All the eighteen microsatellite loci were amplified. The values of Na, Ne, Ho and He for the three populations are given in (Table 1). The number of alleles per locus ranged from 4 (in OarAE129) to 18 (DYMS1 in 18), with an average value of 11.8 alleles per locus. A total of 212 alleles were observed among the 156 sheep using 18 microsatellite loci. The total number of alleles observed in NM, H and NJ populations were 159, 144 and 152, respectively. Out of these 212 alleles, 60 were designated as private alleles. Out of these 60 private alleles, 31 were observed in NM, 15 in H and 12 in NJ breeds populations. For all 18 microsatellite markers in three sheep populations, the mean value were recorded as: the mean of number of alleles (NA) was 11.8, mean number of alleles (MNA) was 8.426, mean of effective allele number (MNE) was 4.506, mean of observed heterozygosity (MHO) was 0.754 and mean of expected heterozygosity (MHE) was 0.752, respectively. The mean of Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) for the 18 marker was 0.750. Mean values for F
IS, F
IT and F
ST were -0.003, 0.033 and 0.036, respectively were observed in F-statistics for each of the 18 analyzed loci in the three sheep populations. The NM sheep breed was genetically closer to H and NJ sheep breeds and the pair-wise genetic distances were 0.031, 0.033 and 0.017 respectively (Table 2).
HWE results showed that 7 loci in NM sheep population followed HWE, 15 loci in Herri and 5 loci in in Najdi at p<0.05. PCoA identified 3 distinct clusters with each cluster comprised of all sheep of one breed (Fig 1). Axis 1 explained 38.1% of the variance and axis 2 explained an additional 21.7%. Axis 1 discriminated all 3 breeds whereas axis 2 discriminated H and NM breeds from NJ. For the Structure analysis, the most likely value of
K was 3, corresponding to the 3 breeds of sheep (Fig 2). All individuals had an assignment coefficient (
q) >0.9 to their own breed, indicating very little admixture among the breeds.
The present study is a significant contribution towards the genetic characterization and diversity of three phenotypically distinguished populations of Saudi Sheep; namely Naeimi, Herri and Najdi using 18 microsatellite markers. This range of allele frequency was comparable with those observed in four sheep populations of Romania
(Jakaria et al., 2012). It was higher than those observed in Kilakarsal sheep population and in Vembur sheep population of South India
(Radha et al., 2011; Pramod
et al., 2009).
Ricardo et al., (2016) has shown that the observed number of alleles per locus ranged from 10 to 23 in the Colombian sheep, and
Yilmaz et al., (2015) found a range of 16 to 31 in Turkish sheep populations. It is known that mean number of alleles in a population is highly dependent on sample size and the presence of unique alleles of low frequencies. As the sample size increases, the number of alleles increases. Large numbers of allele frequencies as high as 270 and 352 were found by some investigators
(Sassi-Zaidy et al., 2014; Yilmaz et al., 2015). Private alleles defined in this study as alleles unique to a single population were observed to be 31, 15 and 7 alleles for Naeimi, Herri and Najdi sheep populations, respectively. Despite the low frequencies of these alleles, however, they can be distinguished among the three sheep populations and can be good indicators as breed markers.
Yilmaz et al., (2015) designated 7 alleles in Turkish sheep breeds as private alleles having been observed in a single population.
Blackburn et al., (2011) observed private alleles with low frequencies in Kazakh sheep breed.
Turkish sheep breed displayed higher mean effective number of alleles of 7.040
(Yilmaz et al., 2015) as compare to the present study. Balochi and Rakhshani sheep breed in Pakistan displayed the lowest average effective number of alleles of 2.969
(Wajid et al., 2014). The mean observed heterozygosity in the present study was 0.800, 0.755 and 0.790 for Naeimi, Herri and Najdi sheep breed, respectively, with a grand mean of 0.754. This is higher than reported by other studies of Indonesian sheep (0.574), Indian sheep (0.618) and Colombian sheep (0.680)
(Jakaria et al., 2012; Yilmaz et al., 2015 and
Ricardo et al., 2016). The expected heterozygosity (He), however, was recorded as 0.755, 0.658 and 0.751 for Naeimi, Herri and Najdi sheep breed, respectively, with a mean of 0.752. This was higher than reported by other studies in Indonesian sheep (0.687)
(Jakaria et al., 2012), but was lowest in Turkish sheep (0.870) and Colombian sheep (0.770)
(Yilmaz et al., 2015 and
Ricardo, et al., 2016). Interestingly, the lowest Ho was observed in Naeimi sheep (0.319) in the MAF65 marker and the lowest value of He was in the OarAE129 marker of Naeimi sheep (0.541). In general, all breeds showed high genetic diversity for all loci analyzed. In the present study it was to verify whether the genotypes studied were in Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium. Results indicated that there were some genotypes with several loci that followed HWE (P< 0.05); 7 loci in Naeimi, 15 loci in Herri and 5 loci in Najdi sheep populations. Although these markers indicated a deficiency and excess of heterozygotes, this does not explain the deviation from HWE. Gene flow was high in some populations but lower in others. FIS value for all loci was -0.003, which indicated that some moderate inbreeding has likely occurred within each population, although it does not explain the genetic variation among the three sheep populations under investigation. Outbreeding is limited due to isolation of breeding groups to specific geographical regions or even farms. In addition, F
ST value of 0.036 indicates little genetic differentiation has occurred. A previous study by
Radha et al., (2011) using 25 microsatellite markers in Indian sheep indicated that seven out of 25 of the loci in the sheep populations were in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.
The mean F
st values among the three sheep populations ranged between 0.031 (between Naeimi and Herri populations), 0.033 (between Najdi and Naeimi populations) and 0.017 (between Najdi and Herri populations) indicating little genetic differentiation among Saudi sheep populations.
Ferrando et al., (2014) also obtained close F
st value in six breeds located in the eastern Pyrenees ranging from 0.011 to 0.053. When Saudi Arabian sheep populations were compared with other populations from different countries, the lower F
st values were observed in this study
(Sassi-Zaidy et al., 2014).
There was no evidence that PIC less than 0.542 indicating that all microsatellite markers used in this study were highly polymorphic. The high average number of alleles per marker and the high values of PIC indicated that the 18 microsatellite markers in this study are appropriate for studying genetic diversity in Saudi sheep. Structure and PCoA results indicated a high degree of distinction among sheep breeds in Saudi Arabia with virtually no admixture. This likely is due to husbandry practices that minimize gene flow among farms raising different breeds.