Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Ultrastructural Characterization of Testis in Non-descript Goat (Capra hircus)

N. Singh1, S. Sathapathy1,*, R. Patra1, S.S. Biswal2, S.S. Behera3, S.R. Mishra4, P.K.K. Mishra5, S.K. Joshi6, R. Sahu7
1Department of Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.
2Department of Animal Reproduction Gynaecology and Obstetrics, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.
3Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.
4Department of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.
5Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India. 
6Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.
7Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.

Background: The proposed experiment was aimed at locating the spermatogonial stem cell niches inside the testis and to characterise the development of germ cells of testis in the non- descript goats at the different stages of pre and post natal life, which could be useful in selecting the goats for breeding at appropriate time and for other interventions related to reproductive developments in the goats. 

Methods: The present study was conducted on the testes of non-descript goats divided into three groups, viz. neonatal (within 1 month), prepubertal (from 1-18 months) and pubertal (above 18 months) with 10 healthy animals in each group. The collected samples of testis were processed for scanning electron microscopic study and subsequently, the samples were viewed and the photographs were taken in the facility available at Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF), OUAT, Bhubaneswar. 

Result: The present study revealed that the testis was surrounded by the tunica albuginea, a thin capsule of connective tissue, from which thin septum originated and extended into the inside of the organ. Among these septa, the seminiferous tubules were found. The seminiferous epithelium consisted of spermatogonial cells at different stages of development separated from each other by interstitial connective tissue. The interstitium was made up of randomly arranged collagen bundles. The intertubular vascular connective tissue contained Leydig cells mainly at wider locations where they were bounded by more than two seminiferous tubules. The mediastinal rete testis area contained many cavities of many intercommunicating channels supported by connective tissue pillars. The present study helped in developing a baseline data on the ultrastructural characteristics of seminiferous epithelium, rete restis, peritubular cells, Lyedig cells and other components of testis in non-descript goat at different post natal stages under study. The appearance of seprmatogonial cell lineage at the various post natal stages in non-descript goat would help in accessing the reproductive status of the animal.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) permits observation of structures in three dimensions. With other types of microscopy, these structures must be visualized by the reconstruction of serial sections (Johnson et al., 1978). In capitalizing on this advantage, SEM has been employed to observe structures within the testis of the non-descript goat. The testes are male gonads and helps in the production of spermatozoa (Banks, 1993). They are housed inside the scrotal sacs suspended by the spermatic cords. They are protected by the testicular tunic consisting of outer skin, tunica dartos, layers of testicular fascia, tunica vaginalis and tunica albuginea (Getty, 1975 and Singh et al., 2019). Each testis is divided into so many lobules and each lobule is occupied by the seminiferous tubules (Singh et al., 2020). The seminiferous epithelium is surrounded by connective tissue elements and peritubular tubular cells. The contraction of peritubular cells helps in the movement of immature spermatogonial cells from the periphery of the seminiferous tubules towards its lumen, where they are released as mature spermatozoa by the process known as Spermiation (Dellmann and Eurell, 1998 and Samuelson, 2007). Abundant research has been done on the gross and histolomorphology of testis in goat and other domestic animals. But a very scanty literature is available on the ultrastructure of testis in domestic animals and this area is quite explored till date. The ultrastructure of spermatogonial cells in the seminiferous epithelium of testis is vital for accessing the reproductive status of the animal. The present study was carried out to develop a baseline data on the ultrastructural characteristics of seminiferous epithelium, rete restis, peritubular cells, Lyedig cells and other components of testis in non-descript goat at different post natal stages under study.
The present study was conducted from March, 2023 to July, 2024 on the testes of non-descript goats at various stages of post-natal life. The samples were collected from the nearby local slaughter houses in and around Bhubaneswar. The animals were divided into three groups, viz. neonatal (within 1 month), prepubertal (from 1-18 months) and pubertal (above 18 months) with 10 healthy animals in each group. The age of the animal is known from the data book of the slaughter houses. The samples of testes were processed for scanning electron microscopic study (Scanning Electron Microscope, Make: Hitachi and Model: S-3400N) as per the standard methods of Sahu et al., (2021). The samples were subsequently viewed and the photographs were taken in the facility available at Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF), OUAT, Bhubaneswar. The measurements of various parameters of testes were also taken at the ultrastructural level by the inbuilt software programming system. The recorded data was subjected to routine statistical analysis (Snedecor and Cochran, 1994).
The testis was surrounded by the tunica albuginea, a thin capsule of connective tissue (Fig 1 and Fig 2), from which thin septum originated and extended into the parenchyma of the testis. Among these septa, the seminiferous tubules were found (Baradi and Rao, 1980, Heyn et al., 1997, Mehraein and Negahdar, 2011, Villagra et al., 2018 and Kocakoglu et al., 2023).
 

