Study design
A total of eight clinical cases of adult dogs (2-3 years old) of either gender, were randomly selected for this study. These cases included dogs with deep appendicular wounds with massive skin damage, received at walk in clinic of Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan. Prior to inclusion in this study written consent was acquired from the owners of each dog.
Selected dogs were evaluated for suitability for grating based surgical procedure. Dogs selected of study were admitted in kennels for post-operative management.
Ad Libitum supply of water along with the commercial feed twice daily was provided.
Grouping of dogs
For this clinical study the selected dogs were divided into two groups
i.e. A and B, 4 clinical cases in each group. In group A and B, autologous and homologous PRP, respectively, was used as skin graft healing promoter during surgery, respectively. Reconstructive surgery using autologous full thickness skin grafts was performed on all dogs of the study.
Platelet rich plasma (PRP) preparation
30 mL of blood was drawn from jugular vein of each dog and shifted to vacutainer containing citrate phosphate dextrose. Each blood sample was subjected to double centrifugation. First centrifugation was carried out at 2400 rpm for 10 minutes
(Tözüm and Demiralp 2003). Centrifugation separated the whole blood into three different fractions
i.e. red blood cells (inferior layer) white blood cells and platelets (buffy coat) and platelet-poor plasma (superior layer). Under aseptic conditions the first supernatant plasma fraction (50%), adjacent to the buffy coat, was obtained. This fraction was spun again for centrifugation at 3200 rpm for another 15 minutes in order to obtain two layers i.e. the upper layer was platelet poor plasma PPP and the lower layer was the PRP (25%)
AL-Bayati et al. (2013).
Pre-operative preparation
Only those dogs were surgically dealt which had fresh wounds whereas, those having contaminated wounds or wounds >8 hrs were dealt as open wounds until a fresh wound appearance was observed. The wound debridement was performed on daily basis initially using chlorhexidine solution followed by daily cleaning with luke warm normal saline solution and dressing of wound with simple wound dressing. The healing period varied from 3-7 days depending upon the type and severity of wound in different cases. Prior to the surgery all dogs were kept off feed for 08 hours and a complete clinical examination along with complete blood count was performed on each dog to rule out anaemia which can alter the results by directly affecting wound healing
(Slatter 2003; Fossum 2019). Before the surgical procedure, cephalic vein of each dog was catheterized with 22-24 gauge canula (B. Braun, Lahore, Pakistan)
(Weidema 1985; Tilley and Smith Jr. 2011) followed by shaving of surgical site
(Slatter 2003).
Anaesthesia
Propofol (Inj. Propofol 10mg/mL, Abbott laboratories, Pakistan Limited) @ 6.6 mg/kg slow iv, followed by Isoflourance anesthesia (Foran 99.9 % w/v, Abbott laboratories, Pakistan Limited) for maintenance
(Franco et al., 2009).
Surgical procedure
The most common donor site for graft harvesting is abdominal and thoracic region so the donor site was selected depending on the size, nature and the damaged area. The size of graft to be harvested was according to the recipient site (minimum 4×4 inches) measured by sterilised scale. After positioning the anaesthetized dog, the skin of the donor site was grasped, lifted, dissected and then released from underlying tissue to evaluate the suitability as a graft. The reference lines were marked on the donor area with surgical markers to indicate the margins of the potential graft and to measure the donor site with reference to the graft size. Each graft size was harvested approx. 3-5% greater than the size of recipient site. The donor and recipient sites were disinfected by 1% chlorhexidine following the debridement of the wounds with normal saline. An incision was made along the marked reference lines and the graft was undermined to the level of muscles, at the distant end of the graft avoiding any trauma to the direct cutaneous vessels
(Pavletic 2018).
Platelet rich plasma (PRP) application
PRP obtained from each patient was divided into two parts. One part was administered into the graft and the remaining one part was administered subcutaneously in surrounding tissue of graft before graft placement and fixation (as discussed above).
Graft application and wound closure
The graft was accurately placed and sutured on the recipient bed applying single layer of simple interrupted non-absorbable silk sutures (Mersilk 2-0, Ethicon). The donor site was closed using sub-cuticular pattern with monofilament Polyglactin 910 absorbable suture (Vicryl 2-0, Ethicon) followed by the skin sutures (horizontal mattress) with non-absorbable silk suture material (Mersilk 2-0, Ethicon) (Fig 1,2,3).
Post-operative management
During the post-operative period, all dogs received Cephradine (Injection Velosef, Glaxosmithkline Pakistan Ltd) @ 25 mg/kg bid, IM. for 07 days and Ketoprofen (injection Profenid 2.5% w/w, Sanofi Aventis (Pakistan) Ltd @ 1mg/kg sid, IM for 03 days
(Hermeto et al., 2012). The graft was covered with triple-antibiotic skin ointment (Ointment Mycitracin Plus, Pfizer Laboratories Ltd.) and covered with surgical gauze, bandage and adhesive tape after the surgery. Bandage was removed every 48 hours up to 15 days followed by healing as without any bandaging. During dressing change the gauze was abundantly wetted with sterile physiological solution (Otsuka Pvt Ltd, Pakistan), so as to avoid any trauma to capillary bed due to avulsion on graft. Sutures were removed on 10
th and 14
th day of procedure, from donor and recipient sites, respectively. Elizabethan collar was used in all dogs post-surgical procedure till sutures removal to avoid damage of graft or suture line by the dog.
Parameters of study
Following parameters were studied to evaluate efficacy of PRP as healing promoter for full thickness skin graft in dog.
Macroscopic evaluation i.e.
a) Colour
b) Edema of graft
c) Exudation of graft.
Microscopic evaluation i.e.
a) Histo-pathological study was carried out on graft tissue (collected through punch biopsy needle) for inflammation, fibroblast proliferation and granulation tissue proliferation.
Sample collection by punch biopsy
Biopsy punch (6mm) for each graft was used
. Punch biopsy was performed from the center of the graft by uni-directional rotation
. Biopsy punch was removed and gently tissue section was grasped with the tissue forceps and placed in a labelled sample container having 10% neutral buffered formalin.