The number of the tested herds and animals over the country during 2009-2018 were shown in Table 1. The results of the accumulated seropositivity rates of the brucellosis of dairy cattle, beef cattle, buffaloes, goats and sheep at the herd level was 7.12% (95% CI: 6.99-7.26) and the animal level was 0.92% (95% CI: 0.91-0.93). Dairy cattle at the herd level were 3.76% (95% CI: 3.60-3.92) (Fig 1) and 0.37% (95% CI: 0.36-0.38) at the animal level (Fig 2). After 2012, the testing policies and slaughtering were performed conscientiously and by 2013 the percentage of positive results at the herd level had decreased to 2%. However, the number of the tested herd and animals decreased because the focus was on infected herds and the percentage of the positive results remained high at about 5%. The percentage of the positive results at the herd level remained consistent from 2015 to 2018, with a 2% positive percentage at the herd level. The seropositivity rate in beef cattle was 9.17% (95% CI: 8.83-9.50) at the herd level (Fig 3) and 2.07% (95% CI: 2.02-2.19) at the animal level (Fig 4), where as in buffaloes at the herd level, it was 3.45% (95% CI: 3.12-3.79) and at the animal level 0.72% (95% CI: 0.68-0.77). In goats, it was 9.65% (95% CI: 9.38-9.92) at the herd level (Fig 5) and 1.89% (95% CI: 1.87-1.91) at the animal level (Fig 6). The highest percentage of the seropositivity rates in goats at 15% was recorded from 2011 to 2012. After 2012, the national program for brucellosis control focused on goat herds and by 2015, the seropositive percentage at the herd level had decreased to 6.2%. However, from 2015 to 2018, the seropositivity rate at the herd level increased but decreased at the individual level. During this period, the DLD encouraged livestock farmers to raise small ruminants and the number of herds increased. While sheep herds had the highest seropositive results, it was 17.81% (95% CI: 16.49-19.12) at the herd level and 3.08% (95% CI: 2.98-3.18) at the animal level. The number of sheep herds in Thailand was also lower than for other livestock such as cattle or goats. Sheep farming mostly involved ecotourism, so if the sheep did not appear to have any serious problems, the owners did not worry about animal health. Nonetheless, the trends for infected herds and animals decreased.
The previous data reviewed the prevalence in the most numbers of livestock in Southeast Asia. The prevalence of bovine brucellosis (
Brucella abortus) in 2014 ranged between 1-2% in Thailand and Indonesia and 4-5% in Malaysia and Myanmar. Additionally, the prevalence of goat brucellosis (
Brucella melitensis) is approximately 1% in Malaysia and Thailand (
Zamri-Saad and Kamarudin, 2016).
Brucella isolation and identification showed five
Brucella abortus isolates, whereas there were 31
Brucella melitensis isolates from the total of 36 isolates. However, a definitive diagnosis would require the isolation and identification of the
Brucella organism, but this method is impractical for large-scale testing and has poor sensitivity depending on the host species and duration of infection. In addition, not all infected animals can be tracked for specimen collection.
Recommendations
The ‘test-and-slaughter’ method is recommended and feasible in countries where prevalence rate is not exceeding 2% (
Alton, 1987). At the herd prevalence (7.12% over all species), the ‘test-and-slaughter’ seemed unsuitable for Thailand. Nevertheless, the national brucellosis control program in Thailand had successfully reduced the prevalence. However, the disease elimination is quite difficult as well as human cases still be reported. Therefore, the implementation of brucellosis control policy in Thailand needs to be reviewed.
These recommendations may focus on some weaknesses to get closer to the goal of eliminating the disease in Thailand.
Surveillance system
The national list agreed by the DLD is based on the WOAH listed diseases and the Animal Epidemics Act 2015. This list is regularly reviewed and updated according to the WOAH -listed diseases and national concerns. The diseases are included for surveillance purposes, so that unusual incidences of animal morbidity or mortality and diseases of public health significance can be quickly detected. The requirement to report notifiable diseases is enforced by law. Surveillance is required for domestic animals in any particular area and also for animal movement control and transport to slaughterhouses. Any positively infected cattle must be culled, with appropriate compensation in terms of price and reasonable payment time. Brucellosis screening tests must be improved to detect infected animals as quickly as possible. An epidemiological investigation should be conducted to identify the risk factors associated with the occurrence and endemicity of the disease.
