Computed tomography (CT)
CT localization of the right kidney, in chinchillas, was found (dorsoventral visualization) between the transverse planes passing through the middle of 1
st lumbar vertebra (cranial) and the cranial end of the 4th lumbar vertebra (caudal) and the left - between the transverse planes passing through the cranial end of 3
rd lumbar vertebra (cranial) and the caudal end of the 5th lumbar vertebra (caudal). The right kidney showed a relative medial and cranial localization compared to the left (Fig 1, Fig 2, Fig 4, Fig 5, Fig 6 and Fig 7).
The length of the right kidney was 2.66±0.28 cm, its width - 1.74±0.18 cm and in the left the length and width were 2.62±0.24 cm and 1.72±0.16 cm, respectively (Table 1 and Fig 2). The differences in diameters were not statistically significant (P<0.05).
In the native CT study, the renal pelvis showed a relatively high X-ray density, compared with the consistentdecrease of the density in the medulla and cortex. The adipose capsule was poorly defined (Fig 1).
Hyperdensity of the renal pelvis and renal medulla was detected by contrast CT imaging. The cortex showed relative hypodensity compared to the renal pelvis and medulla. Perirenal adipose tissue (adipose capsule) was relatively hyperdense to the renal cortex.
Imaging findings, visualizing the multipapillary structure of the kidneys of the chinchilla were observed (Fig 2 and Fig 7).
The volume of the right kidney was larger (3.03±0.31 ml), compared to the same of the left (3.00±0.29 ml) (Table 2). The differences in volume were not statistically significant (P<0.05). X-ray density (Hounsfield Unit - HU) of the right kidney was higher (589.1±175.3 HU) than that of the left- 571.9±172.1 HU (Table 2, Fig 3). The differences in HU were not statistically significant (P<0.05).
Anatomical topographic CT contact was found on the right between the cranial pole of the right kidney and the caudal part of the liver and on the left - between the cranial pole of the left kidney and the spleen (Fig 1, Fig 2, Fig 4 and Fig 5).
The hilus of the right kidney had a medial localization and that of the left kidney was dorsomedial and caudal (Fig 4, Fig 5, Fig 6 and Fig 7).
The right kidney reached with its cranial part to the last rib and the left kidney was located completely extrathoracically and caudoventrally to the right (Fig 1, Fig 4 and Fig 6).
The left kidney was visualized as a laterally distanced finding from the spine, compared to the right, showing anatomical proximity to the left soft abdominal wall (Fig 4, Fig 5, Fig 6 and Fig 7). The image of the medial edge of the right kidney was covered by the finding of the lumbar spine. The image of the medial edge of the left kidney was complete, well defined and distanced from the bone findings (Fig 4, Fig 5 and Fig 6).
The shape of the left kidney was typically bean-shaped, while the shape of the right kidney was oval. The left renal hilus was more definitively visualized. The cranial and caudal poles of the right kidney were relatively elongated compared to those of the left. The medial edge of the left kidney was relatively concave compared to the medial edge of the right kidney. The lateral edge of the left kidney was relatively convex, compared to the lateral edge of the right kidney and was craniolaterally convex (Fig 1-6).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
In T1 weighted MRI of the kidneys, in chinchillas, the contrast was anatomical. The renal findings showed a hypointense signal relative to the peripheral soft tissues. The right kidney was visualized as a soft-tissue hyposignal finding. It was in direct contact (without soft-tissue definition) with the is the signal finding of the cranially imaged liver. The left kidney was ventrocaudally imaged and better defined than the right kidney from the adjacent soft tissues. The peripheral contours of the renal parenchyma were well distinguishable. The definition of the individual parts of the kidney, such as the cortex, medulla and pelvis, was visualized. The adipose capsule was visible as a hyper-intensive finding. The right renal finding was relatively hyperintense compared to the left. The renal hilus was well distinguishable. The medial distance of the renal findings was greater and heterosignal on the left and the lateral distance was greater and hyper signal on the right. Soft tissue homosignal contact was observed on the right between the right kidney and the liver. The contact between the left kidney and the spleen was observed as a relatively hyposignal finding on the left and laterally (Fig 8, Fig 9 and Fig 10).
