Milking performance
The milk fat content in group E4 was 38.35% greater (
P=0.0129) than that of group E3. The milk protein content of E1 treatment was 10.69% and 5.07% greater (P<0.0001) than that of E2 and E3 treatments (Table 2), Milk lactose of group E4 was significant greater than that of E1 and E3 treatments (P<0.05) and the content of total solids and solids-not-fat of group E4 was the highest among the treatments and it was 16.22% and 12.67%, 7.55% and 3.41%, 16.22% and 12.67% greater (P<0.0001) than those of group E1, E2 and E3 treatments, respectively.
Hydrolysis amino acid composition
Concentration of Asp, Thr, Ser, Glu and Gly for group E1, were on average about 34.09%, 32.23%, 36.11%, 33.25% and 32.69% higher than that of E2 treatment (P<0.05), besides, there were also significant difference (P<0.01) in concentration of Val, Ile, Leu, Tyr, Lys, His, Arg and Pro for group E1 treatment than that of E2 treatment. Concentration of total AA was on average about 35.01% and 23.01% higher (P<0.01) for E1 treatment than that of E2 and E3 treatments, respectively (Table 3).
Blood biochemistry indexes
The plasma GPT concentration of group E1 and E4 was greater (P<0.0001) than that of group E2 and E3 (Table 4). For the plasma TC and LDH, the greatest value (P<0.0001) was obtained from group E2 among treatments. The TG concentration in plasma for E2 treatment was significant lower (P<0.05) than that of E3 treatment. The greatest value of plasma UN concentration was found in treatment E1 and it was 31.29%, 36.87% and 46.59% greater (P<0.0001) than that of E2, E3 and E4 treatments, respectively. The plasma GLU concentration of E3 treatment was 8.84%, 9.84% and 12.97% greater than (P<0.01) that of E1, E2 and E4 treatments, respectively.
Milk performance
High dietary energy input played a critical role in effective lactation
(Wang et al., 2014). Zhou et al., (2015) have concluded that milk yield, milk protein and yield and milk lactose yield increased in response to higher levels of dietary energy. The difference were ascribed to the different composition of diet and the species of cows probably, besides, the difference may be also result from the special geographical environment.
Boerman et al., (2015) suggested that a high-forage diet that supplemented with palmitic acid increased milk fat yield, it was similar to the results in the current study.
Zhou et al., (2015) reported that an increased energy level were beneficial to milk protein production due to increased yields of microbial protein when cows are fed corn stover as a dietary forage source.
Cadorniga et al., (1993) also reported that high-energy diets stimulate microbial protein synthesis. The different dietary forage source and the plateau hypoxia and low tempreture environment may be play a critical role in these difference and the partly energy maybe were used to maintain normal life activities of Jersey cows instead of MCP synthesis. Energy intake is associated with milk yield and milk solids production (
Broderick, 2003). This agrees with the current study because the milk total solids content was greatest on group E4, the result in this study was also in accordance with the results reported by
Reid et al., (2015).
Hydrolysis amino acid composition of milk
Many factors could affected the amino acid composition, which included dairy breed, parityand lactation stage and the content of amino acid in high milk protein was higher than that in low milk protein, the results in the current study was in accord with the reported by
Zhou, 2017. However, few documents reported that how energy affected the content of amino acid in milk under the condition of the plateau hypoxiaand low temperature environment and more further works were necessary to illuminate the mechanism.
Blood biochemistry
The activity of GPT could reflect the change of metabolism in body
(Yan et al., 2015). The result in the current study was in accordance with the results reported by
Yan et al., (2015). TG and TC were important indexes that reflected body energy and fat metabolism and could reflect the fat digestive and absorption directly
(Yang et al., 2013). Sun et al., (2013) suggested that the content of TG and TC in plasma increased with the increasing levels of dietary energy. The difference may have a relation to the lipid metabolism under the special geographical and climate environment in Tibet. There was a positive relationship between the concentration of milk UN and blood plasma urea nitrogen (
Ciszukand Gebregziabher, 1994).
Jaster et al., (1990) reported that the high dietary energy for calf starters would result in the decrease of UN content in plasma, the result in the present study was in line with the results reported by
Jaster et al., (1990).
Changes of plasma Glu content with the increasing level of dietary energy in the present study were multifarious. This phenomenon may be related to the plasma insulin content. Researchers have reported that dairy cows increased insulin resistance largely due to deficient energy intake for the postpartum period (
Sinclair, 2010) and excessive energy intake for non-lactating dairy cowsand lactating
(Leiva et al., 2015). Plasma LDH was an important enzyme that related to glycolysis and played a critical role in energy metabolism. The dietary energy level of E2 promoted gluconeogenesis in liver, which may be the main reason for the increase of plasma LDH content.