Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 58 issue 11 (november 2024) : 1838-1845

Enhancing Animal Nutritional Security Through Biofortification in Forage Crops: A Comprehensive Review

S.R. Shri Rangasami1, M. Purnima2,*, R. Pushpam1, R. Ajaykumar3, M. Thirunavukkarasu4, K. Sathiya5, V. Rajanbabu6, G. Yazhini7
1Department of Forage Crops, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Agronomy, Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture, Pollachi-642 103, Tamil Nadu, India.
4Department of Veterinary and Animal Science, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
5Department of Agronomy, Oil seed Research Station, Tindivanam-604 001, Tamil Nadu, India.
6Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Anbil Dharmalingam Agriculture College and Research Institute, Trichy-620 027, Tamil Nadu, India.
7Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture, Pollachi-642 103, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Rangasami Shri S.R., Purnima M., Pushpam R., Ajaykumar R., Thirunavukkarasu M., Sathiya K., Rajanbabu V., Yazhini G. (2024). Enhancing Animal Nutritional Security Through Biofortification in Forage Crops: A Comprehensive Review . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58(11): 1838-1845. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5466.

Livestock nutrition is crucial for sustaining the health and productivity of farm animals, which are a cornerstone of the global food supply. Proper nutrition ensures that animals receive the necessary nutrients for essential bodily functions, growth, reproduction and lactation. Tailored, balanced diets that cater to the specific nutritional needs of different livestock species and their developmental stages also boost reproductive performance, leading to higher birth rates and healthier offspring. Conversely, inadequate nutrition can lead to stunted growth, diminished productivity, and increased vulnerability to diseases, ultimately resulting in significant economic losses. Nutritional imbalances among animals, especially in dairy goats and cattle, pose a significant challenge in livestock management. These disorders result from inadequate or imbalanced nutrient intake, leading to a range of metabolic and health issues. Fodders are essential to livestock nutrition, providing a balanced diet that supports overall animal health, growth and productivity. They are primary sources of energy, with grasses and cereals supplying carbohydrates needed for maintenance and production activities. Leguminous fodders like alfalfa and clover are rich in protein and crucial for muscle development, milk production and growth. Additionally, green fodders offer vital vitamins (A, D, E, K) and minerals such as calcium and phosphorus, which are necessary for various metabolic functions. The high fibre content in fodders aids in proper digestion and prevents digestive disorders. Overall, the review highlights the impact of various nutrient deficiencies on livestock, including the effects of anti-nutritional factors and the mechanisms of nitrate, oxalate and prussic acid toxicity in animals. It underscores the importance of agronomic bio fortification as a promising strategy to enhance the nutritional quality of fodder crops, thereby improving animal health and welfare, while also contributing to food security and sustainable agriculture.

Livestock is crucial in India’s agricultural landscape, significantly contributing to millions of farmers’ rural economy and livelihoods. According to the 20th Livestock Census, the total Livestock population is 535.78 million in the country showing an increase of 4.6% over the Livestock Census 2012. The total number of cattle in the country was 192.49 million in 2019, a rise of 0.8 % over the previous Census (Statistics, 2019). India is the largest milk producer in the world, the livestock sector accounts for about 4.11% of the national GDP and 25.6% of the agricultural GDP, underscoring its economic importance. Dairy farming is particularly prominent with India being the largest milk producer in the world, producing around 188 million tonnes annually. This sector not only provides nutritional security but also generates substantial employment, particularly for women and smallholder farmers. In addition to dairy, the country is a significant producer of meat, eggs and wool, catering to both domestic consumption and export markets.             
       
