Phenolic compounds in bamboo leaf: In the current study the phenolic compounds in BL were; TP (19.38 mg/g), TT (20.48 mg/g), HT (10.33 mg/g) as gallic acid equivalent and CT (10.21 mg/g) as catechin equivalent (Table 2).
As an important category of phytochemicals, plants containing phenolic compounds have been considered to have high antioxidant ability and free radical scavenging capacity
(Maisarah et al., 2014). In a study conducted by
Bhatta et al., (2012) on tannin-containing leaves from tropics
(Ficus religosa, Ficus racemosa, Leucena leucocephala, Moringa oleifera, Sesbania grandiflora), TP, TT, CT and HT averaged 28.60, 20.11, 11.47 and 11.45 (mg/gDM), respectively.
Jayanegara et al., (2009) also reported the phenolic compounds from the leaves of medicinal plants
(Iris lacteal, Sterrella chamaejasme, Toraxacum officinale, Delphinium elatum, Salsola laricifolia), TP, TT and CT ranged from (22.20 to 65.30 mg/gDM), (7.10 to 32.00 mg/gDM) and (0.70 to 14.30 mg/gDM).Our results obtained in the current study are also consistent with the mentioned studies.
Effect of bamboo leaf on total gas and methane gas production
Increases in levels of BL did not result in negative gas production (mL / 250 mg DM) at different times of incubation (Fig 1) and also rate of gas production or (c) constant (Table 3) in BL treatment groups compared to the CON. Methane production as shown in Figure 2 decreased at a decreasing rate with increasing levels of BL. Methane production (mL/ 250mg DM) at 48 h of incubation was: 8.92, 6.27, 5.75 and 3.34 for CON, LBL, MBL and HBL, respectively. Treatment groups; LBL, MBL and HBL showed respectively 29%, 35% and 62% reduction of methane production as compared to CON. Reduction of rumen methane production in this study could be due to the presence of secondary metabolites in BL as it is shown in Table 3.
It has been shown that tannin containing feed materials suppress rumen methanogenesis
(Kushwaha et al., 2011). Leaves of papaya inhibited rumen methane production until 38% as compared with control at 24 h of incubation in an
in vitro study conducted by ourselves
(Jafari et al., 2016). Our
in vitro results conûrm that all tannins containing feed materials have different effect on rumen methanogenesis. However, plant tannin effectiveness changes with the tannings’ source, type and content
(Bhatta et al., 2013). Zmora et al., (2013) indicated that
Mentha piperita leaves at different concentration as substrate mitigated rumen methane production at 24 h of incubation by changing the rumen microbial populations with no effect on digestibility of dry matter.
Effect of bamboo leaf on rumen fermentation characteristics
The results of effect of the addition of different levels of BL on rumen fermentation characteristics have been shown in Table 4. Generally, rumen fermentation parameters were improved by the use of BL in this experiment. The pH in the current study ranged from 7.35 to 7.38 without much difference between CON group and BL treatment groups (LBL, MBL and HBL). The ratio of acetic/propionic was highest in CON (2.28) compared to HBL (1.67) and MBL (2.07) and LBL (2.21). Total VFAs and molar proportions of propionic and butyric acids were not significantly (P>0.05) affected in current study by BL. Interestingly, the molar proportion of acetic acid was affected (P<0.05) by the BL addition in which LBL (51.83 mol/100mol), MBL (44.74 mol/100mol) and HBL (43.49 mol/100mol) had lower acetic acid concentration as compared with CON (51.57 mol/100mol). Rumen NH3N (mg/dL) concentration was highest (P<0.05) for MBL (23.44) and LBL (23.05) compared to HBL (16.99) and CON (18.23).
The difference in rumen pH is an indication of varying buffering capacity and rate of degradation of different nutrients. According to the pH results it seems that the addition of BL could not have negative effect on buffering capacity and nutrient degradation. The highest ratio of acetic/propionic was reported for CON (2.28) as compared to HBL (1.67) and MBL (2.07) and LBL (2.21). The ratio of acetic/propionic is considered as an important parameter in the methane production because propionic acid provides the main alternative sink for metabolic H
2 during rumen fermentation, which means that lower acetic / propionic ratio could modulate methane production. The molar proportions of propionic, butyric acids and total VFAs were not significantly (P>0.05) affected in current study by BL. Polyphenol rich BL’s effect on total VFA (TVFA) is less than methane’s, an indication that the methane suppression was mainly because of antimethanogenic activity rather than lowered fibre digestibility. Moreover, VFAs are the main source of energy for ruminants and reduction in production of VFAs would be nutritionally negative for the ruminants
(Busquet et al., 2006). The higher concentration of NH
3N seen among LBL and MBL compared to CON (18.23 mg/dL) might have resulted from an increase in the breakdown of protein
(Benchaar et al., 2008; Gunal et al., 2014). The higher concentration of NH
3N in LBL and MBL compared to CON could be due to increased dietary levels of carbohydrate and nitrogen, resulting in an increase inNH
3N concentration levels
(Paengkoum et al., 2017). Lower NH
3N in HBL (16.99 mg/dL) compared to other treatment groups could be a result of properties of tannins content in BL which binds the protein and has been reflected at higher inclusion rate of BL.