fluorescence intensity of the α-actin and von Willebrand factors was analyzed in smooth muscle and endothelial cells. The results revealed a significant expression of von Willebrand factor in the endothelial cells compared to smooth muscle cells. In contrast, the fluorescence intensity showed a significant expression of α-actin in the smooth muscle cells compared to α-actin in the endothelial cells (Fig 1A “d”).

Fig 1 A: Confocal images show frozen sections of the femoral artery stained with á-actin and von Willebrand factor. B: Western blot analysis results of the femoral artery.


 
Western blotting was performed to examine the specific expression of caveolin-1, caveolin -3, maxi-K channels and α-actin in protein lysates extracted from rat femoral arteries. As expected, specific single bands of caveolin-1, caveolin-3 and maxi-K channels were detected at the expected protein size (Fig 1B). When the membrane was stripped and probed with anti-α-actin, it exerted another band of α-actin. These findings confirmed the specificity of antibodies and the expression of the three proteins in the smooth muscle cells.
 
Expression of caveolins-1 and caveolins-3 in endothelial cells of rat femoral arteries
 
Endothelial cells had positive red staining for von Willebrand factor, whereas smooth muscle and endothelial cells stained green for caveolin-1 (Fig 2A-B). The yellow color represents the colocalization of caveolin-1 and von Willebrand factor in endothelium cells (Fig 2C). The fluorescence intensity of caveolin-1 was analyzed in smooth muscle and endothelial cells. The results revealed a non-significant expression of caveolin-1 in the endothelial cells compared to smooth muscle cells (Fig 2D). The same pattern was identified in other tissue sections stained with von Willebrand factor and caveolin-3 (Fig 2E, F and G). Interestingly, caveolin-3 and von Willebrand factor were not overlapped in endothelial cells. The results of the fluorescence intensity showed that caveolin-3 was significantly expressed in smooth muscle compared to endothelial cells (Fig 2H). This suggests that caveolin-3 is expressed in smooth muscle cells but not in endothelial cells.

Fig 2: Confocal images shows frozen sections of the femoral artery stained with caveolin-1, caveolin-3 and von Willebrand factor.


 
Expression of maxi-K channels in the endothelial and smooth muscle cells of rat femoral arteries
 
The endothelial cells were stained red with von Willebrand factor and stained green with maxi-K channels (Fig 3A and B). The staining of maxi-K channels was colocalized with von Willebrand factor in endothelial cells (Fig 3C). The stained sections with anti-α-actin and anti-maxi-K channels showed strong green and red signals, respectively, in the smooth muscle cell layer (Fig 3E and F). The two proteins colocalized in the smooth muscle cell layers (Fig 3G). Analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a non-significant expression of maxi-K channels in smooth muscle cells compared to endothelial cells. The results also showed that maxi-K channels were significantly expressed in endothelial cells compared to α-actin. They found the same pattern, showing that maxi-K channels were significantly expressed in smooth muscle cells compared to the von Willebrand factor (Fig 3D and H).

Fig 3: Confocal images shows frozen sections of the femoral artery stained with von Willebrand factor, maxi-K channels and á-actin.


 
Colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolins-1 and caveolins-3 in rat femoral arteries
 
Staining sections with anti-caveolins-1 and anti-caveolins-3 exerted a homogenous expression of the two caveolins in smooth muscle cells and only caveolin-1 in the endothelial layer as a green signal (Fig 4A and F). When the sections were stained with anti-maxi-K channels, an unequivocal red signal was observed in smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells (Fig 4B and F). Overlaying the two colors exhibits yellow color, which represents colocalization of caveolin-1 and 3 with maxi-K channels, as shown in Fig 4C and G.

Fig 4: Confocal images shows frozen sections of the femoral artery stained with caveolin-1 and maxi-K channels.


 
Analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a non-significant expression of maxi-K channels compared to caveolin-1 in the smooth muscle cells or the endothelial cells. The results also showed that maxi-K channels were significantly expressed in endothelial cells compared to caveolin-3. In contrast, maxi-K channels were not significantly expressed in smooth muscle cells compared to caveolin-3 (Fig 4D and H).
 
Colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 and caveolins-3 in individual smooth muscle cells isolated from rat femoral arteries
 
The isolated smooth muscle cells showed a homogenous expression of maxi-K channels on the plasma membrane and cytosol of cells as a red signal (Fig 5A and E). Caveolins-1 and caveolins-3 expressions were observed as a green signal spread throughout the cytosol and plasma membrane of the smooth muscle cell (Fig 5B and F). Staining of maxi-K channels was overlapped with caveolin-1 and 3, as indicated by the yellow color in the cytosol and plasma membrane (Fig 5C and G). Analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a non-significant expression of maxi-K channels compared to caveolin-1 or caveolin-3 in the isolated single smooth muscle cell (Fig 5H).

Fig 5: Confocal images shows frozen sections of the femoral artery stained with maxi-K channels, caveolin-1 and caveolin-1.


 
Caveolae in the cellular membrane of the smooth muscle and endothelial cells of rat femoral arteries before and after MβCD treatment
 
TEM examination of the smooth muscle and endothelial cells showed that the caveolae appear as omega-shaped or tubular invaginations within the plasma membrane. The cells also revealed nanocontacts between the caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticulum. The sarcoplasmic reticulum was concentrated at the periphery of the cell close to the cell membrane (Fig 6A, a, B and b). When the arteries were treated with MâCD, the smooth muscle and endothelial cells showed the removal of caveolae from the plasma membrane. TEM also showed that caveolae abolishment by MâCD led to the abolition of the coupling of caveolae and the sarcoplasmic reticulum as shown in Fig 6C, c, D and d.
 

Fig 6: Transmission electron micrographs of the rat femoral artery.



The current study presents the relationship of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 and caveolin-3. Also, to examine the relationship between the coupling of maxi-K channels within the caveolar domain and the sarcoplasmic reticulum in rat femoral arteries. These results were corroborated by four different methods, including HC, ICC, TEM and Western blotting.
 
The smooth muscle layer is the primary determinant of blood flow in the conducting arteries. In blood vessel tissue, proteins of the maxi-K channel interact with caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 in the caveolar domain, which leads to regulating cellular Ca2+ homeostasis in conducting arteries (Riddle et al., 2011).
 
Results of the IHC of the current study showed a cellular colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 in smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells and with caveolin-3 exclusively in the smooth muscle cell layer. Additionally, ICC showed colocalization of maxi-K channels and caveolin-1 at the freshly-isolated smooth muscle cells. These results suggest that the caveolin-1 scaffolding domain peptide (DGIWKASFTTFTVTKYWFYR, amino acid residues 82-101) may interact with binding motifs, C terminates (1007YNMLCFGIY1015) in the maxi-K channels. These results confirm that the caveolin-1 scaffolding domains serve as anchor sites to maxi-K channels within caveolae and thus might regulate maxi-K channels. The results of this study agree with (Feher et al., 2010), who showed that the maxi-K channels interact with caveolin-1 in smooth muscle and endothelial cells of frozen sections of intact gracilis artery using IHC. Moreover, (Alioua et al., 2002), showed expression of caveolin-1 and maxi-K channels in intact aortic myocytes using IHC. Also, these results decide with Brainard et al., (2005), who showed that the maxi-K channels interact with caveolin-1 in human myometrial smooth muscle cells (cultured cells) using ICC.
 
Several prior studies have reported that the expression of caveolin-3 is muscle-specific and found in cardiac and skeletal muscle, as well as smooth muscle cells (Engelman et al., 1998). Additionally, Kamishima et al., (2007) suggested that caveolin-3 is essential in the Ca2+ removal of conducting artery’s smooth muscle cells. However, the role of caveolin-3 in regulating other ion channels in smooth muscle cells is still controversial. Results of IHC and ICC showed the colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-3 in the smooth muscle cells layer and at the individual smooth muscle cells. These findings suggested that caveolin-3 scaffolding-domain peptide (DGVWRVSYTTFTVSKYWCYR, amino acid residues 55-74) may interact with binding motifs at the C terminus (1007YNMLCFGIY1015) in maxi-K channels of rat femoral artery smooth muscle cells. Therefore, these results may confirm that the caveolin-3 scaffolding domains serve as anchor sites to anchor several proteins within caveolae, thus regulating many signaling molecules. These results agree with Jiang et al. (2005), who showed colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1in bovine aortic endothelial cells (cultured cells) using ICC.
 