Fodders are essential to livestock nutrition, providing a balanced diet that supports overall animal health, growth and productivity. They are primary sources of energy, with grasses and cereals supplying carbohydrates needed for maintenance and production activities. Leguminous fodders like alfalfa and clover are rich in protein and crucial for muscle development, milk production, and growth. Additionally, green fodders offer vital vitamins (A, D, E, K) and minerals such as calcium and phosphorus, which are necessary for various metabolic functions. The high fibre content in fodders aids in proper digestion and prevents digestive disorders. Different types of fodders, including green fodder, silage, hay and crop residues, provide versatility in feed, ensuring year-round availability and nutritional adequacy (Kumar et al., 2016). Green fodder is highly palatable and nutrient-rich, while silage and hay, preserved through fermentation and drying respectively, are critical during off-seasons. Crop residues like straw are efficiently utilized, reducing waste and promoting sustainability. Proper nutrition from fodder enhances growth rate, reproductive health, milk yield and disease resistance, contributing to the overall productivity and profitability of livestock farming (Bouis et al., 2011). Cultivation and utilization of fodder are cost-effective, reducing dependence on expensive commercial feeds and promoting local agriculture (Karthikeyan et al., 2024). Sustainable practices in fodder production improve soil health through crop rotations and nitrogen fixation by legumes, enhancing farm biodiversity and resilience to climate variability. Efficient fodder management, including quality control and preservation techniques, ensures a continuous supply of high-quality feed, essential for animal welfare and optimal production (Ravi et al., 2024). Encouraging farmers to utilize locally grown fodders can help them minimize their carbon footprint and cultivate sustainable farming communities, thereby bolstering the economic viability and environmental sustainability of livestock farming.
       
Despite being the world’s largest milk producer, the animal productivity of India (1538 kg/year) is lower than the global average (2238 kg/year), which may be related to malnutrition because of the massive feed shortage. The country is experiencing a net deficit of 30.65% of green fodder, 24.6% of crude protein and 19.87% of total digestible nutrients (Statistics, 2019). The excessive application of chemical fertilizers devoid of micronutrients to meet the increased demand for forage has negatively impacted soil health and decreased crop yield (Ravi et al., 2023). As population pressure rises, more land is allocated to food and cash crop cultivation, leaving limited arable land for fodder production. This highlights the importance of focusing on fodder production in modern agriculture. To meet the high demand for fodder, excessive and continuous application of large quantities of high-analysis chemical fertilizers has had detrimental effects, resulting in decreased productivity due to nutrient limitations. Consequently, it faces major difficulties in optimizing the use of available land to produce adequate and high-quality animal feed.  Hence, to address the critical gap in crude protein and total digestible nutrients (TDN) availability in India as given below (Fig 1), it is essential to prioritize the biofortification of fodder crops. Enhancing the nutritional quality of these crops through biofortification can significantly improve livestock productivity and contribute to the sustainability of the agricultural sector. This approach is crucial for meeting the growing nutritional demands of livestock and ensuring food security. Thus, the main objective of this review is to explore the different methods used for biofortifying fodder crops in agronomical approaches. The expected scenario for the availability of total digestible nutrients (TDN) and crude protein (CP) as well as their potential deficiencies are given in Fig 1.
 

Fig 1: Projected requirement, availability and deficit of CP and TDN (million tonnes).


 
Importance of livestock nutrition
 
The health and productivity of farm animals, which underpin the world’s food supply are deeply reliant on proper livestock nutrition (Liu et al., 2021). Adequate nourishment ensures that animals receive the essential nutrients needed for critical physiological functions, growth, reproduction, and lactation. Balanced and species-specific diets, tailored to the varying developmental stages of livestock, further enhance reproductive outcomes, leading to higher birth rates and healthier offspring (Ajaykumar et al., 2024). Conversely, poor nutrition can result in stunted growth, reduced productivity, and increased vulnerability to diseases, all of which can lead to substantial financial losses (Table 1). Moreover, the quality of animal products, such as meat and dairy, is directly influenced by the diet of the livestock for instance, specific nutrients can affect milk composition and meat marbling.
 

Table1: Impact of deficiency of different nutrients on livestock.


       
A significant challenge in livestock management is addressing nutritional imbalances, particularly in dairy goats and cattle. These imbalances, often resulting from inadequate or unbalanced diets, can lead to a range of metabolic and physiological disorders (Simoes and Gutierrez, 2017). For example, deficiencies in vitamins and minerals among grazing sheep can increase their susceptibility to oxidative stress, metabolic disorders, and other health issues (Masters, 2018). The cumulative effects of these nutritional deficiencies can have serious repercussions for both animal and human health. Implementing a well-balanced diet and nutrition plan, designed to avoid nutrient toxicities, is crucial for preventing and managing these diseases (Awuchi, 2020).
       
