Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 54 issue 4 (april 2020) : 434-439

Chemical composition, in vitro and in situ dry matter digestibility and preference of Quercus resinosa foliage

O. Carrillo-Muro1, R.G. Ramírez-Lozano2, P. Hernández-Briano1, M.A. López-Carlos1, M. Guerrero-Cervantes3, A. Rivera-Villegas1, F. Méndez-Llorente1, J.I. Aguilera-Soto1
1Unidad Académica de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Carretera Panamericana Zacatecas-Fresnillo Km 31.5, Gral. Enrique Estrada, Zacatecas, 98560, México.
2Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Ave. Universidad S/N, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, 66450, México
3Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango. km 11.5 Carretera Durango-Mezquital, Durango 34280, México.
Cite article:- Carrillo-Muro O., Ramírez-Lozano R.G., Hernández-Briano P., López-Carlos M.A., Guerrero-Cervantes M., Rivera-Villegas A., Méndez-Llorente F., Aguilera-Soto J.I. (2017). Chemical composition, in vitro and in situ dry matter digestibility and preference of Quercus resinosa foliage . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 54(4): 434-439. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-785.
The objectives of this study were to determine the chemical composition and dry matter digestibility of Quercus resinosa leaves harvested at different seasons of the year and to assess the intake and palatability of lamb diets containing foliage of Q. resinosa. There were three sites of collection, two located in the state of Jalisco and one in the state of Zacatecas, México. The young leaves harvested in spring, had greatest (P <0.05) nutritional value than leaves harvested in other seasons. The in vitro digestibility of organic matter (IVOMD), rapidly degradable fraction (a) and the degradation rate (c) were greater (P <0.05) in leaves harvested in spring and winter. The slowly degradable fraction (b) was greater (P <0.05) in spring, summer and autumn, and lesser in winter. The potential degradation fraction (a + b) and the effective degradability of dry matter were maximized (P <0.05) in spring than in the other seasons. The consumption was similar (P >0.05) among diets with different inclusion levels of leaves, but sheep consumed greater (P <0.05) amounts of diet containing leaves collected in spring. In conclusion, the Q. resinosa foliage contains the nutritional value and the digestibility and palatability that makes it suitable to replace completely the forage in the fattening diets of sheep, being preferable to use leaves harvested in spring and winter.
The foliage is an important source of food for ruminants in areas with scarcity of other alternative fodder plants (Singh and Todaria, 2012). Their importance lies in that it does not compete with human food and can provide nutrients throughout the year (Makkar, 2003). Verma and Mishra (1999) reported that Quercus foliage is available in seasons of the year when other fodder sources are scarce, so it could be useful as ruminant feed at these times. In these production systems, feeding of ruminants depend on more than 70% of the foliage (Singh and Todaria, 2012). In India and Nepal, the foliage of Quercus is harvested for its use as forage, and is administered either fresh or dried during food shortages (Makkar et al., 1986). In addition, the Quercus foliage contains anti-nutritional substances in moderate quantities that could potentially have beneficial effects if used to feed ruminants. Thus the animal nutritionists are more focused towards utilization of non-conventional feed resources at the maximum level for livestock feeding (Swain et al., 2016). However, there are limited reports on the use of Q. resinosa as fodder for ruminants, and scarce information on its nutritional value, degradability, and inclusion levels in diets for ruminants.
        
The objectives of this study were: 1) to determine the chemical composition and the in situ degradability of leaves of Q. resinosa through seasons of the year and 2) to evaluate the consumption and palatability of Q. resinosa at different inclusion levels in diets for fattening lambs.
Area description
 
The climate of the region is sub-humid warm with summer rains. There were three collection sites with a distance of 35 km among them. Two sites (Tequila and San Cristobal) were located in the state of Jalisco and one site (Teul de Gonzalez Ortega) was located in the state of Zacatecas, México. In these sites, the annual mean rainfall is 600 mm and the average altitude was 1,750 MASL.
 
