Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Monostephanostomum mesospinosum (Digenea: Acanthocolpidae) Infecting the Coastal Trevally Carangoides caeruleopinnatus (Carangiformes: Carangidae) from the Marine Water off Saudi Arabia

Rewaida Abdel-Gaber1,*, Mashael Alotaibi1, Saleh Al Quraishy1, Sawsan A. Omar1, Manal F. Elkhadragy2, Hossam M.A. Aljawdah1, Esam M. Al-Shaebi1
1Department of Zoology, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
2Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Background: Carangids, like any other fish, can become infected with a variety of external and internal parasites. Little information on parasite infestations in these fish species is known. This study aimed to provide light on parasites that infect caragnids in Saudi Arabia. 

Methods: A total of 20 Carangoides caeruleopinnatus specimens were collected from the Red Sea (Saudi Arabia) and then examined for the presence of digenetic trematodes. Parasitic species were isolated and studied morphologically by using light microscopic examination and molecularly via the partial sequencing of 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA genes. 

Result: Only one parasitic species has been identified. This parasite is morphologically and morphometric compatible with previously Monostephanostomum mesospinosum, identified from Carangoides malabaricus in VSK, BOB. Phylogeny revealed that these putative acanthocolpid species nested well within a clade clustering Monostephanostomum species, which along with morphological data, suggests it is a member of the genus Monostephanostomum. Query sequences showed identities of 97.99% and 97.98% for 18S (EF506762.1.1) and 28S rRNA (EF506763.1) of Monostephanostomum nolani, respectively. This study reflects the third account of this genus as endoparasitic taxa of various carangid fish, as well as providing novel DNA data for this species.
Fish serve as hosts to a range of parasites that are taxonomically diverse and exhibit a wide variety of life cycle strategies (Alshehri et al., 2022). Trematode parasites are considered one of the major invariably endo-parasitic taxa of helminths (Pichelin and Cribb, 2001). Family Acanthocolpidae Lühe (1906) is a family of digenetic trematodes mainly infecting marine teleost fish. Different studies have been carried out to highlight the complex relationships within the Acanthocolpidae and the place of this family in the Digenea system (Bray et al., 2009).

This family includes the following genera Pleorchis Railliet, 1896, Stephanostomum Looss, 1899, Neophasis Stafford, 1904, Acanthocolpus Lühe, 1906, Lepidauchen Nicoll, 1913, Tormopsolus Poche, 1926, Pseudolepidapedon Yamaguti, 1938, Manteria Caballero, 1950, Spinoplagioporus Skrjabin and Koval, 1958, Acaenodera Manter and Pritchard, 1960, Ophiotreminoides Coil and Kuntz, 1960, Pseudacaenodera Yamaguti, 1965, Stephanostomoides Mamaev and Oshmarine, 1966, Monostephanostomum Kruse, 1979, Gissutrema Machida and Kamegai, 1997, Venusicola Bray and Cribb, 2000 and Ningalooia Bray and Cribb, 2007.

Genus Monostephanostomum comprises nine valid species according to WoRMS (2021), which were: Monostephanostomum manteri Kruse, 1979, Monoste phanostomum krusei Reimer, 1983, Monostephanostomum roytmani (Parukhin, 1974) Reimer, 1983, Monoste phanostomum yamagutii Ramadan, 1984, Monoste phanostomum gazzae (Shen, 1990) Bray and Cribb, 2002, Monostephanostomum georgianum Bray and Cribb, 2002, Monostephanostomum loossi (Pandey and Tewari, 1984) Saoud, Nahhas, Al Kuwari and Ramadan, 2002, Monostephanostomum mesospinosum (Madhavi, 1976) Bray and Cribb, 2002 and Monostephanostomum nolani Bray and Cribb, 2007.

The identification and taxonomic tools for the above-mentioned species depend mainly on their morphological, morphometric as well as ultrastructure characteristics which are considered as primary key features for their classification, except Monostephanostomum nolani that infecting Plectropomus leopardus and confirmed molecularly by Bray and Cribb (2007) via small subunit (SSU) and large subunit (LSU) of ribosomal rDNA gene sequences. Recently, DNA technology has been proven to be an alternative to addressing taxonomic parasites problems (Abdel-Gaber et al., 2021).

