Experimental groups E
1, E
2 and E
3 showed a significant decrease in CAT activity from 26.14±0.003 to 20.71±0.003, 26.11±0.003 to 14.21±0.003 and 26.17±0.02 to 10.61±0.003 m MH
2O
2 utilized/min/mgHb respectively when compared between initial to 90
th day (Table 1).
Experimental groups E
1, E
2 and E
3 showed a significant decrease in SOD from 51.06±0.26 to 44.48±0.005, 51.06±0.26 to 30.14±0.01 and 51.03±0.26 to 22.50±0.14 U/mg of hemoglobin respectively when compared from initial to 90
th day (Table 2).
Experimental groups E
1, E
2 and E
3 showed a significant increase in LPO from 3.04±0.02 to 14.45±0.34, 3.04±0.02 to 20.05±0.03 and 3.04±0.002 to 23.67±0.003 Nm.MDA.ml
-1 respectively when compared between initial to 90
th day (Table 3).
Throughout the experimental period, SOD and CAT activity decreased (Table 1 and Table 2 respectively), while LPO increased (Table 3). The findings of this study are consistent with the work of P.C Vidya and K.C Chitra, 2018 on
Oreochromis niloticus exposed to Silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Nanoparticles have easy access to flowing water, which quickly penetrates the gill surface layers and into the secondary lamellae, making fish gills susceptible to nanoparticles
(Federici et al., 2007; Sumi and Chitra, 2016). The gill tissue has a powerful radical scavenging mechanism, which includes antioxidant enzymes, to effectively eliminate ROS. Both short-term and long-term exposure to silicon dioxide nanoparticles reduced the activity of antioxidant enzymes in gill tissue, including superoxide dismutase and catalase. Toxicants make fish more vulnerable to the effects of ROS (
Lushchak, 2011). Similar findings were reported in other studies that exposed different fish species to different nanoparticles
(Linhua et al., 2009) found a similar trend, with a decrease in CAT activity and SOD and an increase in LPO at higher concentrations of Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in fish,
Cyprinus carpio.
Garcia et al., (2011) reported a similar significant decrease in SOD and CAT activity, as well as an increase in LPO, in Ag-NP exposed fish
Chapalichthys pardalis. Nanoparticles’ toxicological processes include the production of ROS and the development of oxidative stress
(Ahmad et al., 2010).
Small amounts of free radicals, such as superoxide anion, hydroxyl radicaland hydrogen peroxide, are produced within the cell and subcellular compartments during aerobic respiration and energy consumption. ROS is the term used to describe free radicals that, when combined with an insecure intermedia, promote lipid peroxidation. The rate of ROS formation in this study outpaced the antioxidant defence system, as evidenced by a decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity. The enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) catalyses the dismutation of superoxide into hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) and oxygen. Catalase is responsible for converting H
2O
2 into O
2 and H
2O. Because of their ability to cross biological membranes, SiO
2NPs are commonly used in medication and gene therapy. Thus, oxidative stress results from an imbalance between radical-generating and radical-scavenging processes.
ROS production has several negative consequences, including protein oxidation, DNA damageand peroxidation of unsaturated lipids in cell membranes (
Sikka, 2001). According to
Miao et al., (2024), the widespread use of amorphous silica nanoparticles (aSiNPs) in recent years has resulted in unavoidable human exposure in daily life, raising widespread concerns about aSiNPs safety for human health. The particle size of nanomaterials is an important factor that can influence their toxicity. Because smaller particles have a larger surface area, they may be more active and reactive to biological systems. SiO
2NPs have also been shown to negatively affect the hematological profile of exposed
Labeo rohita fingerlings suggesting their tendency to affect overall health of the respective animal
(Upreti et al., 2021).