Harvest procedure and sample handling
 
Sampling was conducted the first day of each month, from April, 2014 until March, 2015. The foliage samples were collected manually from the same 15 trees located in a plot of about 50 m × 50 m at each collection site. Leaves were stored in identified paper bags and kept at 4°C on ice to preserve them until processing in laboratory. The leaves were placed in a circulating air oven at 60°C to constant weight, ground in a Wiley mill with a 2 mm mesh, and stored at ambient temperature in identified paper bags for subsequent determinations.
 
Chemical analysis
 
Samples were analyzed in triplicate to determine dry matter (DM) and ash (AOAC, 1995) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) (Van Soest et al., 1991). Hemicellulose (NDF - ADF) and OM (DM - ash) were determined by difference. Non fiber carbohydrate (NFC) were calculated by the equation of Sniffen et al., (1992). The Dumas method (AOAC, 1995) was used for to determinate crude protein (CP) with a FP-528 LECO nitrogen analyzer. The ether extract (EE) was determined using the extractor of Ankomxt15 (AOCS AM 5-04). The concentration of condensed tannins (CT) was estimated using the butanol-HCl method reported by Porter et al., (1986).
 
In vitro digestibility
 
The in vitro procedure adopted in the present study was as proposed by Theodorou et al., (1994). Since the in vitro production of gas is proportional to the DM degraded, the net yield of gas at 24 h (ml/700 mg) incubation of the substrate was used to calculate the metabolizable energy (ME) and IVOMD using the equations proposed by Menke and Steingas (1998). The short chain fatty acids (SCFA) were calculated using the equation of Makkar (2005).
 
Dynamics in situ degradability
 
The DM degradability was determined with the nylon bag technique (Ørskov, 2000). Foliage samples (5 g) were introduced in nylon bags and incubated in the rumen of five rams equipped with ruminal cannula for 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. To determine the parameters of in situ degradability and passage rate, the data obtained were processed with the Neway computer program, applying the equation proposed by Ørskov and McDonald (1979).
 
Intake and palatability
 
The cafeteria technique was used to estimate the intake and preference of diets by sheep (Ganguli et al., 2010).
 
Test 1: Inclusion levels of Q. resinosa Liebm
 
The leaves used in this test were collected in the first week of October. Eight uncastrated Rambouillet lambs (41±1.2 kg) with no history of consumption of Quercus leaves were used. The experimental diets consisted of incremental levels of foliage (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40%) that replaced sorghum hay of the basal diet (Table 1). The basal diet was formulated to meet the gain requirements of lambs (NRC, 2007).
 

Table 1: Ingredients and chemical composition of the basal diet.


 
Test 2: Harvest dates of Q. resinosa
 
The leaves of Q. resinosa used in this test were the leftovers for the chemical composition procedures and were grouped by season of the year. Eight uncastrated Rambouillet lambs (42.0±0.8 kg) with no history of consumption of Quercus leaves were fed four experimental diets containing a 40% monthly mixture of each season of the year of Q. resinosa leaves and 60% of the basal diet described in Table 1.
        
In both tests, the feeder had eight dividers, at each of which were placed 0.1 kg of each one of the experimental diets, the position of the troughs was randomized each day to avoid “habit reflex” (Brown et al., 2016). Observations were made for 30 minutes (0830-0900) each time. Once this time was elapsed, the diet leftovers that were in the different compartments of the feeder were removed, weighed and identified. Animal behavior was recorded with eight security cameras, one per each pen. Samples of approximately 100 g of diet offered and refusals were obtained and dried for 48 h at 60°C. The DMI by each animal was measured by subtracting the difference between the offered and refused, adjusting losses inherent in the spontaneous dehydration of forages in time.
        
The coefficient of consumption was estimated as the relationship between the consumption of each individual treatment, divided by the average consumption of all treatments. Those treatments with a coefficient of consumption greater than one, were considered greater than other treatments.
        
