Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Oxidative Stress Bio-markers in Labeo rohita Fingerlings Exposed to Silica Oxide Nanoparticles

Ujjwala Upreti1,*, Avdhesh Kumar2
1Department of Fisheries Science, Doon P.G. College of Agriculture and Allied Science, Dehradun-248 001, Uttarakhand, India.
2Department of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 149, Uttarakhand, India.

Background: The present study was conducted to study the Oxidative stress bio-markers in Labeo rohita fingerlings exposed to Silica oxide nanoparticles.

Methods: A total number of 180 fishes were randomly divided into 4 groups with 15 fishes each viz. E0 (control), E1 (SiO2NPs @ 2 mg/L), E2 (SiO2NPs @ 4 mg/L) and E3 (SiO2NPs @ 6 mg/L) and each group was set in triplicates. After acclimatization period of 14 days fishes were exposed to SiO2NPs in groups E0, E1, E2 and E3 and oxidative stress was estimated every 15 days up to experimental period of 90 days.

Result: Findings showed a significant decline in Catalase activity and Superoxide dismutase and an increase in Lipid peroxidation at the end of the experimental period in the fingerlings exposed to Silica oxide nanoparticles.

Nanoparticles are defined as particles with all external dimensions within the nanoscale (1-100 nm) (ISO, 2023). They are increasingly being synthesised due to their wide range of industrial applications (Dhawan et al., 2010; Yokel and Mac Phai, 2011; Radad et al., 2012). Nanoparticles are of great interest in a variety of fields due to their unique properties such as small size (1-100 nm in diameter), higher surface area to volume quantitative relationshipand completely different electronic, magnetic, opticaland mechanical properties. However, because these particles have a larger surface area to volume quantitative relation, they are more chemically reactive, resulting in an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
       
Nanosilica, or the nanoform (<100 nm) of silicon dioxide or silica nanoparticles (SiO2NPs), possesses specific physicochemical characteristics than that of its bulk form; smaller size materials bear a higher surface-to-volume ratio and surface reactivity (Oberdörster, 2011; Napierska et al., 2010). Because of their promising properties, SiO2NPs are widely used in agriculture, food, consumer productsand cosmetics (Napierska et al., 2010; Khot et al., 2012; Kasaai, 2015; Brinch et al., 2016). Nanoparticles can enter the aquatic environment via manufacturing processes, wastewater sludge, spillsand emissions into the atmosphere. (Scown et al., 2010; Jovanović and Palić, 2012).
       
The high volume of these particles used in commercial and industrial applications exposes them to a variety of ecological systems (Oberholster et al., 2011) and may pose a threat to aquatic organisms (Baun et al., 2008; Farré et al., 2009). Engineered nanomaterials can take many different physical forms, such as carbon nanotubes and fullerenes, which are carbon spheres (Zhu et al., 2006) and nanoparticles made from metals (Griffitt et al., 2007), metal oxides (Federici et al., 2007), or metal composites (King-Heiden et al., 2009), which have negative effects on fish (Smith et al., 2007). Fish species have long been used as pollution indicators in aquatic toxicity studies due to their sensitivity to stress.
       
Metal ions and nanoparticles have distinct toxicological effectsand various studies show that metal nanoparticles have significantly higher lethal concentrations than metal ions. Metal nanoparticles have been linked to histological damage, metabolic abnormalitiesand developmental problems in fish, according to various studies. Even though nano-metals are chemically insoluble in water, they release metal ions into the suspension medium, which may have effects similar to those observed in fish (Shaw and Handy, 2011). Fish are an important component of aquatic biotas because they are the most diverse of all vertebrates (Nelson, 1994) and are also the most vulnerable to pollutants (Duncan and Lockwood, 2001). In addition, fish have also been an integral part of diet on regular basis for most of the people (Biswas, 2024) due to its high protein and polyunsaturated fatty acids content (Kamble et al., 2023); being a cheap source of nutrients at the same time (Sit et al., 2021). Fish are distributed at various trophic levels (Trujillo-Jiménez and Espinosa de los Monteros-Viveros, 2006), so any toxic effects on this group will have an impact on the entire important structure of the community.
       
