Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 58 issue 8 (august 2024) : 1370-1376

Effects of the Combined Odor Reducing Additive on Fecal Fermentation Characteristics and Growth Performance in Hanwoo Steers 

K.H. Kim1,2, B.K. Park1,*
1Department of Animal Science, Kangwon National University, Chunchoen 24341, Korea.
2Busanbio, Nonghyup Feed Co., LTD, Busan 48475, Korea.
Cite article:- Kim K.H., Park B.K. (2024). Effects of the Combined Odor Reducing Additive on Fecal Fermentation Characteristics and Growth Performance in Hanwoo Steers . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58(8): 1370-1376. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1653.

Background: Odors from livestock facilities are mainly caused by livestock manure. This causes deterioration of the health of the farm workers and the productivity of livestock. Complex additives with different actions are required to effectively reduce fecal contaminants. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of combined odor reducing additive (CORA) supplementation on the odor emission of feces and the growth performance of Hanwoo steers.

Methods: Ninety-six Hanwoo steers were randomly assigned to the following four groups: control group fed with CORA-unsupplemented formula feed; T0.05 group fed with 0.05% CORA-supplemented formula feed; T0.1 group fed with 0.1% CORA-supplemented formula feed and T0.2 group fed with 0.2% CORA-supplemented formula feed. The CORA comprised 88% zeolite, 3% Bacillus licheniformis, 3% Bacillus polyfermenticus and 6% saponin.

Result: The fecal NH3-N gas emission was significantly lower in the T0.2 group than in the control group (P<0.05). The fecal H2S gas emission at 20 d of incubation was lower in the T0.2 group than in the control group (P<0.05). The fecal NH3-N concentration was lower in proportion in all the groups with different supplementation levels of CORA than in the control group after 7 d of incubation (P<0.05). The number of fungi in feces was lower in the treatment groups than in the control group and the lowest was for T0.2 group (P<0.05). The results of this study indicated that CORA supplementation can reduce the emission of harmful gases (NH3-N and H2S) and odor-causing substances in feces and inhibit mold growth. 

The industrialization and the large-scale local congestion of livestock farms not only generate a large amount of odor derived from manure but also pose a social problem. Bad odors from livestock facilities are mainly caused by livestock manure and this causes deterioration of the health of the farm workers and the productivity of livestock (Donham et al., 2000).
       
In general, the odor of livestock manure is affected by various factors, such as feed ingredients, livestock conditions, excretion amounts, treatment conditions and environmental factors (Le et al., 2005). Most of the substances that results in odor in livestock manure are derived from the decomposition of specific components contained in the excrement, rather than the time of excretion. In particular, carbohydrates and proteins in the feed are known to be precursors to odorous substances. The odor is caused by incomplete anaerobic fermentation by microorganisms (Mackie et al., 1998). Odor-causing substances in livestock manure include volatile fatty acids (VFAs), alcohols, aromatic substances, amides, ammonia and sulfides (Hartung and Phillips, 1994; Zahn et al., 2001).
       
Bio-scrubbers, bio-filters and feed additives have been studied as methods for removing odor from livestock feces (Pagans et al., 2007). Among them, supplementation with microorganisms have been reported to improve the livestock environment by reducing nitrogen excretion and ammonia gas emission by inhibiting the growth of harmful microorganisms as they settle in the intestines of animals and help the digestion and absorption of feed (Colina et al., 2001). In addition, it has been reported that clay minerals such as zeolite are composed of fine porous matter. Therefore, they are capable of adsorbing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide because of their excellent physical adsorption and chemical cation substitution (Venglovsky et al., 2005).
               
Complex additives with different actions are required to effectively reduce fecal contaminants. However, most of them have used a single additive. In addition, various studies have been conducted on pigs and chickens concerning odor reduction, but relatively few studies have been conducted on cattle. Thus, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of supplementation of zeolite and microorganisms (Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus polyfermenticus) on the odor emission of feces and the growth performance of Hanwoo steers.
Ethics statement
 
All procedures on animals were carried out in compliance with South Korea regulations (Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency· Ministry of Food and Drug Safety Joint Animal Testing and/or Laboratory Animal Related Committee (IACUC; 2020) Standard Operating Guidelines).
 
Study area
 
The study was conducted in the Livestock Research Center, Nonghyup Co., Ltd. during August 2020 to September 2021.
 