Fodder and forage alternatives play a crucial role in cattle nutrition, providing essential nutrients needed for growth, reproduction and overall health (Saikanth et al., 2023). Nutrient deficiencies in fodder can significantly impact its growth and development, leading to reduced yield and quality (Bhaumik et al., 2024). This, in turn, directly affects the productivity and well-being of cattle, as well as the nutritional value of the animal products consumed by humans (Reddy et al., 2023). Addressing nutrient deficiencies in fodder through appropriate management practices and agronomic interventions is vital for ensuring the efficiency and health of both livestock and people. Additionally, micronutrient deficits in agricultural soils can diminish the nutritional quality of crops, potentially contributing to malnutrition in humans (Bouis et al., 2011).
 
Biofortification of fodder crops
 
Biofortification involves enhancing the content and/or bioavailability of essential nutrients in crops during their growth phase by utilizing genetic and agronomic methods (Bouis et al., 2011). Agronomic biofortification in fodder crops is crucial as it enhances nutrient content through sustainable farming practices, improving livestock nutrition without the need for genetic modification. This method can be quickly implemented and adapted to various environmental conditions, making it a cost-effective and accessible solution. Additionally, it promotes soil health and reduces the reliance on chemical fertilizers, contributing to overall agricultural sustainability (Jadhav et al., 2020).
 
Techniques of Agronomic bio fortification
 
Agronomic biofortification, a key component of biofortification, involves enhancing the nutrient content of crops through soil and foliar application of fertilizers, soil inoculation with beneficial microorganisms and other techniques.
 
Fertilization in fodder crop biofortification
 
One of the most significant factors that directly affect the quantity and quality of fodder is the application of fertilizer. The response of dry matter production in maize to the fertilizer rate was linear (Kumar et al., 2016).
 
Nitrogen           
 
Nitrogen is a critical nutrient that significantly enhances both crop improvement and fodder crop production. Nitrogen is essential for the formation of several structural elements, including molecules, proteins, amino acids, chlorophyll and other components.
       
Nitrogen fertilization is essential for improving the quality of forage, especially in terms of dry matter production and the concentration of crude protein (Maheswari et al., 2017). However, the impact of nitrogen on forage quality can vary depending on the specific crop and the presence of other nutrients such as phosphorus (Aydin and Uzun, 2005). For example, in cluster bean varieties, nitrogen application significantly increased forage yield and quality, with the variety BR-99 showing the highest yield and protein content. Likewise, applying nitrogen fertilizer to native pasture overseeded with ryegrass enhanced forage qualities and the performance of beef calves (Brambilla et al., 2012). These results emphasize the significance of nitrogen fertilization in improving forage quality, while also highlighting the importance of a balanced approach that considers the particular crop and the presence of other essential nutrients.
 
Soil application     
 
When 25 t/ha FYM was applied, the number of micronutrients such as zinc, copper, manganese, and iron in fodder maize was improved by 15.3%, 7.5%, 28.4%, and 15.6% respectively relative to the control, but declined when the amount of nitrogen increased. They have also reported that the application of FYM 25t/ha and nitrogen120kg/ha results in increased crude protein yield (kg/ha) by 33.78 % and 36.56 % respectively (Knez and Graham, 2012).
       
Vennila et al., (2017) stated that the application of both organic and inorganic sources of nutrients to bajra Napier hybrid grass increases yield, yield attributes, and nutrient uptake. It was found that the application of nitrogen at the rate of 180 kg/ha results in maximum crude protein contents (10.52%) which might be due to enhanced production of amino acid resulting from nitrogen application and the highest percentage of crude protein (11.54%) and lowest percentage (7.84%) were observed at 45 and 65 days after sowing, respectively (Swathi et al., 2015).
 
Livestock nutritional response
 
Nitrogen enhancement in forage for livestock has been shown to have a positive impact on forage production and livestock performance. Brambilla et al., (2012) found that nitrogen fertilization increased forage accumulation rate and production, leading to improved livestock performance. Delevatti et al., (2019) similarly reported that increasing nitrogen levels in Marandu grass improved herbage mass forage quality and animal production. However, Jacobs and Ward, (2011) noted that the effect of nitrogen application on forage crops was limited by available moisture, with variable dry matter yield responses. Rouquette and Smith, (2010) highlighted the role of biological nitrogen fixation in reducing input costs for forage production, particularly in cow-calf and stocker programs.
 
