Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

An Updated Review on the Diaphragmatic Hernia in Bovines

Vandana Sangwan1, Ashwani Kumar1,*
1Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.
Diaphragmatic hernia is a common surgical condition in buffaloes but is occasionally recorded in cattle. A high hospital occurrence of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes raises a concern and a thought on the aetiology, as it affects the socio-economic status of the farmer. Scientific literature published to date could not establish any definitive aetiology of diaphragmatic hernia in bovines. However, it is also definitive that diaphragmatic hernia is not a congenital condition as the symptoms start appearing not before one year of age. Some anatomical factors listed specifically for buffaloes may also add to the aetiology other than the foreign body, advanced stage of pregnancy, or recent calving. Being a slow-progressing and non-infectious condition, early diagnostic and prognostic factors based on clinical, imaging and haemato-biochemical parameters and the selection of cases for surgical intervention are important. The article reviews the literature, when it was first time diagnosed, its global incidence, etiological factors and advancement in the diagnostic modalities, anaesthetic and surgical treatment methods, productive and reproductive outcomes and future directions.
Diaphragmatic hernia (DH) is a surgical condition in which a tear in the diaphragm leads to the protrusion of various abdominal organs from cranial abdominal cavity, primarily the reticulum, into the thoracic cavity. DH in bovines, mainly buffaloes, is primarily reported from India and Egypt whereas sporadic reports are from Canada. Cattle and buffaloes are the major milk producing animals in India and thus are important from the socio-economic point of view. It would be worth writing a comprehensive review on the various aspects of this important disease condition of bovines.

This review congregates the hitherto scattered literature on the diaphragmatic hernia in cattle and buffaloes since its first reporting. Besides, it highlights the gaps in the existing research and presents a multitude of possibilities to bovine clinicians and researchers to answer most needed questions like aetiology, prognostic factors and innovations in its treatment. 
 
Organs herniated
 
The organs positioned in the vicinity to the diaphragm such as the reticulum (invariably herniated), liver, spleen (Prasad et al., 1977; Singh et al., 1977; Prasad et al., 1979; Krishnamurthy et al., 1980; Deshpande et al., 1981), abomasum (Prasad et al., 1979) and sometimes even intestines (Horney and Cote, 1961) herniate into the chest cavity. As there can be involvement of multiple organ(s) but reticulum is invariably involved, debate on the nomenclature of the condition as ‘reticular diaphragmatic hernia’ (Deshpande et al., 1977; Mohindroo et al., 2007) or only ‘diaphragmatic hernia’ has been reported.
 
History and aetiology
 
The DH may be an acquired or congenital condition, but the one encountered in buffaloes appears to be acquired as the clinical signs are not reported by birth but at the sub-adult or adult stage. Reports of acquired DH in bovine are rarely reported (Singh et al., 1980a). The youngest age reported for DH in buffaloes is one year. Respiratory distress, as reported in cow calves suffering from congenital DH (Horney and Cote, 1961; Deshpande et al., 1977) is rarely reported in DH buffaloes or if reported, is mostly associated with aspiration due to regurgitation/bloat. Respiratory distress has been reported as one of the common clinical signs in congenital DH (Trout et al., 1967). DH in adult bovines is a slow progression condition with the development of strong fibrinous adhesions (Abdelaal et al., 2014) between the hernia ring and the reticulum (Deshpande et al., 1981), plugging the diaphragmatic tear tightly to ensure no air leak and hence no respiratory distress.

Congenital DH in cattle calves is occasionally reported and at an early age (Horney and Cote, 1961; Troutt et al., 1967; Lewis 1974; Hunter, 1980; Mitsuo et al., 1989; Bellavance et al., 2010) (due to dystocia handling), with successful surgical correction in a few cases (Troutt et al., 1967; Bellavance et al., 2010). Recently, Sahil et al., (2023) investigated the role of COUP-TF II and GATA-4 genes in the diaphragmatic tissues of healthy and DH buffaloes with differences in the COUP-TF II gene. Besides, exploring such genes, investigation is required to compare the status of these genes between cows and buffaloes or other species. 

