Growth performance
The impacts of the dietary treatments on growth performance are presented in Table 2. During starter phase, higher (
P<0.05) average BW and BWG were observed in the HMM group. The average BW and BWG, however, were not influenced (
P>0.05) by the dietary treatments in the grower and finisher phases. The FI was not affected (
P>0.05) by the dietary treatments in the starter phase. The greater (
P<0.05) FI, however, was observed in HHH and MLL groups in the grower and finisher phases, respectively. The HMM group had better (
P<0.05) FCR in the starter, grower and finisher phases. These results are validated by the previous work in broiler chicken
(Zarghi et al., 2020). The improved BWG in the broiler chicken fed HBP diets may partially be due to a higher FI resulting in more nutrients and fulfilling the energy needs (
Nasr and Kheiri, 2011). Amino acids are major regulators of growth and protein metabolism. The broiler chicken fed diets deficient in Lys had reduced growth performance, protein accretion and breast muscle development
(Tesseraud et al., 2009). It has been reported that increasing Lys (0.95 to 1.36%) improves FCR in broiler chicken
(Tran et al., 2021).
Carcass characteristics and composition
The impacts of the dietary treatments on the carcass characteristics and composition are presented in Table 3. The higher (
P<0.05) dressed weight was observed in HHM and HMM groups. The HHH group had heavier (
P<0.05) breast and abdominal fat pad. The HHH group, likewise, had a higher (
P<0.05) drumstick weight at par with HLL, HMM, MML and MMM groups. The HHH group had a greater (
P<0.05) thigh weight at par with HHL and HMM groups. The HHH group had heavier (
P<0.05) spleens, thymus and bursa of Fabricius. Meat production is the interaction of growth and feed efficiency. An adequate dietary level of limiting AA is needed to support optimum growth and carcass yield of fast growing broiler chicken
(Handique et al., 2019). The diets with high Lys may affect carcass characteristics since Lys is an essential AA in protein synthesis. The results regarding carcass characteristics are in line with previous findings by
Zarghi et al., (2020). These later authors reported that the increasing dig Lys levels (0.88, 0.94, 1.00, 1.06 and 1.12% dig Lys) in broiler chicken diets enhanced carcass and breast meat yield, whereas the abdominal fat was reduced.
The chemical composition of carcass including moisture, CP, crude and ether extract contents in the meat samples was not influenced (
P>0.05) by the dietary treatments (Table 3).
Serum metabolites and antibody titers
The effects of the dietary treatments on the serum metabolites and antibody titers are presented in Table 4. The HHH group had higher (
P<0.05) serum glucose, total cholesterol and urea concentrations. In agreement to current findings, it was reported that blood glucose was influenced by the supplementation of Lys above the recommended levels since it acts as a precursor of L-carnitine that has a glucogenic effect (
Arslan, 2006). In contrast to the present findings, it was reported that cholesterol concentration was not influenced by Lys levels
(Zhang et al., 2021). The greater total cholesterol concentration in the HBP fed group may be due to the availability of cholesterol in feed or synthesized in the body. The increase in cholesterol concentration in circulating blood could be due to endogenous synthesis of cholesterol in birds. The current blood urea findings are in contrast to those reported by
Gong et al., (2005). The blood urea may be increased due to increasing CP levels in the diets.
The greater (
P<0.05) antibody titers against NDV and IBDV were observed in HHH group. It has been reported that feeding of high density diets leads to greater development of immune organs
(Attia et al., 2017). The greater weights of bursa of Fabricius in HHH groups in the current study might be the possible explanation of greater antibody titers since the bursa of Fabricius is the primary lymphoid organ responsible for the formation and conservation of the B cells in birds
(Jankowski et al., 2014).