In present study Nile tilapia fish skin was evaluated as biological dressing and skin wound healing promoter in cat. A total 10 clinical cases of cats received with massive skin damages were selected for this study and divided into two groups
i.e. A and B.
Following were the findings of present study in group A and B on the basis of pre-selected parameters.
Wound size
Wound size was measured in each cat of both groups on days 0, 3, 7 and 14. In group A, on days 0, 3, 7 and 14 mean wound size was 73.92±30.20, 41.24±15.26, 25.36±13.61 and 12.2±9.23, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant difference (P<0.05) among means of wound size changes during healing from days 0-14. In group B, on days 0, 3, 7 and 14 mean wound size was 75.40±29.91, 69.40±27.55, 61.52±26.61 and 54.44±23.04, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference (P<0.05) among means of wound healing area in group B from days 0-14. According to
Guo and DiPietro (2010) skin wound healing is a naturally complicated biological mechanism that involves highly programed stages
i.e. inflammation, proliferation and remodeling.
Physical characteristics of wound
Both groups A and B included cats with different characteristics of skin wound in terms of shape, size and healing status (Table 2).
In all cases wounds were not more than 24 hours old. In group A out of total 5 cats 3 cats were wounded due to cat fight cases where as other 2 cats were accidental injuries. In group B, out of total 5 cases 3 were the cat fight cases where as two cases involved accidental injuries (Table 3).
Quality of wound healing
Quality of wound healing was evaluated on the basis of following factors.
a. Scar formation
In both groups A and B, dressing was changed after every 48 hours to avoid contamination of site. In group A, out of total 5 cats no cat showed scar formation. In group B, out of total 5 cats 3 cats showed scar formation and in rest of the 2 cats no scar formation took place mainly because Tilapia fish skin accelerates wound healing by decreasing the effects of pro-inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, InterLeukin-6 and InterLeukin-8) and it increases the number of receptors on target cells for β-defense 14, pattern recognition receptor (NOD2), anti-inflammatory (IL-10), vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor (β-FGF) as observed by
Mei et al., (2020a).
b. Sensitivity raction
In both groups A and B, during the entire course of study, no cat showed any sign of sensitivity reaction to tilapia skin dressing. According to
Magnusson et al. (2016) tilapia fish skin does not active any autoimmune activity of body again the fish skin graft that is why no sensitivity reaction is noted. These findings are also in line with the findings of
Ibrahim et al., (2020). They reported thatTilapia fish skin is a rich source of gelatin as well as collagen.It possesses biocompatible type 1 collagen which has potential for using as clinical regenerative procedure to treat massive dermatological losses smoothly.
c. Speed of healing
According to statistical analysis in group A, the data on the relation between mean wound size with respect to days of complete healing showed a significant difference (P<0.05) that indicates speedy wound healing process. Graphical presentation with respect to statistical data also demonstrated that during in most of the wounds maximum healing was achieved by day 14. In group B, according to statistical analysis, data on relation between mean wound size of this group with respect to days of complete healing showed a significant difference (P<0.05) that indicate wound healing process. Graphical presentation with respect to statistical data showed that during trial in most of wounds delayed healing was achieved as compared to group A. Same observations are documented by
Mei et al., (2020a). They documented that Tilapia fish skin accelerates wound healing by decreasing the effects of pro-inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, InterLeukin-6 and Inter Leukin-8) and it increases the number of receptors on target cells for β-defense 14, pattern recognition receptor (NOD2), anti-inflammatory (IL-10), vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor (β-FGF). It increases the bacterial growth responsible to promote wound healing and decreases that bacterial growth which disturbs wound healing.
d. Histo-pathological findings
Histo-pathological evaluationin group A, revealed a fast healing process followed by the complete wound healing by day 14 in all cats of this group (Fig 2).
Based on the histo-pathological evaluation in group B, the healing process was slow and wound healing was incomplete in all cats on day 14 (Fig 3).
Wound size comparison between Group A and B
Statistical analysis based comparison of wound size on days 0-14 in group A and B revealed a significant difference (P<0.05) both groups with respect to wound size at different intervals (Fig 4).