Acquired DH in water buffaloes has a hospital incidence of as high as 40% (Dhablania et al., 1971; Doere and Jahagirdar, 1971; Singh et al., 1977; Deshpande et al., 1981). DH is rarely reported in cows/cattle (Dollar, 1895; Milne, 1951; Hall, 1963; Deshpande et al., 1977; Saini et al., 2001; Saini et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2024). However, a latest report showed an equal occurrence of DH in cattle and buffaloes (Suryawanshi et al., 2023). DH in a buffalo has been earliest documented in an MVSc thesis from Bombay Veterinary College, India (Deshpande, 1965), where it was an incidental finding during laparo-rumenotmy. The scientific documentation of DH in buffaloes appeared in 1969 from India (Kohli and Kumar, 1969; Naik and Mehendale, 1969; Iyer, 1969).

Two major predisposing aetiologies associated with the occurrence of DH in buffaloes are advance stage of pregnancy (Hutchkins et al., 1957; Dhablania et al., 1971) and presence of sharp metallic foreign bodies (Hutchkins et al., 1957; Krishnamurthy et al., 1985a; Singh et al., 1989). Absence of sharp metallic foreign body (Deore and Jehagirdar, 1971; William et al., 2003) or their presence in only 50-70% of DH buffaloes (Singh et al., 1977; Deshpande et al., 1977; Prasad et al., 1977; Krishnamurthy et al., 1985a; Saini et al., 2000, Saini et al., 2001) has also been reported. Similarly, 50% of DH incidence in non-pregnant heifers/buffaloes (Singh et al., 1980a; Saini et al., 2000; Saini et al., 2001), or in early gestation (Singh et al., 1977; Deshpande et al., 1977), or incidence in ox/bullocks (Done and Drew, 1972; Deshpande et al., 1977) and buffalo bulls (Angelo and Joshi, 1969; Sobti et al., 1989) also nullified the hypothesis of traumatic reticulitis and pregnancy as the primary aetiological factors. Only 26% of bovines presented with sharp metallic foreign bodies developed DH (Krishnamurthy et al., 1985a), while remaining either developed pericarditis or lung abscesses or peritonitis alone.

DH is commonly reported on the right side to cardia, followed by the central and the least to the left side in buffaloes (Singh et al., 1980a; Deshpande et al., 1981), though more commonly on the left side in cattle (Tubbs, 1953; Troutt et al., 1967; Muradwar et al., 1986). This raises the question of the anatomical position of the reticulum in buffaloes in comparison to cows. Incidence of DH is rarely reported from organized private or institutional dairy farms, which may be due to better maintenance or no practice of wallowing (Singh et al., 2006), but also be that the buffaloes are culled if not productive and the condition remained undiagnosed.

Another aetiology described for DH in buffaloes is elevated intra-abdominal pressure during straining, impaction, or severe bloat (Singh et al., 1980a). There is a relative difference between the intra-peritoneal and the intra-pleural pressure gradients in non-pregnant buffaloes (8.16±0.81cm of H2O) as compared to cows (5.50±0.82 cm of H2O). However, these values were almost similar in pregnant and non-pregnant buffaloes (Venkataravanappa and Krishnamurthy, 1984a). Thus, greater tension is exerted on the buffalo diaphragm during inspiration and expiration, thus leading to more stress and predisposing it to rupture in comparison to cows.

The water buffaloes reported here, are tolerant to heat stresses and as the name suggests are happy to wallow in ponds during hot months. It has been hypothesized that wallowing may also increase the intra-abdominal pressure abruptly and if the diaphragm is inherently weak it can act as an exciting factor for the rupture of the diaphragm (Singh et al., 2006). However, to nullify it, wallowing is not a common practice in most of the parts of India and buffaloes are kept stall fed, but still many DH cases are reported.
 