Increasing certification of brucellosis-free farms
Registered brucellosis-free farms are allowed to move their animals freely, without movement testing. Therefore, increasing the amount of free farm testing is a crucial control measure to better determine the true prevalence of brucellosis among animal populations. Increased testing could be encouraged by offering incentives, increasing the amount of free farm testing during trading or increasing disease awareness among farmers or disease-affected populations. The DLD has a standard operating protocol for farmers on how to register as a brucellosis-free farm.
Educating and encouraging farmers
Educating farmers in disease introduction, relevant regulations and adjusting their attitudes are important initiatives. Farmers should be encouraged to learn more about disease prevention and control. The DLD and Public Health Departments have produced pamphlets to educate farmers about diseases, contact, symptoms and prevention and the procedure to follow when suspecting disease occurrence. Animal identification (ID), moving control, good farm practice and screening animals before purchasing must be permanent practices routinely applied on their farms.
Brucella is mainly found in the uterus and placenta and spread by secretion during delivery. Thus, to reduce the spread of the disease, delivery management such as separating an animal in labor from other animals during parturition is necessary to reduce the transmission of the agent across the herd.
One health approach
The one health concept recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment and involves cooperation among physicians, veterinarians and ecologists. One health is defined as a collaborative, multisectoral and transdisciplinary approach at local, regional, national and global levels with the goal of achieving optimal health outcomes and recognizing the interconnection between people, animals and plants and their shared environment. Human brucellosis investigation is an effective method to provide collaboration among animals. However, the clinical signs of human brucellosis are atypical, including a mostly undulant fever that can cause misdiagnosis among physicians and lead to underreported case numbers. To resolve these problems, an information exchange mechanism between the human and animal sectors should be established and enhanced.
Increasing vaccination efficacy
In Thailand
, B. abortus S19 strain vaccination remains the only permitted vaccine that is given to female calves aged between 3 and 6 months in high-risk areas via a single subcutaneous dose of 5-8×10
10 viable organisms. The test-and-slaughter policy is still be set with problems such as compensation, animal ID or specific guidelines. Vaccination is a valuable method in the effort to decrease disease prevalence. However, vaccination policy implementation in Thailand should be reconsidered by reducing the dose from 3×10
8 to 3×10
9 organisms that can be administered subcutaneously to adult cattle. The differences in immune responsiveness after immunization in cattle of different genotypes, which should be tested in all breed in Thailand or at least the basic breeds (
Kumar, 2018).
Meat inspection
Government compensation for slaughtered animals is only 75% of the market price and the process usually takes a long time, resulting in farmers lacking the incentive to control the disease more effectively. Meat from slaughtered animals could be consumed according to FAO guidelines (
Herenda and Chambers, 2000). The FAO has developed guidelines for meat inspection in developing countries, where the aim of meat inspection is to provide safe and wholesome products for human consumption. In many developing regions, meat inspectors often lack the necessary guidelines to assess the sanitary status of carcasses, meat and organs from slaughtered animals. Brucellosis is one of the diseases mentioned in the guidelines.
Brucella organisms have only a short lifespan in the muscles after slaughter and this impacts the safety of skeletal muscle meat. Cattle and horse carcasses affected with brucellosis are approved for consumption after removal of the affected parts. In the acute abortive form after a miscarriage, the cattle carcasses are condemned. Pig, sheep, goat and buffalo carcasses require total condemnation. Affected parts of the carcass, such as the udder, genital organs and corresponding lymph nodes must be condemned. In Thailand, the Control of Animal Slaughter for the Distribution of Meat Act B.E.2559 (2016) does not allow the distribution of meat from infected animals. This issue should be considered nationally and the law should be amended to be appropriate and in accordance with the FAO guidelines.