Fig 1: Photograph showing the tunica albugenia and testicular tissue in prepubertal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 2: Photograph showing the dense irregular connective tissue component of tunica albugenia in prepubertal non-descript goat.


       
The outer surface of tunica albugenia was folded. These folds were longitudinal and transverse with the depressions or troughs in between them. Ridges and throughs were also noticed in these folds at higher magnification (Fig 3). These ridges and folds may be attributed to the increase in surface area (Saleem et al., 2018). No microvilli, intercellular stomata or gaps were evident on the parietal layer (Baradi and Rao, 1980). The filamentous processes were observed in the mesothelial cells of tunica albugenia (Fig 4), which were likely to serve as attachment devices between mesothelial cells (Simionescu and Simionescu, 1977). These cells were subjected to mechanical stress as scrotal, inguinal and abdominal positions of the testis are achievable.
 

Fig 3: Photograph showing the ridges and throughs on the surface of tunica albugenia in prepubertal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 4: Photograph showing the filamentous processes of tunica albugenia in prepubertal non-descript goat.


       
Seminiferous tubules appeared in the form of cylinders which were longitudinally arranged (Fig 5 and Fig 6). Two types of free space continuous with each other were produced: open, triangular interstices between three adjacent cylinders (Fig 6) and flat, biconcave interstices between two adjacent cylinders (Clark, 1975 and Saleem et al., 2018). The seminiferous epithelium consisted of spermatogonial cells at different stages of development separated from each other by interstitial connective tissue (Pires et al., 2012 and Saleem et al., 2018). The seminiferous epithelium comprised of mainly spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes in neonatal goats (Fig 7), where as the spermatids were visible in pre-pubertal and pubertal non-descript goats (Fig 8).
 

Fig 5: Photograph showing the cylindrical seminiferous tubules in neonatal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 6: Photograph showing the cylindrical seminiferous tubules with triangular spaces in between in pubertal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 7: Photograph showing the germinal epithelium of seminiferous tubules with spermatogonia (yellow arrows) and primary spermatocytes (red arrows) in neonatal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 8: Photograph showing the germinal epithelium of seminiferous tubules with spermatogonia (yellow arrows), primary spermatocyte (red arrows), sertoli cell (white arrow), secondary spermatocyte (orange arrow), early spermatid (green arrow) and late spermatid (blue arrow) in pubertal non-descript goat.


       
The spermatogonia cells, those initiate the development of the germ line, were isolated oval cells arranged on the tubule basal membrane, in contact with a Sertoli cell (Villagra et al., 2018). The primary spermatocytes were rounded cells placed adjacent to the spermatogonial cells (Fig 6 and Fig 8). The secondary spermatocytes were also rounded cells, but were comparatively smaller in size than that of the primary spermatocytes (Fig 8). The early spermatids were oval shaped cells, which were located towards the lumen of the seminiferous tubules along with the elongated late spermatid cells (Fig 8). The present findings were in line with the findings of Villagra et al., (2018) in frogs. These cells undergo a process called spermiogenesis, the last stage of spermatogenesis, which involves a complete reorganization of the nucleus (Villagra et al., 2018).
       