The coefficient of effective time consumption was calculated as the ratio between the time consumption of each individual treatment, divided by the average time of consumption of all treatments. Animals spend more time consuming than other animals, when the coefficient is greater than one. Data of DMI were used to determine the relative palatability index (RPI) of different treatments, which was obtained by dividing the data of the treatment with higher DM consumption with the other treatment, and multiplied by 100 (Abdulrazak et al., 2001).
 
Statistical analysis
 
Data were analyzed as a randomized block design using the GLM procedure of the SAS statistical software [SAS/STAT® User’s Guide (8.1Edition)], SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA. The collection site was considered as block effect for the chemical composition, in vitro and in situ degradability studies. In the study of intake and palatability, the animals were used as block effect. When significant effects were observed, a comparison of means with the Tukey method using the MEANS statement was made. P values observed were considered different if P<0.05.
Chemical composition of leaves
 
The contents of CP and EE were significantly higher in spring and summer than in other seasons. Moreover, the proportions of NFC and CT were significantly higher in spring and minor in summer, autumn and winter (Table 2). Forwood and Owensby (1985) who evaluated the contents of CP and CT in the leaves of Q. macrocarpa and Q. Alba reported similar results. They mentioned that the chemical composition tends to decrease with increasing sampling time. However, Infascelli et al., (2007) noted that the EE of Q. ilex foliage is similar in spring and summer.
 

Table 2: Chemical composition of the leaves of Quercus resinosa harvested in different seasons of the year.


        
The NDF and ADF were significantly lower in spring compared to other seasons. Olson and Kelsey (1997) also observed that the fiber content of Centaurea maculosa is lower in the early stages of growth. In contrast, Infascelli et al., (2007) noted that the NDF and ADF of Q. ilex foliage was similar in spring and summer. In this study, the hemicellulose content was not different (P>0.05) among seasons. However, concentrations of ME, NEl and SCFA were maximum during the spring and winter and dropped significantly in summer and autumn. In this study, only the leaves collected in spring had ME values to satisfy the maintenance requirements of mature ewes (6.2 MJ/kg DM; NRC, 2007). Safari et al., (2011) reported that herbs and native grasses in East Africa contain greater CP and ME at the beginning of the plant growth, but eventually reduced with maturity.
 
In vitro and in situ degradability
 
The IVOMD was significantly higher in spring than in other seasons. The quickly degradable fraction (a), the potential degradation fraction (a + b), the rate of degradation (c) and effective degradability of dry matter of Q. resinosa leaves were significantly higher in spring than in the other seasons (Table 3). High IVOMD values, in situ digestion parameters and EDDM in spring leaf samples might be because of their low fiber NDF and ADF content (Table 2). In addition, the decline in digestion of Q. resinosa leaves to advance maturity is consistent with previous studies (Hassen et al., 2007; Safari et al., 2011).
 

Table 3: In vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), parameters of the in situ degradability and effective degradability of dry matter (EDDM) of Quercus resinosa foliage harvested in different seasons of the year.


 
Intake and palatability
 
The DMI was significantly higher in sheep fed diets with Q. resinosa at 0, 10, 30 and 40%, compared to 20% (Table 4). However, the DM intake did not differ significantly among the sheep fed diets with different levels of Q. resinosa.  The calculated coefficients of effective consumption and time consumption and the RPI of sheep were also not significantly different between treatments. Telford et al., (1983) reported that DM intake of goats did not change when included 25 or 50% of Quercus spp in diet, but consumption was reduced by 75%. Similarly, Villena-Rodríguez (1987) reported that DMI in goats was not affected at levels of 0, 25 and 50% of Q. havardii in the diet. In contrast, Yildiz et al., (2005) recommended that only 50% of the forage could be replaced by Q. hartwissiana foliage in diets for lambs. Nastis and Malechek (1981) also pointed out that when using Q. incana with 25% in the diet increased the DMI.
        