Carangidae forms one of the largest families of bony fish with worldwide distribution. Parasitic fauna of the Coastal trevally (Carangoides caeruleopinnatus), from Saudi Arabia are poorly known. Therefore, this study proved for the first time the digenetic parasitic infections from this fish species in Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea Coasts.
Twenty specimens of the coastal trevally Carangoides caeruleopinnatus Rüppell, 1830 (F: Carangidae) were collected from commercial fishermen on the Red Sea coast in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Fish were brought to the Lab and identified using the rules of the website fishbase.org. Following that, fish specimens were necropsied and their organs were examined. Internal organs were transferred to Petri dishes with 0.65% saline and examined under a stereo-dissecting microscope (Nikon SMZ18, NIS ELEMENTS software) for detection of parasite infections. According to Bush et al., (1997), infection levels for the parasite species obtained were reported using prevalence and mean intensity.

Flukes were removed and preserved in 70% ethanol for morphological analysis or stored directly in absolute ethanol for DNA extraction. Semichon’s acetocarmine was used to stain the whole mounts (Al Quraishy et al., 2019). After dehydrating the specimens in alcohol gradients, clearing them in clove oil, mounting them using Canada balsam and incubating at 60°C for 24 hrs to drive the air bubbles according to Schmidt (1992). Using a Leica DM 2500 microscope (NIS ELEMENTS software), specimens and relevant structural features were examined and photographed at various magnifications. Using a camera lucida, drawings were made to scale. Measurements were reported in millimeters.

Genomic DNA was extracted using Qiagen DNeasy tissue kit © (Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For parasite identification, partial 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA genes were amplified using PCR. Primers for 18S rRNA were designed by Indaryanto et al., (2015) and those for 28S rRNA were designed by Lee et al., (2007). BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) was used to sequence PCR products via ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA). BLASTn compared sequences in NCBI database to find the most similar ones. BioEdit 7.0.5.3 was used to edit sequences. Sequences derived from 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA genes and those received from GenBank were aligned using ClustalW. Maximum Likelihood (ML) in MEGA 7.0 was used to construct phylogenetic trees with 1000 replicates.
Fish are considered one of the important sources of animal protein (de Boer et al., 2020). Several studies have been conducted about the parasites of the Red Sea fish with digenea as the largest sector of endoparasitic species (Cribb et al., 2001). In total, 20 specimens of Carangoides caeruleopinnatus were examined, 13 (65%) of which were infected in the intestinal region with one acanthocolpid species having morphological features corresponding with the genus Monostephanostomum. The parasite’s mean intensity per fish host does not exceed 5. The recovered acanthocolpid species identified as Monostephanostomum mesospinosum inhabited C. caeruleopinnatus for the first time.
 
Description (Fig 1)
 
Body elongated, parallel-sided over most of its length, and measured 6.102-7.923 (6.870) long × 0.201-0.243 (0.231) wide. Tegument covered with spines that increased gradually in size. Forebody contains eyespot pigment. A single uninterrupted row of enlarged 18 circum-oral spines surrounds oral sucker. The oral sucker measured 0.070-0.079 (0.075) long × 0.091-0.103 (0.098) wide. Prepharynx long, narrow, and measured 0.590-0.721 (0.611) long. Pharynx pyriform and measured 0.163-0.184 (0.172) long × 0.082-0.094 (0.086) wide. Just before ventral sucker, esophagus measured 0.078-0.098 (0.082) long and divided into two intestinal caeca. Ventral sucker has a spherical shape, pre-equatorial and measured 0.118-0.147 (0.128) long × 0.124-0.168 (0.141) wide. The sucker ratio 1:1.2-1.4. Forebody is about 7% of body length. Caeca broad, long, opened into excretory bladder forming uroproct.