Our observations show that, until the spermatogenesis process is completed, all the cells of the germ cell line are in close relationship with at least one Sertoli cell (Choudhary et al., 2015 and Villagra et al., 2018). The sertoli cells were tall columnar cells with few cell populations in the germinal epithelium (Fig 8). They were extended from the basal membrane of the seminiferous epithelium up to the lumen of the tubule. The Sertoli cells, which nurture maturing germ cells, play an important role in the process of spermatogenesis. Although a number of studies in many mammals have been made on their morphological characteristics using light and transmission electron microscopy (Elftman 1963; Ploen and Ritzen, 1984; Ekstedt et al., 1986), scanning electron microscopic configuration was never accurately described, probably because of its complicated morphological features as well as its close attachment to germ cells. In addition, the three-dimensional structure of the Sertoli cell in the rat and monkey was also reconstructed from electron micrographs of semiserial sections (Wong and Russell, 1983; Weber et al., 1983; Russell et al., 1986). Moreover, Hamasaki and Murakami (1981) described in detail certain processes of the rat Sertoli cell by scanning electron microscopy. The results of this work demonstrated that there is a close relationship between germ cells and Sertoli cells during spermatogenesis, a fact with important functional significance. It is generally accepted that the shape of the Sertoli cell continually changes in association with the progress of spermatids formation ((Elftman 1963). Russell and co-workers (Wong and Russell, 1983; Russell et al., 1986) classified the configuration of the Sertoli cell into Type A and Type B. The cell observed in this study corresponds to their Type A. In the basal portion of the seminiferous epithelium, the germ cells seem to be situated in compartments enclosed by adjacent Sertoli cells. Furthermore, they were located in successive recesses as viewed from the basal aspect. These recesses were formed by continuous Sertoli cells, presumably being equivalent to the so-called basal compartment. The tight junctions and desmosomes among somatic cells indicate the existence of a hemato-testicular barrier in charge of maintaining the differences in the composition of the germinal and interstitial compartments. This barrier would give rise to an adequate medium for the development of the germ line cells, as suggested by Yoshida (2016), protecting them from pathogens and toxins that cannot pass through the intercellular junctions. Another function of Sertoli cells is to act as a structural support for germ cells (Gavrila and Mircea, 2001; Griswold and McLean, 2006 and Kopera et al., 2010).
       
The interstitium was made up of randomly arranged collagen bundles (Heyn et al., 1997). The arrangement of the interstitial cells of the testis in relation to the capillaries and lymphatic channels, in particular, was easier to visualize in SEM (Connell, 1976). The intertubular vascular connective tissue contained Leydig cells, which were polyhedral or rounded in shape located mainly at wider locations where they were bounded by more than two seminiferous tubules (Fig 9). The present observation was similar to the reports given by Ezeasor (1985) in goat and Villagra et al., (2018) in frog. The cells were generally scanty, mostly occurring singly close to vascular elements. The cells were generally oval-elongated in shape (Ezeasor, 1985 and Villagra et al., 2018). The peritubular cells in the seminiferous tubules were mostly occupied by the spindle shaped myo-fibrocytes having contractile activity (Fig 10). The regular contraction of these cells, propels the mature germ cells towards the lumen of the seminiferous tubules from their periphery for spermiation. 
 

Fig 9: Photograph showing the Lyedig cell in between the seminiferous tubules in neonatal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 10: Photograph showing the spindle shaped peritubular myo-fibrocytes around the seminiferous tubule in pubertal non-descript goat.


