Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 12 (december 2021) : 1491-1497

Prevalence of Intestinal Parasite Infections in Stray Dogs in Taif Region, KSA

Jamila S. Al Malki1,*
1Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 111099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Cite article:- Malki Al S. Jamila (2021). Prevalence of Intestinal Parasite Infections in Stray Dogs in Taif Region, KSA . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(12): 1491-1497 . doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1421.
Background: The study of intestinal parasites that occur in stray dogs in the Taif region, KSA, is most important since there is little data available on this subject. 

Methods: Dog fecal samples were collected from 129 dogs in three different areas. Fecal samples were processed and analyzed by different mount techniques including, parasitological examination, wet-mount preparation and modified Kinyoun’s acid-fast technique.

Result: The total prevalence of enteric parasites was 115 positive cases; for helminths was (62.7%) and for protozoa (26.3%). Mixed infection was higher than single infection in three areas. The total prevalence of helminths eggs by different mount preparation recovered from fecal sample examination from single or mixed form E. granulosus, T. canis and T. vulpis was of high infection rate (15.5%), (10.07%), (10.07%), followed by A. lumbercoides (7.7 %). Finally, T. leonine (6.9%), both A. caninum and A. braziliense are of the same percentage (6.2%). Concerning single and mixed protozoa infection, Giardia was of a high prevalence (16.2%), followed by Cryptosporidium (8.5%) and finally E. histolytica (1.5%) in fecal samples of doges. These data revealed that infection levels of parasites in stray dogs in the studied areas were high, knowing that this is the first study for mixed infections between dogs and humans in KSA.
Taif city is situated at an elevation of 1,879 m above mean sea level. The city’s modern economy is still mostly dependent on agriculture (Prothero 1920). Dogs that spend their lives in rural areas are primarily “sentinels” of animal herds and homes. The dogs’ close contact with humans and other animals obligates their caregivers to systematic deworming (Michalczyk et al., 2019). Dogs play a potential role as reservoirs for zoonotic parasites, being especially problematic uncontrolled dog populations such as stray dogs with access to populated areas (Regidor-Cerrillo et al., 2020). Dogs have close contact with humans and this represents a serious route of transmission of parasites from dogs to man (Martínez-Carrasco, 2007; Zanzani et al., 2014). Dogs act as reservoirs of many parasites such as Taenia sp., hydatid tapeworm (Echinococcus sp.), dog roundworm (Toxocara canis), dog hookworm (Ancylostoma sp.), Giardia sp. and Cryptosporidium sp. (Soriano et al., 2010; Weese et al., 2011; Jacob and Lorber, 2015). Therefore, food and water contaminated with dog feces serve as the major sources involved in the intake of intestinal zoonotic parasites to humans (Younes et al., 2021). With an emphasis on parasite life cycle, transmission, pathogenicity, prevention and identification of knowledge gaps (Dantas-Torres and Otranto, 2014; Baneth et al., 2016). Many researchers indicate the presence of intestinal parasites in numerous kinds of dogs in the world, but no available data about the parasites in stray dogs in the Taif region. Microscopic observation of wet mounts remains the most widely used method for identifying ova and cyst of parasites from stool specimens (Myers and Koshi, 2011). Some problems and art facts made the diagnosis of parasites difficult in fecal specimens (Zaman et al., 2018). So, the present study was carried out to determine the prevalence, intensity and types of intestinal parasites in stray dogs in the Taif region in Saudi Arabia and the detection of parasites with the aid of different mount stain techniques.
Study area
 
This study was conducted at Taif University Central Laboratory, during the period from June 2020 to December 2020 in three regions, Area 1 (21°20'58.4"N 40°25'49.9"E), Area 2 (21°14'00.9"N 40°27'23.3"E) and Area 3 (21°13'17.4"N 40°22'07.3"E) at the Taif region (Fig 1).
 

Fig 1: Three areas of Taif region where dog samples were collected.


 
Animals
 
One hundred and twenty-nine stray dogs live in three different regions at Taif. These dogs were free secured outdoors, fed on garbage, or scavenged on rodents and dead animals.
 
