Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Bottleneck Effect Analysis in Indigenous Poonchi Chicken Located Near International Border of India and Pakistan

Mandeep Singh Azad1,*, Dibyendu Chakraborty2, Kawardeep Kour3, Sanjoy Datta4, Palak Sharma2
1Directorate of Extension, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu-180 009, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
2Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu-180 009, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
3Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu-180 009, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
4Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Begachia, Kolkata-700 037, West Bengal, India.

Background: Poonch is the remotest district of Jammu, India located near to line of control with Pakistan. Poonchi chicken is the first native poultry breed of Jammu region which is being characterized and registered with National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources. Present study is the first study on genetic bottleneck assessment in Poonchi chicken population using recommended microsatellite markers. This study in Poonchi chicken would be of immense use in tracing evolutionary origin and formulating effective conservation strategies for genetic diversity within breeds. 

Methods: Blood samples were collected randomly from Poonch and Rajouri districts of Jammu for DNA extraction and analysis. Microsatellite markers selected for the analysis were ADL0268, MCW0206, MCW0081, ADL0278, MCW0069, MCW0248, MCW0111, MCW0222, MCW0016 and LEI0094. To evaluate the Poonchi chicken for mutation drift equilibrium, Bottleneck software was used. Infinite allele model (IAM), two phase model of mutation (TPM) and stepwise mutation model (SMM) tests were done. Mode shift test was also used as another method of qualitative test for allele frequency.

Result: Total number of alleles observed were 72, with the total number alleles ranged from 6 to 9. The results of all three models (IAM, TPM, SMM) in Sign test depicted the heterozygosity was more in the expected number of loci in Poonchi chicken as 5.97 (P<0.05), 5.93 (P<0.05), 5.90 (P<0.05) respectively. Whereas for Wilcoxon rank test the IAM, TPM and SMM revealed significant values of (P<0.05) deviation indicating that all the loci deviate from mutation-drift equilibrium. Mode shift test graph obtained depicted a slight shift from normal L-shaped curve indicating recent bottleneck effect in Poonchi chicken. This might have resulted in the loss of number of effective alleles which suggests a need of planning and implementing an effective breeding policy in order to preserve and promote this native breed.

Livestock production constitutes a very important component of the agricultural economy of developing countries, with multipurpose uses, such as skins, meat, egg, fibre and fertilizer (George et al., 2024). Poonch and Rajouri (Fig 1) are remote districts of Jammu located near line of control and share international borders with Pakistan. Backyard poultry farming with local native indigenous chicken is common practice in these hilly areas. These native indigenous chickens play an important role in socioeconomic upliftment of hilly tribal farmers. The present study was carried out with the main aim to evaluate the presence or absence of bottleneck effect in the Poonchi chicken as previously no study has been done in Poonchi chicken using these recommended microsatellite markers. Earlier studies have documented that local indigenous breeds /strains exhibit more diversity as compared to exotic commercial breeds (Lee et al., 2000; Okumura et al., 2006). It is very imperative to chracterize these native breeds and register them with national breed registration organization for conservation and research purposes. Breed registration involves genotypic chracterization using different molecular markers for estimation of genetic variabilty. Microsatellite markers have been reported by many research workers as one of the most accurate and easy ways to estimate genetic diversity estimation and its relationships among populations (Takezaki and Nei, 1996). Microsatellite markers are highly polymorphic, randomly repeated motifs or simple sequence nucleotide repeats (Tautz, 1989).
 

Fig 1: Various natural breeding tract of Poonchi chicken mainly Poonch and Rajouri district (Jammu and Kashmir).


