Effect of the luteolin treatment against the oxidant/antioxidant status following acetamiprid exposure of the cerebral cortex
The stained sections with anti-α-actin showed an unequivocal red signal localized in the smooth muscle cell layer but completely absent in the endothelial cell layer (Fig 1A “a”). The stained sections with the von Willebrand factor showed a strong green signal observed only in the endothelium cell layer (Fig 1A “b”). As expected, rat artery tissues had no overlapping between α-actin and von Willebrand factor (Fig 1A “c”). In addition, the fluorescence intensity of the α-actin and von Willebrand factors was analyzed in smooth muscle and endothelial cells. The results revealed a significant expression of von Willebrand factor in the endothelial cells compared to smooth muscle cells. In contrast, the fluorescence intensity showed a significant expression of α-actin in the smooth muscle cells compared to α-actin in the endothelial cells (Fig 1A “d”).
Western blotting was performed to examine the specific expression of caveolin-1, caveolin -3, maxi-K channels and α-actin in protein lysates extracted from rat femoral arteries. As expected, specific single bands of caveolin-1, caveolin-3 and maxi-K channels were detected at the expected protein size (Fig 1B). When the membrane was stripped and probed with anti-α-actin, it exerted another band of α-actin. These findings confirmed the specificity of antibodies and the expression of the three proteins in the smooth muscle cells.
Expression of caveolins-1 and caveolins-3 in endothelial cells of rat femoral arteries
Endothelial cells had positive red staining for von Willebrand factor, whereas smooth muscle and endothelial cells stained green for caveolin-1 (Fig 2A-B). The yellow color represents the colocalization of caveolin-1 and von Willebrand factor in endothelium cells (Fig 2C). The fluorescence intensity of caveolin-1 was analyzed in smooth muscle and endothelial cells. The results revealed a non-significant expression of caveolin-1 in the endothelial cells compared to smooth muscle cells (Fig 2D). The same pattern was identified in other tissue sections stained with von Willebrand factor and caveolin-3 (Fig 2E, F and G). Interestingly, caveolin-3 and von Willebrand factor were not overlapped in endothelial cells. The results of the fluorescence intensity showed that caveolin-3 was significantly expressed in smooth muscle compared to endothelial cells (Fig 2H). This suggests that caveolin-3 is expressed in smooth muscle cells but not in endothelial cells.
Expression of maxi-K channels in the endothelial and smooth muscle cells of rat femoral arteries
The endothelial cells were stained red with von Willebrand factor and stained green with maxi-K channels (Fig 3A and B). The staining of maxi-K channels was colocalized with von Willebrand factor in endothelial cells (Fig 3C). The stained sections with anti-α-actin and anti-maxi-K channels showed strong green and red signals, respectively, in the smooth muscle cell layer (Fig 3E and F). The two proteins colocalized in the smooth muscle cell layers (Fig 3G). Analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a non-significant expression of maxi-K channels in smooth muscle cells compared to endothelial cells. The results also showed that maxi-K channels were significantly expressed in endothelial cells compared to α-actin. They found the same pattern, showing that maxi-K channels were significantly expressed in smooth muscle cells compared to the von Willebrand factor (Fig 3D and H).
Colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolins-1 and caveolins-3 in rat femoral arteries
Staining sections with anti-caveolins-1 and anti-caveolins-3 exerted a homogenous expression of the two caveolins in smooth muscle cells and only caveolin-1 in the endothelial layer as a green signal (Fig 4A and F). When the sections were stained with anti-maxi-K channels, an unequivocal red signal was observed in smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells (Fig 4B and F). Overlaying the two colors exhibits yellow color, which represents colocalization of caveolin-1 and 3 with maxi-K channels, as shown in Fig 4C and G.
Analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a non-significant expression of maxi-K channels compared to caveolin-1 in the smooth muscle cells or the endothelial cells. The results also showed that maxi-K channels were significantly expressed in endothelial cells compared to caveolin-3. In contrast, maxi-K channels were not significantly expressed in smooth muscle cells compared to caveolin-3 (Fig 4D and H).
Colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 and caveolins-3 in individual smooth muscle cells isolated from rat femoral arteries
The isolated smooth muscle cells showed a homogenous expression of maxi-K channels on the plasma membrane and cytosol of cells as a red signal (Fig 5A and E). Caveolins-1 and caveolins-3 expressions were observed as a green signal spread throughout the cytosol and plasma membrane of the smooth muscle cell (Fig 5B and F). Staining of maxi-K channels was overlapped with caveolin-1 and 3, as indicated by the yellow color in the cytosol and plasma membrane (Fig 5C and G). Analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a non-significant expression of maxi-K channels compared to caveolin-1 or caveolin-3 in the isolated single smooth muscle cell (Fig 5H).
Caveolae in the cellular membrane of the smooth muscle and endothelial cells of rat femoral arteries before and after MβCD treatment
TEM examination of the smooth muscle and endothelial cells showed that the caveolae appear as omega-shaped or tubular invaginations within the plasma membrane. The cells also revealed nanocontacts between the caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticulum. The sarcoplasmic reticulum was concentrated at the periphery of the cell close to the cell membrane (Fig 6A, a, B and b). When the arteries were treated with MâCD, the smooth muscle and endothelial cells showed the removal of caveolae from the plasma membrane. TEM also showed that caveolae abolishment by MâCD led to the abolition of the coupling of caveolae and the sarcoplasmic reticulum as shown in Fig 6C, c, D and d.
The current study presents the relationship of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 and caveolin-3. Also, to examine the relationship between the coupling of maxi-K channels within the caveolar domain and the sarcoplasmic reticulum in rat femoral arteries. These results were corroborated by four different methods, including HC, ICC, TEM and Western blotting.
The smooth muscle layer is the primary determinant of blood flow in the conducting arteries. In blood vessel tissue, proteins of the maxi-K channel interact with caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 in the caveolar domain, which leads to regulating cellular Ca
2+ homeostasis in conducting arteries
(Riddle et al., 2011).
Results of the IHC of the current study showed a cellular colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1 in smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells and with caveolin-3 exclusively in the smooth muscle cell layer. Additionally, ICC showed colocalization of maxi-K channels and caveolin-1 at the freshly-isolated smooth muscle cells. These results suggest that the caveolin-1 scaffolding domain peptide (DGIWKASFTTFTVTKYWFYR, amino acid residues 82-101) may interact with binding motifs, C terminates (1007YNMLCFGIY1015) in the maxi-K channels. These results confirm that the caveolin-1 scaffolding domains serve as anchor sites to maxi-K channels within caveolae and thus might regulate maxi-K channels. The results of this study agree with
(Feher et al., 2010), who showed that the maxi-K channels interact with caveolin-1 in smooth muscle and endothelial cells of frozen sections of intact gracilis artery using IHC. Moreover,
(Alioua et al., 2002), showed expression of caveolin-1 and maxi-K channels in intact aortic myocytes using IHC. Also, these results decide with
Brainard et al., (2005), who showed that the maxi-K channels interact with caveolin-1 in human myometrial smooth muscle cells (cultured cells) using ICC.
Several prior studies have reported that the expression of caveolin-3 is muscle-specific and found in cardiac and skeletal muscle, as well as smooth muscle cells
(Engelman et al., 1998). Additionally,
Kamishima et al., (2007) suggested that caveolin-3 is essential in the Ca
2+ removal of conducting artery’s smooth muscle cells. However, the role of caveolin-3 in regulating other ion channels in smooth muscle cells is still controversial. Results of IHC and ICC showed the colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-3 in the smooth muscle cells layer and at the individual smooth muscle cells. These findings suggested that caveolin-3 scaffolding-domain peptide (DGVWRVSYTTFTVSKYWCYR, amino acid residues 55-74) may interact with binding motifs at the C terminus (1007YNMLCFGIY1015) in maxi-K channels of rat femoral artery smooth muscle cells. Therefore, these results may confirm that the caveolin-3 scaffolding domains serve as anchor sites to anchor several proteins within caveolae, thus regulating many signaling molecules. These results agree with
Jiang et al. (2005), who showed colocalization of maxi-K channels with caveolin-1in bovine aortic endothelial cells (cultured cells) using ICC.