In vascular smooth muscle, the opening of the maxi-K channel inhibits the voltage-gated calcium channels, reducing Ca2+ influx into smooth muscle cells, thus vasodilation (Kaczorowski et al., 1996). Recent studies have focused on the ultrastructure of vascular smooth muscle cells to examine the relationship between caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticulum contacts in the smooth muscle cells (Popescu et al., 2006). The caveolae’s proximity to the superficial sarcoplasmic reticulum, about 20 nm in smooth muscle cells, may explain the importance of sarcoplasmic reticulum to maxi-K channels in caveolar membranes.
 
TEM showed caveolae covering most of the plasma membrane smooth muscle cells. Also, caveolae were close to the peripheral sarcoplasmic reticulum in intact smooth muscle cells of the femoral arteries. These results agree with Popescu et al., (2006), who stated caveolae are within a few nanometers of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle cells of the vascular artery. Moreover, these results agree with (Gherghiceanu and Popescu, 2007). Saliez et al. (2008) demonstrated the caveola juxtaposition of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle cells of the rat urinary bladder. In addition, This finding also agrees with other studies conducted by , who reported that the caveolae were localized in juxtaposition to the sarcoplasmic reticulum in the vascular smooth muscle cells of different arterial beds.
 
TEM examination of endothelial cells in intact rat femoral arteries showed caveolae covering the endothelial cells’ plasma membrane. These findings were consistent with Razani et al. (2002). This study showed that caveolae are present in the plasma membranes of the endothelial cells of rat aorta. The results of this study agree with Saliez et al. (2008), who demonstrated the presence of caveolae in the endothelial cells of rat mesenteric arteries. Moreover, the current study also did not observe any sarcoplasmic reticulum in the endothelial cells of the rat femoral artery. A similar result was shown by Linder et al. (2005), who did not observe any sarcoplasmic reticulum in the endothelial cells of rat aorta.
 
Multiple prior studies have reported that the integrity of caveolae is essential for nitric oxide synthesis in the vascular endothelial cells of rat mesenteric arteries (Shaul, 2002; Cohen et al., 2004). TEM revealed the disassembling of caveolae in the plasma membranes of smooth muscle and endothelial cells following MβCD treatment. These findings aligned with studies on smooth muscle cells, where MβCD disassembled caveolae from the plasma membrane (Dreja et al., 2002; Bergdahl et al., 2003). Also, they reported that the disproportion of the caveolae by MβCD might lead to disproportion and/or redistribution of the caveolae in the plasma membrane, which increases the gap between the caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticulum (Gherghiceanu and Popescu, 2007).
 
The Western blot results of the current study showed the expression of caveolin-1, caveolin-3, α-actin and maxi-K channels in rat femoral artery lysates. These results were partially decided by Feher et al. (2010), who showed the expression of caveolin-1, Maxi-K channels and α-actin in the coronary arteries using Western blot. Our findings also agreed with Sampson et al., (2004), who reported the expression of caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 in rat arterial tissues using Western blot.
 
The current study is essential for understanding the caveolae-sarcoplasmic reticulum relationship and its importance in regulating calcium ion concentration in smooth muscle and endothelial cells (Shaw et al., 2006). However, these results may reveal the role of caveolae in regulating signaling pathways in smooth muscle cells and, hence, the contractility of the blood vessels, as suggested in the summary figure (Fig 7).

Fig 7: Summary figure of the rat femoral artery before and after treatment with MâCD.

This study concluded that maxi-K channels are localized to caveolae of rat femoral arteries, whereas caveolin-1 scaffolding domains serve as anchor sites to anchor maxi-K channels in smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells and caveolin-3 serves as anchor sites to anchor maxi-K channels in smooth muscle cells only. On the other hand, disassembling the caveolae by MβCD abolish the coupling of the caveolar domain and the sarcoplasmic reticulum, due to the disruption of the caveolae.
The authors extend their appreciation to Taif University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through project number (TU-DSPP-2024-55).
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-55).
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare. The author has seen and agreed with the manuscript's contents, and there is no financial interest to report.

  1. Alioua, A., Lu, R., Kumar, Y., Eghbali, M., Kundu, P., Toro, L. and Stefani, E. (2008). Slo1 caveolin-binding motif, a mechanism of caveolin-1-slo1 interaction regulating slo1 surface expression. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 283(8): 4808-4817.

  2. Alioua, A., Mahajan, A., Nishimaru, K., Zarei, M.M., Stefani, E. and Toro, L. (2002). Coupling of c-src to large conductance voltage-and ca2+-activated k+ channels as a new mechanism of agonist-induced vasoconstriction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99(22): 14560-14565.