       
The term ²bottleneck² refers to narrow neck of a bottle which decreases the flow of any substance into the bottle. In conservation studies population bottlenecks attributes to the loss of genetic variation in the population in due course of time due to drastic climate change, predation, limited resources that lead to random fluctuation in the size of the existing population. This reduction in size of the populations results in development of smaller gene pool, this decrease in gene pool is not contemplative of the diversity in the original gene pool. Probable reasons for genetic bottle neck in Poonchi chicken population is loss of genetic diversity due to natural disaster like flash floods in hilly areas of Jammu and Kashmir, inbreeding and small population size of Poonchi chicken flocks. Founder effect is another reason for reduction in diversity as a large habitat of the Poonchi chicken have gone to Pakistan after independence. Microsatellite markers have been used for bottleneck analysis in various livestock species like cattle (Ganapathi et al., 2012; Thiagarajan, 2012), sheep (Girish et al., 2007; Radha et al., 2011) goat (Thiruvenkadan et al., 2014) and poultry (Vij et al., 2006; Pandey et al., 2005, Sharma et al., 2017. Microsatellite markers are useful in assessing genetic diversity, population structure and gene flow analysis and identifying inbreeding and out breeding levels. Microsatellite profiling helps assess the genetic variability within and between population, helps to identify the low genetically diverse population and simultaneously helps to conservation actions. Microsatellite markers can detect levels of inbreeding within a population, guiding breeding plans to introduce new genetic material or promote outbreeding to enhance heterozygosity.
Blood samples were collected aseptically from wing vein of Poonchi chicken from remote villages of Poonch (Gursai, Ari, Harni, Digvaar) and Rajouri district (Androoth, Hanjana, Guni, Rajpur Bhatta) Rajouri. Genomic DNA isolation was carried out by both phenol-chloroform method and by sigma AldrichGenelute blood genomic DNA kit.50 best DNA samples with spectrophotometer values ranging from 1.7 to 1.9 were selected for further PCR amplification with FAO recommended microsatellite markers namely ADL0268, MCW0206, MCW0081, ADL0278, MCW0069, MCW0248, MCW0111, MCW0222, MCW0016 and LEI0094 (Table 1). PCR was standardized for all 10 primers and positively amplified samples were then resolved at 10% urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for a period of 4hrs at 100 -120 volts. The gels were then stained with silver staining to visualize and analyse the number of alleles in each sample.The bands obtained after staining were further genotyped, scored and different alleles were identified as different bands. Alleles were marked as A,B,C….. in ascending order of size. Popgen 32 software was used to analyze the genetic diversity. Three tests Infinite allele model (IAM), two phase model (TPM) and step wise mutation model (SMM) were performed to evaluate the Poonchi chicken for mutation drift equilibrium. Three tests namely sign rank, standardized differences and wilcoxon test were used to investigate the presence of bottleneck effect in Poonchi chicken breed. The method for detecting bottleneck effect involves comparison of expected heterozygosity (He) with heterozygosity expected at mutation disequilibrium (Heq). If He is higher than Heq then there is heterozygosity excess whichmeans a recent bottleneck effect (Cornuetand Luikart 1996). Heterozygosity excess was tested with one tailed wilcoxon sign rank using bottleneck software 1.2.02 (Piry et al., 1999).The allele frequency distribution was established to see absence or presence of bottleneck effect. For qualitative graphical representation of allele frequency distribution another test, mode shift graph (Luikart et al., 1998) was used to identify potential bottlenecks. With the use of Mode shift graph allele frequency classes of ten microsatellite markers was obtained. L-shaped distribution curve of the allele frequency graph indicates no recent bottleneck effect and a shift from L-shaped distribution is suggestive of a recent genetic bottleneck.
 

Table 1: Primer sequence of different microsatellites used in the study.

Chicken represents a valuable genetic resource and diversification of the poultry production is one of the viable options to enhance the food production (Kaushik et al., 2023). Poonchi chicken is an indigenous breed reared mainly in remote areas of Rajouri and Poonch, Jammu and Kashmir (UT). Severe bottlenecks and population decline often lead to the reduction of most important factor i.e. genetic variation in a population (Mundy et al., 1997; Groombridge et al., 2000). Documentation have been done by researchers to acknowledge the importance of variation for survival (McAlpine 1993; Keller et al., 1994), the clutch size (McAlpine 1993) and growth rate (Alvarez et al., 1989). In contrast to it some researchers observed no or little effect of these parameters. (Ardern and Lambert 1997). However, like many other indigenous breeds, Poonchi chicken is facing threats from the widespread use of commercial breeds. Since very less information regarding this indigenous population is available, it is very important to characterize, promote and conserve this breed. Therefore, the present study was carried out for bottleneck analysis of Poonchi chicken using microsatellite markers.
       
