Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Screening of cattle gut associated Bacillus strains for their potential use as animal probiotic

M. Naeem2, I. Ahmed1, S. Ahmed2, Z. Ahmed4, M.N. Riaz3, S. Ghazanfar1,*
1Bio-resources Conservation Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Park Road, Islamabad-4500, Pakistan.
2Department of Microbiology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
3National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnogy (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre, Park Road, Islamabad-4500,Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
4Department of Home and Health Sciences, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Use of antibiotic in animal feed pose a significant risk to human health. Over the last decade uses of probiotics increasingly viewed as an alternative to antibiotic. Bacillus are currently being used as feed supplements in animal diet, due to their enhanced tolerance rate and survivability under harsh gut environment. Animal gut is a rich source for Bacillus species isolation. There is still a scarcity of information on the Bacillus species of livestock species. The present study was carried out to identify Bacillus species from animal gut to evaluate their probiotic potential. Three (NCCP-2004a, NCCP-2029 and NCCP-2029) strains were selected as putative probiotics strains based on their super acid and bile survival rates. These isolates were identified as Bacillus subtilis subsp. inaquosorum (NCCP-2029, NCCP-2025). Bacillus tequilensis (NCCP-2004a) by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. NCCP-2004a elicited best results regarding antimicrobial potential and its ability to survive on acid and bile conditions. The results of present study demonstrated that the B. tequilensis showed a promising alternative probiotic candidate to the use of antibiotics in the dairy feeding system.
Dairy items describe a significant industry all over the world.  It is estimated that 99% of this milk production come from the ruminants (Dill-McFarland et al., 2017; Chitra et al., 2018; Sahin et al., 2017). The diverse complex of microflora in animal gut may play a critical role for their low or high production performance.
       
Probiotic are living microbes that provide beneficial effects on host by maintaining its gastrointestinal tract microbial flora equilibrium (Zoumpopoulou et al., 2018). The most frequently used strains of probiotic microbes are lactic acid bacteria, Bifidobacteria and yeast. The selection criteria of the probiotics are very important factors which affect the probiotic quality, safety and validity of commercial probiotic products. A felicitous probiotic bacteria must fulfill some essential standards, like its ability to adhere on gut epithelial cell wall, to overcome possible obstruction inside gut, like low pH and high concentration of bile acids, compete with pathogen (Anandharaj et al., 2015). The probiotic strains must tolerate the manufacturing, transportation, storage and application steps. Previously literature indicated that, probiotic strains like, lactic acid bacteria, Bifidobacteria and yeast, has been facing some difficulties in term of storage transportation point of views (Frizzo et al., 2018). Researches show that for long storage term storage, we need some techniques like, microencapsulation and lyophilization which leads to additional cost (Bora et al., 2018).
       
To overcome this drawback, now a days scientists use spore forming bacteria, especially from genus Bacillus as feed supplements in animal and human diets, because of  long shelf life and their significant resistance to unfavorable conditions (Petruk et al., 2018). Bacillus can be considered as a metabolically active member of host microbial population (Grutsch et al., 2018). In addition, survival ratio of some gut associated Bacillus may be linked to their capability to synthesize biofilms, which is a protecting material against the GIT unfavorable conditions. Nevertheless, current researches revealed that some Bacillus spp. also provide the vital probiotic properties and have the capability to produce some important antimicrobial substance, like; bacterocin, which has a comprehensive inhibitor on many pathogen (Mingmongkolchai et al., 2018). Bacillus species widely used as animal probiotics in South East Asia markets (Cutting, 2011). These reports motivated us to identify the animal origin Bacillus species from lactating dairy cattle of Sahiwal breed for their incorporated into feed as probiotic.
Three healthy Sahiwal lactating dairy cattle were raised at the Livestock Research Station, National Agriculture Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan. The nutrient requirements of the dairy cows were fulfilled by offering the diet composed of 4 kg concentrates feed, 50 kg fodder.
       