Zinc
 
Zinc plays a crucial role in the growth and development of fodder crops, particularly maize and cowpea, by improving their yield and quality (Rathore et al., 2015). Furthermore, it has been noted that zinc is essential for various vital processes in plants, such as protein synthesis and gene expression (Ahmad and Tahir, 2019). Therefore, the inclusion of zinc in the fertilization and management of fodder crops is crucial for their optimal growth and nutritional value.
 
Importance of dietary zinc in livestock
 
The insufficient presence of zinc in forage can lead to substantial effects on livestock, including decreased growth and reproduction, as well as impaired health of bone and skin tissues. The easiest and latest practice to deal with micronutrient deficiency in crops is the application of micronutrient fertilizers (Gupta et al., 2008). Enhancing the micronutrient content of fodder crops through foliar application is a promising and economical method of agronomic biofortification, which will improve animal health and productivity Singh Dhaliwal et al., (2023). The agro-qualitative characteristics of fodder are affected by the micronutrient content thereby directly impacting animal productivity. Therefore, fortifying plants with zinc and copper presents a superior approach to addressing their deficiency in both green and dry fodder (Kumar et al., 2016).
 
Soil application
 
The effect of varying doses of zinc fertilizer on plant growth is different among the crops because the response of fodder crops depends on the application of zinc fertilizers (Mohan et al., 2015). Applying 20 kg/ha of ZnSO4 heptahydrate as a basal dose result in 31.3% higher zinc content and 50.9% greater zinc uptake compared to the control, along with the highest levels of crude protein, ether extract and ash content in fodder (Kumar et al., 2017). Application of zinc at a rate of 10 kg/ha to fodder maize significantly improved plant height, leaf area index and green fodder yield (Table 2-3). Additionally, it increased the content and uptake of nitrogen and zinc, while calcium and crude protein content remained unchanged (Sheraz et al., 2001). Higher crude protein yield which is due to the combined effect of more crude protein content in plants, dry-matter yield, and leafless plants and higher digestible dry-matter yield because of higher digestibility% and higher dry-matter yield was recorded in fodder sorghum with the application of 5 kg Zn/ha  (Verma et al., 2005).
 

Table 2: Effect of fertilizer spraying on the quality of forage maize.


 

Table 3: Effect of seed priming on quality of forage maize.


 
Agronomic management of anti-nutritional factors
 
Anti-nutritional factors are substances that, either on their own or through their metabolic by products, hinder feed utilization, negatively impacting animal health and production. These factors reduce nutrient intake, digestion, absorption and utilization, potentially causing other adverse effects (Kumar et al., 2017).
 
Antinutritional factors in forages
 
Nitrate toxicity
 
Nitrate toxicity in livestock can have severe consequences on their health and productivity. Even though nitrate by itself is not harmful to animals, rumen microorganisms in ruminants convert nitrate to nitrite, which they then use as a source of nitrogen by turning it into ammonia (Lee and Beauchemin, 2014).
   
The excess uptake of nitrate by plants beyond the limit leads to the accumulation of nitrate at toxic concentrations. Plant density/seed rate, genotypes (variety) and nitrogen management are the agronomic practices that influence nitrate toxicity (Oberoi and Kaur, 2019). When nitrogen fertilizers are used on sorghum and oats, the unabsorbed nitrates remaining on the plant surface become a substantial source of nitrates in the diet of animals (Kamra et al., 2015).
       
Brassica rapa has the lowest nitrate concentration, while Sorghum bicolor, Avena sativa and Brassica campestris had the highest. Compared to stem parts, young plants, and plant samples taken in the morning, the concentrations of nitrate were lower in the afternoon in the leaves and mature crops (Rashid et al., 2019). The highest concentration of nitrate is found in stalks, with leaves and grain following in descending order. The nitrate content of sorghum Sudan grass, piper sudan grass and pearl millet is three times higher in the lower six inches of their stems than in the upper part of the plant (Kumar et al., 2018).
       
