The experiment was conducted from March 2021 to September 2021 at Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh province, Vietnam. Dried
S. procumbens L. was bought from a local traditional medicine store. The extraction of
S. procumbens L. was applied using the protocol described by
Chaweepack et al., (2015). Briefly, the dried
S. procumbens L. was ground into fine powder. After that, the powder was added to a 70% alcohol solution at a ratio of 1:10 and left for 24 h before being filtered with paper. The collected liquid was evaporated at 50°C using a vacuum evaporation machine. The remaining crude extract was freeze-dried and stored at 4°C for further experiments. Shrimp at postlarvea 12 (specific pathogen free-SPF) was reared to reach required size for the experiment. Shrimp at 5.33±0.13 g was selected to place in 0.5 m
3 tanks containing 15ppt aerated seawater. The density of shrimp was 50 individuals per tank. The shrimp was fed commercial pellets supplemented with four different ratios of
S. procumbens L. extract at 0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% four times per day. Each treatment was three time replication. Before feeding,
S. procumbens L. extract was weighted and dissolved in sterilized water before being sprayed on the pellets. After that, the pellets were coated with squid oil at 5ml per kg of feed. Water parameters such as salinity, pH, oxygen and temperature in each tank were measured daily; mean while, ammonia and hydrosulfic were measured every 3 days. Salinity was measured by master refractometer (Atago, Japan), pH and temperature by pH/Cond/Temp Pocket Meter (EZDO 7200, Taiwan), dissolved oxygen by oxygen meter (SevenGo pro; Mettler Toledo, USA), ammonia and hydrogen sulfide by sera test kit (Germany). During the experiment, environmental parameters were maintained at suitable levels for shrimp growth: dissolved oxygen was above 4 ppm, pH between 7.5-8, temperature between 28-29°C, salinity at 15 ppt and ammonia and hydrogen sulfide were undetectable. Siphoning and water exchange was carried out at 10% every 3 days. At the end of experiment, survival rate (SR), growth responses and immune parameters of experimental shrimp were examined. SR and growth responses including weight gain (WG), absolute growth rate (AGR) and specific growth rate (SGR) of experimental shrimp was calculated following formulas described by
Chandran et al., (2016). In immune response examination, hemolymph collection for total haemocyte count (THC) and phenoloxidase (PO) activity measurement followed protocols described by
Hernández López et al., (1996). THC was determined following the protocol described by
Kakoolaki et al., (2011). The PO activity was determined in duplicate following the protocol described by
Hernández López et al., (1996) and
Widanarni et al., (2020).
To observe the effects of the treatment against Vp
AHPND,
pirAB gene positive
V. parahaemolyticus was previously isolated from AHPND shrimp stored at -80°C at the Laboratory of Aquaculture Disease Management, Tra Vinh University and it was recovered on trypsin soybean agar (TSA) (Himedia, India). The
pirAB genes of
V. parahaemolyticus isolate were rechecked by duplex PCR method using the protocol described by
Han et al., (2015). Shrimp fed diets supplemented 0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% after 30 days was subjected to challenge tests with three time replications. The challenge test followed the protocol described by
Loc et al., (2013) and
Hong To et al., (2020). Ten shrimps were placed in each plastic container containing 20L of 15 ppt seawater.
V. parahaemolyticus harboring
pirAB genes recovered on TSA was diluted in sterilized saline water and added into experiment containers. The density of AHPND
V. parahaemolyticus in plastic containers was adjusted at 10
6 CFU/ml. The experiment was observed over two weeks for the cumulative mortality and clinical signs of infected shrimp. Moribund shrimp was picked-up for re-isolation of Vp
AHPND. The collected data was analyzed for normal distribution and variance homogeneity. One-way ANOVA was applied and Turkey HSD was employed for comparison. Significant differences were considered at P<0.05. SPSS software (version 20. IBM,USA) was used for statistical analysis.