Table 4: Dry matter intake (DMI), coefficients of consumption and palatability of lamb fed diets containing incremental levels of Quercus resinosa.


 
In this study, DMI of sheep was significantly higher in spring, followed by winter, autumn and summer (Table 5). The coefficients of calculated and effective time consumption and RPI of animals followed the same patern as DMI. Similarly, Ganguli et al., (2010) reported that sheep prefer and consume more foliage from native plants when they are growing and to a lesser extent during maturity. Moreover, Launchbaugh (1996) reported that sheep could form a strong preference for unpalatable compounds, if their consumption is associated with a high concentration of nutrients or better energy levels. Conversely, Riddle et al., (1999) reported that goats had similar intakes of Q. virginiana Sarg. var fusiformis in spring and autumn. Furthermore, Papachristou et al., (2005) reported that sheep and goats selected more shrubs with high CP content, NDF and of lignin. In addition, Carlson et al., (1993) suggested that white-tailed deer preferred browse species with high CP, phosphorus and OMD, regardless of the content of antinutritional compounds.
 

Table 5: Dry matter intake (DMI), coefficients of consumption and palatability of lamb diets containing foliage of Quercus resinosa harvested at different seasons of the year.

The Q. resinosa foliage showed a nutritional value and digestibility that makes it a useful fodder for feeding ruminants at any season of the year. Sheep preferred leaves collected in spring, than leaves collected in winter, autumn or summer. The leaves of Q. resinosa can completely replace forage in diets for fattening sheep without having negative effects on palatability and intake.
The authors thank the people of the southern region of Zacatecas and the north of Jalisco who participated enthusiastically in the field work to carry out the present work. A special thanks to Mr. Jose Felix Carrillo Lamas and Mrs. Ma. Consuelo Muro Saldana for the great help they gave to this project and interest in the conservation and enhancement of the uses of Quercus as a sustainable forage source for livestock production systems.

  1. Abdulrazak, S.A., Nyangaga J., Fujihara, T. (2001). Relative palatability to sheep of some browse species their in sacco degradability and in vitro gas production characteristics. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 11:1580-1584.

  2. AOAC. (1995). Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C., USA.

  3. Brown, D., Ng’ambi, J. W., Norris, D. (2016). Voluntary intake and palatability indices of Pedi goats fed different levels of Acacia karroo leaf meal by cafeteria method. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 50:41-47.

  4. Carlson, P.C., Tanner, G.W., Wood, J.M., Humphrey, S.R. (1993). Fire in key deer habitat improves browse, prevents succession, and preserves endemic. J. Wildl. Manage. 57:914-928. 

  5. Forwood, J.R. and Owensby, C.E. (1985). Nutritive value of tree leaves in the Kansas Flint Hills. J. Range. Manage. 38:61-64.

  6. Ganguli, A.C., Hale, M.B., Launchbaugh, K.L. (2010). Seasonal change in nutrient composition of spotted knapweed and preference by sheep. Small Rum. Res. 89:47-50.

  7. Hassen, A., Rethman, N.F.G., Van Niekerk, W.A., Tjelele, T.J. (2007). Influence of season/year and species on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of five Indigofera accessions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 92:149-158.

  8. Infascelli, F., Cutrignelli, M.I., Bovera, F., Tudisco, R., Zicarelli, F., Calabrò, S. (2007). Effects of polyethylene glycol supplementation on the performances of Cilentana goats grazing woodland and scrubland. In [Priolo, A., Biondi, L., Ben Salem, H., de Tunisie, A. T., Morand-Fehr, P.] (2007). Advanced Nutrition and Feeding Strategies to Improve Sheep and Goat Production. CIHEAM-IAMZ. pp. 153-157.

  9. Launchbaugh, K.L. (1996). Biochemical aspects of grazing behavior. In: The Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems [Hodgson, J., Illius, A.W.]. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK, pp. 159-184.