Diaphragm structure and composition
 
The tendino-muscular junction on the right ventral side, a few centimeters below the foramen ovale (Deshpande et al., 1981) is the most common site for DH in buffaloes. It was hypothesized that the innate weakness of the diaphragm at this site in buffaloes is the reason for its rupture. To study the difference in the diaphragm of buffaloes and cows, a few histological and biochemical studies have also been done. The conclusions reported from these studies supporting the fact that the right ventromedial musculo-tendinous portion is prone to occurrence of DH in buffaloes are:
• At the musculotendinous junction, the tendinous fibres extend only into the indentations of the sarcolemma       and do not penetrate the muscles resulting in a weak junction (Krishnamurthy et al., 1983).
• The right ventromedial tendinous zone of the buffalo diaphragm is thinner (0.85mm) than the left ventromedial      zone (1.35 mm, thickest) (Krishnamurthy et al., 1985a).
• The peri-cardio-phrenic vessels responsible for the vascular supply to the central tendinous area of the cattle  diaphragm are missing in buffaloes and the caudal phrenic vessels are not able to fully compensate for this deficiency (Sharma et al., 1981; Krishnamurthy et al., 1985b) resulting in a weaker central tendinous area in buffaloes.
• The golgi tendon organs that function as the pressure receptors are absent in buffalo diaphragm at the musculo- tendinous junction (Roy, 1980). The tendinous, costal and sternal parts are all thick and the strain on the          junctional zone makes it more prone to rupture (Roy and Das, 1983).

• The percentage of dry matter elastin content of sternal and costal parts of the diaphragm is non-significantly    less in buffaloes compared to cattle. Even the left ventral tendinous portion has much higher dry matter elastin      content compared to the right side in buffaloes, which was otherwise much higher and equal on both sides in cattle. In the right tendinous part, the mean elastin content in buffaloes is only 50 per cent to that of cattle (Venkataravanappa and Krishnamurthy, 1984b). However, the dry matter myosin content was higher in buffaloes in these regions compared to cattle.
• The hydroxyproline content of ventral and right tendinous  parts of buffalo diaphragm is comparatively lesser than that in cow (Venkataravanappa and Krishnamurthy, 1984b).
 
Clinical signs
 
The common clinical signs of DH are recurrent bloat, partial anorexia, hard black faeces or diarrhoea (Athar et al., 2010), drop in milk yield (Dhablania et al., 1971; Kumar et al., 1980), dehydration and rough coat (Singh et al., 1977). The presence of recurrent tympani, with frothy bloat, is pathognomonic of the disease condition and is believed to be due to occasional entrapment of reticulo-omasal groove in the hernia defect and/or deviation of cardia due to involvement of oesophagus (Deshpande et al., 1981) leading to impaired eructation and hence bloat. However, history of absence or one time bloat has also been reported (Athar et al., 2010). The frothy bloat could be due to churning of feed in the herniation and mixing of gas accumulated in the rumen due to impaired eructation. Relieving of gas through trocar or needle is non-responsive and the buffalo may regurgitate, especially when exposed to high environmental temperature. With bloat, the rumen and reticulum are hyper-motile. Presence of brisket oedema has also been reported in a few advance cases  of DH (Athar et al., 2010), though no pericardial effusions were found on ultrasonography, which could be due to pressure of reticulum on heart or caudal vena cava (Deshpande et al., 1981).

Elevated rectal temperature is a rare feature of DH in buffaloes (Singh et al., 1977) and if reported is mostly due to hyperthermia from environment temperature. Absence of complete anorexia makes the condition chronic and debilitating, though otherwise the behaviour of buffalo is hyperactive. The behaviour of sick cattle on the other hand is observed to be dull due to fast reduction in haemoglobin compared to buffalo with the same number of illness days. Development of abomasal ulcers may be related to the passing of hard black faeces by the bovine. High yielding bovines have also been reported to be prone to DH (Tubbs, 1953; Hutchkins et al., 1957; De Moor et al., 1969; Dhablania et al., 1971, Prasad et al., 1977).
 
Auscultation
 
Clinical examination of lower chest using stethoscope while listening to the splashing sound of reticulum in the chest and the muffled heart sound in a few (Singh et al., 1977; Ghanshym et al., 2020) has been recommended under field conditions for the diagnosis of DH as radiography is not available. However, auscultation may not be useful when severe adhesions are there and reticular motility is absent (Kumar et al., 1980), or when some other organ is herniated along with the reticulum (Prasad et al., 1979). Other than reticular organs, if herniated, are difficult to diagnose on auscultation or radiography and require exploratory laparo-rumenotomy (Prasad et al., 1979).
 