Fresh fecal samples from all animals were collected by hand from deep in the rectum by using gloves. Sterile polythene bags were used for sample collection and samples were delivered to laboratory for further preservation and processing. For the isolation of bacterial strains, 1gm of fecal sample was mixed in phosphate buffer saline. The samples were further processed and examined on De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar, media. This media composed of C6H12O6 (18.5 g L-1), agar technical (15g/L) meat peptone (10g/L), beef extract (8 g/L), yeast extract (4g/L), C2H3NaO2 (3 g/L), K2HPO4 (2g/L), C6H17N3O7 (2g/L), Tween 80 (1g/L), MgSO4.7H2O (0.2g/L) and MnSO4.4H2O (0.05 g/L). The samples were spread on MRS plates and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h. The acid and bile salt tolerance test of 10 isolates have been performed and results indicated that only 3 strains (NCCP-2004a, NCCP-2029 and NCCP-2029) showed bile and acid tolerance. Colony morphology of strains were observed by using phase contrast microscope (Phase contrast 2, Nikon, Japan).  For complete morpho logical characterization of the isolates, we used scanning electron microscope (MIRA3, Tescan SEM). For extraction of template DNA from the pure bacterial colony, single colony of each strain was picked and mixed properly with 20µL of Tris-EDTA buffer in PCR strips. The mixture was heated (95°C) for 10 min in the PCR machine. After centrifugation the supernant was removed, which served as template DNA. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was done by the using PCR machine. We used 25 µL of the TAKARA Pre-mix Ex-Taq; 2 µL of Universal forward primers 9F (5`'-GAGTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3`') and 2 µL of Universal reverse primers 1510R (5`'-GGCTA CCTTGT TACGA -3`'); 20 µL PCR water and 1 µL template DNA (total volume 50 µ L) were used for the PCR amplification of DNA. The amplified PCR products were sequenced by using Macrogen sequencing, Korea (http://dna.macrogen.com). The strains were identifed at species level by using the EzBioCloud server (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/identify). All probiotic bacterial strains sequences were submitted to NCBI for getting the accession numbers. The tree was constructed from unambiguously arranged nucleotides sequence using an algorism by using MEGA 7 (Saitou and Nei, 1987). The acid tolerance was determine by methods given by Parveen et al., (2016). Briefly, Bacillus strains were growth in MRS broth (pH; 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 7.0) and culture plates were incubated at 37°C for 20 h aerobically. The bacterial cells count (log CFU/mL) was done by growing the isolates (MRS agar) at 37°C for 20 h aerobically. The experiments were performed in triplets and means were calculated. The bile salt resistance of the Bacillus strains was calculated by using MRS broth having different concentration of bile salts (Oxgall, Merck). Freshly grown Bacillus culture were centrifugate and re-suspended in the MRS broth (0.3 or 0.5% bile salts) and then kept in an incubator at 37°C. After 3 and 5 h, I ml of samples was withdraw and plated on MRS agar and incubated at 37°C aerobically for 24 hours. The experiments were performed in triplets and means were calculated. Antimicrobial activities of the Bacillus strains were determine by using the pathogenic strains such as, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC9027), E.coli (ATCC8739) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC6538) based on Shakira et al., (2018). Briefly, 100μl of pathogenic strain was suspended in 2.5ml of (0.75% TSA) soft agar. In order to prepare the lawn of pathogenic strains, soft agar suspension was poured into petri plates having the TSA media. The prepared plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 3 h. Sterile disks were set on the lawn of indicator strains and poured the Bacillus strains supernatant (10µl) on filter paper disks and incubator at 37°C for 48 h. Results of antimicrobial activity were observed in terms of its zone diameter (nm). A clear zone formation around the disks, determine the antimicrobial activity of the testing strains (Fig 1). Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the Bacillus isolates were generated by using diûerent cell wall synthesis and protein synthesis inhibitor and other antibiotic disks given by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) panel in 2012 (Amoxicillin, Cefuroxime, Chloramphenicol, Erythromycin, Kanamycin, Gentamicin, Metronidazole, Penicillin, Vancomycin, Streptomycin, Clindamycin and Tetracycline (Bioanalyse, Turkey) were used. Bacillus culture (100 μl) was spread over the MRS plates (4 mm) and prepared disks were seeded on the agar surface and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h. Inhibition zone diameter (in mm) were measured accurately for result interpretation.
 

