Growth performances
The growth performances are presented in Table 2. The ADFI and ADG of test group 3 were significantly higher (
p<0.05) in comparison with the control. However, there was no significantly difference in ADFI in group 1, group 2 and group 3 and no significantly difference in ADG in group 1 and group 3. There was no significant difference in feed/gain ratio among all groups (
p>0.05).
A previous study has shown that 2%
(Giesting and Easter, 1985), 2% ~3%
(Cronmwell, 1987), 2.5%
(Krause et al., 1994). CA diets increased the ADG of weaned piglets. However, the current study testified that 1% CA diet had the best performance. But there was no significant difference in ADFI 1%, 1.5%. 2% CA groups. Similar to these findings were the studies by
(Huang et al., 2002),
Wang (2011) and
(Zheng et al., 2005). The reasons for the inconsistent results among studies are not known but might be the weaning age of piglets, the buffering capacity of the diets, dietary components and the feeding environment.
Apparent nutrient digestibility
The apparent digestibility values were shown in Table 3. The digestibility of CP increased with the increase in dietary CA levels and there were significant differences among all groups (
p<0.05). The digestibility of EE was reduced with the increase in dietary CA level and there was significant lower (
p<0.05) in the 2% CA group in comparison with control and 1% CA groups. The digestibility of Ca and P were significantly increased with the increase in dietary CA levels (
p<0.05), but there were no significantly differences in Ca and P digestibility between the 1% CA and the 1.5% CA groups (
p>0.05), P digestibility between the 1.5% CA and the 2% CA groups (
p>0.05).
Similar to this result,
(Debi et al., 2010) indicated that supplementation of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0% and 2.5% CA in growing rabbit diet improved CP digestibility.
(Broz et al., 1987) found that adding 0.5%, 1.0% or 2.0% CA in the basal diet of weaned piglets could significantly improve feed utilization rate.
(Cao et al., 2015) reported that adding 0.5% CA and compound acid (0.25% benzoic acid and 0.25% CA) significantly increased Ca and P digestibility.
(Diao et al., 2013) determined that dietary 0.5% CA significantly increased the digestibility of crude protein, ether extract, calcium and phosphorus of weaned piglets.But this study showed that 2% CA group had the highest digestibility of ether extract, which was inconsistent with the report by
(Diao et al., 2013).
Gastrointestinal pH
As shown in Table 4, The gastrointestinal pH were significantly reduced with the increase in dietary CA levels (
p<0.05), but there were no significantly differences in pH of stomach contents between the 1% CA and the 1.5% CA groups (p>0.05), pH of duodenum contents between the 0.5% CA and the 1% CA groups and between the 1% CA and the 1.5% CA groups (
p>0.05), PH of jejunum contents between the 0.5% CA and the 1% CA groups, pH of ileum contents between the 0.5% CA and the 1.5% CA groups.
(Klieviiut et al., 2016) showed that organic acids had no significant effect on pH in different parts of the stomach and intestines of rabbits. There were no significant differences in stomach and small intestine pH of weaned piglets which also supported by
(Piva et al., 2007) who reported that no effect on gastrointestinal pH after inclusion of sorbic acid in swine diets. However,
(Esmaeilipour et al., 2011) reported that adding CA to a low-phosphorus diet in broilers significantly reduced gastrointestinal pH
(Risley et al., 1992) found that adding 1.5% CA to corn soybean meal diet of weaned piglets reduced the pH of ileum contents. The results of this study showed that additions of CA could significantly reduce the pH levels of gastric, ileal and jejunal contents. The results of different effects of acidifiers on the pH of gastrointestinal tract contents may be related to the treatment technology and the inclusion level of acidifiers as well as the differences of animal species and individuals.