The effect of irrigation and nitrogen on bajra proved that the nitrate level was significantly lower in irrigated conditions and at an application of 100kg N/ha when compared to the toxicity level (Table 4). However, the amount of nitrate in the unirrigated condition was more than in the irrigated condition and in both cases rise in nitrate as nitrogen levels increased (Rashid et al., 2019).
 

Table 4: Level of nitrate in forage (dry matter basis) and potential effects on animals.


 
Mechanism of Nitrate toxicity in animals
 
When forages have an unusually high concentration of nitrate, the animal cannot complete the conversion and nitrite accumulates. As nitrite accumulates and enters the bloodstream, it combines with a ferrous ion (Fe+2) of haemoglobin (Hb) to create methemoglobin (met-Hb) which is incapable of carrying oxygen (Sidhu et al., 2011). As a result, the blood turns a chocolate brown colour instead of the typical bright red. An animal succumbing to nitrate (nitrite) poisoning actually dies from asphyxiation or a lack of oxygen (Kumar et al., 2018).
 
Oxalate toxicity
       
Frequent ingestion of an excessive amount of oxalic acid can lead to serious intestinal lining irritation and nutritional deficits in animals (Oberoi and Kaur, 2019). A few nutrients such as N, K, Na and Ca have a role in the buildup of oxalate in forage. Oxalic acid forms strong bonds with various minerals, including calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium. This chemical interaction leads to the creation of oxalate salts (Kumar et al., 2018). When dietary calcium (Ca) and ingested oxalate combined insoluble Ca oxalate is formed. This causes abnormalities in the metabolism of calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), which results in an excessive mobilization of bone material in animals (Rahman and Kawamura, 2011).
       
Oxalate toxicity in fodder crops can vary significantly depending on factors such as plant species, nitrogen fertilization and harvesting interval. Napiergrass experiments revealed a strong correlation between the K concentration and the soluble oxalate level (Rahman et al., 2008).
 
Prussic acid toxicity
       
Prussic acid is typically absent in plants, but certain conditions can cause several common plants to accumulate large amounts of cyanogenic glycosides, which can then convert to prussic acid. The risk of prussic acid poisoning in livestock increases during drought periods and becomes even higher when drought conditions end and stressed, stunted plants start growing again (Robson, 2007). Ruminant animals, such as cattle and sheep are more prone to prussic acid poisoning compared to monogastric animals like horses and pigs. This is because the lower pH in the stomachs of monogastric animals helps to break down the enzymes that convert cyanogenic glycosides into prussic acid (Kumar et al., 2018).
 


 
Certain conditions can lead to dangerous levels of cyanogenic glycosides in plants. These conditions include periods of rapid regrowth following stunting, such as after a drought breaks, when a crop is eaten back and then allowed to regrow, or when a crop is harvested for hay and then regrows, with levels being highest in young plants with green, growing shoots. Additionally, frosted or wilted plants, herbicide-treated plants, high nitrogen and low phosphorus levels in the soil and specific plant species like sorghum, which can contain more prussic acid than sudan grass, contribute to increased glycoside levels. Varieties within these species can vary in their prussic acid potential. Plants that are wet with dew or light rain also exhibit higher glycoside levels (Robson, 2007).
It was observed that several methods are available for the agronomic biofortification of forage crops with nitrogen (N) and zinc (Zn) including soil application, foliar application, a combination of soil and foliar application and seed priming. Among these, soil application is the most preferred due to its ease of use. However, foliar application is used in emergencies to address nutrient deficiencies quickly.
       
In conclusion, agronomic biofortification stands as a promising avenue for enhancing the nutritional quality of fodder crops, thereby bolstering livestock health and productivity. Through the application of various agronomic interventions such as soil management practices, and crop selection it becomes feasible to elevate the levels of essential nutrients crucial for animal nutrition, including vitamins, minerals and antioxidants. This strategy not only addresses potential deficiencies in animal diets but also holds the potential to improve the nutritional status of humans consuming animal products derived from biofortified livestock.
               