Animals, treatments and management
 
The study was performed using 48 (398.1±34.5 kg; aged 18 months) early fattening and 48 (642.5±52.5 kg; aged 29 months) late fattening Hanwoo steers. Hanwoo steers (n=96) were randomly assigned to the following four groups: control group fed with combined odor-reducing additive (CORA)-unsupplemented formula feed; T0.05 group fed with 0.05% CORA-supplemented formula feed; T0.1 group fed with 0.1% CORA-supplemented formula feed; and T0.2 group fed with 0.2% CORA-supplemented formula feed. The CORA comprises 88% zeolite (73.96% SiO2, 15.24% Al2O3, 0.66% Fe2O3, 0.46% CaO, 4.78% Na2O, 4.67% K2O and 0.01% MgO), 3% Bacillus licheniformis (3.0x108 cfu/g), 3% Bacillus polyfermenticus (3.0x108 cfu/g) and 6% saponin.
       
The steers were housed in 16 pens (5 x 10 m), where the floor was covered with 20 cm of sawdust. The formula feed was provided twice daily (08:00 and 17:00) using an automatic feeding system (SEOCHANG 65M/M, Seochang Co. Ltd., Cheonan, Korea). Steers had free access to rice straw, water and mineral blocks. Other feeding management procedures were conducted as per the practices of the experimental farm. The ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets are listed in Table 1.   
 

Table 1: Ingredients and chemical compositions of experimental diets.


 
Gas emission and fermentation characteristics
 
To evaluate the change in the characteristics of feces through in vitro incubation based on the supplementation with CORA, feces collected from the early fattening Hanwoo steers in the control group were used. Feces collected from the pen and CORA (0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2%) were sufficiently mixed for each treatment group. The feces mixed with CORA were transferred to a gas collection container at 600 g in three repetitions for each treatment group.
       
After incubating the feces in an incubator at 30°C for 10 and 20 d, gas was collected in a gas collection container, using a gas measuring glass syringe and transferred to a gas collection bag. Next, it was diluted 100 times using the same mixed gas (78% nitrogen and 22% oxygen), as the atmospheric gas standard. NH3-N and H2S concentrations were measured using a gas meter (Gas Alert Micro 5, BW Technologies, Honeywell, Mexico).
       
The pH was measured using a pH meter (Thermo Sci, Korea) by mixing 4 g of incubated feces with 16 mL of distilled water (Miller and Varel 2001). NH3-N concentration was determined using the method described by Chaney and Marbach (1962) and VFAs concentration was measured using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A, Agilent Technology, CA, USA).  
        
Evaluation of the fecal properties
 
The in vitro ruminal pH was measured using a pH meter (Corning Glass Works, Medfield, MA, USA) in a 160 mL bottle for each incubation time. The ammonia concentration was calculated according to the method of Chany and Marbach (1962). VFAs concentrations was measured via gas chromatography (Shimadzu-17A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
 
Growth performance
 
Body weight (BW) was measured at the beginning and end of the experimental period. Average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was also calculated.
 
Statistical analysis
 
All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)/Windows 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The means of different groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.
Gas emission and fermentation properties of feces during in vitro incubation
 
The fecal NH3-N gas emission showed a linearly decreasing tendency as the supplementation level of CORA increased at 10 d of in vitro incubation and was significantly lower in the T0.2 group than in the control group (P<0.05). The fecal H2S gas emission at 10 d of incubation was lower in the T0.1 and T0.2 groups than in the control group (P<0.05). The fecal H2S gas emission at 20 d of incubation was lower in the T0.2 group than in the control group (P<0.05, Table 2).
 

Table 2: Effects of the CORA supplementation levels on concentrations of fecal NH3-N and H2S gases during in vitro incubation.


       
The fecal pH and NH3-N concentration at 10 d of incubation were not affected by CORA levels. The fecal acetate concentration showed a linearly decreasing tendency as the supplementation level of CORA increased and was particularly effective in T0.1 and T0.2 groups (P<0.05). There was no difference between treatment groups in the fecal propionate, isobutyrate and butyrate concentrations (Table 3).
 

Table 3: Effects of the CORA supplementation levels on fecal pH, NH3-N and VFAs concentrations during in vitro incubations.


