Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorM. R. Saseendranath

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.40

  • SJR 0.233, CiteScore (0.606)

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Effect of Supplementation of Different Levels of Trace Mineral Mixture on the Performance of White Pekin Ducks for Meat Production Purpose

P.K. Naik1,*, B.K. Swain1, R. Behera1, D. Kumar 1, C.K. Beura1, S.K. Sahoo1, S.K. Mishra1
1ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Regional Station, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.

Background: Duck meat consumption has been popularized and augmented during the past few decades and the better growth necessitates optimal mineral requirements. Over the past few decades, the consumption of duck meat has increased and become more popular and its improved growth requires the right minerals. Therefore, the present study was carried out conducted to find out the effect of supplementation of different levels of trace mineral mixture on the performance of White Pekin ducks for meat production purpose.

Methods: 180 day-old White Pekin ducks (180; day-old) were divided into three groups; with each group consist of four replicates; and each replicate had 15 ducklings. Three experimental diets feeds were prepared by supplementing a standard starter feed with TMM @ of 100 g (TMM-100), 200 g (TMM-200) and 300 g (TMM-300) per 100 kg diet; and were offered randomly to the above three groups for eight weeks of age.

Result: The day-old body weight (51.67- 52.02, g) and 8th week body weight (2155.02- 2176.17, g) of the ducklings were similar among the groups. The daily feed intake at the 8th week of age in TMM-100 group (156.62 g) was similar to both TMM-200 group (154.77 g) and TMM-300 group (160.31 g). However, the cumulative feed intake up to 8 weeks in TMM-100 group (6.83 kg) was similar to TMM-200 group (6.83 kg) and both the groups were recorded higher feed intake than the TMM-300 group (6.60 kg). The feed conversion ratio up to 8 weeks (3.07-3.17) was similar among all the experimental groups. The eviscerated weight percentage (68.98-70.27) was similar among all the treatment groups. There is were no significant differences in various body parts as percentage of eviscerated weight i.e. legs (19.89-20.51), breast (27.99-29.11) and wings (15.57-17.08) among the experimental groups. However, the back expressed as percentage of eviscerated weight in TMM-100 group (23.11) was similar to TMM-200 group (24.23), but lower than TMM-300 group (24.69) recorded higher weight than other two groups. It can be concluded that trace mineral mixture can be supplemented @ 100- 200 g per 100 kg feed in the diet of White Pekin ducks up to 8 weeks of age for resulted  better growth rate and meat production.

Duck meat consumption has been popularized and augmented during the past few decades owing to the high nutritional value packed with essential amino acids, fatty acids composed more of polyunsaturated fatty acids with a balanced proportion of omega-6 and omega-3 (Pingel and Germany, 2011; Naik et al., 2022a; 2022b). The continuous selection pressure on the birds for better growth has further necessitated more mineral requirements for bone health (Swain et al., 2023). recorded. In ducks, rapid bone growth and mineralization due to intensive selection for growth rate in ducks. Minerals have a significant role in bone mineralization and the growth of meat ducks (Zhang et al., 2019). Minerals are essential to support several enzymatic systems enhancing antioxidant ability and immunity (Wang et al., 2020). Micro minerals like manganese, copper, zinc, selenium and iron play significant roles in growth, reproduction, egg production and egg quality in ducks. Till dates, research have mostly concentrated on macro-nutrients (amino acids, crude protein, metabolizable energy). Therefore, the literature on duck mineral nutrition is comparatively scarce quite limited. Furthermore, among the minerals, macro-minerals have dragged most attention of the researchers, with scarce scanty literature on the micro-minerals (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn and Se). To add on, most mineral nutrition studies have focused on requirements in chicken. Chicken and ducks differ in terms of digestion physiology (Jamroz et al., 2002), digestibility of minerals (Adeola, 2006) and mineral deposition (Rodehutscord and Dieckmann, 2005). Compared to chickens, ducks possess a spindle-shaped widening at esophagus and proventriculus is fusi form. Ducks exhibit a faster transit rate of chime, consequentially a lesser mineral availability (Fan, 2003). Copper being a cofactor for many enzymes like pyruvate hydrolase,cytochrome oxidase, phydroxyphenyl, lysyl oxidase, tyrosinase etc. is highly essential micro-mineral in poultry nutrition (Leeson, 2009). However, copper requirement in meat duck is not given recommended by NRC (1994). Zinc is an essential mineral for structural and regulatory and catalytic functions. Growing ducks fed Zn-deficient diet exhibited stunted growth and lesions in pedal epidermis (Wight and Dewar, 1976). Severe Zn deficiency resulted in lower hatchability, anomalous embryonic development (Kienholz et al., 1961).  Manganese serves as a vital element of pyruvate carboxylase, arginase and superoxide dismutase. Iron is a component of protein heme in the red blood cell and myoglobin protein in muscle cells (Theil, 2004). Selenium is crucial element of selenoproteins needed for regulation of different physiological processes. Se deficiency injured fibroblast membranes and declined collagen synthesis in ducks (Brown et al., 1982). Looking into the availability and role of minerals on duck nutrition, the present study was conducted to find out the effect of supple-mentation of different levels of trace mineral mixture on the performance of White Pekin ducks for meat purpose production.
 
