Two-dimensional linear and cross-sectional measurements of left ventricle,interventricular septum, left ventricular free wall and mitral valve was standardized in 50 healthy mongrel dogs ageing 6 months-5 year (mean age= 1.59
± 0.13 yr) and weighing 7-30 kg (mean body weight=16.66
±0.73 kg).Two-dimensional echocardiographic images obtained in study resembled images documented by
Thomas (1984) and
O’Grady et al., (1986).Right parasternal location provided superior images compared to left parasternal, similar to findings of
O’Grady et al., (1986). When measuring left ventricle dimensions, it was found that systolic and diastolic dimensions in short axis views were consistently greater compared to long-axis views (Table 1), aligning with the findings of
O’Grady et al., (1986).
Left ventricular internal lengths
Left ventricular internal lengths in diastole and systole in RPLAx (L1d and L1s) and LPALAx (L2d and L2s) (Table 1) were lower than values (58.16
±10.82 and 44.86
±8.38 mm) and (51.74
±10.42; 39.68
±8.89 mm), respectively reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) in normal dogs.
Left ventricular internal dimensions (RPLAx)
Diastolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSd) (Table 1) was greater than value given by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (6.91
± 1.65 mm) but lower than values reported by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (10.1
±1.1 mm). Systolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSs) was near to value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (10.08
±2.43 mm) but lower than value reported by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (13.7
±1.9 mm). Diastolic left ventricular internal dimension (LVIDd) was near to value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (33.92
± 5.54 mm) but lower than value reported by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (38.80
±4.00 mm). Systolic left ventricular internal dimension (LVIDs) was lower than values reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (24.64
±4.79 mm) and
Oliveira et al., (2014) (27.7
± 3.10 mm) in normal dogs. Diastolic left ventricular free wall thickness (LVFWd) was slightly lower than value reported by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (9.90
±1.30 mm) but greater than value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (7.88
± 2.16 mm). Systolic left ventricular free wall thickness (LVFWs) was slightly greater than value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (10.85
±2.25 mm) but lower than value given by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (14.80
±2.00 mm).
Left ventricular internal dimensions (RPSAx)
Diastolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSd) was near to value reported by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (9.5
± 0.80 mm) but greater than value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (8.26
±1.97 mm). Systolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSs) was near to value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (10.19
±2.15 mm) but lower than that given by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (12.8
± 0.06 mm). Diastolic and systolic left ventricular internal dimensions (LVIDd and LVIDs) in RPSAx were near to values reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (34.55
±1.97 mm and 25.89
±4.77 mm) but lower than value given by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (40.0
±4.3 mm and 28.9
±3.40 mm).Diastolic left ventricular free wall thickness (LVFWd) was near to value reported by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (9.7
±0.11 mm) but slightly greater than value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (8.01
±2.32 mm). Systolic left ventricular free wall thickness (LVFWs) was lower than value reported by
Oliveira et al., (2014) (14.3
±0.16 mm) but near to value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (10.33
±2.77 mm).
Left ventricular internal and external area and mitral valve orifice area (RPSAx)
Internal and external area of left ventricle and mitral valve orifice area (Table 1) were slightly lower than values reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (9.17
±2.17 cm
2, 22.85
±7.6 cm2 and 3.69
±69 cm
2, respectively).
Left ventricular systolic function indices (Fractional shortening and ejection fraction)
Fractional shortening (FS) in RPLAx was slightly greater than value reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (28 %; 21-34%) and
Oliveira et al., (2014) (28.4 %;
26.89-29.94%) while in RPSAx, FS was near to values reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (26%; 14-39 %) and
(Oliveira et al., 2014) (28.1 %; 26.52-29.68%).
Visser et al., (2019) reported a cut-off value of FS of 22 % suggesting that many apparently large breed healthy dogs can have a FS close to 20% for years without a known cardiac event. Ejection fraction in RPLAx (53 %; 45-72%) was within the reference range proposed by
O’Grady et al., (1986) (54 %; 42-64%) and Visser
et_al(2019) (46-82.5%).