       
The mediastinum rete was an elongated epithelial-connective tissue structure, which followed the major axis of the testis (Messing 1877, Klein and Noble-Smith 1880; Hill, 1906; Benoit, 1926; Lasserre and Armingaud, 1934; Schulte, 1937; Short et al., 1967; Setchell, 1970 and Dym, 1974). The mediastinal rete testis area contained many cavities of intercommunicating channels supported by connective tissue pillars (Fig 11). conical columns were observed separating the channels of rete testis (Roosen-Runge and Holstein, 1978). The present findings were in agreement with the reports of Burgos et al., (1979) in monkey, Nykanen (1980) in rat and Goyal and Williams (1987) in goat. Delicate ridges were present on the walls of the rete, possible overarching subepithelial blood vessels. These ridges were quite prominent in the pubertal period (Fig 12).
 

Fig 11: Photograph showing intercommunicating channels of mediastinal rete testis in prepubertal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 12: Photograph showing prominent delicate ridges separating the intercommunicating channels of mediastinal rete testis in pubertal non-descript goat.


       
The rete and the seminiferous tubules were usually separated by only a thin layer of dense connective tissue (Fig 13). Thus, the seminiferous tubules caused modifications in the contour of the inner rete walls (Nykanen, 1980). Blood vessels with RBC were also observed in the areas of rete testis. The rete cavities were nearly devoid of spermatozoa (Nykanen, 1980). The rete testis, regardless of its location, was lined by flat cuboidal cells (Fig 14). The present report was in line with the observation of Goyal and Williams (1987) in goat. The epithelial cells had “cobble-stoned’’ appearance (Nykanen, 1980). The epithelial cells possess few microvilli and a centrally located flagellum at the luminal border (Leeson, 1962 and Goyal and Williams, 1987). The epithelium of the mediastinum rete was lying on a layer of connective tissue, which was usually quite thin (Nykanen, 1980). The subepithelial loose connective tissue had a fine structure typical of this type of tissue and might have a role in the fluid physiology of the rete testis (Nykanen, 1980).
 

Fig 13: Photograph showing the connective tissue area separating the seminiferous tubules and rete testis in prepubertal non-descript goat.


 

Fig 14: Photograph showing flat cuboidal bulging cells lining the rete testis in prepubertal non-descript goat.

The present study helped in developing a baseline data on the ultrastructural characteristics of seminiferous epithelium, rete testis, peritubular cells, Lyedig cells and other components of testis in non-descript goat at different post natal stages under study. The results presented in this work provide data for the knowledge of the reproductive biology of non-descript goat, setting up bases for further studies of molecular mechanisms oriented towards a better understanding of gonadal functions. The appearance of seprmatogonial cell lineage at the various post natal stages in non-descript goat would help in accessing the reproductive status of the animal. The same could be exploited in the selection of goats at specific stages of life for breeding purposes.
This article is a part of Doctoral Research work of the first author. The Authors are very much grateful to the Dean, CVSc. and A. H., OUAT, Bhubaneswar and In-charge, CIF, OUAT, Bhubaneswar for providing necessary facilities for successful completion of this research work in time.
There is no conflict of interest among the authors.

  1. Banks WJ. (1993). Applied Veterinary Histology, 4th Edn, Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, USA. pp 429-432.

  2. Baradi, A.F. and Rao, N.S. (1980). A scanning electron microscope study of the tunica vaginalis testis in the mouse. Journal of Anatomy. 131: 367-370.

  3. Benoit, J. (1926). Recherches anatomiques, cytologiques et histophysiologiques sur les voies excretrices du testicule, chez les mammiftres. Arch. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 5: 173.

  4. Burgos, M.H., Cavicchia, J.C. and Jensen, N.E. (1979). Electron Microscopy (SEM and TEM) of the Rete testis in the monkey. International Journal of Andrology. 2: 559-571.

  5. Choudhary, O.P., Dhote, B.S. and Bharti, S.K. (2015). Scanning electron microscopic studies on sertoli cell of dog (Canis lupus familiarisi). Indian Veterinary Journal. 92(5): 56-59.