Bottleneck occurs when populations experience severe temporary reduction in size (Barani et al., 2024). Bottleneck hypothesis was investigated using bottleneck software 1.2.02. The result for Bottleneck analysis under three microsatellite evolution models are presented in Table 2. Result showed that the number of alleles in the present study ranged from 6 to 9 for recommended microsatellite markers under study. It can be seen that the expected heterozygosity ranged between 0.73 (LEI0094) to 0.859 (MCW0111). Three tests IAM, TPM and SMM were performed to evaluate the Poonchi chicken for mutation drift equilibrium. All three models in Sign test showed expected numbers of loci with heterozygosity excess in Poonchi chicken as 5.97 (P<0.05), 5.93 (P<0.05), 5.90 (P<0.05) respectively. Whereas for Wilcoxon rank test the IAM, TPM and SMM revealed significant values of (P<0.05) deviation indicating that all the loci deviate from mutation-drift equilibrium (Table.3). Result show that the observed heterozygosity excess (He) is more than expected heterozygosity excess (Hee). The higher values of He then Hee indicate the presence of recent bottleneck effect in the Poonchi chicken. Probable reasons for genetic bottleneck in Poonchi chicken population are natural calamities/flood (that occurs during the 2014 causing huge loss in genetic resources and population size drastically reduced which leads to loss of genetic diversity), inbreeding and small population size (Poonchi chicken is reared in small flocks and there is no systematic breeding knowledge among farmers, inbreeding occurs in the population causing reduction of genetic diversity over time and increasing the likelihood of genetic bottlenecks) and geographical relocation (Poonchi bird is unique in nature and after independence some part of natural habitat goes to Pakistan, that left with a small group of individuals which subsequently establishes a new population; hence the genetic variation is limited to Poonchi chicken leading to a genetic bottleneck). Similar results were observed by De la Para et al., (2024) in light Brahma breed.
 

Table 2: Bottleneck analysis under three microsatellite evolution models in Poonchi Chicken.


 

Table 3: Test for null hypothesis under three microsatellite evolution models for bottleneck analysis in Poonchi Chicken.


       
Bottleneck effect in Poonchi chicken can be improved or removed by introduction of genetically diverse Poonchi chicken population by the farmers or exchange of breeding birds among themselves. Farmers should be trained for scientific breeding management among Poonchi chicken to control inbreeding.
 
Mode-shift test
 
Mode shift test was used as another method of qualitative test for allele frequency. Luikart et al., (1998) proposed mode shift test for qualitative graphical representation of allele frequency distribution. The graph obtained depicted a slight shift from normal L-shaped curve indicating recent bottleneck effect in Poonchi chicken. (Fig 2). A normal L shaped distribution of the allele frequency graph is an indication of no recent bottleneck. When there is some shift or change in L-shaped distribution of the studied populations it indicates recent genetic bottleneck. The result suggested that the Poonchi chicken population had undergone an effective recent genetic bottleneck (last 15-20 generations). The main reason for genetic bottleneck is indiscriminate and unplanned crossbreeding which has led to the loss of effective alleles due to small size population, inbreeding or mating which occur among relatives and consequent to it causes genetic drift. Similar to these results were reported by De la Para et al., 2024 in various Chilean Chicken breeds namely Kollonka, Ketro, Trintre, Cogotepelado, Light Brahma and Barred Plymouth Rock. Comparative to this a normal L-shaped curve was observed by De la Para et al., (2024) in Kollonca de aretes breed, in Punjab Brown chicken  by Vij et al., (2006), in Ankleshwar poultry population of India by Pandey et al., (2005), in Kaunayen chicken of Manipur by Sharma et al., (2017) indicating that these breeds have not experienced any recent genetic bottleneck.
 

Fig 2: Mode shift test for bottleneck in poonchi chicken.

The presence of genetic bottleneck calls for an urgent need of implementing an effective well planned breeding policy to preserve and promote this native breed which is well suited for local conditions of Jammu and Kashmir. Genetic heterozygosity and inbreeding are indeed inversely proportional, meaning that as inbreeding increases within a population, genetic heterozygosity decreases. Although, the overall heterozygosity deficiency in the population is negative but the value is very close to zero which indicates loss of substantial heterozygosity in the population. This work is the first study done on Poonchi chicken using specific microsatellite markers indicating genetic bottleneck effect.
There is no conflict of interest for authors to declare.

  1. Alvarez, G., Zapata, C., Amaro, R. and Guerra, A.  (1989). Multilocus heterozygosity at proteinloci and fitness in the European oyster. Heredity. 63: 359-372.

  2. Ardern, S.L. and Lambert, D.M. (1997). Is the Black Robin in genetic peril? Molecular Ecology. 6: 21-28.

  3. Barani, A., Rahumathulla, P.S., Rajendran, R., Kumarasamy, P., Ganapathi, P., Radha P. (2024). Molecular characterization of Pulikulam cattle using microsatellite markers. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 49(1): 36-39. doi: 10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00007.2.