In T2 weighted MRI the contrast was hyposignal in the renal cortex and relatively hyper signal in the medulla. The renal pelvis was visualized as a cavity finding with the relatively most intensive signal from the renal structure. The adipose capsule was relatively hyper intensive compared to the renal parenchyma. The kidneys were distinguished by the peripheral soft tissues. The organs’ boundaries demonstrated the typical shape of the kidneys. Contact between the right kidney and lumbar muscles was a clear hyper-signal finding and contact between the left and soft abdominal wall was hyperintense. The renal hilus was poorly defined. The transverse image of the right kidney was approximately oval and that of the left kidney was approximately triangular. Heterosignal findings were observed in the renal parenchyma, which has the characteristics of a multipapillary image of the pyelo-calyx system of the kidney (Fig 10 and Fig 11).
The obtained CT results demonstrate the medullary part of the kidneys in chinchillas as multipapillary and do not correspond to a previous study
(Ferrari et al., 2013), presenting its single-papillary structure.
The CT location of the kidneys in chinchillas shows caudal topographic positioning, compared to the topography of the kidneys in the rabbits. Similar to that found in the rabbit, in chinchillas the right kidney is located medially and cranially, compared to the left
(Ferrari et al., 2013).
The greater length and width of the right kidney in the chinchilla, compared to the left by CT do not correspond to the opposite found in the rabbit - the left kidney is larger than the right. In addition to its larger size, the right kidney in chinchillas shows a larger volume and higher X-ray density than the left. The resulting CT image of the medial edge of the right kidney, in chinchillas, is closer to the lumbar spine than in rabbits. The CT contact, on the left, between the cranial pole of the left kidney and the spleen, in chinchillas, does not correspond to the radiographically known in the rabbit. The CT imaged oval shape of the right kidney, in chinchillas and bean-shaped of the left kidney, are an essential species trait, in contrast to the rabbit, in which both kidneys are bean-shaped. The CT established close localization of the left kidney with the soft abdominal wall does not correspond to that found in the rabbit
(Ferrari et al., 2013).
The CT definition of the kidneys’ size in chinchilla is not affected by the condition of the colon, unlike
(Jones et al., 2020) finding the opposite. Compared with the localization of the kidneys in chinchillas was determined about the successive lumbar vertebrae used as bone markers. In our opinion, the use of soft tissue markers (aorta) to perform a morphometric and topographic assessment of the kidneys in chinchillas is a variable indicator that we do not present.
The CT sizes of the kidneys in chinchillas found by us support the stereological data of
Başaran et al., (2013) presenting the right kidney as larger.
Similar to
Cui et al., (2016) we obtained 3D reconstructed results that precisely define the topography, shape and cortico-medullary characteristics of the kidneys in chinchillas.
Our results from T1- weighted MRI of the kidneys in chinchillas show that the contrast is anatomical. The hypointense signal of the renal findings corresponds to that found in the human kidney
(Nikken and Krestin, 2007). The soft tissue hyposignal finding (in T1-weighed MRI) of the right kidney in chinchillas showed relative cranial localization compared to the left.
The relative hypersignal image of the right kidney in chinchillas is probably due to its extensive contact with the liver. Our MRI investigation of the kidneys in chinchillas allows achieving a good tissue definition of the individual parts of the kidney, such as the cortex, medulla and pelvis.
The resulting hypersignal image of the renal pelvis and medulla (in T2-weighed MRI) better demonstrates the corticomedullary definition and the pyelocalyx system in chinchillas. Therefore, from what is known for the man
(Nikken and Krestin, 2007), one can suggest chinchilla kidneys as an affordable and reliable model for MRI anatomical study of the urinary organs.
The magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys of chinchillas corresponds to the anatomical structure of these organs and supports similar results for the rat
(Morehouse et al., 1995). The cortico-medullary MRI definition in chinchillas is better visible in the T2 sequence than in the human- in the T1 sequence
(Leung et al., 1984). The advantage of MRI in studying the soft tissue characteristics of the kidneys in chinchillas, based on the increased soft tissue contrast, supports what is known for the man
(Nikken and Krestin, 2007).
Compared to
Nikken and Krestin (2007), who studied mainly human kidney lesions, the results of our MRI investigation of the kidneys in chinchillas are a precise anatomical basis for assessing the renal status of chinchillas.