  6. Clark, R.V. (1975). Three dimensional organization of testicular interstitial tissue and lymphatic space in the rat. Anat Rec. 184(2): 203-225.

  7. Connell, C.J. (1976). A scanning electron microscope study of the interstitial tissue of the canine testis. Anat. Rec. 185(4): 389- 401. 

  8. Dellmann, H.D. and Eurell, J.A. (1998). Text Book of Veterinary Histology, 5th Edn., Wiley-Blackwell, USA. pp 114-127.

  9. Dym, M. (1974). The fine structure of monkey Sertoli cells in the transitional zone at the junction of the seminiferous tubules with the tubuli recti. Amer. 1. Anat. 140(1): 1-25.

  10. Ekstedt, E., Soderquist, L. and Ploen, L. (1986). Fine structure of spermatogenesis and Sertoli cells (Epitheliocytus sustentans) in the bull. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 15: 23-48.

  11. Elftman, J. (1963). Sertoli cells and testis structure. Amer. J. A nat. 113: 25-32.

  12. Ezeasor, D.N. (1985). Light and electron microscopical observations on the Leydig cells of the scrotal and abdominal testes of naturally unilateral cryptorchid West African dwarf goats. J. Anat. 141: 27-40.

  13. Gavrila, L. and Mircea, L. (2001). Chromatin and chromosomal fine structure in spermatogenesis of some species of amphibians.  Zygote. 9: 183-192.

  14. Getty, R. (1975). Sisson and Grossman’s. The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. W B Saunders Co., Philadelphia, USA. 2: 718-719.

  15. Goyal, H.O. and Williams, C.S. (1987). The rete testis of the goat, a morphological study. Acta Anat (Basel). 130(2): 151- 157.

  16. Griswold, M.D. and McLean, D.J. (2006). The Sertoli Cell. In: Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. [Neill, J.D. (Ed.)], Academic Press, New York, pp. 949-975.

  17. Hamasaki, M. and Murakami, M. (1981). SEM observation on the basal layer of the rat Seminiferous epithelium exposed with collagenase and trypsin. J. Electron Microsc. 30: 128-135.

  18. Heyn, R., Muglia, U. and Motta, P.M. (1997). Microarchitecture of the cat testis with special reference to leydig cells: A three dimensional study by alkali maceration method and scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Reproductive Systems. 39(2): 135-145.

  19. Hill, E.C. (1906).  On the gross development and vascularization of the testis. Amer. J. Anat. 6(1): 439-459.

  20. Johnson, L., Amann, R.P. and Pickett, B.W. (1978). Scanning electron and light microscopy of the equine seminiferous tubule. Fertility and Sterility. 29(2): 208-215.

  21. Klein, E.E. and Smith, E.N. (1880). Atlas of Histology, Smith Elder, London. Nature. 23: 382-383.

  22. Kopera, I.A., Bilinska, B., Cheng, C.Y., Mruk, D.D. (2010). Sertoli germ cell junctions in the testis: A review of recent data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B365: 1593-1605.

  23. Kocakoglu, N.O., Candan, S. and Caglar, U. (2023). Anatomical and histological structures of male reproductive system in long-horned beetle Isotomus speciosus (Schneider, 1787) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): Light and scanning electron microscopic study. Microscopy and Microanalysis. 29: 1258-1266. 

  24. Lasserre, R. and Armingaud, F. (1934). Anatomie des vaisseaux testiculaires chez le cheval et applications a la pathologie chirurgicale. Rev. Vet.  86: 13.

  25. Leeson, T.S. (1962). Electron microscopy of the rete testis of the rat. Anat. Rec. 144: 57.

  26. Mehraein, F. and Negahdar, F. (2011). Morphometric evaluation of seminiferous tubules in aged mice testes after melatonin administration. Cell Journal. 13(1): 1-4.

  27. Messing W. (1877). Anatomische Untersuchungen iiber die Testikel der Siiugetiere unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung des Corpus Highmori. Inaugural Dissertation, Dorpat University.