Fig 1: Antimicrobial sensitivity of bacterial isolates as candidate for animal probiotics.


       
To measure the hemolytic activity Bacillus isolates were grown on the nutrient agar (NA) having 4% blood based agar (Hi media) (5% human blood and 3% NaCl). Plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C.  The results were measured as; formation of green zones around the bacterial colonies and slight hydrolysis (α hemolysis), clear zone of hydrolysis around colonies (β hemolysis) and without any change in the agar (γ hemolysis). All experimental tests were performed in triplicates. Results are represented in mean plus minus standard deviation. All statistical analysis was done by using the statistics (Version 8.1) software. The significant difference between the means were assessed by Tukey’s test (p<0.05).
Identification of the animal origin probiotic bacteria at strain level is a critical step for the determination of the safety of the microbes. In this study, ten pure bacterial cultures were isolated from the fecal samples of dairy cow and three were selected for their potential probiotic tests. These isolates were molecular identified as B. subtilis (NCCP-2029, NCCP-2025) B. tequilensis (NCCP-2004a) (Table 1). The morphological characterization are given in the Fig 2. The molecular identification results showed that, Bacillus NCCP2004a revealed 98.53% identity to B. tequilensis. Similarly, Bacillus NCCP-2025 and NCCP-2029 revealed 99.58% and 99.90% identity to B. subtilis subsp. inaquosorum (Table 1, Fig 3). Many probiotics are commercially available in the local markets, but their probiotic potential in a local animal breed diet is questionable. Therefore, investigation of the new indigenous probiotic strain is of great interest in this context. This experiment was the may be more compatible with animal gut microbes giving highest outputs (Shakira et al., 2017).  Acid tolerance is usually known as an essential criteria in the in probiotic selection. The probiotic strains should express high survival rate against different acidic conditions (Anandharaj et al., 2015). All Bacillus showed a wide range of pH tolerance at 1 to 4. In addition, B. tequilensis strains showed significantly (p<0.05) good results of bile tolerance followed by (NCCP-2029) and (NCCP-2015) strains (Table 2). The viable bacterial counts in pH adjusted 1 to 4 in MRS media were according with the finding of Khochamit et al., (2015) and Nguyen et al., (2015). Bile salt are very toxic for living organism and bile salts tolerance is known as a useful property to demonstrate the strain ability to colonization to the host gut, balancing the GIT microbial flora. In this study, 0.3 bile salt concentration were used for determination of the Bacillus strains bile salt tolerance ability. Our tested strains were found to be against the changeling 0.3% bile salt concentration by showing the variable degree of resistance after 5h exposure. The strains B. tequilensis was the most significantly (p<0.05) resistant strain (Table 3). Similar results were given by Parveen et al., (2016). A vital property of the probiotic strains is the antipathogenic activity. The inhibition activity of Bacillus strains against three pathogens (E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus) are given in (Table 4). All Bacillus strains showed the resistance against the pathogenic bacteria strains. NCCP-2004a showed exhibited clear zone of 13.06 mm against E.coli which is significantly (p<0.05) higher followed by NCCP2025 and NCCP-2029 strains which had 11.57 and 10.23 mm inhibition zone, respectively. Similarly, NCCP-2004a (14.78mm) had revealed significantly (p<0.05) high inhibition (14.78 and 13.23mm) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus respectively than other probiotic candidate strains. Over all pathogenicity results revels that NCCP-2004a showed maximum (p<0.05) inhibition against all the tested pathogenic strains. This might be due to the antimicrobial protein produced from the B. tequilensis (Parveen et al., 2016). Bacillus species can spread from its habitat to feed and food particles due to its endospore production and its long term survival ability. Bacillus species produced a number of antimicrobial substances (surfactin, bacteiocin etc.) those exhibiting broader inhibition spectra against various food borne pathogens (Abriouel et al., 2011; Khochamit et al., 2015). The results revealed that B. tequilensis found resistant to most of tested antibiotics in various degree expect kanamycin and amoxicillin (Table 5). This study results concurred with results of Coetzee (2015), that the B. tequilensis showed resistance against penicillin, tetracyclic, streptomycin and trimethoprim. Potential spore producing probiotic used in animal feed are mainly isolated from animal feces. Probiotics which have haemolytic capability is considered a disadvantage. Some Bacillus species produced hemolysis, which could be a health risk to the host. In present study, all Bacillus strains showed no hemolysis. Parveen et al., (2016) had worked on probiotic potential of Bacillus strains and their results were in accordance with present findings in which B. tequilensis FR9 showed no hemolysis. Similar results were given in the one of the experiment of Luis-Villasenor et al., (2011), who noted that Bacillus species showed alpha hemolysis. This means the Bacillus species did not show any risk to host. Recently, it has been noted that, B. tequilensis could be used as human probiotic because it produces the novel silver nanoparticles and showed significant cytotoxic effects against cancer (Parveen et al., 2016).
 