Fig 1: Line drawing for Monostephanostomum mesospinosum. Scale bar= 200 µm. (A) Whole-mount preparation. (B and C) Terminal genitalia and ventral sucker. Note: CS: Cirrus sac; ED: Ejaculatory duct; EG, egg(s); EP: Excretory pore; ES: Esophagus; GP: Genital pore; IC: Intestinal ceca; MT: Metraterm; OS: Oral sucker; OV: Ovary; PH: Pharynx; PP: Pars prostatica; PrP: Pre-pharynx; SP: Spine(s); SV: Seminal vesicle; TE: Testes; UT: Uterus; VS: Ventral sucker.



Testes two, oval, tandem and separated by vitelline follicles and found in posterior half of the body. The anterior testis measured 0.267-0.351 (0. 298) long × 0.173-0.185 (0.174) wide, while the posterior one was 0.291-0.371 (0.311) long × 0.189-0.184 (0.184) wide. Post-testicular region long. Cirrus-sac long, intercaecal that extends slightly more than halfway between ovary and ventral sucker, joining metraterm slightly posterior to ventral sucker. The cirrus sac measured 0.960-1.936 (1.721) long × 0.061-0.079 (0.065) wide. Seminal vesicle tubular. Pars prostatica short, sinuous, and bordered by prostate gland cells. Ejaculatory duct long, lined with knob-like protuberances. Genital atrium located anteriorly to ventral sucker and opened with a genital pore.

Ovary rounded, pre-testicular and measured 0.115-0.124 (0.119) long × 0.113-0.125 (0.119) wide. There is a uterine seminal receptacle. Uterus pre-ovarian, intercaecal and runs dorsally to cirrus sac. Metraterm opened into genital atrium. Eggs large, operculated, and measured 0.049-0.054 (0.052) long × 0.020-0.025 (0.023) wide. Vitellaria of two lateral fields of numerous vitelline follicles that extend from base of cirrus-sac to posterior end of body, interrupted at level of ovary and testes. Excretory vesicle I-shaped and opened by a terminal excretory pore.
 
Remarks
 
At the morphological and morphometric level, the current acanthocolpid species is compatible with other Monostephanostomum species by possessing all the species’ characteristics exceptions. Kruse (1979) established the genus Monostephanostomum for the digenetic trematodes belonging to the family Acanthocolpidae. Parasites within this genus are characterized by relative sizes of suckers, presence of a single row of circumoral spines, small forebody, location of ventral sucker in middle or anterior third of body, forward and then backward loop of uterus, long metraterm, oval and contiguous gonads, anterior position of genital pore to ventral sucker, and distribution of vitelline follicles, caeca opened via uroproct, elongated cirrus sac, weekly developed pars prostatica, long ejaculatory duct and excretory vesicle I-shaped reached ovary level. The present parasite species resembles the previously recorded species of Madhavi’s (1976) and Madhavi and Bray (2018) for M. mesospinosum from C. malabaricus in VSK, BOB, especially in the long slender body and presence of 18 circumoral spines in uninterrupted rows. Our specimen falls within the range of measurements for different body parts suggested by Madhavi (1976), but with different localities and species for fish hosts. This species is distinguished from other species of genus by: smaller body size and number of circumoral spines of M. yamaguttii (12-16), M. manteri (16-18), M. nolani (17-20), M. krusei (17), M. gazzae (23), and M. loossi (32). These results have been obtained via comparison with other data from Ramadan (1984) and Bray and Cribb (2007).

