We identified nine saturated FAs (SFA), seven monounsaturated FAs (MUFA) and eleven PUFAs in all 23 fishes (Table 1) and total lipids are presented in Table 2. The lipid content of marine and fresh water fishes ranged from1.03% to 20.56%.
Amblygaster clupeiodies (20.56%) and
Gerres abbreviatus (12.78%) had the highest content of lipid in muscle. Two marine fishes, namely
Siganus lineatus and
Tricusurus savala had the highest amount of total SFA (52.68 mg g
-1 and 51.84 mg g
-1, respectively). Within SFAs, palmitic acid (C16:0) was the most abundance fatty acids and the highest quantities of which were found in four fishes,
S. lineatus (27 mg g
-1),
Nibea sp. (26.55 mg g
-1),
Wallago attu (26.34 mg g
-1) and
T. savala (25.64 mg g
-1). Oleic acid (cis C18:1n9) tended to be the most abundant MUFA, the highest levels being found in two fresh water fishes,
Clarius sp. (34.94 mg g
-1) and
W attu (33.16 mg g
-1), (Table3). The essential fatty acid DHA (C22:6n3) was the most abundant of 11 PUFAs; four fishes had the highest levels:
D acuta (34.73 mg g
-1),
T. savala (26.13 mg g
-1),
Sphyrenae barracuda (24.08 mg g
-1) and
G abbreviatus (24.03 mg g
-1). Among PUFAs, docosadienoic acid (C22:2n6) and adrenic acid (C22:4n6) were identified in 20 fishes. Total PUFAs were significantly lower in fresh water fishes and higher in marine fishes in this study N-3 fatty acid content was the highest in planktivorous fish like
A. clupeiodes (26.10 mg g
-1), followed by the carnivorous species,
T. savala (25.04 mg g
-1) and
G. abbreviatus (22.94 mg g
-1) (Table 3).The n-3 / n-6 ratio was significantly higher in marine fishes (p < 0.05) than in the brackish and fresh water fishes studied the n-3/n-6 ratio is a better index in identifying nutritional value of fish oils of different fishes than n-3 levels alone. AI and TI indices were lower in marine fishes than brackish or fresh water fishes (Fig 1a). Among all fish,
G. abbreviatus, which had the very lowest AI (0.01) and TI (0.81), had the highest n-3/ n-6 ratio (Table 3), and thus, consumption of this fish would be expected to be good for cardiovascular patients.
S. lineatus (AI=2.68, TI = 1.33) and
Stoleophorus commensoni (AI = 2.33, TI = 1.86) had significantly high AI and TI values. Since
S. lineatus is a herbivorous fish and
S. commensoni is a planktivorous fish, the total SFA content in these fish most influenced their AI and TI values. EPA and DHA level showed significantly higher in marine fishes than brackish and fresh water fishes (Fig1b).
The PUFAs were found at high levels in marine fishes whereas the MUFA found high in fresh and brackish water fishes. SFA was high in marine fishes. These results were consistent with those obtained by other researchers (
Vlieg and Body, 1988).
Pigott and Tucker, (1990) suggested that the n-3/n-6 ratio is a useful indicator for comparing relative nutritional value of fish of different fishes.
S. lineatus and
A. clupeiodies had high n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratios. It was suggested that ratios of 1:1-1:5 would be in range for a healthy human diet
(Osman et al., 2001). All fresh water and marine water fish species studied had n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratios within these recommended values. However, marine fishes had greater n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratios in this study as reported by
Hossain, (2011). The ratio of unsaturated FAs (UFA) to SFA ranged from 0.45 to 1.25 in this study. Marine species generally had a ratio greater than one. The essential FAs EPA and DHA were found in all marine fishes and ranged from 23.34 mg g
-1 to 10.7 mg g
-1. Marine water fish species contained high levels of n-3. Similar results obtained by
Rasoarahona et al., (2005), fresh water and brackish water fishes had higher n-6 levels and these results agreed with the result obtained by
Abouel-Yazeed, (2013). Differences in FAs of marine and fresh water fishes should be considered not only with respect to species habitat, but also based on the natural diet, especially whether a species is herbivorous, omnivorous, planktivorous, or carnivorous (
Sargent,1997). Fishes are often classified based on their fat content, according to
Bennion, (1980). Based on that classification, lean fish have lower than 5% fat by weight whereas fatty fish have more than 10%. According to another classification scheme described by
Greenfield and Southgate (2003), lean fish have <1% total lipid, medium fish have 1-5%, lipids and fatty fish contain more than 5% of lipid. In this study, marine fishes tended to be fatty, with a lipid content of 20.56%, such as herring species. Brackish water and fresh water fish tended to have medium and low lipid content, respectively.
In conclusion, this study examined the fatty acid compositions of the fish species most commonly consumed on the eastern coast of Sri Lanka. We found that marine fish were better sources of n-3 FAs, particularly the essential FAs, EPA and DHA, whereas fresh and brackish water fishes were better sources of n-6 FAs. With respect to diet, herbivorous and planktivorous fishes had high levels of n-3 FAs, including EPA and DHA, than their carnivorous counterparts. AI and TI shows high in herbivorous, planktivorous and omnivorous species. Carnivorous species have low AI and TI. These data should be useful to consumers and nutritionists wishing in increase intake of n-3 and n-6 FAs, which have been shown to be associated with ‘heart-healthy’ diets. Understanding the relative lipid profiles of various species of fish will be of use in the application of technological processes for fish preservation, nutritional processing, and value-added development of fish products.