  3. Allen, L.A.H. (2007). Immunofluorescence and Confocal Microscopy of Neutrophils. In: Neutrophil Methods and Protocols. Springer: pp: 273-287.

  4. Baruah, R.K. and Deka, D.K. (2022). Relaxation of goat detrusor muscle by l-arginine involves no-dependent but guanylyl cyclase independent activation of kca channels. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 56(6): 680-684. doi: 10.18805/ IJAR.B-4292.

  5. Bergdahl, A., Gomez, M.F., Dreja, K., Xu, S.Z., Adner, M., Beech, D.J., Broman, J., Hellstrand, P. and Sward, K. (2003). Cholesterol depletion impairs vascular reactivity to endothelin-1 by reducing store-operated ca2+ entry dependent on trpc1. Circulation Research. 93(9): 839-847.

  6. Bolton, T.B. and Imaizumi, Y. (1996). Spontaneous transient outward currents in smooth muscle cells. Cell Calcium. 20(2): 141-152.

  7. Brainard, A.M., Miller, A.J., Martens, J.R. and England, S.K. (2005). Maxi-k channels localize to caveolae in human myometrium:  A role for an actin-channel-caveolin complex in the regulation of myometrial smooth muscle k+ current. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 289(1): C49-57. 

  8. Brozovich, F., Nicholson, C., Degen, C., Gao, Y.Z., Aggarwal, M. and Morgan, K. (2016). Mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle contraction and the basis for pharmacologic treatment of smooth muscle disorders. Pharmacological Reviews. 68(2): 476-532.

  9. Cohen, A.W., Hnasko, R., Schubert, W. and Lisanti, M.P. (2004). Role of caveolae and caveolins in health and disease. Physiological Reviews. 84(4): 1341-1379. 

  10. Dreja, K., Voldstedlund, M., Vinten, J., Tranum-Jensen, J., Hellstrand, P. and Sward, K. (2002). Cholesterol depletion disrupts caveolae and differentially impairs agonist-induced arterial contraction. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. 22(8): 1267-1272.

  11. Engelman, J.A., Zhang, X., Galbiati, F., Volonte, D., Sotgia, F., Pestell, R.G., Minetti, C., Scherer, P.E., Okamoto, T.  and Lisanti, M.P. (1998). Molecular genetics of the caveolin gene family: Implications for human cancers, diabetes, alzheimer disease and muscular dystrophy. American Journal of Human Genetics. 63(6): 1578-1587. 

  12. Feher, A., Rutkai, I., Beleznai, T., Ungvari, Z., Csiszar, A., Edes, I. and Bagi, Z. (2010). Caveolin-1 limits the contribution of bk (ca) channel to edhf-mediated arteriolar dilation: Implications in diet-induced obesity. Cardiovascular Research. 87(4): 732-739.

  13. Gherghiceanu, M. and Popescu, L. (2007). Electron microscope tomography: Further demonstration of nanocontacts between caveolae and smooth muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 11(6): 1416-1418.

  14. Isshiki, M. and Anderson, R. (1999). Calcium signal transduction from caveolae. Cell Calcium. 26(5): 201-208.

  15. Jiang, H., Xia, Q., Wang, X., Song, J. and Bruce, I. (2005). Luteolin induces vasorelaxion in rat thoracic aorta via calcium and potassium channels. Die Pharmazie-An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 60(6): 444-447.

  16. Kaczorowski, G.J., Knaus, H.G., Leonard, R.J., McManus, O.B. and Garcia, M.L. (1996). High-conductance calcium- activated potassium channels; structure, pharmacology and function. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes. 28: 255-267.

  17. Kamishima, T., Burdyga, T., Gallagher, J.A. and Quayle, J.M. (2007). Caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 regulate ca2+ homeostasis of single smooth muscle cells from rat cerebral resistance arteries. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 293(1): H204-214. 

  18. Linder, A.E., McCluskey, L.P., Cole, K.R., Lanning, K.M. and Webb, R.C. (2005). Dynamic association of nitric oxide downstream signaling molecules with endothelial caveolin-1 in rat aorta. J. Pharmacol Exp Ther. 314(1): 9-15.

  19. Lohn, M., Furstenau, M., Sagach, V., Elger, M., Schulze, W., Luft, F.C., Haller, H.  and Gollasch, M. (2000). Ignition of calcium sparks in arterial and cardiac muscle through caveolae. Circ Res. 87(11): 1034-1039.