Fecal samples
 
Fresh fecal samples were collected from each dog population by the responsible person from the ground in the morning after voiding by dogs and individually labeled in a plastic container. The distance between the three areas was at least 5 km so that a sample from the same dog was not collected twice. The number of each dog population, each sample was preserved in formalin (10%) until examined.
 
Parasitological examination
 
Each fecal sample was examined macroscopically for adult nematodes and tapeworm proglottids. Each sample was subjected to examination by centrifugal fecal floatation technique using zinc sulphate solution (Dryden et al., 2005). Furthermore, the formol ether sedimentation technique (Cornell et al., 2017) was applied for each sample. Parasites were identified based on morphology to the family, genus, or, when possible, species level (Salvador et al., 2014).
 
Wet mount preparation
 
Saline-based
 
Dilution using a normal saline (0.09%) for a minute portion of the feces was performed on a microscopic glass slide, then a coverslip was gently put over it to spread out the emulsion to obtain a thin transparent layer. Observation for stool preparation of three different wet mounts was performed in three different microscopes and examined initially under low power (10X) objective, then again under a high-power objective (40X) to confirm presumptive and positive findings (Parija and Srinivasa, 1999).
 
Iodine-based
 
Saline-based wet mounts were prepared by adding a drop of Lugols iodine to a small volume of stool, then mixing both on the glass slide that contains saline, followed by placing a coverslip on it. The usage of iodine solution aimed to make protozoan and cyst identification easier (Zajac and Conboy, 2012).
 
Modified trichrome (MT) stain
 
Fixation of the obtained concentrated pellet was performed using absolute methyl alcohol (Merck) on a clean glass slide, then stained with modified trichrome (MT) stain (Weber et al., 1992).
 
Modified Kinyoun’s acid-fast technique
 
After preparing modified Kinyoun’s acid-fast stain, fecal smears were dried on a warmer slide at 60°C, fixed with absolute methanol for 30 seconds, then stained with Kinyoun’s carbol fuchsin for 5 minutes. De-staining for the preparations was performed using acid alcohol for 2 min, then Malachite green was used to perform counterstaining for another 2 min. Slides were then rinsed with distilled water, dried on a warmer slide at 60°C for about 5 min and then mounted and examined for the detection of oocysts of coccidian (Wood et al., 1982; Ash and Orihel, 1987).
 
Statistical analysis
 
Data collection was tabulated and calculated. The tabulation process was performed manually, as well as using SPSS software. An electronic calculator was used for the calculation. Using a microscope in the parasitological laboratory at the faculty of science, Taif University was used to photograph and produce pictures of the protozoan cysts and eggs (ova) of the helminth. Identification of the trophozoite, cyst, oocysts, eggs observed under the microscope was performed following descriptions and pictures published by WHO (2019).
The total prevalence of enteric parasites in the fecal sample showed 115 positive cases, where helminths were 81 (62.7%) and protozoa were 34 (26.3%) out of 129 examined dogs (Fig 2). Infection rates were high in the fecal samples collected from dogs in area 2, the percentages of helminths and protozoa were (27.1%), (10.07%) respectively followed by area (3) (20.1%), (9.3%) and finally area (1) (15.5%), (6.9%) in Taif region, the difference was statistically significant (p=<0.0001). The prevalence of mixed infection of enteric helminthic and protozoa in fecal samples of stray dogs in three areas was higher than single infection (Table 1, 2 and 3).
 

Fig 2: Prevalence of enteric helminths and protozoa in the examined dogs.


 

Table 1: Prevalence of single infection enteric helminthic species in stray dogs in three areas.


 

Table 2: Prevalence of single infection enteric protozoa species in stray dogs in three areas.


 

Table 3: Prevalence of mixed enteric parasites species infection in three areas in stray dogs.


