Effect of premilking teat sanitation on milk composition, somatic cell count and test day milk yield in Holstein cows
 

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.8480    | Article Id: B-664 | Page : 1077-1081
Citation :- Effect of premilking teat sanitation on milk composition, somatic cell count and test day milk yield in Holstein cows .Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2018.(52):1077-1081

Edit Mikóné Jónás, Savas Atasever and Erika Havranek     

satasev@omu.edu.tr
Address :

Institute  of  Animal Science and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Szeged, Hódmezóvásárhely, Hungary

Submitted Date : 29-11-2016
Accepted Date : 9-03-2017

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of premilking teat sanitation applications on milk composition, somatic cell count (SCC) and test day milk yield (TDMY) in Holstein cows. The research was conducted in two private farms located in Hódmezõvásárhely, South- Hungary. In the first trial, only water and drying application (WD) was practiced to 791 cows and in the second trial, disinfectant solution and drying application (DD) was performed to 1418 cows. Fat (F), protein (P) and lactose (L) were tested as the milk parameters and SCC and TDMY records were also evaluated. To investigate the effects of non-genetic factors on the parameters, four parity and three days in milk groups were designed. L, SCC and TDMY were affected by parity in both applications, and P affected by DD (P<0.01). All traits were affected by DIM in both applications (P<0.05 or P<0.01). While positive correlations were estimated between F and P; F and SCC; P and SCC; L and TDMY; the negative correlations were determined between F and L; F and TDMY; P and L; P and TDMY; L and SCC; SCC and TDMY. The means of F, P and SCC were higher in DD, but L and TDMY were higher in WD (P<0.05). The study revealed that cleaning the udder using plenty of water and drying the teats with clean clothes are suggested to dairy owners as a preferential premilking application to obtain high quality milk. 

Keywords

Cow Milk content Milk production Premilking management Somatic cell count Udder hygiene.

References

  1. Atasever, S. and Stadnik, L (2015). Factors affecting daily milk yield, fat and protein percentage, and somatic cell count in primiparous Holstein cows. Indian J. Anim. Res., 49: 313-316. 
  2. Gibson, H., Sinclair, L.A., Brizuela, C.M., Worton, H.L. and Protheroe, R.G. (2008). Effectiveness of selected premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load on commercial dairy farms. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 46: 295-300. 
  3. Gurmessa, J. and Melaku, A. (2012). Effect of lactation stage, pregnancy, parity and age on yield and major components of raw milk in bred cross Holstein Fresian cows. World J. Dairy Food Sci., 7: 146-149.
  4. Islam, M.A., Islam, M.N., Khan, M.A.S., Rashid, M.H. and Obaidullah, S.M. (2009). Effect of different hygienic condition during milking on bacterial count of cows’ milk. Bang. J. Anim. Sci., 38: 108-114.
  5. Jadhav, P.V., Tarate, S.B., Bhuvana, M., Das, D.N. and Shome, B.R. (2016). Somatic cell count as a monitoring system for hygienic milk production in India: A review. Asian J. Dairy & Food Res., 35: 270-277.
  6. Kamal, R.M. and Bayoumi, M.A. (2015). Efficacy of premilking and postmilking teat dipping as a control of subclinical mastitis in Egyptian dairy cattle. Int. Food Res. J., 22: 1037-1042. 
  7. Kumar, A.V., Rao, L.V., Kumar, M.K., Srinu, B. and Rao, T.M. (2012). Efficacy of udder disinfectants on reduction of bacterial load and certain pathogens of public health significance. J. Microbiol. Biotech. Res., 2: 147-151.
  8. Mammadova, N.M. and Keskin, I. (2015). Application of neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to predict subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Indian J. Anim. Res., 49: 671-679. 
  9. Mikone Jonas, E., Atasever, S., Graff, M. and Erdem, H. (2016). Non-genetic factors affecting milk yield, composition and somatic cell count in Hungarian Holstein cows. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 22: 361-366.
  10. Miseikiene, R., Rudejeviene, J. and Gerulis, G. (2015). Effect of pre-milking antiseptic treatment on the bacterial contamination of cow teats’ skin. Bulgarian J. Vet. Med., 18: 159-166. 
  11. Pavicic, Z., Cergolj, M., Balenovic, T., Ekert-Kabalin, A. and Valpotic, H. (2008). Influence of udder sanitation on hygienic quality of cow milk. Vet. Arhiv., 78: 105-112. 
  12. Sandrucci, A., Bavai L., Zucali, M. and Tanburini, A. (2014). Management factors and cow traits influencing milk somatic cell counts and teat hyperkeratosis during different seasons. R. Bras. Zootec., 43: 505-511. 
  13. Sharma, N., Singh, N.K. and Bhadwal, M.S. (2011). Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 24: 429-438.
  14. Stadnik, L. and Atasever, S. (2015). Influence of some environmental factors on body condition score and somatic cell count in Czech Holstein cows. Indian J. Anim. Res., 49: 774-777. 
  15. Yang, L., Yang, Q., Yi, M., Pang, Z.H. and Xiong, B.H. (2013). Effects of seasonal change and parity on raw milk composition and related indices in Chinese Holstein cows in northern China. J. Dairy Sci., 96: 6863-6869. 
  16. Yoon, J.T., Lee, J.H., Kim, C.K., Chung, Y.C. and Kim, C.H. (2004). Effects of milk production, season, parity and lactation period on variations of milk urea nitrogen concentration and milk components of Holstein dairy cows. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 479-484. 

Global Footprints