 
Gas emission and fermentation properties of feces
 
The fecal NH3-N gas emission was lower in proportion to the supplementation level of CORA in all treatment groups than in the control group at 7 d of incubation  (P<0.05). The fecal H2S gas emission occurred from the 7 d of incubation, but there was no difference between the treatment groups (Table 4).
 

Table 4: Effects of the CORA supplementation levels on concentrations of fecal NH3-N and H2S gases in Hanwoo steers.


       
In early fattening Hanwoo steers, fecal acetate and isobutyrate concentrations were lower in T0.1 and T0.2 groups than in control and T0.05 groups (P<0.05). In late fattening Hanwoo steers, NH3-N, acetate and propionate concentrations in feces were lower in the treatment groups than in the control group and the reduction effect increased as the level of supplementation increased (P<0.05). However pH and isobutyrate concentration was not different (Table 5).
 

Table 5: Effects of the CORA supplementation levels on concentrations of fecal fermentation parameters in Hanwoo steers.


 
Chemical compositions and microbial properties of feces
 
The supplementation levels of CORA did not have any effect on the moisture, nitrogen and crude ash contents in early and late fattening Hanwoo steers. Furthermore, there was no difference in compost maturity between the treatment groups (Table 6).
 

Table 6: Effects of the CORA supplementation levels on fecal compositions in Hanwoo steers.


       
In both early and late fattening Hanwoo steers, the numbers of Bacillus, Coli form, lactic acid bacteria and yeast in feces were not affected by CORA, but the number of fungi was lower in the treatment groups than in the control group and the lowest in T0.20 (P<0.05, Table 7).
 

Table 7: Effects of the CORA supplementation levels on fecal microbial compositions in Hanwoo steers.


 
Growth performance
 
In early fattening Hanwoo steers, the ADG was significantly higher in the treatment groups than in the control group. CORA did not affect DMI. Supplementation with CORA did not affect ADG and DMI in late fattening Hanwoo steers (Table 8).
       

Table 8: Effects of the CORA supplementation levels on growth performance in Hanwoo steers.


 
The results of this study showed that CORA (zeolite and probiotics) can effectively reduce the amount of odor-causing pollutants. This is because the concentration of odorous substances in feces tended to decrease in a dose-dependent manner in CORA. These results suggest that CORA may have a direct effect on the source of odor through two different mechanisms of action or may effectively remove the generated odor substance.
       
Clay minerals included in silicates have a high ion-exchange capacity, so they can adsorb harmful gases and toxic substances (Volzone, 2007). In particular, the aluminosilicate type is a clay mineral with a three- dimensional crystal structure, large surface area, excellent thermal/hydrothermal stability and has been used as an important adsorbent owing to its high ion exchange capacity (Lopes et al., 2014). Zeolite is a representative aluminosilicate hydrated with alkali and has high cation exchange, water retention and adsorption capacities (Mumpton, 1999). Lefcourt and Meisinger (2001) reported that the supplementation of dairy sludge with 6.25% zeolite adsorbed ammonium lowered the dissolved ammonia gas, reducing ammonia emissions by approximately 50%. Islam et al., (2014) also reported that ammonia, sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide gas in fecal were reduced by artificial zeolite supplementation.
       
Bacillus genus is the most beneficial microorganism, has an excellent production capacity for α-amylase and protease and can suppress harmful microorganisms by generating antibacterial substances (Ushida et al., 2003). It has been reported that microbial supplementation changes the intestinal microbial balance and produces lactic acid and antibiotics to reduce odor-causing gas due to the inhibition of the growth of harmful microorganisms (Smith and Jones, 1963). Similar to previous studies, in this study, the emissions of fecal ammonia and hydrogen sulfide gas decreased in proportion to the CORA supplementation level. This is considered to be due to the zeolite adsorption capacity. Moreover, microorganisms decreased the fecal NH4+ and affected harmful microorganisms in feces. In particular, direct feeding of Bacillus spp. to livestock is considered more effective in reducing ammonia gas by reducing fecal ammonia concentration. The results of this study are supported by previous studies (Chen et al., 2006) In some studies, it has been reported that supplementation with Bacillus spp. reduced ammonia production by improving the nitrogen availability of feed (Payling et al., 2017) and reducing fecal pH (Durand et al., 2015); however, no difference in fecal pH and nitrogen concentration was found in this study. Similarly, Wang et al., (2009) reported that 0.2% feeding of a mixture of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, aluminum silicate and whey powder did not affect dry matter and nitrogen digestibility in pigs but reduced ammonia emissions from sludge. Therefore, 0.2% supplementation with a mixture of zeolite and microorganisms can reduce harmful gas emissions by increasing adsorption capacity and reducing fecal NH4 concentration.
       
