Upon extracting 34 grams of
L. shawii powder with 85% ethanol, the fractions obtained were as follows: 370 mg from Hex (Fraction 1), 205 mg from EtOAc (Fraction 2) and 490 mg from n-BuOH (Fraction 3), while 23 grams of bound phenol extraction yielded 220 mg for EtOAc (Fraction 4) and 940 mg for n-BuOH (Fraction 5), with 520 mg for saponin (Fraction 6).
Our findings indicated that MDA-MB-231 (IC
50: 407.3 μg/mL) and HUVECs (IC
50: 500 μg/mL) cell proliferation was inhibited only with Fraction 2. However, the extract did not exhibit activity against HepG2 and Huh-7 liver cancer cell lines. Fig 1 illustrates the cytotoxic properties of
L. shawii against these cell lines. The most potent anticancer effect of the extract was observed against MDA-MB-231 cancer cells. Fraction 2 induced notable morphological alterations in MDA-MB-231 cells, characterized by cytoplasmic shrinkage, contraction and detachment, leading to the complete loss of cellular integrity. In contrast, untreated cells displayed normal cellular morphologies (Fig 2 A and b). Similar results were observed in a previous study documenting that costunolide (IC
50: 32) and aloe emodin (IC
50 38 µM) isolated from
L. shawii stem extract exhibited substantial apoptotic potential against oral squamous cell carcinoma OSCC cells. Notable cellular morphological alterations and gene and protein expression (BAK, caspase 3, 6 and 9) indicated the presence of apoptosis in treated cells.
In cancer, the invasion and migration of cells are pivotal factors contributing to recurrence and metastasis. Effectively inhibiting cell migration is essential for successful cancer therapy, as metastasis significantly impacts survival rates, reducing them to approximately 50% (
Irani, 2016). As illustrated in Fig 3A and 3B, fraction 2 significantly hindered the time-dependent migration of MDA-MB-231 cells. In the absence of treatment, the cells exhibited wound closure, reaching up to 93.8% and 96.6% at 24 and 48 hours, respectively. The scratch closures at IC
50 doses were smaller, measuring up to 17.2% at 24 hours and 35.8% at 48 h, reflecting the potential of the extract in reducing cell migration. Several in vitro studies have provided evidence that phytochemical compounds derived from
L. shawii can impede the invasion and migration of various cell lines
(Choi et al., 2013; Xiao and Guo, 2009;
Shams et al., 2023).
To assess the impact of oxidative stress on the cytotoxicity of fraction 2, cell lines were exposed to its IC
50 concentration determined through cytotoxicity assays. Fraction 2 significantly elevated cellular ROS levels in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to the 0.01% MeOH-treated cells (control) (Fig 2 C and D).
Docking is essential for systematically exploring large chemical libraries and it remains a key tool in rational drug design and drug repurposing strategies
(Friesner et al., 2004) (Huang and Zou, 2007). The GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of fifty-one compounds within fraction 2 of
L. shawii (Table 1). Out of fifty-one phytoconstituents, it was observed that stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3α,24S) and lup-20(29)-ene-3,28-diol, (3α), exhibited the most favourable interactions with 6CHZ, featuring binding energies of -10.0 and -9.9 kcal/mol, respectively (Table 1). Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3α,24S)-showed 15 hydrophobic interactions with Leu 346 (3x), Ala 350, Leu 384, Leu 387, Met 421, GLU 423, 424 ILE (3x), LYS 520, HIS 524 and LEU 525 (Table 1). The 2D and 3D interactions are shown in Fig 4 A and B. Similarly, the best-docked secondary metabolite with BCL-2 was LUP-20(29)-ENE-3,28-DIOL (-9.5 kcal/mol). In the binding site of BCL-2 lup-20(29)-ene-3,28-diol, (3α), interacted through 8 hydrophobic interactions with the following residues: 127A PHE (2x), 131A VAL, 132A GLU, 173A TRP, 176A GLU and 177A TYR (2x) The 2D and 3D interactions are shown in Fig 4 B.
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3α,24S)- and Lup-20(29)-ene-3,28-diol, (3α)- interact with 6CHZ, presenting a binding energy of -10.0 and -9.9 kcal/mol respectively. Notably, their binding affinity was equal to or greater than the control compounds (-9.9 kcal/mol). ER-α is associated with both hormone-dependent and hormone-independent tumours. This dual role of ER-α is notable, as it has been reported to play a part in both cancer suppression and cancer progression
(Liu et al., 2020). Given that 60-70% of breast cancers in women are ER-α positive, the current therapy primarily relies on tamoxifen, which helps control ER-α-induced breast cancer progression. However, the prolonged use of tamoxifen may lead to resistance in breast cancer patients. Consequently, there is a pressing need to explore novel natural drugs and understand ER-α signalling to enhance breast cancer therapy
(Xue et al., 2019).
The capacity to avoid apoptosis is a critical characteristic of cancer cells. Therefore, they frequently disrupt the apoptotic pathway to ensure the tumour cells survival by upregulating the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins within the Bcl-2 family. These proteins include Bcl2-A1, Mcl-1, Bcl-2, Bcl-w and Bcl-xL
(Williams et al., 2019). In various cancer types, the elevated levels of anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Mcl-1, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, have been established to not only confer resistance to chemotherapy but also promote tumour initiation and progression through the microRNAs regulation and transcription factors
(Valentini et al., 2022; Choi et al., 2016). The VINA scoring function predicted the ability of lup-20(29)-ene-3,28-diol, (3α) and stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, acetate, (3α), to bind to Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 with similar affinities and more effectively than BCL-W.
Various studies have proved that Stigmast-5-en-3-ol can induce apoptotic cancer cell death, including MCF-7 (BC), U937 and HL-60 leukemia cell lines with IC
50 values of 45.17, 37.82 and 8.294 μg/ml, respectively
(Fernando et al., 2018; Moon et al., 2008). Similarly, it has been documented that the apoptotic effects induced by Stigmast-5-en-3-ol are linked to an elevation in Bax, Caspase-9, PARP cleavage and p53, while concurrently reducing Bcl-xl levels
(Fernando et al., 2018). Likewise, Lup-20(29)-ene-3β,11β-diol displayed cytotoxic potential against HeLa cell lines (IC
50: 28.5 μM)
(Nguyen et al., 2017).