Radiography
 
Earlier the radiography of large animals was restricted to limbs, head and neck due to the non-availability of high powered X-ray machines. But with the improvement in the technology of X-ray machines, the radiography of thorax and reticular region was made possible (Ilijas and Rapic, 1972).

The first X-ray machine with a 200mA unit for the projection of thorax and abdomen in large animals especially buffaloes was made available in the Veterinary College, Hisar, Haryana, in India, in 1970. Vig and Tyagi (1973) compared reticulography (200-350 g barium sulphate) and plueurography (35% diodone solution, 20-30 ml) as contrast radiographic procedures in experimentally induced diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes.

The reticulography was recommended in right recumbent lateral positions, with a 200 mA x-ray unit (Vig and Tyagi, 1973, Bhargawa and Tyagi, 1975) using 200 mAs, 100KVp and 76 inches (190 cm) FFD (film-focal distance) (Bhargawa and Tyagi, 1975, Kumar et al., 1980). In doubtful cases, oral contrast reticulography with 1 kg Barium sulphate was made after 15-20 min (Kumar et al., 1980).

Foreign bodies were defined as potential (sharp metallic) and non-potential (iron fillings, rings, chains, spoon, keys, nuts, bolts, silver and gold ornaments, etc.) and potential were considered important for the causation of DH, while non-potential were mostly non-traumatic with exceptions like penetrating metallic spoon (Kohli et al., 1982).

The early radiographic features described for DH using plain radiography were presence of soft tissue mass in the thoracic cavity with foamy appearance and having continuity with the density of rumen and reticulum. The heart, lung and diaphragmatic shadows were not differentiable (Bhargava and Tyagi, 1975). With contrast radiography using barium, the reticulum and diaphragm were better visualised with the break in the continuity of diaphragm and cranial displacement of heart visible (Bhargava and Tyagi, 1975).

In 1977, the radiographic features were slightly modified with the absence of ‘clear Diaphragmatic line’ to be suspected for DH and was subjected to contrast reticulography while a distinct break in diaphragm line or presence of reticular patch cranial to diaphragm (with or without foreign body) and displacement or partial or complete over-shadowing of the heart to be confirmative for DH (Deshpande et al., 1977; Kumar et al., 1980). The presence of honeycomb appearance of herniated reticulum in few bovines has been related to presence of gas in it (Farrow, 1999), otherwise, in others, a soft tissue sac like opacity is visible, due to its contents.

Radiography for the diagnosis of DH in bovines has been recommended in right (Kumar et al., 1980) or left (Misk and Samieka, 2001) lateral recumbency (using 14x17” or 432X356 mm film and a stationary grid below the cassette). In standing position, the heavy humeral musculature of buffaloes does not allow the forelimbs to be extended forward and the olecranon overlaps the ventral diaphragm region, making the diagnosis of DH difficult (Kumar et al., 1980; Kohli et al., 1982; Misk and Samieka, 2001).

The cassette is placed behind the elbow to cover the area caudal to 5th intercostal space (ICS) and ventrally including sternum (Kumar et al., 1980). The machine settings were kept at 100cm FFD, 80-120 KVp and 90-100 mAs (Kumar et al., 1980) compared to what had been used earlier (Bhargawa and Tyagi, 1975) and later with better machine technologies the settings reduced to 50-60 mAs, 90-100 KVP and 90-110 cm FFD (Athar et al., 2010). The diaphragm line can be clear if there is gas in herniated reticulum. Apart from visualization of honey comb opacity cranial to diaphragm, presence of non-potential foreign bodies with or without sac visualization in chest is also considered confirmatory for DH as the non-potential foreign bodies cannot penetrate the diaphragm without being herniated along with the sac.