  20. Marty, A., (1981). Ca-dependent k channels with large unitary conductance in chromaffin cell membranes. Nature. 291(5815): 497-500.

  21. Matthaeus, C., Lian, X., Kunz, S., Lehmann, M., Zhong, C., Bernert, C., Lahmann, I., Müller, D.N., Gollasch, M. and Daumke, O. (2019). Enos-no-induced small blood vessel relaxation requires ehd2-dependent caveolae stabilization. PLoS One. 14(10): e0223620.  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223620. 

  22. Parton, R.G. and Del Pozo, M.A. (2013). Caveolae as plasma membrane sensors, protectors and organizers. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 14(2): 98-112.

  23. Pereira da Silva, E.A., Martín-Aragón Baudel, M., Navedo, M.F. and Nieves-Cintrón, M. (2022). Ion channel molecular complexes in vascular smooth muscle. Frontiers in Physiology. 26(13): 999369. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.999369.

  24. Popescu, L., Gherghiceanu, M., Mandache, E.  and Cretoiu, D. (2006). Caveolae in smooth muscles: Nanocontacts. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 10(4): 960- 990.

  25. Ramadoss, J., Pastore, M.B. and Magness, R.R. (2013). Endothelial caveolar subcellular domain regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology. 40(11): 753-764.

  26. Razani, B., Woodman, S.E. and Lisanti, M.P. (2002). Caveolae: From cell biology to animal physiology. Pharmacological Reviews. 54(3): 431-467.

  27. Riddle, M.A., Hughes, J.M.  and Walker, B.R. (2011). Role of caveolin- 1 in endothelial bkca channel regulation of vasoreactivity. American Journal of Physiology. Cell physiology. 301(6): C1404-1414. 

  28. Saliez, J., Bouzin, C., Rath, G., Ghisdal, P., Desjardins, F., Rezzani, R., Rodella, L.F., Vriens, J., Nilius, B., Feron, O., Balligand, J.L. and Dessy, C. (2008). Role of caveolar compartmentation in endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated relaxation: Ca2+ signals and gap junction function are regulated by caveolin in endothelial cells. Circulation. 117(8): 1065-1074. 

  29. Sampson, L.J., Hayabuchi, Y., Standen, N.B. and Dart, C. (2004). Caveolae localize protein kinase a signaling to arterial atp-sensitive potassium channels. Circ Res. 95(10): 1012-1018.

  30. Scott, D.J., Gunn, N.J., Yong, K.J., Wimmer, V.C., Veldhuis, N.A., Challis, L.M., Haidar, M., Petrou, S., Bathgate, R.A. and Griffin, M.D. (2018). A novel ultra-stable, monomeric green fluorescent protein for direct volumetric imaging of whole organs using clarity. Scientific Reports. 8(1): 667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18045-y.

  31. Shaul, P.W. (2002). Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: Location, location, location. Annual Review of Physiology.  64(1): 749-774.

  32. Shaw, L., Sweeney, M.A., O’Neill, S.C., Jones, C.J., Austin, C.  and Taggart, M.J. (2006). Caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticular coupling in smooth muscle cells of pressurised arteries: The relevance for ca2+ oscillations and tone. Cardiovasc Res. 69(4): 825-835. 

  33. Sweeney, M., Jones, C.J.P., Greenwood, S.L., Baker, P.N. and Taggart, M.J. (2006). Ultrastructural features of smooth muscle and endothelial cells of isolated isobaric human placental and maternal arteries. Placenta. 27(6): 635- 647. 

  34. Taggart, M.J. (2001). Smooth muscle excitation-contraction coupling: A role for caveolae and caveolins? News in physiological sciences: An International Journal of Physiology Produced Jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society. 16: 61-65. 

  35. Xu, Y., Buikema, H., van Gilst, W.H. and Henning, R.H. (2008). Caveolae and endothelial dysfunction: Filling the caves in cardiovascular disease. Eur J. Pharmacol. 585(2-3): 256-260.

  36. Xu, Y., Henning, R.H., van der Want, J.J., van Buiten, A., van Gilst, W.H. and Buikema, H. (2007). Disruption of endothelial caveolae is associated with impairment of both no-as well as edhf in acetylcholine-induced relaxation depending on their relative contribution in different vascular beds. Life Sciences. 80(18): 1678-1685. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)