There was a noticeable difference from our specimen that recorded by Ramadan (1984) by presence of two spines rows in M. geogianum, first ventral one with 18-20 (19), and second dorsal with 3-5 smaller spines, vitellarium is restricted to hind body and interruptions in vitelline fields at gonads level, and cirrus sac reaches only to about middle of ventral sucker to ovary distance. While, it differs from M. manteri which has a claviform body, continuous row of circum-oral spines, oval pharynx, longer post-testicular region, vitellarium reaches into forebody, and cirrus sac overlaps ovary; this agreed with Bray and Cribb (2007). Additionally, some differences were recorded with M. yamaguttii by Ramadan (1984) which has an elongate pharynx, smaller cirrus sac and vitellaria that extends anteriorly only to posterior margin of ventral sucker. Extension of vitellarium into forebody was observed in M. nolai versus that in recovered species. Characteristic feature for ventral hiatus in circum-oral spine row was recorded in M. nolai, M. krusi, and M. roytmani, this is consistent with Bray and Cribb (2007). In addition, it distinguished by smaller egg size from M. yamaguttii (0.068-0.074 × 0.036-0.052), M. geogianum (0.075-0.086 × 0.039-0.050), M. manteri (0.080-0.094 × 0.035-0.048), and M. krusei (0.062-0.064 × 0.039-0.044), these measurements regarding studies of Ramadan (1984), Bray and Cribb (2002, 2007). Regarding sucker ratio by Bray and Cribb (2007), the current species has a smaller ratio than M. krusi (1:1.8-2.7), M. gazzae (1:2.0-2.5) and M. nolani (1:1.6-3.1). Monostephanostomum species occupied many hosts belonging to different families (Lethrinidae, Arripidae, and Carangidae) in different geographical locations (Egypt, Australia and Tasmania) (Madhavi, 1976, Kruse, 1979, Reimer, 1983, Ramadan, 1984, Bray and Cribb, 2002, Bray and Cribb, 2007, Madhavi and Bray, 2018). Our findings represent the third record for this acanthocolpid species in carangid fish.
 
Molecular analysis
 
Identification and taxonomic characterization of different parasitic taxa are primarily based on their morphological and ultrastructural features, which are considered mainly criteria for their classification (Indaryanto et al., 2015). Molecular biological tools are recently considered sensitive and advanced tests for parasite taxonomy (Chaudhary et al., 2016). In our molecular analyses, one Monostephanostomum species was confirmed to belong to other Opisthorchiida taxa, especially Acanthocolpidae, based on 18S and 28S rRNA sequencing.
 
18S rRNA gene
 
PCR amplification was successfully carried out to amplify a 697 bp with 51.5% GC content and submitted to NCBI database with accession number OL770106.1. The query sequence was compared with 18S rRNA sequences of other digenean taxa available in the GenBank database (Table 1).

Table 1: Taxa used for the 18S rRNA sequence analysis for Monostephanostomum mesospinosum.



Phylogenetic tree was represented by two orders Opisthorchiida and Plagiorchiida within Digenea (Fig 2).

Fig 2: Molecular analysis using ML method based on Tamura-Nei model for 18S rRNA gene.



First major clade of the dendrogram was subdivided into two lineages, the first one containing taxa of Opisthorchiida and represented by Acanthocolpidae with strong support value (82), the second lineage supported taxa of two suborders of Plagiorchiida: Xiphidiata, Lepocreadiata, and remaining taxa of Acanthocolpidae. Second clade contains remaining taxa of Opisthorchiata (represented by Cryptogonimidae, Heterophyidae, Opisthordiidae), and other plagiorchiids belonging to Xiphidiata, Lepocreadiata, and Troglotremata. Among Acanthocolpidae, the maximum identity (97.99%) with the lowest divergent value was recorded between the present species and M. nolani. Monophyly of Monoste phanostomum species was supported sister group generally to Stephanostomum. Query sequence is well aligned and placed within Opisthorchiida with special reference to Acanthocolpidae. Sequence representing M. mesospinosum grouped with strong bootstrap value (100) with sequence represented by EF506762.1 for the previously deposited sequence for M. nolani parasitizes the barcheek trevally Carangoides plagiotaenia collected from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef (Australia), as expected based on sequence comparisons.
 
28S rRNA gene
 
The sequence analysis revealed a band size of 693 bp with 53.5% GC content that submitted to NCBI database with accession number OL773371.1. The query sequence was compared with 28S rRNA sequences of other related digenean available in the GenBank database (Table 2).

Table 2: Taxa used for the 28S rRNA sequence analysis for Monostephanostomum mesospinosum.



Phylogenetic tree was constructed with two major clades (Fig 3), the first one clustered taxa of the family Acanthocolpidae within the subclass Digenea.