The study has been carried out in ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research Regional Station, Bhubaneswar during 2022 - 2023. 180 day-old White Pekin ducklings (180; day old) were divided into three groups; with each group consists of four replicates; and each replicate had 15 ducklings. A basal starter feed diet was prepared by mixing wheat (60 kg), soybean meal (25 kg), fishmeal (5 kg), deoiled rice bran (8 kg), oyster shell (1 kg), dicalcium phosphate (1 kg) and feed supplements (DL-methionine-50 g; lysine-50 g; vit. AD3B2K-20 g; vit E  and Se -20 g; vit B Complex-20 g; toxin binder-100 g; choline chloride -100g; Salt-100g). Three experimental diets feeds were prepared by supplementing the above basal starter feed with TMM containing (Mn 11 g; Zn 10 g; Cu 2 g; Fe 11 g; Se 0.15 g; I 0.25 g; Co 0.125 g; Cr 40 mg per 100 kg feed) @ of 100 g (TMM-100), 200g (TMM-200) and 300 g (TMM-300) per 100 kg diet. The three experimental feeds  diets were offered randomly to all the above three experimental groups for up to eight 8 weeks of age as per the suggested practical inclusion levels of nutrient requirements for White Pekin ducks 8 weeks (Singh and Panda, 1996). During the experiment, the ducks were reared on deep litter system and the respective diets were fed ad libitumlib. following standard management practices. During the feeding trial, a metabolic trial of 4-d collection period was conducted on six birds from each group (two birds from each replicate) in individual cages. The samples of feeds, residues and faeces were analyzed for proximate principles following standard procedures (AOAC, 1997). The metaboliszability of the nutrients was calculated as the difference between nutrient intake and nutrient voided. The data on feed intake was recorded daily, while the live weights were recorded weekly. At the end of eight weeks of age, four male ducks from each group i.e. one duck from each replicate was sacrificed following standard procedure for the study of the carcass characteristics. The statistical analysis of the data for any significant differences was conducted as per Snedecor and Cochran (1994).
 
 
The chemical compositions (on % DM basis) of the experimental feeds are presented in (Table 1). The CP content and energy content ranged from 22.31-22.70 % is maintained in the diets. The day-old body weights of the ducklings (51.67-52.027) were similar among all the treatment groups (Table 2). The mean body weigh at 6th week in TMM-100 group (1821.02 g) was similar to TMM-200 (1833.27 g) and TMM-300 groups (1719.92). Sahoo et al., (2014) has reported similar findings at 6th week of age body weight in White Pekin ducklings, while higher body weight was recorded by Farhat and Chavez (2000) and lower body weight than the present study was reported by Bhuyian et al., (2005). However, the mean body weight at 8th week (2155.02-2176.17, g) was similar among the experimental groups. The body weight gain during 4-6 weeks (673.60-736.44, g) was higher than 6-8 weeks (335.16-435.10, g). Many of the researchers have recorded a higher 8th week body weight at 8th week  of age in Pekin ducks compared to our present study (Solomon et al., 2006; Solomon et al., 2007; Kuzniacka and Adamski, 2019) while a lower body weight was observed by many researchers (Ghosh et al., 202;  Rabbani et al., 2019). In contrary to our present study, Yin et al., (2022) observed more body weight gain with greater supplementation of trace minerals. Baltic et al., (2016) recommended that trace mineral selenium supplementation @ 4 mg/kg feed imparted better growth rate in ducklings.

