Chemical composition of yak milk
Table 1 showed that there were significant seasonal effects on the chemical composition of yak milk. Especially, there are significant differences in the protein content of yak milk in different seasons. In addition, from Table 1, we could also find that fat was the most volatile index of all indicators. There were great differences between individuals in green grass period (summer) and grass withered period (winter and spring). The highest value in summer and spring was nearly three times the lowest value and the highest value in winter was twice the lowest value. It is well documented that the chemical composition of yak milk is affected by altitudes and parities
(Bin et al., 2011; Zuo-Lin et al., 2011;
Peng et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2009). However, there are few data on the chemical composition of yak milk in different seasons in the same area. In the present study, we observed that changes in the grass composition of pasture according to the seasons led to changes in the chemical composition of their milk, especially fats (higher in winter) and proteins (lower in winter and spring).
Ding et al., (2013) found that fat content of yak milk in winter is higher than that in summer and spring, this result is consistent with ours. The reason that he proposed for this was that yaks increase their fibre intake in winter, resulting in high concentrations of acetate in the ruminal fluid, which is the main substrate for synthesising milk fat. And another possible reason is that during winter (early stages of grass withered period), yaks have a large reserve of fat that can be mobilized for milk secretionis. However, our study has opposite results with
Ding et al., (2013) concerning the content of protein, our study showed that protein content in winter samples were lower than that in the summer samples. On the other hand, in our study the content of protein of Qinghai yak milk in the same season was higher than that in the Guo’s report (5.63 vs 4.79 g/100 g, respectively) (
Xian et al., 2015).
Concentrations of vitamin A and calcium
Fat soluble vitamin A (VA) and calcium content in different seasons were listed in Fig 1, respectively. ANOVA analysis showed that the content of vitamin A was significantly lower in winter than that in summer and spring (52.7 vs 72.7 μg/100 g, 52.7 vs 75.7 μg/100 g respectively ), but the content of calcium was no significant difference in yak milk in different seasons. Moreover, for the vitamin A content, there was a great difference between yak individuals in summer and spring (with larger standard deviations). Studies on fat-soluble vitamins of yak milk are rare, but there are many research achievements on calcium content in yak milk and the reported values of yak milk was higher than holstein cows (about 106 mg/100 g) (
McSweeney and Fox ,2009). The present study found a higher VA content compared to those in previous studies, it is about 1.63 times (summer and spring yak milk) and 1.18 times (winter yak milk) than that of white yak milk in Gansu (44.5 μg/100 g)
(Hai-Jun et al., 2007) and it is about 2.10 times (summer and spring yak milk) and 1.52 times (winter yak milk) than holstein cows (34.7 μg/100 g, data came from brightdairy unpublished laboratory data). The present study also found that the VA content related to different seasons, this might be due to the low vitamin A precursor (β-carotene) in grass in winter
(Lindqvist et al., 2012), which affected the synthesis of vitamin A in yaks.
Fatty acid composition
The AOAC method allowed for sensitive analysis of 44 fatty acids by gas chromatography, the results were shown in Table 2. The main fatty acids in yak milk were C
6:0, C
10:0, C
14:0, C
16:0, C
18:0, cis-9 C
16:1, cis-9 C
18:1 and trans-9 C
18:1. This result was similar to that in the literature
(Peng et al., 2008; Ding et al., 2013; Xian et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2011; Feng, Hua and Peilei, 2006). For saturated fatty acids (SFA), more than 80% of the total SFA were composed of C
14:0 (myristic acid), C
16:0 (palmitic acid) and C
18:0 (stearic acid). For monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), cis-9 C
18:1 (oleic acid), accounted for 70.6%, 82.9% and 80.5% of total MUFA in summer, winter and spring yak milk, respectively. For polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), cis-9,12 C
18:2 n-6 (linoleic acid, LA), cis-9,12,15 C
18:3 n-3 (linolenic acid, ALA), trans-9,12 C
18:2 n-6 ( trans linoleic acid, TLA) were the highest content PUFA, the content of LA and ALA accounts for more than 75% of the PUFA. This value was similar to that found in the yak milk
(Li et al., 2017) and Tibet yak butter (
Feng andPeilei, 2006) from Sichuan and it was higher than that yak milk and holstein milk from Gansu
(Yu-jiao et al., 2013). For main fatty acids of yak milk, the contents of C
6:0, C
12:0, C
14:0, C
16:0, C
17:0, C
18:0, cis-9 C
16:1, cis-9 C
18:1 and LA in yak milk were significant higher in winter than in summer and spring and the main trans fatty acids (trans-9 C
18:1 and trans-9, 12 C
18:2 n-6) of yak milk were significantly lower in winter than in summer. As for trans fatty acids, the types reported in this paper are slightly different from those reported by Ding
(Ding et al., 2013) and Liu
(Liu et al., 2011), but the content change of trans fatty acids in different seasons are the same.
The short- and medium-chain fatty acids (C
4-C
16) can be synthesised de novo
e.g. from carbohydrates in the rumen and the metabolism of the animals, but the long-chain fatty acids (C
18-C
24), such as cis-9 C
18:1, trans-9 C
18:1, cis-9, 12 C
18:2 n-6 (LA) and trans-9,12 C
18:2 n-6 cannot be synthesized in vivo, mainly derived from the diet (
Or-Rashid et al., 2008). The present study showed that the main long-chain fatty acids cis-9 C
18:1 and LA were higher in winter than in summer and spring and the main long-chain fatty acids trans-9 C
18:1 and trans-9,12 C
18:2 n-6 were lower in winter and spring than in summer. The result of cis-9 C
18:1 is consistent with that of Ding
(Ding et al., 2013) and contrary to that of Liu
(Liu et al., 2011) and for LA in this paper is contrary to that of Ding and Liu. And, conflicting results may be due to other factors, breed, feeding, natural grass and altitude gradient. Our data also showed the content of LA was higher in the winter yak milk than that in the summer and spring yak milk. The total content of n-6 series PUFAs in yak milk significantly decreased (p<0.05) with seasonal changes (summer-winter-spring), while the content of n-3 series PUFAs in summer yak milk and winter yak milk showed no significant difference, but both were significantly higher than in spring. When we further analyzed the n-6 series PUFAs, we found that the reason for the great difference of n-6 series fatty acids was that the trans-9,12 C
18:2 n-6 content in summer milk samples was significantly higher than that in winter and spring milk samples and its average value was more than twice that in winter more than triple that in spring.
In the total SFA of yak milk in different seasons, the SFA of winter samples was significantly higher than that of summer and spring samples (p<0.05). The MUFA and PUFA levels in yak milk showed no significant difference between summer and winter samples, but both were significantly higher than those in spring samples. In addition, the n-6 PUFA in PUFA showed significant differences between different seasons. The main groups of SFA, MUFA and PUFA clearly varied with seasons(p<0.05) (Table 2). For this seasonal variation in SFA, MUFA and PUFA, it may be due to different diets in different seasons (summer diet contained fresh grass, while winter and spring diet did not contain fresh grass)
(Liu et al., 2011); another possible reason is the mobilization of the yak’s body reserved fat at this time in winter
(Ding et al., 2013).