       
Regarding infection with helminths eggs recovered from fecal sample examination from single or mixed form, Echinococcus granulosus, Toxocara canis, Trichuris vulpis were of high infection rate (15.5%), (10.07%), (10.07%) followed by Ascaris lumbercoides (7.7%), then Toxocara leonine (6.9%), while both Ancylostoma caninum and Ancylostoma braziliense are of the same percentage (6.2%). Concerning single and mixed protozoa infection, Giardia was of a high prevalence (16.2%) followed by Cryptosporidium (8.5%) and finally Entamoeba histolytica (1.5%) in fecal samples of stray dogs (Fig 3).
 

Fig 3: Showing A- T. canis egg; B- T. leonine egg; C- T. Vulpis egg. Scale-bar= 100 ìm; D- E. granulosus egg. Scale-bar= 50 ìm; E- A. caninum egg. Scale-bar= 100 ìm; F- A. Lumbricoides egg. Scale-bar= 50 ìm; G- Cryptosporidium oocyst; H- Giardia cyst. Scale-bar= 100 ìm.


 
The total prevalence of helminths eggs by three different mount preparations showed Toxocara canis and Toxocara leonine eggs were (10.07%), (6.9%) respectively confirmed by the trichrome stain. At the same time, the percentage with the saline-based wet mount was (6.9%), (5.4%) and (8.5%), (6.2%) by the iodine-based wet mount. The prevalence of Trichuris vulpis was (10.07%) confirmed by trichrome wet mount, while the percentage (6.9%) by saline wet method and wet iodine mount preparation. Echinoccous granulose prevalence was (15.5%) detected by trichrome wet mount and (11.6%) by saline wet method and (13.1%) by iodine wet mount. The prevalence of Ancylostom caninum and Ancylostoma braziliense was (6.2%) detected by saline wet mount preparation, and trichrome wet mount prevalence with iodine wet mount was (4.6%) and (3.8%), respectively. A prevalence of (7.7%) for Ascaris lumbricoides was detected by trichrome mount wet, while prevalence with both saline wet and iodine wet mounts was (5.4%) (Table 4).
       
Protozoa recovered from the fecal samples and the total prevalence of Cryptosporidium species was (8.5%) detected by Kinyoun’s acid-fast stain, while the prevalence with saline wet mount and iodine were (7.7%), (6.9%) respectively. The prevalence of Giardia was (16.2%) confirmed with iodine wet mount method while, with saline wet mount and Kinyoun’s acid-fast were (12.4%), (13.9%). Entamoeba histolytica incidence was (1.5%) confirmed with iodine wet mount method and Kinyoun’s acid-fast while, with saline wet mount was (0.8%) (Fig 4).
 

Fig 4: Comparative prevalence of different protozoa using different types of wet mount-based preparations.


       
As per our knowledge, this is the first study addressing mixed infections between dogs and humans in Saudi Arabia. Public health authorities and research bodies all over the world are especially and highly interested in the intestinal parasites found in dogs. This huge attention was taken because dogs are reservoirs for these zoonotic parasites, carry and transmit them (Gracenea et al., 2009). Our study showed a total prevalence (115 out of 129 cases) for enteric parasites in the fecal samples, where it was for helminths 81 (62.7%) and for protozoa 34 (26.3%). This result was recorded for the first time in Taif, KSA. As stray dogs have free access to potentially infectious; synchronized with the lack of anti-parasitic treatments, dogs are heavily parasitized animals. Humans in Taif are at high risk for being subjected to different gastrointestinal parasites of zoonotic potential, which can be spread easily via stray dogs, a fact that is relevant to what is aforementioned. Similar results were reordered in other countries in the world, such as in the Philippines and Canada (Villeneuve et al., 2015; Urgel et al., 2019).
       
