Indian Journal of Animal Research
Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)
Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)
Molecular Characterization of the Presence of Bovine Papillomavirus in Cattle Teat Warts and a Different Treatment Approach
Submitted26-12-2023|
Accepted28-06-2024|
First Online 22-07-2024|
Background: Papillomatosis is a skin condition that is distinguished by benign proliferative tumors with a complicated etiology and epithelial proliferation. There is a need to perform a more thorough study on bovine papillomavirus and identify the virological properties of the agent in detail since a definitive treatment approach against this infection has not yet been completely identified and the suggested treatment outcomes differ.
Methods: Samples were collected from warts developing on the teats of 500 cattle raised for milk production in Burdur Center and its districts. The samples were defrosted in order to extract DNA and the Dneasy Blood and Tissue Kit was used for the extraction procedure. By using a PCR assay, wart sample extracts were examined for 13 different BPV types (excluding BPV Type 7). For BPV type-specific primers, a protocol was utilized. Amplification products were demonstrated using agarose gel electrophoresis.
Result: In the PCR test of 500 wart samples, BPV types (type 1-type 13) were detected in 378 (75.6%). In the general distribution of BPV types (single or mixed types) in teat warts, BPV-2 (n=85; 22.49%), BPV-8 (n=45; 11.90%), BPV-9 (n=48; 12.70%) and BPV-10 (n=52; 13.76%) were determined to be more common. In the study; it was determined that three different combined treatments provided 100% regression or complete recovery in warts developing on the teat of cattle. In conclusion; one of these three treatment combinations may be preferred for teat wart lesions in cattle.
Anthropogenic activities, changes in farming systems and environmental changes all contribute to the development, reemergence and geographical spread of infectious illnesses (Kumar et al., 2023). Among many diseases that cause loss of productivity in meat and dairy farming, papillomatosis cases have an important place. Papillomatosis is a disease characterized by epithelial proliferation in the skin and benign proliferative tumors with a complex pathogenesis and etiology. Papillomas are benign tumors, but sometimes they can transform into malignant epithelial tumors and cause significant disorders (Araldi et al., 2017). Bovine papillomavirus (BPV); Mastitis reduces milk output and quality, which results in significant financial losses for milk producers (Safak et al., 2023). Mastitis causes economic losses due to decreased milk yield, blunting of the teats, inability of the teats to enter the milking machines due to deformities and inability to milk due to pain (Atasever et al., 2005, Yıldırım et al., 2022; Özmen and Kale, 2023).
In research, BPV has been detected in blood as well as in papilloma tissues. It has also been stated that it can be transmitted through milk, urine, semen and uterine lavages and vertical transmission has been observed. The presence of viral genomes was also found in the offspring’s waste and blood (Bocaneti et al., 2016; Lindsey et al., 2009). BPV can be transmitted from animal to animal through direct skin contact; Contaminated feed and materials, milking machines, ear tagging, procedures, castration devices, tuberculin injections, heredity, malnutrition, hormonal imbalance and mutation and arthropod vectors also indirectly play an important factor in the spread of the disease (Atasever et al., 2005). In addition to negatively affecting animal health, BPV has also been reported in recent years to show that it can be transmitted from animals to humans due to its zoonotic nature (Gallina et al., 2020). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the diagnosis of BPV infection is the most widely used method for detecting viral DNA in blood and tissue samples taken from BPV-infected animals (Ataseven et al., 2016; Tomita et al., 2008; Wobeser et al., 2012). Therefore, the conventional PCR method is preferred (Guo et al., 2012; Melo et al., 2014). Since no definitive treatment method has been defined against BPV infections, different treatment methods are applied for BPV infections.All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.