Table 1: Chemical composition (on % DM basis) of feeds.



Table 2: Effect on weekly body weight (g) of ducks.


       
The daily feed intake at 6th week of age (158.44-162.59, g) was similar among the treatment groups (Table 3). However, the daily feed intake at 8th week of age in TMM-100 group (156.62 g) was similar to both TMM-200 group (154.77 g) and TMM-300 group (160.31 g). The cumulative feed intake up to 6 weeks and 8 weeks in TMM-100 group (4.55 and 6.83, kg) was similar to TMM-200 group (4.61 and 6.83) and both were higher than the TMM-300 group (4.33 and 6.60) (Table 4). The feed conversion ratio (FCR) up to 6 weeks (2.58-2.60) and 8 weeks (3.14-3.25) were similar among the experimental groups (Fig 1). The present our findings have been supported by Yin et al., (2022) who reported non-significant influence of dietary mineral supplementation on average daily feed intake and FCR. The data on metabolisability of various nutrients and nitrogen balances is presented in (Table 5). The metabolisability (%) of dry matter (72.03-75.86), organic matter (73.24-76.86), crude protein (76.82-79.87), ether extract (83.74-85.16) and crude fibre (60.22-63.93) were similar among the treatment groups. Attia et al., (2013) recommended that supplementation of trace mineral zinc in Pekin duck diet can prevent clinical deficiencies and help the ducks to achieve their full genetic growth potential. Inorganic Zn supplemented @ 30 ppm exhibited positive impact on growth rate and Zn excretion in male White Pekin ducklings.

Table 3: Effect on daily feed consumption (g) (under DM basis).



Table 4: Effect on cumulative feed intake (g) (under DM basis).



Table 5: Effect on metabolisability of various nutrients and nitrogen balances.



Fig 1: Effect of trace mineral supplementation on feed conversion ratio of white pekin ducklings.


       
The slaughter body weight (2165.75 - 2234.00 g) and various body parts expressed as percentage of body weight viz. blood (4.80-5.63), feather (11.65-13.30), head (5.23-5.85), shank (2.85-2.98), heart (0.56-0.64), liver (1.69-1.74), gizzard (2.84-3.20), intestine (3.51-3.60) and eviscerated weight (68.98-70.27) was similar among the experimental groups (Table 6). There were no significant differences in various body parts as percentage of eviscerated weight i.e. legs (19.89-20.51), breast (27.99-29.11) and wings (15.57-17.08) among the treatment groups. However, the back as percentage of eviscerated weight in TMM-100 group (23.11) was similar to TMM-200 group (24.23), but lower than TMM-300 group (24.69). Our findings The observations of the present study  being supported by findings of Attia et al., (2013) who observed supplementation of trace mineral copper at different concentrations exhibited non-significant influence on dressing percentage of the carcass and the feather, giblets or intestine. The researchers advocated the dose as 8 mg/kg feed of inorganic Cu for male White Pekin ducklings (0-8 weeks) for optimal growth. However, Cu @ 150 mg/ kg feed significantly enhanced meat quality (more meat protein, lesser meat lipids and cholesterol). In another study, Zhang et al., (2020) recorded that trace mineral manganese when supplemented in layer duck breeder diet (up to 160 mg/kg of feed), influenced their tibial characteristics, overall production, serum biochemical and antioxidant status. In another study, Baltic et al., (2016) observed that ducks fed high-selenium diets (0.4 mg/kg feed) exhibited significantly higher daily weight gain (15 to 49 days) and final bodyweight than the control or the group supplanted with supra-nutritional (0.6 mg/kg) selenium quantities. The effect of selenium supplementation in diet had non-significant effect on weights of the primal cuts.