The major purpose of the present study was to investigate the alterations in antioxidant status of Labeo rohita fingerlings exposed to SiO2NPs as stress response.
The experimental set up was maintained in the Wet lab, College of Fisheries, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (G.B.P.U.A.T), Pantnagar, Uttarakhand from January 2020 to July 2022. The 80-liter tanks were filled with 50-liters of fresh tap water and provided with continuous aeration, regular feeding, waste syphoned from leftover feed and excretaand a daily partial water exchange. In this experiment, 180 fingerlings were randomly distributed in triplicate of three treatments (E1, E2 and E3) and a Control group (E0 with no added SiO2NPs) each. The synthesized SiO2NPs were obtained from the Department of Chemistry, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, G.B.P.U.A. and T. The total duration of experiment was 90 days, conducted to study the long-term effect of SiO2NPs toxicity at lower concentration to fulfill the objectives of the study.
 
Antioxidant-status
 
Status of catalase activity (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and lipid peroxidation (LPO) was recorded in the blood hemolysate of exposed fish fingerlings every 15 days up to the experimental period of 90 days.
 
Statistical analysis
 
All the experiment’s indices were subjected to two-way ANOVA using Statistical Packaging for Social Sciences (SPSS), the Duncan Multiple Range Test, 2013 Version and Microsoft Excel, 2019.
Experimental groups E1, E2 and E3 showed a significant decrease in CAT activity from 26.14±0.003 to 20.71±0.003, 26.11±0.003 to 14.21±0.003 and 26.17±0.02 to 10.61±0.003 m MH2O2 utilized/min/mgHb respectively when compared between initial to 90th day (Table 1).
 

Table 1: CAT (mMH2O2 utilized/min/mgHb) in different experimental groups at different days post exposure.


       
Experimental groups E1, E2 and E3 showed a significant decrease in SOD from 51.06±0.26 to 44.48±0.005, 51.06±0.26 to 30.14±0.01 and 51.03±0.26 to 22.50±0.14 U/mg of hemoglobin respectively when compared from initial to 90th day (Table 2).
 

Table 2: SOD (U/mg of hemoglobin) in different experimental groups at different days post exposure.


       
Experimental groups E1, E2 and E3 showed a significant increase in LPO from 3.04±0.02 to 14.45±0.34, 3.04±0.02 to 20.05±0.03 and 3.04±0.002 to 23.67±0.003 Nm.MDA.ml-1 respectively when compared between initial to 90th day (Table 3).
 

Table 3: LPO (Nm.MDA.ml-1) in different experimental groups at different days post exposure.


       
Throughout the experimental period, SOD and CAT activity decreased (Table 1 and Table 2 respectively), while LPO increased (Table 3). The findings of this study are consistent with the work of P.C Vidya and K.C Chitra, 2018 on Oreochromis niloticus exposed to Silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Nanoparticles have easy access to flowing water, which quickly penetrates the gill surface layers and into the secondary lamellae, making fish gills susceptible to nanoparticles (Federici et al., 2007; Sumi and Chitra, 2016). The gill tissue has a powerful radical scavenging mechanism, which includes antioxidant enzymes, to effectively eliminate ROS. Both short-term and long-term exposure to silicon dioxide nanoparticles reduced the activity of antioxidant enzymes in gill tissue, including superoxide dismutase and catalase. Toxicants make fish more vulnerable to the effects of ROS (Lushchak, 2011). Similar findings were reported in other studies that exposed different fish species to different nanoparticles (Linhua et al., 2009) found a similar trend, with a decrease in CAT activity and SOD and an increase in LPO at higher concentrations of Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in fish, Cyprinus carpio. Garcia et al., (2011) reported a similar significant decrease in SOD and CAT activity, as well as an increase in LPO, in Ag-NP exposed fish Chapalichthys pardalis. Nanoparticles’ toxicological processes include the production of ROS and the development of oxidative stress (Ahmad et al., 2010).
       
Small amounts of free radicals, such as superoxide anion, hydroxyl radicaland hydrogen peroxide, are produced within the cell and subcellular compartments during aerobic respiration and energy consumption. ROS is the term used to describe free radicals that, when combined with an insecure intermedia, promote lipid peroxidation. The rate of ROS formation in this study outpaced the antioxidant defence system, as evidenced by a decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity. The enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) catalyses the dismutation of superoxide into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and oxygen. Catalase is responsible for converting H2O2 into O2 and H2O. Because of their ability to cross biological membranes, SiO2NPs are commonly used in medication and gene therapy. Thus, oxidative stress results from an imbalance between radical-generating and radical-scavenging processes.
       