VFAs generated in barns is an important factor in evaluating odors and has been reported to cause odors (Miller and Varel, 2002). VFA are substances that stimulate the sense of smell even at very low concentrations. Pathogenic microorganisms (Bacteroides, Propionibacterium,  Clostridium, etc.) decompose amino acids to produce acetic, butyric, propionic and isobutyric acids (Davila et al., 2013). In this study, CORA supplementation effectively reduced acetic acid and although there was a difference according to the supplementation level, it also reduced the concentrations of isobutyric, butyric and propionic acids. These results may have been influenced by the antibacterial effects of Bacillus polyfermenticus and Bacillus licheniformis. Bacillus licheniformis produces various types of surfactants and antibiotics (Grangemard et al., 2001). In this study, the number of fungi was significantly reduced in the feces of the CORA-supplemented groups, which is thought to be due to the decreased amount of acetic acid produced because CORA affected fiber decomposition. In addition, it is presumed that the antibacterial effect of Bacillus polyfermenticus and Bacillus licheniformis reduced VFAs concentration by inhibiting the growth of microorganisms.
               
Supplementation with clay minerals can improve the growth performance of calves and cattle and can have a positive effect on rumen health and fermentation by improving trace mineral supply and buffering capacity (Humer et al., 2019). In addition, Bacillus spp. can improve feed availability by producing carbohydrates and proteolytic enzymes. However, in this study, CORA supplementation did not affect the growth performance of early and late fattening Hanwoo steers. Although it cannot be concluded, these results may be due to the limited feeding of formula feed and the supplementation levels of CORA. Chesson (1994) reported that differences in growth performance may occur depending on several factors, including the age of the livestock, supplementation level, type of feed and interaction with other feed additives. Therefore, high-dose and long-term studies are needed to improve the growth performance of livestock as well as odor reduction.
In this study, CORA, composed of zeolite and microorganisms (Bacillus polyfermenticus and Bacillus licheniformis), reduced the emission of harmful gases (ammonia and hydrogen sulfide), odor-causing substances in feces and inhibited fungal growth. In addition, the treatment effect was proportional to the CORA supplementation level. Therefore, CORA is considered to have a high potential for use as an environmental improvement additive, which can effectively adsorb harmful gases from cattle feces and reduce the production of pollutants and odorous substances.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Chaney, A.L., Marbach, E.P. (1962). Modified reagents for determination  of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry. 8: 130-132. 

  2. Chen, Y.J., Min, B.J., Cho, J.H., Kwon, O.S., Son, K.S., Kim, H.J., Kim, I.H. (2006). Effects of dietary Bacillus-based probiotic  on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content in finishing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 19: 587-592.

  3. Chesson, P. (1994). Multispecies competition in variable environments.  Theoretical Population Biology. 45: 227-276. 

  4. Colina, J.J., Lewis, A.J., Miller, P.S., Fischer, R.L. (2001). Dietary manipulation to reduce aerial ammonia concentrations in nursery pig facilities. Journal of Animal Science. 79: 3096-3103.

  5. Davila, A.M., Blachier, F., Gotteland, M. andriamihaja, M., Benetti, P.H., Sanz, Y., Tomé, D. (2013). Re-print of Intestinal luminal nitrogen metabolism: Role of the gut microbiota and consequences for the host. Pharmacological Research.  69: 114-126.

  6. Donham, K.J., Cumro, D., Reynolds, S.J., Merchant, J.A. (2000). Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: recommendations for exposure  limits. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.  43: 260-269.

  7. Durand, L., Planchon, S., Guinebretiere, M.H., Carlin, F., Remize, F. (2015). Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of foodborne Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Food Microbiology.  45: 103-110.

  8. Grangemard, I., Wallach, J., Maget-Dana, R., Peypoux, F. (2001). Lichenysin: A more efficient cation chelator than surfactin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 90: 199-210.