Table 6: Effect on carcass characteristics.

It can Based on the above research findings, it is concluded that trace mineral mixture can be supplemented @ 100 -200 g per 100 kg feed in the diets of White Pekin ducks up to 8 weeks of age for better growth rate and meat production.
The authors are thankful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, for providing financial support to conduct this study.
All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Adeola O. (2006). Review of research in duck nutrient utilization. International Journal of Poultry Science. 5: 201-218.

  2. Anonymous. (2019). Basic Animal Husbandry statistics. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Krishi Bhawan. New Delhi.

  3. AOAC. (1997). Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

  4. Attia, Y.A. Qota, E.M. Zeweil, H.S. Bovera, F. Abd Al-Hamid A.E. and Sahledom, M.D. (2013). Effect of different dietary concentrations of inorganic and organic copper on growth    performance and lipid metabolism of White Pekin male ducks. British Poultry Science. 53(1): 77-88, DOI: 10.  1080/00071668.2011.650151.

  5. Baltic, M.Z. Starcevic, M.D. Basic, M. Zenunovic, A. Ivanovic, J. Markovic, R. Janjic J. Mahmutovic, H. Glamoclija, N. (2016).  Effects of dietary selenium-yeast concentrations on growth performance and carcass composition of ducks. Animal Production Science. 57(8): 1731-1737. 

  6. Bhuyian, M.M. Khan, M.H. Khan, M.A.H. Das, B.C. Lucky, N.S. and Uddin, M.B. (2005). A study on comparative performances  of different breeds of broiler ducks under farmers conditions at farming system research and development (FSRD) site. Sylhet, Bangladesh. International Journal of Poultry Sciences. 4: 596-599. 

  7. Brown, R.G. Sweeny, P.R. and Moran, J.E.T. (1982). Collagen levels in tissues from selenium deficient ducks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. A Comparative Physiology.    72(2): 383-389.

  8. Brown, R. Sweeny, P. Moran, E. (1982). Collagen levels in tissues from selenium deficient ducks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A. 72: 383-389.

  9. Fan, H.P. (2003). Comparative study of the digestion of feed nutrients between cockerel and drake. Chinese Academy    of Agricultural Sciences; Beijing. 

  10. Farhat, A. and Chavez, E.R. (2000). Comparative performances, blood chemistry and carcass composition of two lines of ducks reared mixed or separated by sex. Poultry Science. 79: 460-465.

  11. Ghosh, S. Saha, M. Habib, M. and Sahu, N.C. (2022). Growth performance and meat quality of white pekin ducks reared in backyard farming system. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 41(4): 495-499. 

  12. Jamroz, D. Wiliczkiewicz, A. Orda, J. Wertelecki, T. Skorupinska, J. (2002). Aspects of development of digestive activity of intestine in young chickens, ducks and geese. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 86: 353-366.

  13. Kienholz, E.W. Turk, D.E. Sunde, M.L. and Hoekstra, W.G. (1961). Effects of zinc deficiency in the diets of hens. The Journal of Nutrition. 75(2): 211-221.

  14. KuŸniacka, J. and Adamski, M. (2019). Effect of genotype and age at slaughter on meat traits in Pekin ducks. European Poultry Science. DOI: 10.1399/eps.2019.276. 

  15. Leeson, S. (2009). Copper metabolism and dietary needs. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 65: 353-366.

  16. Naik, P.K. Swain, B.K. and Beura, C.K. (2022 a). Duck production in India-a review. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 92 (8): 917-926.

  17. Naik, P.K. Swain, B.K. Sahoo, S.K. Kumar, D. Mishra, S.K. and Beura,    C.K. (2022 b). Performance of White Pekin ducks fed wheat or broken rice based diets during mid phase of laying  under intensive rearing system. Indian Journal of Animal Research. DOI: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4870.

  18. National Research Council and Subcommittee on Poultry Nutrition. (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry: National Academies Press.