Most of the limitations of radiography described in the literature are overcome today with the availability of better X-ray technologies such as Computed and Digital Radiography. Presence of chest growth, cystic opacity and cardiac/phrenic/lung abscess is still the radiographic differentials for DH if no non-potential foreign body or iron/sand dust is visible cranial to diaphragm. Casting of bovine for reticulography of DH is also a major limitation in bovines with bloat, advanced stage of pregnancy, regurgitation or pericarditis. Since, buffaloes with pericarditis less commonly show the typical clinical sign of brisket edema (Kumar et al., 2012; Sangwan et al., 2018) and are at the risk when casted for reticulography.
 
Ultrasonography
 
Successful diagnosis of reticular diaphragmatic hernias using ultrasonography was first-time reported in buffaloes (Mohindroo et al., 2007) and cows (Saini et al., 2007). This diagnostic technique was considered a boon in the history of DH as it was done on non-sedated, standing bovines and thus, was safe for advanced pregnant and/or bloated bovine which was otherwise risky for radiographic examination in a recumbent position. Ultrasonography was recommended in real time B-mode with a 3·5 MHz microconvex (Mohindroo et al., 2007; Saini et al., 2007) or 2-5 MHz multi-frequency curvilinear transducer (Kumar and Saini, 2011; Kumar et al., 2017). The criterion for diagnosis was the visualization of characteristic biphasic reticular motility of reticulum at 4th and 5th ICS (i.e in the chest). As the herniated reticulum is usually on the right side between the heart and right thoracic wall, it is possible to scan the thick echogenic band of about 1 cm, corresponding to the reticular wall from the right 4th ICS, shadowing the heart. However, during the reticular contractions, it is possible to scan the heart from the right 4th ICS. And when conducting, an ultrasonographic examination from the left side, the reticular wall will be seen medial to the heart (Kumar et al., 2017, Aneja et al., 2022). However, the honeycomb structure of the reticulum and the foreign bodies could not be seen ultrasonographically (Mohindroo et al., 2007).

With the advent of ultrasonography, further studies focussed on the comparative diagnosis of DH using ultrasonography and radiography and concluded ultrasonography to be accurate than radiography in both cows and buffaloes. However, a false positive diagnosis of DH cannot be ruled out using USG (Athar et al., 2010). Another study concluded that the cupula of diaphragm in healthy cows is slightly cranial in comparison to healthy buffaloes (Makhdoomi et al., 2018) and thus the reticulum can be visualized one ICS cranial to that is seen in healthy non-pregnant buffaloes. It may move further with advance stage of pregnancy, so the ultrasonographic visibility of the reticular wall and motility at the 5th ICS as a diagnostic criterion for reticular diaphragmatic hernia should be interpreted with caution concerning the species and pregnancy status of the animal; however, is confirmatory (with no clause) at 4th ICS (Kumar and Saini, 2011). Another study has reported congenital variation in the number of sternebrae in cow and buffalo calves and thus may affect the ICS position of various organs in adult stage (Verma et al., 2023). Morphometry of DH reticulum from different windows has also been reported (Aneja et al., 2022). The Doppler USG of major vessels close to heart like, jugular, carotid and cranial epigastric has been reported with certain variation in DH buffaloes as compared to healthy (Sangwan et al., 2015; Sangwan et al., 2019). Apart from diagnostic utility, ultrasonography can play a vital role in the prognostic assessment of a DH-affected bovine.

Ultrasonography too had certain limitations including, the false negative in the diagnosis of small DH and contrast radiography would be more reliable (Kumar and Saini, 2012) in such a situation. On ultrasonography, visualization of foreign body is not possible which otherwise is required as these are to be removed during rumenotomy. For USG and to approach the 4th ICS, the corresponding side forelimb need to be pulled forward using a rope or hand, which is sometimes difficult in certain bovines. In extensive herniation, the diagnosis for DH can be made using the cranial thoracic approach with the forelimb not stretched and transducer placed cranial to forelimb and lateral to brisket directed into the chest (Kumar et al., 2017).
 