In vascular smooth muscle, the opening of the maxi-K channel inhibits the voltage-gated calcium channels, reducing Ca
2+ influx into smooth muscle cells, thus vasodilation
(Kaczorowski et al., 1996). Recent studies have focused on the ultrastructure of vascular smooth muscle cells to examine the relationship between caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticulum contacts in the smooth muscle cells
(Popescu et al., 2006). The caveolae’s proximity to the superficial sarcoplasmic reticulum, about 20 nm in smooth muscle cells, may explain the importance of sarcoplasmic reticulum to maxi-K channels in caveolar membranes.
TEM showed caveolae covering most of the plasma membrane smooth muscle cells. Also, caveolae were close to the peripheral sarcoplasmic reticulum in intact smooth muscle cells of the femoral arteries. These results agree with
Popescu et al., (2006), who stated caveolae are within a few nanometers of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle cells of the vascular artery. Moreover, these results agree with
(Gherghiceanu and Popescu, 2007).
Saliez et al. (2008) demonstrated the caveola juxtaposition of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle cells of the rat urinary bladder. In addition, This finding also agrees with other studies conducted by , who reported that the caveolae were localized in juxtaposition to the sarcoplasmic reticulum in the vascular smooth muscle cells of different arterial beds.
TEM examination of endothelial cells in intact rat femoral arteries showed caveolae covering the endothelial cells’ plasma membrane. These findings were consistent with
Razani et al. (2002). This study showed that caveolae are present in the plasma membranes of the endothelial cells of rat aorta. The results of this study agree with
Saliez et al. (2008), who demonstrated the presence of caveolae in the endothelial cells of rat mesenteric arteries. Moreover, the current study also did not observe any sarcoplasmic reticulum in the endothelial cells of the rat femoral artery. A similar result was shown by
Linder et al. (2005), who did not observe any sarcoplasmic reticulum in the endothelial cells of rat aorta.
Multiple prior studies have reported that the integrity of caveolae is essential for nitric oxide synthesis in the vascular endothelial cells of rat mesenteric arteries
(Shaul, 2002;
Cohen et al., 2004). TEM revealed the disassembling of caveolae in the plasma membranes of smooth muscle and endothelial cells following MβCD treatment. These findings aligned with studies on smooth muscle cells, where MβCD disassembled caveolae from the plasma membrane
(Dreja et al., 2002;
Bergdahl et al., 2003). Also, they reported that the disproportion of the caveolae by MβCD might lead to disproportion and/or redistribution of the caveolae in the plasma membrane, which increases the gap between the caveolae and sarcoplasmic reticulum
(Gherghiceanu and Popescu, 2007).
The Western blot results of the current study showed the expression of caveolin-1, caveolin-3, α-actin and maxi-K channels in rat femoral artery lysates. These results were partially decided by
Feher et al. (2010), who showed the expression of caveolin-1, Maxi-K channels and α-actin in the coronary arteries using Western blot. Our findings also agreed with
Sampson et al., (2004), who reported the expression of caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 in rat arterial tissues using Western blot.
The current study is essential for understanding the caveolae-sarcoplasmic reticulum relationship and its importance in regulating calcium ion concentration in smooth muscle and endothelial cells
(Shaw et al., 2006). However, these results may reveal the role of caveolae in regulating signaling pathways in smooth muscle cells and, hence, the contractility of the blood vessels, as suggested in the summary figure (Fig 7).