Effects of dietary supplementation of endo-1,4-b-D-glucanase producing Bacillus subtilis sp.-fermented products on growth performance in broilers 

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.9117    | Article Id: B-692 | Page : 1014-1017
Citation :- Effects of dietary supplementation of endo-1,4-b-D-glucanase producing Bacillus subtilis sp.-fermented products on growth performance in broilers .Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2018.(52):1014-1017

Jeayoung Kim, Byeongwoo Kim, Seongkeun Cho, Kyungjin Cho and Jakyeom Seo

jseo81@pusan.ac.kr
Address :

Division of management planning, Charmfre Inc,Buan-gun, Republic of Korea

Submitted Date : 25-01-2017
Accepted Date : 16-06-2017

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of Endoglucanase producing Bacillus subtilis sp. fermented product (EBFP) on growth performance and meat characteristics in broilers. A total of 480, 1 day old ROSS male broiler chicks were obtained from a local hatchery and randomly allotted to 1 of 4 dietary treatments with 6 replicate pens consisting of 20 chicks. Three additional diets were prepared by mixing 0.1% of commercial cellulase, 0.1%, and 0.2% of EBFP with the control diet and all chicks were fed experimental diets and water ad libitum. Feed intake and body weight (BW) were recorded at 0, 3, and 5 week of the experiment. At the end of the experiment, birds fed a diet containing 0.1% of EBFP had the highest BW compared to birds in other groups (P < 0.01). During 0 to 5 week the experimental period, the dietary addition of 0.1% EBFP significantly increased (P < 0.01) BW gain that was higher than that of birds fed the diet in which only a commercial cellulase was added. No significant difference among treatments was observed in carcass weight, carcass yield, left breast, and thigh meat. These results suggest that dietary addition of cellulolytic probiotics may enhance growth performance compared with the single use of probiotics or enzymes.

Keywords

Broilers Feed enzymes Growth performances Probiotics

References

  1. AOAC, (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  2. Bedford, M.R. (2000). Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition-their current value and future benefits. Anim. Feed Sci. & Technol., 86: 1-13.
  3. Bedford, M.R. and Partridge G.G. (2010). Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition. CABI.
  4. Cho, J.S., Choi Y.J. and Chung D.K. (2000). Expression of Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase gene in Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus johnsonii and characterization of the genetically modified probiotic lactobacilli. Curr. Microbiol., 40: 257-263.
  5. Collins, J., La Ragione, R.M., Woodward M.J., and Searle L.E.J. (2009). Application of prebiotics and probiotics in livestock, In: [Charalampopoulos, D., Rastall, R.A. (Eds.),] Prebiotics and probiotics science and technology, Springer, pp. 1123-1192.
  6. Cummins, J. and Ho. M.-W. (2005). Genetically modified probiotics should be banned. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis., 17: 66-68.
  7. Fuller, R. (1989). Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 66: 365-378.
  8. Horvatovic, M.P., Glamocic, D., Zikic D., and. Hadnadjev T.D. (2015). Performance and some intestinal functions of broilers fed diets with different inclusion levels of sunflower meal and supplemented or not with enzymes. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 17: 25-30.
  9. Khattak, F., Pasha, T., Hayat Z. and Mahmud A. (2006). Enzymes in poultry nutrition. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 16: 1-7.
  10. Liu, J.R., Lai S.F. and Yu. B. (2007). Evaluation of an intestinal Lactobacillus reuteri strain expressing rumen fungal xylanase as a probiotic for broiler chickens fed on a wheat-based diet. Br. Poult. Sci., 48: 507-514.
  11. Lutful Kabir, S.M. (2009). The Role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 10: 3531-3546.
  12. NRC, (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th eds. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  13. Paloheimo, M., Piironen J. and Vehmaahperä J. (2010). Xylanases and cellulases as feed additives, In: Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition, [Bedford, M.R., Partridge, G.G. (Eds.)], CABI, pp. 12-53.
  14. Park, E., Lee, S.S., Kim, B., Shin, T., Cho, B., Cho, S., Cho, K.J., Ha J.K. and Seo. J.(2016). Isolation of endo-1,4-b-D-glucanase producing Bacillus subtilis sp. from fermented foods and enhanced enzyme production by developing the mutant strain. Indian J. Anim. Res., accepted. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.7253 
  15. Patterson, J. and Burkholder K. (2003). Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci., 82: 627-631.
  16. Rantala, M. and Nurmi E. (1973). Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chicks by the flora of the alimentary tract of chickens. Br. J. Poult. Sci., 14: 627-630.
  17. SAS Institute Inc, (2002). User’ Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC.
     

Global Footprints