Infection rates in fecal samples collected from three different areas in Taif showed higher rates of infection with helminths and protozoa in the area (2) (27.1%), (10.07%) followed by area (3) (20.1%), (9.3%) and finally area (1) (15.5%), (6.9%), respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p=<0.001). A possible explanation for these findings is that areas (2 and 3) are characterized by dogs living in close contact with livestock besides the presence of animal slaughterhouses. These animal species are intermediary hosts essentially required for many parasites to complete their life cycle (Weese et al., 2011). Prevalence of intestinal parasites (helminths and protozoa) in the fecal samples of dogs in three areas showed a higher rate of mixed infection rather than of mono-infection. This is attributed to the fact that the presence of one parasite species may lessen the immunity of the dogs with higher parasite intensity, which in turn enhances the presence of the other parasitic species, causing these mixed infection cases (Fontanarrosa et al., 2006). The present study showed types of helminth and protozoan species like those reported in earlier surveys of dogs (De Alwis, 2000).
       
It was found, after observing various helminths eggs by different mounting techniques, that E. granulosus, T. canis, and T. vulpis were the helminths in single and mixed infection and resembled high rates of infection (15.5%), (10.07%) and (10.07%), respectively followed by A. lumbercoides (7.7%), then T. leonine (6.9%), while both A. caninum and A. braziliense are of the same percentage (6.2%). These results were confirmed with the trichrome wet mount method. The trichrome stain has been considered as a helpful stain in the detection of helminths ova (Wood et al., 1982; Hale et al., 1996). They described the appearance of the most common helminth ova that was easily detected using the trichrome stain than other mount preparation.
       
In the present work, we found E. granulosus prevalence was high in the areas 2 and 3 (40%) in either single infection or mixed infection with T. canis and T. leonine. This finding is particularly important because there are many large feedlots for cattle, sheep, goats and camels in areas 2 and 3. These animals are of high infection risk by contamination of food or water supplies with eggs carried by dogs, which could result in the spread of this zoonotic infection to local stray dogs. Consequently, human and animal infection with an intermediate stage (hydatid cyst) may arise in KSA (Deplazes et al., 2011; Shalaby et al., 2011).
       
T. canis prevalence in the current study was (10.07%). It has been documented that T. canis ova were very resistant to extreme weather conditions and chemical agents (Torres-Chablé et al., 2015; Regidor-Cerrillo et al., 2020). Also, it is well known that routes of infection of T. canis include oral, transmammary, and transplacental and that it can be transmitted by paratenic hosts, which let the parasite everlasting in our ecosystem (Corrales et al., 1999). T. leonine percentage was (6.9%), the latter one of the more frequent parasites detected in shelter dogs in several countries (Villeneuve et al., 2015). The region is a shared habitat with dogs; this interaction may explain the presence of T. leonina in stray dogs (Beiromvand et al., 2013).
       
The prevalence of T. vulpis was (10.07%). The zoonotic potential of T. vulpis was supported by Dunn et al., (2002), who recorded human infection with this worm due to close contact with dogs. Trichuris spp. is considered to be soil-transmitted helminths (Liberato et al., 2018). The prevalence of A. caninum and A. braziliense was (6.2%) in this study. Transmission of this parasite can occur through penetration of skin at hair follicles or sweat glands or through direct ingestion of A. caninum (Wojnarowicz and Smith, 2007; Scaramozzino et al., 2018). However, recorded mixed infection with A. braziliense and T. vulpis similar result by Villeneuve et al., (2015) has reported a strong positive association between Ancylostoma sp. and T. vulpis in North America. The A. lumbricoides has a prevalence of (7.7%), where the present study suggested that dogs could act as reservoir hosts of A. lumbricoides and environmental contaminators that increase the risk of infection in humans (Zaman et al., 2018).
       