Table 1: 16S-rRNA based gene analysis of selective bacterial strains as candidate for animal probiotics.


 

Fig 2: Scanning electron microscopy view of bacterial isolates as candidate for animal probiotics.


 

Fig 3: Phylogenetic tree of the bacterial showing the inter-relationship of most closely related type species interfered from 16 s rRNA.


 

Table 2: Different pH (7, 1, 2, 3 and 4) effects on survival of isolated strains.


 

Table 3: Effect of different bile salt concentration, on survival of isolated strains.


 

Table 4: The antipathogenic activity of bacterial strains against pathogenic strains and their inhibitory zones diameter (mm).


 

Table 5: Antibiotic resistance profiles of isolated strains against commonly used antibacterial compounds.

Utilization of probiotics for health and production is influenced by many factors including probiotic strains, age and breed of cattle. In this respects, identification for novel animal origin probiotic strains will be the key research and development spot for future livestock markets all over the world. In conclusion, this study is the first to identify the potential animal origin probiotic B. tequilensis strain from dairy cow gut which can be safe for animal consumption. This work highlighted that there might be very useful microbiota inside the GIT of dairy animals, which should be identified and characterized for potential use as animal origin probiotic to improve productivity near future.

  1. Abriouel, H., Franz, C.M., BenOmar, N., Galvez, A. (2011). Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 35: 201–232. DOI:org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x

  2. Anandharaj, M., Sivasankari, B., Santhanakaruppu, R., Manimaran, M., Rani, R.P., Sivakumar, S. (2015). Determining the probiotic potential of cholesterol-reducing Lactobacillus and Weissella strains isolated from gherkins (fermented cucumber) and south Indian fermented koozh. Research in Microbiology, 166: 428-39. DOI:org/10.1016/j.resmic.2015.03.002

  3. Bhat, A.R., Ganai, A.M., Ishfaq, A., Beigh, Y.A., Sheikh, G.G., Masood, D. (2018). In-vitro effect of Artemisia absinthium (Titween) on digestibility and rumen parameters of small ruminants. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52: 579-582. DOI:10.18805/    ijar.v0iOF.6996

  4. Bora, A.F., Ma, S., Li, X., Liu, L. (2018). Application of microencapsulation for the safe delivery of green tea polyphenols in food systems: Review and recent advances. Food Research International, 105: 241-9. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.047

  5. Chitra, A., Jain, A., Kumar, M., Ratwan, P., Gupta, A.K. (2018). Effect of genetic and non-genetic factors on milk yield and milk composition traits in Murrah buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52: 304-8. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.v0i0f.3785

  6. Coetzee, I. (2015). Antibiotic resistance in triclosan heterotrophic plate count bacteria from sewage water, Doctoral dissertation.