Correlation of two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements with body weight
Two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements showed significant (P<0.01) positive linear correlationship with body weight (Table 2), concurring with previous findings in normal dogs (
O'Grady et al., 1986;
Muzzi et al., 2006; Visser et al., 2019) and with those of left atrium and left ventricle size in cats
(Haggstorm et al., 2016; Karsten et al., 2017). Significant (P<0.001) positive correlation between body weight and diastolic and systolic left ventricular length (L1d, LIs) in RPLAx and LPALAx (L2d, L2s) was in consonance with the findings of
O’Grady et al., (1986). Significant (P<0.001) positive correlation between body weight and diastolic and systolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSd, IVSs), left ventricular internal dimension (LVIDd, LVIDs) and left ventricular free wall thickness (LVFWd, LVFWs) in right parasternal long and short axis views was in agreement with findings of other investigators (
O'Grady et al., 1986;
Oliveira et al., 2014 and
Visser et al., 2019). Significant (P<0.001) positive correlation between body weight and left ventricular internal and external area and mitral valve orifice area was in line with findings of
O’Grady et al., (1986).
Significant weak negative correlation between body weight and FS (RPLAx, RPSAx) observed during this study (Table 2) substantiate the findings of
Kayar et al., (2006), Oliveira et al., (2014) and
Visser et al., (2019) but negate the findings of other investigators who reported no correlation between FS and body size, suggesting that FS is independent of body weight
(Cornell et al., 2004; Bodh et al., 2019). Visser et al., (2019 observed significant weak negative correlations of EF and fractional area change with body weight suggesting that larger dogs might exhibit relatively decreased systolic function compared to smaller dogs owing to their higher resting vagal tone, calmer demeanor and increased athleticism. Variation in the observation of FS and EF might result due to dependence of these parameters on multiple factors such as preload, afterload and contractility, which influence them (
O’Leary et al., 2003). In general, linear measurements are linearly related to body length or body weight
1/3 and area and volume measurements are linearly related to body weight
2/3. Few studies reported a non-linear relationship between body weight and linear measurements of cardiac chamber size in dogs
(Cornell et al., 2004; Hall et al., 2008) and cats (
Scansen and Morgan, 2015). Contrary to above findings, our study supports the notion that linear cardiac measurements in dogs are indeed linearly related to body weight.
Effect of gender on two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements
Diastolic left ventricular internal length (Ld; RPLAx), systolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSs, RPLAx), systolic left ventricular internal dimension (LVIDs, RPSAx) and diastolic left ventricular free wall thickness (LVFWd, RPSAx) and internal and external area of left ventricle (RPSAx) showed significant (P<0.05) gender-based differences, with male dogs having greater values than females corroborating earlier reports
(Muzzi et al., 2006; Bavegems et al., 2007). Mitral valve orifice area was significantly (P<0.05) greater in female dogs compared to males, substantiating the findings of
Bodh et al., (2019) who reported significantly (P<0.05) higher mitral valve excursion amplitude in Indian Spitz dogs. Significantly (P<0.05) greater LVIDs (RPSAx) in male dogs was in line with finding of
Muzzi et al., (2006) but contrary to findings of
Bavegems et al., (2007) who reported significantly larger values of left ventricle internal diameters in female Whippets, attributable to their greater mean heart weight to body weight ratio compared to males. Significantly (P<0.05) greater LVFWs (RPSAx) in male dogs was in line with findings of
Muzzi et al., (2006) who attributed increased thickness of left ventricular free wall due to work hypertrophy and higher body of males dogs. Other parameters
viz. L2d and L2s (LPALAx), IVSd and IVSs (RPSAx), LVIDd and LVIDs (RPLAx), LVFWd and LVFWs (RPLAx), were unaffected by gender. Non-significant effect of gender on FS and EF supported previous findings in dogs
(Muzzi et al., 2006; Visser et al., 2019) and cats
(Haggstorm et al., 2016; Karsten et al., 2017).
Correlation between structures imaged and measured from different tomographic planes
All two-dimensional linear and cross-sectional measurements of left ventricle measured from the right parasternal long axis, right parasternal short axis, left parasternal long axis and left parasternal apical long axis imaging planes displayed significant positive correlations (P<0.01) with each other (Table 3) consistent with findings reported by
O’Grady et al., (1986) in normal dogs.