  19. Pingel, H. Germany, L. (2011). Waterfowl production for food security.  Lohmann Information. 46: 32-42.

  20. Rabbani, M.A.G. Das, S.C. Ali, M.A. Hassan, M.R. and Ali, M.Y. (2019).  Growth performance of Pekin ducks under full confinement    system fed diets with various nutrient concentrations. Asian Journal of Biological sciences. 12: 717-723.

  21. Rodehutscord, M. Hempel, R. and Wendt,  P. (2006). Phytase effects on the efficiency of utilisation and blood concentrations of phosphorus and calcium in Pekin ducks. British Poultry Science. 47 (3): 311-321.

  22. Rodehutscord, M. and Dieckmann, A. (2005). Comparative studies with three-week-old chickens, turkeys, ducks and quails on the response in phosphorus utilization to a supple  mentation of monobasic calcium phosphate. Poultry Science. 84:1252-1260.

  23. Sahoo, S.K. Naskar, S.K. Giri, S.C. Padhi, M. K. and Panda, S.K. (2014). Performance of White Pekin ducks on replacement  of maize with cassava tuber meals. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technololgy. 14: 291-300. 

  24. Singh, K.S. and Panda, B. (1996). Poultry Nutrition. 3rd  ed. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

  25. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods, 8th ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Calcutta, India.

  26. Solomon, J.K.Q. Austin, R. Cumberbatch, R.N. Gonsalves, J. and Seaforth, E. (2006). A comparison of live weight and carcass gain of Pekin, Kunshan and Muscovy ducks on a commercial ration. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18: Article No. 154. Retrieved  from http:// www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/11/solo18154.htm. 

  27. Solomon, J.K.Q. Austin, R. and Cumberbatch, R.N. (2007). Restricted    feeding of Pekin ducks: a comparison of three levels of quantitative feed restriction and full feed on the growth, carcass and economic indices. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 19:(Article  91). Retrieved  from http:/ /www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/7/solo19091.htm.

  28. Swain, B.K. Naik, P.K. Sahoo, S.K. Mishra, S.K. Kumar, D. and Beura,  C.K. (2023). Effect of replacing fishmeal by soybean meal    on the performance, nutrient utilization and egg quality of Khaki Campbell ducks in late laying phase. Indian Journal of Animal Research, DOI: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5144.

  29. Theil, EC. (2004). Iron, ferritin and nutrition. Annual Review of Nutrition. 24: 327-343.

  30. Wang, H. Gao, W. Huang, L. Shen, J.J. Liu, Y. Mo, C.H. Yang, L. Zhu, Y.W. (2020). Mineral requirements in ducks: an update. Poultry Science. 99 (12): 6764-6773. doi: 10. 1016/j.psj.2020.09.041. 

  31. Wight, P.A. and Dewar, W.A. (1976). The histopathology of zinc deficiency in ducks. The Journal of Pathology. 120 (3): 183-191.

  32. Yin, D. Zhai, F. Lu, W. Moss, A.F. Kuang, Y. Li, F. Zhu, Y. Zhang, R. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. (2022). Comparison of coated and uncoated trace minerals on growth performance, tissue mineral deposition and intestinal microbiota in ducks. Front Microbiology. 13: 831945. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.    831945. PMID: 35495727.

  33. Zhang, H.Y. Zeng, Q.F. Bai, S.P. Wang, J.P. Ding, X.M. Xuan, Y. Su, Z.W. Fraley, G.S. Zhang, K.Y. (2019). Study on the morphology and mineralization of the tibia in meat ducks from 1 to 56 d. Poultry Science. 98: 3355-3364.

  34. Zhang, Y. N.  Wang, S. Huang, X.B. Li, K.C. Chen, W. Ruan, D. Xia, W.G. Wang, S.L.  Abouelezz, K.F.M. Zheng, C.T. (2020). Estimation of dietary manganese requirement for laying duck breeders: effects on productive and reproductive performance, egg quality, tibial characteristics and serum biochemical and antioxidant indices. Poultry Science. 99 (11): 5752-5762.

Editorial Board

View all (0)