Concerning single and mixed protozoa infection, Giardia was of high prevalence (16.2%), followed by Cryptosporidium (8.5%) and finally E. histolytica (1.5%) in fecal samples of dogs. Protozoa appeared to have less shrinkage and a more distinct internal structure with the saline concentration than other mount preparations (Zaman et al., 2018). The present work recorded that the prevalence of Giardia was (16.2%), which was confirmed by the iodine wet mount method, where internal structures of trophozoites, cysts were stained well by iodine, the method that made their recognition and identification easier in the specimens. Cryptosporidium species was (8.5%) detected by Kinyoun’s acid-fast stain (Elsafi et al., 2014). Those protozoa represent zoonotic risk factors for man, the zoonotic potentiality supported by (Robertson and Thompson, 2002; Stafford et al., 2020). Finally, the higher prevalence of Giardia sp. and Cryptosporidium sp. in stray dogs may be due to dogs drinking water from small rivers and lakes that are frequently more contaminated with parasites (Frizzo et al., 2016).
In conclusion, the present results clearly showed significant results of intestinal helminths and protozoa in stray dogs we have examined, as those act as hosts for several species of enteric parasites. Therefore, we should take preventive measures to avoid the environmental contamination and infection of both man and animals in the Taif region.
I extend my appreciation to Taif university researchers supporting project number (TURSP-2020/299), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Funding: Grant number (TURSP-2020/299), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
 
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
 
Availability of data and materials: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
 
Code availability: Not applicable.
 
Authors’ contributions
 
Jamila S. Al Malki has designed the study, collected samples and performed parasitological assays. Also, Jamila S. Al Malki performed data analysis and wrote the article draft and conducted the required revision to reach the readable and publishable approved final manuscript.
 
Ethics approval
 
Not applicable. Samples were feces collected from stray dogs, no sacrificing for animals nor tissue samples were collected that require ethical approval.
 
Consent to participate: Not applicable.
 
Consent for publication: Not applicable.

  1. Ash, L.R. and Orihel, T.C. (1987). American Society of Clinical Pathologists (ASCP) Press, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

  2. Baneth, G., Thamsborg, S.M., Otranto, D., Guillot, J., Blaga, R., Deplazes, P., Solano-Gallego, L. (2016). Major parasitic zoonoses associated with dogs and cats in Europe. J. Comp Pathol. 155: 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.10.179

  3. Beiromvand, M., Akhlaghi, L., Fattahi Massom, S.H., Meamar, A.R., Motevalian, A., Oormazdi, H., Razmjou, E. (2013). Prevalence of zoonotic intestinal parasites in domestic and stray dogs in a rural area of Iran. Prev. Vet. Med. 109: 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.09.009.

  4. Cornell, H.N., O’Neal, P.R., Wong, V.M., Noah, D.L. (2017). Survey of intestinal parasitism in dogs in the Phoenix metropolitan area. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 251: 539-543. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.251.5.539.

  5. Corrales, G.M., de Vega, F.D.A., del Campillo, M.C., Acedo, C.S., Quílez, J., del Cacho, E., Díez-Baños, P., María Patrocinio Morrondo-Pelayo, M.P. (1999). Parasitosis of the dog and the cat. Parasitol Vet. 636-638. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ servlet/articulo?codigo=3879668.

  6. Dantas-Torres, F., Otranto, D. (2014). Dogs, cats, parasites and humans in Brazil: opening the black box. Parasit Vectors. 14: 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-22

  7. De Alwis, T.M.D.R. (2000). A survey of endoparasitic zoonoses in stray dogs at a selected locality (Thamankaduwa) in Polonnaruwa district. M. Sc. thesis, Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya. 8-42. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1435

  8. Deplazes, P., van Knapen, F., Schweiger, A., Overgaauw, P.A. (2011). Role of pet dogs and cats in the transmission of helminthic zoonoses in Europe, with a focus on echinococcosis and toxocarosis. Vet. Parasitol. 182: 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.014.

  9. Dryden, M.W., Payne, P.A., Ridley, R., Smith, V. (2005). Comparison of fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts. Vet. Ther. 6: 15-28.

  10. Dunn, J.J., Columbus, S.T., Aldeen, W.E., Davis, M., Carroll, K.C. (2002). Trichuris vulpis recovered from a patient with chronic diarrhea and five dogs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2703-2704. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.7.2703-2704.2002

  11. Elsafi, S.H., Al-Sheban, S.S., Al-Jubran, K.M., Abu Hassan, M.M., Al Zahrani, E.M. (2014). Comparison of Kinyoun’s acid- fast and immunofluorescent methods detected an unprecedented occurrence of Cryptosporidium in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci, 9: 263-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.03.008.