However, while the concept of agronomic biofortification shows immense potential, its widespread adoption and efficacy in diverse agricultural systems necessitate further research and development. Challenges such as ensuring nutrient bioavailability, minimizing environmental impacts, and optimizing cost-effectiveness must be addressed to realize the full benefits of biofortified fodder crops. Collaboration among multidisciplinary teams comprising agronomists, breeders, nutritionists and policymakers is essential to overcome these challenges and drive innovation in the field. Additionally, long-term studies assessing the impact of biofortified fodder on animal health, reproduction, and performance are crucial for establishing its efficacy and value proposition. By harnessing the power of agronomic biofortification, we can not only enhance livestock welfare and productivity but also contribute to broader goals of sustainable agriculture and food security in a changing world.
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Abramowicz, B., Kurek, L., Debiak, P., Madany, J. and Lutnicki, K. (2019). Hematological parameters in dairy cows with copper deficiency. Journal of Elementology. 24(2).

  2. Ahmad, A. and Tahir, M. (2019). Role of Zinc Sulphate for Maize (Zea mays L.) and Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) yield improvement: A review. Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research. 2017(1): 7-7.

  3. Ajaykumar, R., Harishankar, K. and Rangasami, S.S. (2024). Growth performance, quantitative analysis and economics of broiler chickens as influenced by herbal dietary additives as alternative growth booster. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1: 9. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5326.

  4. Allan, J., Plate, P. and Van Winden, S. (2020). The effect of iron dextran injection on daily weight gain and haemoglobin values in whole milk fed calves. Animals. 10(5): 853.

  5. Awuchi, C.G., Igwe, V.S. and Amagwula, I.O. (2020). Nutritional diseases and nutrient toxicities: A systematic review of the diets and nutrition for prevention and treatment. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research. 6(1): 1-46.

  6. Aydin, I. and Uzun, F. (2005). Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of rangelands affects yield, forage quality and the botanical composition. European Journal of Agronomy. 23(1): 8-14.

  7. Bhowmick, S., Rai, G., Mishra, S.K., Bisht, N. and Chauhan, P.S. (2024). Bio-stimulants from medicinally and nutritionally significant plant extracts mitigate drought adversities in Zea mays through enhanced physiological, biochemical and antioxidant activities. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 207: 108396.

  8. Bouis, H.E., Hotz, C., McClafferty, B., Meenakshi, J.V. and Pfeiffer, W.H. (2011). Biofortification: a new tool to reduce  micronutrient malnutrition. Food and nutrition bulletin. 32(1_suppl1): S31-S40.

  9. Brambilla, D.M., Nabinger, C., Kunrath, T.R., Carvalho, P.C.D.F., Carassai, I.J. and Cadenazzi, M. (2012). Impact of nitrogen fertilization on the forage characteristics and beef calf performance on native pasture overseeded with ryegrass. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 41: 528-536.

  10. Delevatti, L.M., Cardoso, A.S., Barbero, R.P., Leite, R.G., Romanzini, E.P., Ruggieri, A.C. and Reis, R. A. (2019). Effect of nitrogen application rate on yield, forage quality and animal performance in a tropical pasture. Scientific reports. 9(1): 7596.

  11. Dhara, S., Thakur, S., Anwar, S.M., Maiti, A., Ghosh, T. and Houzha, R. (2022): Selenium and vitamin E on reproductive health of dairy cattle-An overview. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 11(3).

  12. Duffy, R., Yin, M. and Redding, L.E. (2023). A review of the impact of dietary zinc on livestock health. Journal of Trace Elements and Minerals. 5: 100085.

  13. Fekata, A. (2021): Calcium Requirement in Relation to Milk Fever and its Economic Impact in Dairy Cattle- Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research. 8(2): 1215.

  14. Gupta, U.C., Kening, W.U. and Liang, S. (2008). Micronutrients in soils, crops and livestock. Earth Science Frontiers. 15(5): 110-125.

  15. Jacobs, J.L. and Ward, G.N. (2011). Effect of nitrogen application on dry matter yields, nutritive characteristics and mineral content of summer-active forage crops in southern Australia. Animal Production Science. 51(1): 77-86.

  16. Jadhav, P.V., Magar, S., Thakur, P., Moharil, M., Yadav, H. and Mandlik, R. (2020). Biofortified fodder crops: An approach to eradicate hidden hunger. Advances in Agri-Food Biotechnology. 173-198.