  4. Cornuet, J.M. and Luikart, G. (1996). Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 144: 2001-2014.

  5. De la Parra, M.D.M., Inostroza, K., Alcalde, J.A., Larama, G. and Bravo, S. (2024). Characterization of the genetic diversity, structure and admixture of 7 Chilean chicken breeds. Poultry Science. 103(2): 103238.

  6. Ganapathi, P., Rajendran, R. and Kathiravan, P. (2012). Detection of occurrence of a recent genetic bottleneck event in Indian hill cattle breed Bargur using microsatellite markers. Tropical Animal Health Production. 44: 2007-2013. 

  7. George, N., Devendran, P., Sesh, P.S.L., Cauveri, D. (2024). Genetic diversity in katchaikatty sheep based on microsatellites polymorphism. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58(5): 716-722. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5132.

  8. Girish, H., Sivaselvam, S.N., Karthickeyan, S.M.K. and Saravanan, R. (2007). Molecular characterization of Nilagiri sheep of South India based on Ovis aries microsatellites. Asian- Australian Journal of Animal Sciences. 20: 633-637. 

  9. Groombridge, J.J., Jones, C.G., Bruford, M.W. and Nichols, R.A. (2000). Ghost alleles of the Mauritius Kestrel. Nature. 403: 616.

  10. Kaushik, P., Kalita, K.B., Deka, R.J. and Dutta, D. Characterization of Microsatellite Markers in Crossbred Ducks. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1: 6.

  11. Keller, L.F., Arcese, P., Smith, J.N.M., Hochachka, W.M. and Stearns, S.C. (1994). Selection  against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Nature. 372: 356.

  12. Lee, E.J., Mannen, H., Mizutani, M. and Tsuji, S. (2000). Genetic analysis of chicken lines by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Animal Science Journal. 71(3): 231-238.

  13. Luikart, G. and Cornuet, J.M. (1998). Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked population form alleles frequency data. Conservation Biology. 12: 228-237.

  14. McAlpine, S. (1993). Genetic heterozygosity and reproductive success in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea. Heredity. 70: 553-558.

  15. Mundy, N.I., Winchell, C.S. and Woodruff, D.S. (1997). Microsatellite variation and microevolution in the critically endangered san clemente island loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianusmearnsi). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series. B 264: 869-875.

  16. Okumura, F., Shimogiri, T., Kawabe, K., Okamoto, S., Nishibori, M., Yamamoto, Y. and Maeda, Y. (2006). Gene constitution of South-East Asian native chickens, commercial chickens and jungle fowl using polymorphisms of four calpain genes. Animal Science Journal. 77(2): 188-195.

  17. Pandey, A.K., Kumar, D., Sharma, R., Sharma, U., Vijh, R.K. and Ahlawat, S.P.S. (2005). Population structure and genetic bottleneck analysis of ankleshwar poultry breed by microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18(7): 915-921.

  18. Piry, S., Luikart, G., Cornuet, J.M. (1999). Bottleneck: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity. 90(4): 502-503.

  19. Radha, P., Sivaselvam, S.N., Kumarasamy, P. and Kumanan, K. (2011). Genetic diversity and bottleneck analysis of kilakarsal sheep by microsatellite markers. Indian Journal of Biotechnology. 10: 52-55. 

  20. Sharma, R., Sharma, P., Ahlawat, S., Singh, T.R., Vij, P.K., Vijh, R. and Tantia, M.S. (2017). Genetic variability and phylogenetic relationship establishes distinctness of Kaunayen chicken of Manipur. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 87(7): 871- 878.

  21. Takezaki, N. and Nei, M. (1996). Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics. 144(1): 389-399.

  22. Tautz, D. (1989). Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Research. 17(16): 6463-6471.

  23. Thiagarajan, R. (2012). Genetic diversity and bottleneck analysis of Umblachery cattle by microsatellite markers. Journal of Biotechnology. 2: 28-33.

  24. Thiruvenkadan, A.K., Jayakumar, V., Kathiravan, P. and Saravanan, R. (2014). Genetic architecture and bottleneck analyses of Salem Black goat breed based on microsatellite markers. Veterinary World. 20: 733. 

  25. Vij, P.K., Tantia, M.S. andVijh, R.K. (2006). Characterization of Punjab brown chicken. Animal Genetic Resources/ Resources génétiques animales/ Recursos genéticos animals. 39: 65-76.

Editorial Board

View all (0)