The lower body weight (Fig 1) and ADG (Table 3) in restricted feed groups (
P<0.001) indicated that the level of feed restriction in the present study directly influenced the body weight and ADG. The FPP supplementation did not compensate the body weight and ADG for the loss of feed intake. These similar findings were documented in a previous study
(Poltep et al., 2016).
The serum IGF-1 of pigs in NF+S and RF+S that received FPP was significantly higher than NF and RF groups which were raised without FPP (Fig 2A). Reports from several studies showed that the relation between feed restriction and IGF-1 levels are still inconclusive.
Combes et al., (1997) found that reductions in serum IGF-1 levels in response to feed restriction was inconsistent throughout swine development. The serum IGF-1 was not significantly different in feed restricted swine at the body weight of 40 kg and during 100-130 kg, but showed statistically reduction when measured in 70 kg swine. In contrast, a study showed that feed restriction in swine reduced serum IGF-1
(Thorson et al., 2018). The rise in IGF-1 from FPP supplementation were also found in a previous study
(Poltep et al., 2016).
The serum concentrations of cortisol in all groups were not significantly different regardless of feed regimen or FPP addition for 30 days (Fig 2B). It has been reported that serum concentration of cortisol in swine experiencing feed restriction of less than 21 days underwent no change in their serum cortisol level
(Prunier et al., 1993; Thorson et al., 2018). However, feed restriction for 21 days in 78-98 days old pigs led to an increase in serum cortisol
(Metges et al., 2015). The variations of cortisol responses to feed restriction between different studies may be from differences between age, degree of feed restriction and duration of the treatment of each study. The results of this study indicated that restricted feed alone had no effect on serum IGF-1 and cortisol concentrations and the FPP supplementation raised the IGF-1 levels but not serum cortisol concentration.
The
IGF1 mRNA expression from semitendinosus muscle was significantly higher (
P=0.019) in NF+S and RF+S than that of NF and RF groups (Fig 3A). The
GHR mRNA levels of semitendinosus muscle (Fig 3B) were not different in all groups. There was also no difference in the
IGF1 and
GHR mRNA expression levels in the liver (Fig 3C and 3D) between all groups, although FPP supplementation had shown to increase
IGF1 gene expression in the liver of broiler chickens
(Lertpimonpan et al., 2019). The liver is known to be the principal source of circulatory IGF-1 (
Sjögren et al., 1999), but in young pigs, possibly major source of serum IGF-1 is from non-hepatic tissue such as skeletal muscle
(Lee et al., 1993). In results from this study indicated that the increase in serum concentration of IGF-1 was resulted from non-hepatic tissue production and the higher
IGF1 mRNA expression in the semitendinosus muscle correlated with the increase level of serum IGF-1.
As
Kiss1 gene expression in the ARC of hypothalamus were not significantly different in all animal groups (Fig 3E), hence, the results from this study indicated that increased serum IGF-1 by the FPP supplementation did not alter
Kiss1 mRNA expression in the hypothalamus of prepubertal pigs. Similar findings found that IGF-1 stimulated the AVPV kisspeptin expression but had a negligible effect on ARC kisspeptin neuron population of mice
(Hiney et al., 2009). This resemble the findings by
Thorson et al., (2018), where short-term (10 d) feed restriction with mild body weight loss in ovariectomized late prepubertal gilts had no changes in the number of cells that express
Kiss1 in the medial arcuate nucleus of hypothalamus and also had no differences in serum cortisol level, eventhough serum IGF-1 were lowered. Contrarily,
Zhou et al., (2014) observed that long-term feed restriction (100 d) with body weight loss in intact pubertal gilts decreased hypothalamic
Kiss1 mRNA expression. Suggested that transcription of hypothalamic kisspeptin appeared to be influenced by magnitude and duration of feed restriction as reviewed by
Lents (2019). Therefore, feed restriction procedure, cortisol or combination of these factors may influence the response of the
Kiss1 mRNA expression in swine.