  7. Cutting, M.S. (2011). Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiology, 28: 214-220. DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.007

  8. Dill-McFarland, K.A., Breaker, J.D., Suen, G. (2017). Microbial succession in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows from 2 weeks to first lactation. Scientific reports, 7: 40864. DOI: 10.1038/srep40864

  9. Frizzo, L.S., Signorini, M.L., Rosmini, M.R. (2018). Probiotics and prebiotics for the health of cattle. In: Probiotics and Prebiotics in Animal Health and Food Safety, 155-174. Springer, Cham.

  10. EFSA, (2015). Panel on Biological Hazards/BIOHAZ; Statement on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA by European Food Safety Authority. EFSA, 29.

  11. Grutsch, A. A., Nimmer, P. S., Pittsley R. H., McKillip, J. L. (2018). Bacillus spp. as Pathogens in the Dairy Industry. In Foodborne Diseases, 193-211.

  12. Khochamit, N., Siripornadulsil, S., Sukon, P., Siripornadulsil, W. (2015). Antibacterial activity and genotypic–phenotypic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing B.subtilis KKU213: potential as a probiotic strain. Microbiological Research, 170: 36-50.DOI: Org/10.1016/j.micres.2014.09.004

  13. Luis-Villasenor, I.E, Macias-Rodriguez, M.E., Gomez-Gil, B., Ascencio-Valle, F., Campa-Cordova, A.I. (2011). Beneficial effects of four Bacillus strains on the larval cultivation of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 321: 136-44.

  14. Mingmongkolchai, S., Panbangred, W. (2018). Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 124: 1334-1336. DOI.org/10.1111/jam.13690

  15. Nguyen, A.T., Nguyen, D.V., Tran, M.T., Nguyen, L.T., Nguyen, A.H., Phan, T.N. (2015). Isolation and characterization of B. subtilis CH16 strain from chicken gastrointestinal tracts for use as a feed supplement to promote weight gain in broilers. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 60: 580-8. DOI: 10.1111/lam.12411

  16. Petruk, G., Donadio, G., Lanzilli, M., Isticato, R., Monti, D.M. (2018). Alternative use of Bacillus subtilis spores: protection against environmental oxidative stress in human normal keratinocytes. Scientific Reports, 8:1745. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20153-2

  17. Parveen, R.R., Anandharaj, M., Hema, S., Deepika, R., David, R.A. (2016). Purification of antilisterial peptide (Subtilosin A) from novel B. tequilensis FR9 and demonstrate their pathogen invasion protection ability using human carcinoma cell line. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7: 1910. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01910

  18. Saitou, N., Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4: 406-425.

  19. Sahin, A., Yildirim, A., Ulutaº, Z. (2017). The effects of stage of lactation, parity and calving season on somatic cell counts in Anatolian Water Buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 51:35-9. DOI:10.18805/ijar.11461

  20. Shakira, G., M, Qubtia., F, Hassan., I, Ahmed., M, Imran. (2018). Effects of indigenously isolated S. cerevisiae probiotics on milk production, nutrient digestibility, blood chemistry and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows. The Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 28: 407-420.

  21. Shakira, G., N, Khalid., I. Ahmed., M, Imran. (2017). Probiotic Yeast: Mode of Action and Its Effect on Ruminant Nutrition. Chapter 11, pp.14-20. In:- yeast –Industrial Application ISBN978-953-51-5782-3.Ed.Antonio Morata. InTechOpen Janeza Trdine 9 51000 Riijeka, Croatia. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70778

  22. Zoumpopoulou, G., Kazou, M., Alexandraki, V., Angelopoulou, A., Papadimitriou, K., Pot, B., Tsakalidou, E. (2018). Probiotics and Prebiotics: An Overview on Recent Trends. In Probiotics and Prebiotics in Animal Health and Food Safety, Springer, Cham.

Editorial Board

View all (0)