  28. Nykanen, M. (1980). On the microscopic anatomy of the rete testis a scanning electron microscopic and light microscopic study. International Journal of Andrology. Pp 383-395.

  29. Pires, G.A., Mateus, L., Martins, C. and Dias, G.F. (2012). Seasonal changes in testes vascularisation in the domestic cat (Felis domesticus): Evaluation of microvasculature, angiogenic activity and endothelial cell expression. Anatomy Research International. pp 1-10. 

  30. Ploen, L. and Ritzen, E.M. (1984). Fine Structural Features of Sertoli Cells. In: Ultrastructure of reproduction. [(ed. by) Van Blerkom, 1.  and Motta, P.M.], Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp: 67-74.

  31. Roosen-Runge, E.C. and Holstein, A.F. (1978). The human rete testis. Cell Tiss. Res. 189: 409-433.

  32. Russell, L. D., Gardner, R.J. and Weber, J.E. (1986). Reconstruction of a Type-B configurational and specialized cell-to-cell relationships. Amer. J. Anat. 175: 73-90.

  33. Sahu, S.K., Mishra, U.K. and Sathapathy, S. (2021). Scanning Electron Microscopic studies on the ventricular architecture of pre-natal non-descript sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 10.18805/IJAR.B-4480.

  34. Saleem, R., Singh, B. and Mohd, K.I. (2018). Scanning electron microscopic studies on male reproductive system of local hill fowl of Uttarakhand (Uttara fowl). Journal of Entomology. 6(3): 1135-1140.

  35. Samuelson, D.A. (2007). Textbook of Veterinary Histology. 1st edn., Saunders, Elsevier, Philadelphia, USA.

  36. Schulte, T.L. (1937). The genito-urinary systcin of the Elephas indicus male. Amer. I. Anat. 61(1): 131-137.

  37. Setchell, P.P. (1970). Testicular Blood Supply. Lymphatic Drainage and Secretion of Fluid in the Testis. [(Eds.): Johnsen, A.D., Gomez, W.R. and Vandemark, N.L.], Academic Press, New York, USA. I: 101.

  38. Short, R.V., Mann, T. and Hay, M.F. (1967). Male reproductive organs of the African elephant (Loxodonta Africana). J. Reprod. Fertil. 13: 517-536.

  39. Simionescu, M. and Simionescu, N. (1977). Organization of cell junctions in the peritoneal mesothelium. Journal of Cell Biology. 74: 98-110.

  40. Singh, T.S., Kalita, P.C., Choudhary, O.P., Kalita, A. and Doley, P.J. (2019). Histomorphological studies on the testis of local pig (Zovawk) of Mizoram. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(11): 1455-1458.  doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3697.

  41. Singh, T.S., Kalita, P.C., Choudhary, O.P., Kalita, A. and Doley P.J. (2020). Histological, micrometrical and histochemical studies on the testes of large white yorkshire pig (Sus scrofa domesticus). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 54(12): 1595-1598. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3914.

  42. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods, 9th Edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, USA.

  43. Villagra, L.I., Ramos, I., Cisint, S., Crespo, C.A. and Fernandez, S.N. (2018). Electron microscopy observations on testis and spermatozoa of Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Micron. 105: 35-46.

  44. Weber, J. E., Russell, L.D., Wong, V. and Peterson, R.N. (1983). Three-dimensional reconstruction of a rat stage V Sertoli cell: II. Morphometry of Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoligerm- cell relationship. Amer. J. Anat. 167: 163-179.

  45. Wong, V. and Russell, L.D. (1983). Three-dimensional reconstruction of a rat stage V Sertoli cell: 1. Methods, basic configuration and dimensions. Amer. J. Anat. 167: 143-161.

  46. Yoshida, S. (2016). From cyst to tubule: innovations in vertebrate spermatogenesis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 5(1): 119-131.

Editorial Board

View all (0)