Fig 3: Molecular analysis using ML method based on Tamura-Nei model for 28S rRNA gene.



Whereas, the second clade contains taxa of four orders Xiphidiata (represented by Brachycladiidae, Plagiorchiidae, Choanocotylidae, and Telorchiidae), Monorchiata (represented by Monorchiidae and Lissorchiidae), Lepocreadiata (represented by Deropristidae) and Troglotremata (represented by Troglotrematidae). Among Acanthocolpidae, the maximum identity (97.98%) with the lowest divergent value was recorded between the present digenean species and Monostephanostomum nolani. Monophyly of Monostephanostomum species was supported sister group generally to Stephanostomum. Query sequence M. mesospinosum is well aligned and placed within Opisthorchiida with special reference to Acanthocolpidae with a close relationship in a well-supported taxon (100) with the previously recorded M. nolani (EF506763.1) parasitizes the barcheek trevally Carangoides plagiotaenia collected from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef (Australia), as expected based on sequence comparisons.

A close relatedness to M. nolani (EF506762.1 and EF506763.1) was determined based on molecular similarities of those described by Bray and Cribb (2007) infecting the carangid, the barcheek trevally, Carangoides plagiotaenia from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. This is consistent with Bray et al., (2009) who reported that complete SSU and partial LSU rDNA sequence data enhance significantly the chance for an accurate differentiation between plagiorchiids. Thus, the nuclear RNA analyses herein showed that the Monostephanostomum was consistent with the morphological taxa of trematodes within the same genus. Our phylogeny assured morphological evidence for a close relation between Stephanostomum and Monostephanostomum to be clustered together in the well-supported clade with consideration for the number and arrangement of circum-oral spines for both genera, this agreed with previous studies by Bray and Cribb (2002, 2007) and Bray et al., (2007). The current dendrograms demonstrated Acanthocolpidae polyphyly, which is in agreement with Abdel-Gaber et al., (2020) who reported the same issue due to presence of relation with taxa included within Xiphidiata and Lepocreadiata. Furthermore, the current study confirms the position of the Acanthocolpidae in the superfamily Brachycladioidea along with Brachycladiidae, as consistent with Bray et al. (2009) and Bakhoum et al., (2015).
It could be concluded that valuable information on the natural occurrence of acanthocolpid species identified as M. geogianum was given in the present study. In addition, to our knowledge, this indicates the third report of the genus Monostephanostomum in the carangid fish, as well as, providing information about the new host and locality records of C. caeruleopinnatus off the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia. It is proposed that future studies include more parasite samples and different genes to provide more knowledge of this parasite.
This study was supported by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R23), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and also was supported by Researchers Supporting Project (RSP2023R25), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the content of this article. 

  1. Abdel-Gaber, R., Al Quraishy, S., Dkhil, M.A., Abu Hawsah, M., Bakr, L., Maher, S. (2020). Morphological and molecular analyses of Paropecoelus saudiae sp. nov. (Plagiorchiida: Opecoelidae), a trematoda parasite of Parupeneus rubescens (Mullidae) from the Arabian Gulf. Journal of King Saud University-Science. 32: 2243-2253.

  2. Abdel-Gaber, R., Fouad, D., Ataya, F., Morsy, K., Maher, K. (2021). Morphological identification and molecular characterization of 18S rDNA of two hemiurid trematodes (Lecithocladium cristatum Rudolphi, 1819 and Lecithocladium parviovum Yamaguti, 1953) infecting the greater lizardfish Sauida tumbil (Pisces: Synodontidae) inhabiting the Red Sea. Gene. 683: 243-252.

  3. Al Quraishy, S., Abdel-Gaber, R., Dkhil, M.A., Elamin, M., Saleh, R., Ali, H. (2019). Morphological re-description and phylogenetics of Opecoeloides columbellae (Digenea: Opecoelidae) that infects the shore rockling Gaidropsarus mediterraneus (Actinopterygii: Lotidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 29: 100684.