  17. Jain, R.K. and Mudgal, V. (2021). Phosphorus deficiency influences rumen microbial activity. International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology. (4).

  18. Kamra, D.N., Agarwal, N. and Chaudhary, L.C. (2015). Nitrate/nitrite toxicity and possibilities of their use in ruminant diet. Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution. New Delhi, Springer. pp 343-353.

  19. Karthikeyan, C., Rangasami, S.S., and Kumar, S.A. (2024). Digital revolution in livestock rarming: empowering indian farmers with TNAU Cattle expert system and userfeedback  insights. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1: 8. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5383.

  20. Knez, M. and Graham, R.D. (2012). The impact of micronutrient deficiencies in agricultural soils and crops on the nutritional health of humans. In Essentials of Medical Geology: Revised Edition (pp. 517-533). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

  21. Kumar, B., Dhaliwal, S.S., Singh, S.T., Lamba, J.S. and Ram, H. (2016). Herbage production, nutritional composition and quality of teosinte under Fe fertilization. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 18(2).

  22. Kumar, B., Tirkey, N. and Kumar, S.A. (2017). Anti-nutrient in fodders: A review. Chemical Science Review and Letters. 6(24): 2513-2519.

  23. Kumar, R., Kumar, D., Datt, C., Makarana, G. and Yadav, M.R. (2018). Forage yield and nutritional characteristics of cultivated fodders as affected by agronomic interventions: A Review. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 35(4): 373-385.

  24. Kumar, R., Singh, M., Meena, B.S., Ram, H., Parihar, C.M., Kumar, S. and Meena, V. K. (2017). Zinc management effects on quality and nutrient yield of fodder maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 87(8): 1013-17.

  25. Kumar, R., Singh, M., Tomar, S.K., Meena, B.S. and Rathore, D.K. (2016). Productivity and nutritive parameters of fodder maize under varying plant density and fertility levels for improved animal productivity. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 50(2): 199-202. doi: 10.18805/ijar.9423.

  26. Lee, C. and Beauchemin, K.A. (2014): A Review of Feeding Supplementary Nitrate to Ruminant Animals: Nitrate Toxicity, Methane Emissions and Production Performance- Canadian. Journal of Animal Science. 94(4): 557-570.

  27. Liu, E., Hanigan, M.D. and VandeHaar, M.J. (2021). Importance of considering body weight change in response to dietary protein deficiency in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 104(11): 11567-11579.

  28. Maheswari, M., Murthy, A.N.G. and Shanker, A.K. (2017). Nitrogen nutrition in crops and its importance in crop quality. In The Indian nitrogen assessment Elsevier. 175-186 pp.

  29. Masters, D.G. (2018). Practical implications of mineral and vitamin imbalance in grazing sheep. Animal Production Science. 58(8): 1438-1450.

  30. Mohan, S., Singh, M. and Kumar, R. (2015). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc fertilization on yield and quality of kharif fodder-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(3): 218- 226. doi: 10.5958/0976-0741.2015.00025.2.

  31. Oberoi, H. K., and Kaur, M. (2019):  Agronomy-A Key to Influence Fodder Toxic Substances-A Review- In Forage Res. 44.

  32. Pandey, G. (2011). Role of calcium in human and animal health. Jigyasa. 5: 61-65.

  33. Pinotti, L., Manoni, M., Ferrari, L., Tretola, M., Cazzola, R. and Givens, I. (2021). The contribution of dietary magnesium in farm animals and human nutrition. Nutrients. 13(2): 509.

  34. Rahman, M.M. and Kawamura, O. (2011): Oxalate Accumulation in Forage Plants: Some Agronomic, Climatic and Genetic Aspects- Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 24(3): 439-448.

  35. Rahman, M.M., Ishii, Y., Niimi, M. and Kawamura, O. (2008): Effects of Levels of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Oxalate and Some Mineral Contents in Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach)- Grassland Science. 54(3): 146-150. 

  36. Rashid, G., Avais, M., Ahmad, S.S., Mushtaq, M. H., Ahmed, R., Ali, M. and Khan, N.U. (2019). Influence of nitrogen fertilizer on nitrate contents of plants: a Prospective aspect of nitrate poisoning in dairy animals. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 51(1).