ROS production has several negative consequences, including protein oxidation, DNA damageand peroxidation of unsaturated lipids in cell membranes (Sikka, 2001). According to Miao et al., (2024), the widespread use of amorphous silica nanoparticles (aSiNPs) in recent years has resulted in unavoidable human exposure in daily life, raising widespread concerns about aSiNPs safety for human health. The particle size of nanomaterials is an important factor that can influence their toxicity. Because smaller particles have a larger surface area, they may be more active and reactive to biological systems. SiO2NPs have also been shown to negatively affect the hematological profile of exposed Labeo rohita fingerlings suggesting their tendency to affect overall health of the respective animal (Upreti et al., 2021).
In conclusion Silica oxide nanoparticle chronic toxicity causes a negative impact on the anti-oxidant status of Labeo rohita fish fingerlings when exposed at lower concentration over long time, supporting, a significant decline in the Catalase activity and Superoxide dismutase is clearly observed along with an increase in Lipid peroxidation.
The authors are thankful to Dean, College of Fisheries G.B.P.U.A.T, Pantnagar; Professor and Head, Department of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries G.B.P.U.A.T, Pantnagar for the credible and valuable suggestions during the study.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  1. Ahamed, M., Alsalhi, M.S and Siddiqui, M.K.J. (2010). Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clin. Chim. Acta. 411(23-24): 1841-1848.

  2. Baun, A., Hartmann, N.B., Grieger, K. and Kusk, K.O. (2008). Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: A brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology. 17(5): 387-395.

  3. Biswas Olipriya, (2024). Evaluation of storage stability and quality changes of fish muscle (Pangasianodon hypothalamus) preserved in fabricated portable solar cooler and domestic refrigerator. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 43(2): 313-319. doi: 10.18805/ajdfr.DR-2075.

  4. Brinch, A., Hansen, S.F., Hartmann, N.B. and Baun, A. (2016). EU regulation of nanobiocides: Challenges in implementing the biocidal product regulation (BPR). Nanomaterials. 6(2): 33.

  5. Dhawan, A. and Sharma, V. (2010). Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: Methods and challenges. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 398(2): 589-605.

  6. Duncan, J.R. and Lockwood, J.L. (2001). Extinction in a field of bullets: A search for causes in the decline of the world’s fresh water fishes. Biol. Conserv. 102(1): 97-105.

  7. Farré, M., Gajda-Schrantz, K., Kantiani, L. and Barceló, D. (2009). Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393(1): 81-95.

  8. Federici, G., Shaw, B.J. and Handy, R.D. (2007). Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Gill injury, oxidative stress and other physiological effects. Aquat. Toxicol. 84(4): 415-430.

  9. García-Barrasa, J., López-de-Luzuriaga, J.M. and Monge, M. (2011). Silver nanoparticles: Synthesis through chemical methods in solution and biomedical applications. Central European Journal of Chemistry. 9: 7-19.

  10. Griffitt, R.J., Weil, R., Hyndman, K.A., Denslow, N.D., Powers, K., Taylor, D. and Barber, D.S. (2007). Exposure to copper nanoparticles causes gill injury and acute lethality in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(23): 8178-8186. ISO 80004-1:2023(en). Nanotechnologies-Vocabulary -Part 1: Core vocabulary.

  11. Jovanović, B. and Palić, D. (2012). Immunotoxicology of non- functionalized engineered nanoparticles in aquatic organisms with special emphasis on fish-Review of current knowledge, gap identificationand call for further research. Aquat. Toxicol. 118(7): 141-151.

  12. Kamble, P.A., Gore, S.B., Relekar, S.S., Telvekar, P.A., Rathod, R.H., Belsare, S.S., Tandale, A.T., Meshre, S.D. (2023). Development of fish cracker from indian major carp, Labeo catla. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 38(2): 167-171. doi: 10.18805/BKAP617.

  13. Kasaai, M.R. (2015). Nanosized particles of silica and its derivatives for applications in various branches of food and nutrition sectors. J. Nanotechnol. 11: 1-6.

  14. Khot, L.R., Sankaran, S., Maja, J.M., Ehsani, R. and Schuster, E.W. (2012). Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: A review. Crop Prot. 35(5): 64-70.