  4. Alshehri, E., Alqahtani, J., Al-Shaebi, E.M., Al-Quraishy, S., Abdel- Gaber, R. (2022). Identification of gnathiid isopods as ectoparasites of the brown-spotted grouper Epinephelus chlorostigma from the Red Sea of Saudi Arabia. Indian Journal of Animal Research. pp. 1-8.  

  5. Bakhoum, A.J.S., Quilichini, Y., Justine, J.L., Bray, R.A., Bâ, C.T., Marchand, B. (2015). Ultrastructural study of sperm cells in Acanthocolpidae: The case of Stephanostomum murielae and Stephanostomoides tenuis (Digenea). Peer J. 3: e744.

  6. Bray, R., Cribb, T., Waeschenbach, A., Littlewood, D. (2007). A new species of Stephanostomum Looss, 1899 (Digenea, Acanthocolpidae) with a bizarre oral sucker: S. adlardi sp. nov. from the common coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Lacepède, 1802) (Perciformes, Serranidae) from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Acta Parasitologica.  52(3): 206-212.

  7. Bray, R.A. and Cribb, T.H. (2000). Venusicola inusitatus gen. n., sp n. (Digenea, Acanthocolpidae) from the venus tuskfish Choerodon venustus (De Vis) from the southern great barrier reef. Acta Parasitologica. 45(4): 295-298.

  8. Bray, R.A. and Cribb, T.H. (2002). Monostephanostomum georgianum n. sp. (Digenea: Acanthocolpidae) from Arripis georgianus (Valenciennes) (Perciformes: Arripidae) off Kangaroo Island, South Australia, with comments on Monostephan ostomum Kruse, 1979 and Stephanostomum Looss, 1899.  Systematic Parasitology. 53(1): 61-68. 

  9. Bray, R.A. and Cribb, T.H. (2007). Monostephanostomum nolani sp. n. and M. krusei Reimer, 1983 (Digenea: Acanthocolpidae)  from carangid fishes from coral reef waters off Australia.  Folia Parasitologica. 54: 19-26.

  10. Bray, R.A., Waeschenbach, A., Cribb, T.H., Weedall, G.D., Dyal, P., Littlewood, D.T.J. (2009). The phylogeny of the Lepocreadioidea (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial genes: Implications for their systematics and evolution. Acta Parasitologica. 54: 310-329.

  11. Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. Shostak, A.W. (1997). Parasitology  meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology. 83: 575-583. 

  12. Chaudhary, A., Mukut, S., Singh, H.S. (2016). Molecular characterization  of three species belongs to the Allocreadioidea, Hemiuroidea  and Plagiorchioidea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) infecting  freshwater fishes in India. Helminthologia. 53(4): 378-384.  

  13. Coil, W.H., Kuntz, R.E. (1960) Three new genera of trematodes from Pacific sea serpents, Laticauda colubrina and L. semifasciata. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 27(2): 145-150.

  14. Cribb, T.H., Bray, R.A., Littlewood, D.T.J., Pichelin, S., Herniou, E.A. (2001). The Digenea. In: Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes. [Littlewood, D.T.J., Bray, R.A. (Eds.)]. Taylor and Francis, London. pp. 168-185.

  15. de Boer, J., Schösler, H., Aiking, H. (2020). Fish as an alternative protein-A consumer-oriented perspective on its role in a transition towards more healthy and sustainable diets. Appetite. 152: 104721. 

  16. Indaryanto, F.R., Abdullah, M.F., Wardiatno, Y., Tiuria, R., Imai, H. (2015). A description of Lecithocladium angustiovum (Digenea, Hemiuridae) in short mackerel, Rastrelliger brachysoma (Scombridae) of Indonesia. Tropical Life Sciences Research. 26: 31-40. 

  17. Kruse, G.O.W. (1979). Trematodes of marine fishes from South Australia. 6. Monostephanostomum manteri gen. et sp. n. (Acanthocolpidae). Journal of Parasitology. 65(6): 921- 923.

  18. Lee, S.U., Chun, H.C., Huh, S. (2007). Molecular phylogeny of parasitic Platyhelminthes based on sequences of partial 28S rDNA D1 and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I. Korean Journal of Parasitology. 45(3): 181-189.