  12. Fontanarrosa, M.F., Vezzani, D., Basabe, J., Eiras, D.F. (2006). An epidemiological study of gastrointestinal parasites of dogs from Southern Greater Buenos Aires (Argentina): Age, gender, breed, mixed infections and seasonal and spatial patterns. Vet. Parasitol. 136: 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.11.012

  13. Frizzo, C., Schimidt, A.P., Wagner, G., Muller, G.A. (2016). Intestinal parasites present in canine fecal samples collected in rural areas of municipalities in the Midwest of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Rev. Patol. Trop. 45: 227-232. https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v45i2.41774.

  14. Gracenea, M., Gomez, M.S., Torres, J. (2009). Prevalence of intestinal parasites in shelter dogs and cats in the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain). Acta Parasit. 54: 73-77. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-009-0005-7

  15. Hale, D.C., Carroll, K., Kucera, J.R., Aldeen, W.E. (1996). Use of a Single slide trichrome-stained concentrate for the detection of intestinal parasites stained concentration procedure for Ova and Parasites. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 106: 175- 179. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/106.2.175

  16. Jacob, J., Lorber, B. (2015). Diseases transmitted by man’s best friend: The dog. Microbiol. Spectr. 3: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.IOL5-0002-2015.

  17. Liberato, C., Berrilli, F., Odorizi, L., Scarcella, R., Barni, M., Amoruso, C., Scarito, A., Filippo, M., Carvelli, A., Iacoponi, F., Scaramozzino, P. (2018). Parasites in stray dogs from Italy: Prevalence, risk factors and management concerns. Acta Parasitol. 63: 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2018-0003.

  18. Martínez-Carrasco, C., Berriatua, E., Garijo, M., Martínez, J., Alonso, F.D., de Ybáñez, R.R. (2007). Epidemiological study of non-systemic parasitism in dogs in southeast Mediterranean Spain assessed by coprological and postmortem examination. Zoonoses Public Health. 54: 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01047.x

  19. Michalczyk, M., Sokół, R., Gałęcki, R. (2019). Internal parasites infecting dogs in rural areas. Ann. Parasitol. 65: 151-158. https://doi.org/10.17420/ap6502.195.

  20. Myers, R.M., Koshi, G. (2011). Manual of Diagnostic procedures in Medical Microbiology and Immunology/Serology. Faculty, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore. India. Pondicherry, All India Press 31-37.

  21. Parija, S.C., Srinivasa, H. (1999). View point: the neglect of stool microscopy for intestinal parasites and possible solutions. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 4: 522-524. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00434.x

  22. Prothero, G.W. (1920). Arabia. London: H.M. Stationery Office. p. 86. https://www.wdl.org/en/item/11767/view/1/86/ 

  23. Regidor-Cerrillo, J., Arranz-Solís, D., Moreno-Gonzalo, J., Pedraza- Díaz, S., Gomez-Bautista, M., Ortega-Mora, L.M., Collantes-Fernandez, E. (2020). Prevalence of intestinal parasite infections in stray and farm dogs from Spain. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 18: e014920. https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1984-29612020063. 

  24. Robertson, I.D., Thompson, R.C. (2002). Enteric parasitic zoonoses of domesticated dogs and cats. Microbes Infect. 4: 867- 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01607-6.

  25. Salvador, R.T., Abalos, R.P., Ruba, A.M., Mingala, C.N. (2014). A comparison of FLOTAC and CFF techniques in detecting gastrointestinal parasites in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Ann Parasitol. 60: 119-125.

  26. Scaramozzino, P., Carvelli, A., Iacoponi, F., De Liberato, C. (2018). Endoparasites in household and shelter dogs from Central Italy. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 6: 45-47. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.04.003 

  27. Shalaby, M.I., Banaja, A.A., Manal, M.G. (2011). Comparative study on the prevalence of some parasites in animals slaughtered at new Taif abattoir. Glob. Vet. 6: 295-299.