  9. Hartung, J. and Phillips, V.R. (1994). Control of gaseous emissions from livestock buildings and manure stores. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 57: 173-189.

  10. Humer, E., Kröger, I., Neubauer, V., Reisinger, N., Zebeli, Q. (2019). Supplementation of a clay mineral-based product modulates  plasma metabolomic profile and liver enzymes in cattle fed grain-rich diets. Animal. 13: 1214-1223.

  11. Islam, M.M., Ahmed, S.T., Kim, S.G., Mun, H.S., Yang, C.J. (2014). Dietary effect of artificial zeolite on performance, immunity, faecal microflora concentration and noxious gas emissions in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 13: 3404.

  12. IACUC, (2020). Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) Standard Operating Guidelines. ISSN 11-1543061-000457-01. Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency. Korea.

  13. Le, P.D., Aarnink, A.J.A., Ogink, N.W., Verstegen, M.W.A. (2005). Effects of environmental factors on odor emission from pig manure. Transactions of the ASAE. 48: 757-765.

  14. Lefcourt, A.M. and Eisinger, J.J. (2001). Effect of adding alum or zeolite to dairy slurry on ammonia volatilization and chemical composition. Journal of Dairy Science. 84: 1814-1821.

  15. Lopes, A.C., Martins, P., Lanceros-Mendez, S. (2014). Aluminosilicate  and aluminosilicate based polymer composites: Present status, applications and future trends. Progress in Surface  Science. 89: 239-277.

  16. Mackie, R.I., Stroot, P.G., Varel, V.H. (1998). Biochemical identification  and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste. Journal of Animal Science. 76: 1331-1342.

  17. Miller, D.N. and Vare, V.H. (2001). In vitro study of the biochemical origin and production limits of odorous compounds in cattle feedlots. Journal of Animal Science. 79: 2949-2956.

  18. Miller, D.N. and Varel, V.H. (2002). An in vitro study of manure composition on the biochemical origins, composition and accumulation of odorous compounds in cattle feedlots. Journal of Animal Science. 80: 2214-2222. 

  19. Mumpton, F.A. (1999). La roca magica: Uses of natural zeolites in agriculture and industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 96: 3463-3470.

  20. Pagans, E., Font, X., Sánchez, A. (2007). Coupling composting and biofiltration for ammonia and volatile organic compound  removal. Biosystems Engineering. 97: 491-500.

  21. Payling, L., Kim, I.H., Walsh, M.C., Kiarie, E. (2017). Effects of a multi-strain Bacillus spp. direct-fed microbial and a protease enzyme on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, fecal microbiota and noxious gas emissions of grower pigs fed corn-soybean- meal-based diets-a meta-analysis. Journal of Animal Science. 95: 4018-4029.

  22. Smith, H.W. and Jones, J.E.T. (1963). Observations on the alimentary  tract and its bacterial flora in healthy and diseased pigs. The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology. 86: 387-412.

  23. Ushida, K., Hashizume, K., Miyazaki, K., Kojima, Y., Takakuwa, S. (2003). Isolation of Bacillus sp. as a volatile sulfur-degrading  bacterium and its application to reduce the fecal odor of pig. Asian-australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 16: 1795-1798.

  24. Venglovsky, J., Sasakova, N., Vargova, M., Pacajova, Z., Placha, I., Petrovsky, M., Harichova, D. (2005). Evolution of temperature and chemical parameters during composting of the pig slurry solid fraction amended with natural zeolite. Bioresource Technology. 96: 181-189.

  25. Volzone, C. (2007). Retention of pollutant gases: Comparison between clay minerals and their modified products. Applied Clay Science. 36: 191-196.

  26. Wang, Y., Cho, J.H., Chen, Y.J., Yoo, J.S., Huang, Y., Kim, H.J., Kim, I.H. (2009). The effect of probiotic BioPlus 2B ® on growth performance, dry matter and nitrogen digestibility and slurry noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Livestock  Science. 120: 35-42.

  27. Zahn, J.A., DiSpirito, A.A., Do, Y.S., Brooks, B.E., Cooper, E.E., Hatfield, J.L. (2001). Correlation of human olfactory responses to airborne concentrations of malodorous volatile organic compounds emitted from swine effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality. 30: 624-634.

Editorial Board

View all (0)