  15. King-heiden, T.C., Wiecinski, P.N., Mangham, A.N., Metz, K.M., Nesbit, D., Pedersen, J.A., Hamers, R.J., Heideman, W. and Peterson, R.E. (2009). Quantum dot nanotoxicity assessment using the zebrafish embryo. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(5): 1605-1611.

  16. Linhua, H.A.O., Zhenyu, W.A.N.G. and Baoshan, X.I.N.G. (2009). Effect of sub-acute exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles on oxidative stress and histopathological changes in Juvenile Carp (Cyprinus carpio). Res. J. Environ. Sci. 21(10): 1459-1466.

  17. Lushchak, V.I. (2011). Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals. Aquat. Toxicol. 101(1): 13-30.

  18. Miao, C., Jia, P., Luo, C., Pang, J., Xiao, L., Zhang, T. and Sun, Z. (2024). The size-dependent in vivo toxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles: A systematic review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 271: 115910.

  19. Napierska, D., Thomassen, L.C., Lison, D., Martens, J.A. and Hoet, P.H. (2010). The nanosilica hazard: Another variable entity. Part Fibre Toxicol. 7(1): 39. 

  20. Nelson, J.S. (1994). Fishes of the World. 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 600 p.

  21. Oberholster, P.J., Musee, N., Botha, A.M., Chelule, P.K., Focke, W.W. and Ashton, P.J. (2011). Assessment of the effect of nanomaterials on sediment-dwelling invertebrate Chironomus tentans larvae. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 74(3): 416-423.

  22. Radad, K., Al-Shraim, M., Moldzio, R. and Rausch, W.D. (2012). Recent advances in benefits and hazards of engineered nanoparticles. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34(3): 661- 672.

  23. Scown, T.M., Santos, E.M., Johnston, B.D., Gaiser, B., Baalousha, M., Mitov, S., Lead, J.R., Stone, V., Fernandes, T.F., Jepson, M. and van Aerle, R. (2010). Effects of aqueous exposure to silver nanoparticles of different sizes in rainbow trout. Toxicol. Sci. 115(2): 521-534.

  24. Shaw, B.J. and Handy, R.D. (2011). Physiological effects of nanoparticles on fish: A comparison of nanometals versus metal ions. Environ. Int. 37(6): 1083-1097.

  25. Sikka, S.C. (2001). Relative impact of oxidative stress on male reproductive function. Curr. Med. Chem. 8(7): 851-862.

  26. Sit, G., Jana, A. and Chanda, A. (2021). A study on fish diversity, marketing and economics in fish markets at kharagpur, west bengal, India. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 36(2): 112-119. doi: 10.18805/BKAP310.

  27. Smith, J.E., Medley, C.D., Tang, Z., Shangguan, D., Lofton, C. and Tan, W. (2007). Aptamer-conjugated nanoparticles for the collection and detection of multiple cancer cells. Anal. Chem. 79(8): 3075-3082.

  28. Sumi, N. and K.C. Chitra. (2016). Effects of fullerene (C60) on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in gill of the cichlid fish, Etroplus maculatus (Bloch, 1795). J. Zool. 3(36): 31-37.

  29. Trujillo-Jiménez, P. and Espinosa de los Monteros Viveros, E. (2006). La ecología alimentaria del pez endémico Girardinichthys multiradiatus (Cyprinidontiformes: Goodeidae), en el Parque Nacional Lagunas de Zempoala, México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 54(4): 1247-1255.

  30. Upreti, U., Kumar, A. and Semwal, A. (2021). Hematology of fresh water fish, Labeo rohita, fingerlings exposed to silica oxide nanoparticles. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(5): 797-800.

  31. Vidya, P.V. and Chitra, K.C. (2018). Irreversible nanotoxicity of silicon dioxide nanoparticles in the fresh water fish, oreochromis mossambicus (Peters 1852). Asian Fish. Sci. 31(2): 146-160.

  32. Yokel, R.A. and MacPhail, R.C. (2011). Engineered nanomaterials: Exposures, hazards and risk prevention. J. Occup. Med. and Toxicol. 6(1): 1-27.

  33. Zhu, H., Yang, D., Yu, G., Zhang, H. and Yao, K. (2006). A simple hydrothermal route for synthesizing SnO2 quantum dots. Nanotechnology. 17(9): 23-86.

Editorial Board

View all (0)