  19. Looss, A. (1899). Weitere beiträge zur kenntniss der trematoden- fauna aegyptens, zugleich versuch einer natürlichen gliederung des genus distomum retzius. Zoologische Jahrbücher. 12: 521-784.

  20. Lühe, M. (1906). On the trematode parasites from the marine fishes of Ceylon. Report to the Government of Ceylon on the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar. 5: 97-108.

  21. Machida, M. and Kamegai, S. (1997). Digenean trematodes from deep-sea fishes of Suruga Bay, central Japan. National Science Museum Monographs, No. 12, Deep-Sea Fauna and Pollutants in Suruga Bay. Tokyo: National Science Museum. pp. 19-30.

  22. Madhavi, R. (1976). Digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of waltair coast, Bay of Bengal. Family Acanthocolpidae. Rivista di Parassitologia. 37(2-3): 115-128.

  23. Madhavi, R. and Bray, R.A. (2018). Digenetic Trematodes of Indian Marine Fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, 693 pp. page(s): 375.

  24. Mamaev, Y.L. and Oshmarin, P.G. (1966). Trematodes of the family Acanthocolpidae Lühe, 1909 in herrings of the North-Vietnam. Helminthologia. 7: 155-164.

  25. Manter, H.W. and Pritchard, M.H. (1960). Some digenetic trematodes  of eels of hawaii. The Journal of Parasitology. 46(5): 651- 658.

  26. Nicoll, W. (1913). New trematode parasites from fishes of the English Channel. Parasitology. 5: 238-246.

  27. Pandey, K.C. and Tewari, S.K. (1984). On three new digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of Bombay coast, India. Journal of the Zoological Society of India. 95: 60-65.

  28. Parukhin, A.M. (1974). Some new trematode species of the family Acanthocolpidae Lühe, 1909 from fishes of the Red Sea and Indian Ocean. Izvestiya Tikhookeanskogo Nauchno- Issledovatel’skogo Instituta Rybnogo Khozyaistvai Okeanografii (TINRO). 88: 110-116.

  29. Pichelin, S. and Cribb, T.H. (2001). The status of the Diplosentidae (Acanthocephala: Palaeacanthocephala) and a new family of acanthocephalans from Australian wrasses (Pisces: Labridae). Folia Parasitologica. 48: 289-303.

  30. Ramadan, M.M. (1984). Monostephanostomum yamagutii sp. nov. (Trematoda: Acanthocolpidae) - intestinal parasite of a lethrinid fish from the Red Sea. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde.  70(2): 183-187.

  31. Reimer, L.W. (1983). Acanthocolpidae (Digenea) aus Fischen der Küste von Moçambique. Angewandte Parasitologie. 24: 134-146.

  32. Saoud, M.F.A., Nahhas, F.M., Al Kuwairi, K.S.R., Ramadan, M.M. (2002). Helminth parasites of fishes from the Arabian Gulf: 10. Trematodes of the genus Stephanostomum Looss, 1899 (Digenea: Acanthocolpidae Luhe, 1901), with description of Stephanostomum qatarense n.sp. and redescription of Stephanostomum triacanthi Madhavi, 1976 Riv. Parassitology. 19(63): 87-103.

  33. Schmidt, G.D. (1992). Essentials of Parasitology. 5th ed. Brown, C. Publishers, USA.

  34. Shen, J.W. (1990). Digenetic Trematodes of Marine Fishes from Hainan Island. Beijing: Science Press. 228 pp.

  35. Skrjabin, K.I. and Koval, V.P. (1958). Subfamily Plagioporinae Manter, 1947. Osnovy Trematodologii. 15: 424-811.

  36. Stafford, J. (1904). Trematodes from Canadian fishes. Zoologischer Anzeiger. 27: 481-495.

  37. WoRMS. 2021). Monostephanostomum Kruse, 1979. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p= taxdetailsandid=  391372 on 2022-02-05.

  38. Yamaguti, S. (1965). New digenetic trematodes from Hawaiian fishes, I. Pacific Science. 19(4): 458-481.

Editorial Board

View all (0)