  28. Soriano, S.V., Pierangeli, N.B., Roccia, I., Bergagna, H.F., Lazzarini, L.E., Celescinco, A., Saiz, M.S., Kossman, A., Contreras, P.A., Arias, C., Basualdo, J.A. (2010). A wide diversity of zoonotic intestinal parasites infects urban and rural dogs in Neuquén, Patagonia, Argentina. Vet. Parasitol. 167: 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.048

  29. Stafford, K., Kollasch, T.M., Duncan, K.T., Horr, S., Goddu, T., Heinz- Loomer, C., Rumschlag, A.J., Ryan, W.G., Sweet, S., Little, S.E. (2020) Detection of gastrointestinal parasitism at recreational canine sites in the USA: The DOGPARCS study. Parasit Vectors. 13: 275. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13071-020-04147-6.

  30. Torres-Chablé, O.M., García-Herrera, R.A., Hernández-Hernández, M., Peralta-Torres, J.A., Ojeda-Robertos, N.F., Blitvich, B.J., Baak-Baak, C.M., García-Rejón, J.E., Machain- Wiliams, C.I. (2015). Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in domestic dogs in Tabasco, Southeastern Mexico. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 24: 432-437. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015077.

  31. Urgel, M., Ybañez, R., Ybañez, A.P. (2019). The detection of gastrointestinal parasites in owned and shelter dogs in Cebu, Philippines. Vet World. 12: 2231-0916. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.372-376

  32. Villeneuve, A., Polley, L., Jenkins, E., Schurer, J., Gilleard, J., Kutz, S., Conboy, G., Benoit, D., Seewald, W., Gagné, F. (2015). Parasite prevalence in fecal samples from shelter dogs and cats across the Canadian provinces. Parasit Vectors. 8: 281 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0870-x

  33. Weber, R., Bryan, R.T., Owen, R.L., Wilcox, C.M., Gorelkin, L., Visvesvara, G.S. (1992). Improved lightmicroscopical detection of microsporidia spores in stool and duodenal aspirates. N. Engl J. Med. 326: 161-166 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199201163260304.

  34. Weese, J.S., Peregrine, A.S. anderson, M.E.C., Fulford, M.B. (2011). Parisitic diseases In: Companion Animal Zoonoses. [Weese, J.S., Peregrine, A.S., Anderson M.E.C., Fulford M.B. (eds)], 1st ed. Blackwell Science, Iowa, USA https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470958957.ch1 

  35. Wojnarowicz, C. and Smith, K. (2007). Ancylostoma caninum infection in a Texas-born Blue Lacy dog-Alberta. Can. Vet. J. 48: 1185-1186.

  36. Wood, J.C., Friedly, G., de la Maza, L.M. (1982). Detection of helminth ova and larvae in trichrome-stained stool smears. J. Clin. Microbiol. 16: 1137-1144. https://doi.org/10.1128/ jcm.16.6.1137-1144.1982.

  37. Younes, N., Behnke, J.M, Ismail, A., Abu-Madi, M.A. (2021). Socio-demographic infuences on the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among workers in Qatar. Parasit Vectors. 14: 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04449-9.

  38. Zajac, A.M. and Conboy, G.A. (2012). Veterinary Clinical Parasitology. 8th ed. John Wiley and Sons, UK. P40-87.

  39. Zaman, R.F., Khanum, H., Nargis, S., Das, P.K. (2018). Comparison of saline, iodine and koh wet mount preparations for occurrence of parasites in stool samples from patients attending ICDDR, B. Bangladesh J. Zool. 45: 159-170. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjz.v45i2.35711

  40. Zanzani, S.A., Gazzonis, A.L., Scarpa, P., Berrilli, F., Manfredi, M.T. (2014). Intestinal parasites of owned dogs and cats from Metropolitan and Micropolitan areas: prevalence, zoonotic risks and pet owner awareness in Northern Italy. Biomed. Res. Int. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/696508.

Editorial Board

View all (0)