  10. Makkar, H.P.S. (2003). Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Rum. Res. 49:241-256.

  11. Makkar, H.P.S. (2005). In vitro gas methods for evaluation of feeds containing phytochemicals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 123:291-302.

  12. Makkar, H.P.S., B. Singh, Dawra, R.K. (1986). Can oak leaves be fed to animals? Farmers and Parliament. 24:17-18.

  13. Menke K.H. and Steingass, H. (1998). Estimation of the energetic feed value from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Develop. 28:7-55.

  14. Nastis, A.S. and Malechek, J.C. (1981). Digestion and utilization of nutrients in oak browse by goats. J. Anim. Sci. 53:283-290.

  15. NRC. (2007). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., USA.

  16. Olson, B.E. and Kelsey, R.G. (1997). Effect of Centaurea maculosa on sheep rumen microbial activity and mass in vitro. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:1131-1144. 

  17. Ørskov, E.R. (2000). The in situ technique for the estimation of forage degradability in the ruminants. In: Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition, (eds.. Givens, D.I, Owen, E., Axford y R.F.E., Ohmed, H.M.). CAB International pp. 175-188.

  18. Ørskov, E.R. and McDonald, L.M. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurement weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92:499-503.

  19. Papachristou, T.G., Dziba, L.E., Provenza, F.D. (2005). Foraging ecology of goats and sheep on wooded rangelands. Small Rumin. Res. 59:141-156.

  20. Porter, I.J., L.N. Hirstich and B.G. Chan. (1986). The conversion of procyandinin and prodelphinindins. Phytochemistry, 25:223-230.

  21. Riddle, R.R., Taylor Jr, C.A., Huston, J.E., Kothmann, M.M. (1999). Intake of ashe juniper and live oak by angora goats. J. Range. Manage. 52:161-165.

  22. Safari, J., Mushi, D.E., Kifaro, G.C., Mtenga, L.A., Eik, L.O. (2011). Seasonal variation in chemical composition of native forages, grazing behaviour and some blood metabolites of Small East African goats in a semi-arid area of Tanzania. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 164:62-70.

  23. Swain P.S., Srinivasa Rao, D., Nagalakshmi, D., Mahender, M., Ray, S. (2016). Nutritional evaluation of pulse screenings by in vitro gas production technique. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 50:705-710.

  24. Singh, B. and Todaria, N.P. (2012). Nutrients composition changes in leaves of Quercus semecarpifolia at different seasons and altitudes. Ann. For. Res. 55: 189-196.

  25. Sniffen, C.J., O’Connor, J.D., Van Soest, P.J., Fox, D.G., Russell, J.B. (1992). A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: 2. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3562–3577.

  26. Telford, J.P., Kothmann, M.M., Hinnant, R.T., Ngugi, K.R. (1983). Nutritive value of alfalfa and live oak leaves for goats. Sheep and goat, wool and mohair. National Agricultural Library Catalog (AGRICOLA). pp. l0.

  27. Theodorou, M.K., Williams, B.A., Dhanoa, M.S., McAllan, A.B., France, J. (1994). A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed. Sci. and Technol. 48:185-197.

  28. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597.

  29. Verma, K.S. and Mishra, V.K. (1999). Foliage nutrient concentration and lopping time of agroforestry tree species in the Western Himalayan region of India. Agroforestry Systems. 42: 283-290.

  30. Villena-Rodriguez, F. (1987). Nutrition of goats grazing sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii) ranges in West Texas. A Thesis in Range Science. Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science. pp. 46-62.

  31. Yildiz, S., Kaya, I., Unal, Y., Aksu Elmali, D., Kaya, S., Censiz, M., Kaya, M., Oncuer, A. (2005). Digestion and body weight change in Tuj lambs receiving oak (Quercus hartwissiana) leaves with and without PEG. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 122:159-172.

Editorial Board

View all (0)