  37. Rathore, D.K., Kumar, R., Singh, M., Meena, V.K., Kumar, U., Gupta, P.S., Yadav, T. and Makarana, G. (2015): Phosphorus and Zinc Fertilization in Fodder Cowpea-A Review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(4): 333-338. doi: 10.18805/ ag.v36i4.6670.

  38. Ravi, S., Rangasami, S.R., Vadivel, N., Ajaykumar, R. and Harishankar, K. (2023). Growth and yield attributes of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by tank-mix application of early post emergence herbicides. Legume Research. 46(8): 1080-1086. doi: 10.18805/LR-5147.

  39. Ravi, S., Rangasami, S.S., Ajaykumar, R., Sathiya, K. and Rajanbabu, V. (2024). Quantitative variables analysis, growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different weed management practices. Legume Research-An International Journal. 1(8). doi: 10.18805/LR-5326.

  40. Reddy, A.D., Nirmala, T.V., Satish, J.V., Balakrishna, C.H., Subbaiah, K.V., Deepthi, V. and Prasad, J. V. (2023). Amplification of Small and Marginal Farmers Income through Integrated Farming Systems. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 13(4): 89-101.

  41. Robson, S. (2007). Prussic acid poisoning in livestock. NSW, Primefact. 417(3).

  42. Rouquette, F.M., and Smith, G.R. (2010): Review: Effects of Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Nutrient Cycling on Stocking Strategies for Cow-Calf and Stocker Programs- The Professional Animal Scientist. 26(2): 131-141. 

  43. Saikanth, D.R.K., Roy, D., Kumar, N., Buch, K., Sharma, P., Dubey, G. and Singh, B. V. (2023). Exploring the Nutritional Landscape: A Review of Fodder Options for Livestock. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 13(10): 2481-2493.

  44. Sharifi, R. (2016): Effect of Seed Priming and Foliar Application with Micronutrients on Quality of Forage Corn (Zea Mays)- Environmental and Experimental Biology. 14(4): 151-156. 

  45. Sheraz Mahdi, S., Badrul Hasan and Lal Singh. (2001): Influence of Seed Rate, Nitrogen and Zinc on Fodder Maize (Zea Mays) in Temperate Conditions of Western Himalayas- Indian Journal of Agronomy. 57(1): 85-88. 

  46. Sidhu, P.K., Bedi, G.K., Mahajan, V., Sharma, S., Sandhu, K.S. and Gupta, M. P. (2011). Evaluation of factors contributing to excessive nitrate accumulation in fodder crops leading to ill-health in dairy animals. Toxicology international. 18(1): 22.

  47. Simões, J., and Gutiérrez, C. (2017). Sustainable Goat Production in Adverse Environments: Volume I. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  48. Singh Dhaliwal, S., Sharma, V., Kumar Shukla, A., Singh Shivay, Y., Hossain, A., Verma, V., Kaur Gill, M., Singh, J., Singh Bhatti, S., Verma, G., Singh, J. and Singh, P. (2023): Agronomic Biofortification of Forage Crops with Zinc and Copper or Enhancing Nutritive Potential: A Systematic Review- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 103(4): 1631–1643. 

  49. Spears, J.W. (2000). Micronutrients and immune function in cattle. Proceedings of the nutrition society. 59(4): 587- 594.

  50. Statistics, B.A.H. (2019). GOI, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.

  51. Swathi, P., Nagavani, A. V, Sunitha, N., Ramana, J. V and Reddy, G.P. (2015): Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization and Time of Harvesting on Growth and Yield of Fodder Sorghum- Andhra Pradesh. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 1 (4)

  52. Talukdar, D.J., Talukdar, P. and Ahmed, K. (2016). Minerals and its impact on fertility of livestock: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 37(4): 333-337. doi: 10.18805/ag.v37i4.6464.

  53. Vennila, C., Sankaran, V.M. and Nithya, C. (2017). Influence of Nutrients on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Bajra Napier Hybrid Grass. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 5(6): 1444- 1448.

  54. Verma, S.S., Singh, N., Joshi, Y.P. and Deorari, A. (2005): Effect of Nitrogen and Zinc on Growth Characters, Herbage Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Fodder Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 50 (2).

Editorial Board

View all (0)