Hemato-biochemistry
 
Many studies were conducted to document hemato-biochemical findings in bovines suffering from DH. Significantly elevated total leucocytes with neutrophilia and total protein is a consistent finding on bovines positive for DH (Kaur and Singh, 1994; Rose et al., 2009; Abdelaal et al., 2014; Attia, 2016; Ghanshym et al., 2020) irrespective to the presence of foreign body, which was correlated to the destruction of lymphocytes due to stress (Jain, 1986) tissue damage and suppuration at the site of injury (Kaur and Singh, 1994).  The SGOT, Creatinine Kinase and Serum Creatinine (Ghanshym et al., 2020, Suryawanshi et al., 2023) are significantly high and SGPT to be significantly low in DH buffaloes as compared to normal (Kaur and Singh, 1994; Rose et al., 2009). DH may cause reduced serum total bilirubin, AST, BUN, creatinine glucose, lactate and fbrinogen in buffaloes (Hussain et al., 2021). The erythrocytic indices show macrocytic normochromic anaemia in DH, while it was macrocytic hypochromic in foreign body syndrome (Kaur and Singh, 1994), which was correlated to the deficiency of folic acid and cobalt (Jain, 1986).
 
Surgery
 
The diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy (DHy) requires major surgical intervention done in dorsal recumbency under general anaesthesia and the cost, time and manpower involved are significant. In India, bovine are not the primary food animal and the owner mostly go for the surgical treatment. The government-funded Indian institutes provide subsidized surgical treatment facilities for the farmers, therefore, a lot of efforts and research is being focused on the development of safer anaesthetic protocols and surgical approaches for DHy in bovines. 

In late 1960’s many cases of DH were diagnosed in buffaloes and a treatment requirement emerged. The experimental repair was made successful in buffalo calves (Vig and Tyagi, 1974; Singh, 1974), though it was different from the clinically presented adult. The adult clinical buffaloes had strong adhesions with no controlled respiratory technique for positive pressure ventilation and had a large rumen putting pressure on the diaphragm while suturing hernial defect in dorsal recumbency.

The procedure of DHy was started in 2 stages as is even followed today, with certain alterations. In earlier days, the rumen was partially emptied through left flank rumenotomy in standing position and the foreign bodies from the reticulum were removed in the 1st stage while in the 2nd stage the hernia ring was sutured in dorsal recumbency under general anaesthesia. The 2nd stage was done after 4-14 days of stage one and the bovine were called 24 hrs off-feed and off-water for it (Singh et al., 1977). The herniorrhaphy procedure was done using a crescent incision through a post xiphoid approach (Singh et al., 1977; Prasad et al., 1979; Singh et al., 1980b). The surgical gloves were not used during surgery as they used to slip off inside while operating. The braided silk no. 4 was used for suturing the diaphragm in continuous lock stitch pattern (Singh et al., 1977). Earlier attempt to repair the diaphragm was with interrupted mattress sutures (Vig and Tyagi, 1974; Singh, 1974) or synthetic patches (Vig and Tyagi, 1974) and was not found satisfactory compared to the continuous lock stitch using no. 4 braided silk (due to its high tensile strength) (Singh et al., 1977). Now-a-days, no. 2 braided silk is used, made double by making a loop, but this is less ideal for suturing of diaphragm in a continuous lock stitch pattern as two threads may intermingle with each other and is likely to break, thus complicating the procedure. The commercial availability of at least 300 cm single strand long suture material no. 4 or 5 with swaged on heavy taper cutting needle No. 1 will be highly useful, but, limited marketing and commercial non-viability of such unusual suture materials is of concern for pharmaceutical companies. 

Transthoracic approach through resection of 20-30 cm of sixth rib (Krishnamurthy et al., 1980) or 7th rib (Gahlot et al., 1989) under general anaesthesia or local standing anaesthesia (Singh et al., 1996) has also been described from right side with satisfaction except where; there was close adherence of herniated reticulum with lungs or pericardium (Nigam et al., 1980).

The linea alba incisions and right or left para-costal incisions have also been tried for DHy in bovines (Singh et al., 2002). Though, the post-xiphoid semilunar incision provides the maximum working space but it is associated with incising abdominal muscles and thus excessive bleeding. Besides, it requires careful placement of sutures because of excessive muscle tension leading to incisional hernia (Kumar et al., 2012). In the linea alba approach, in dorsal recumbency, the bleeding is minimal, suturing is easy but the working space is less. This approach is sometimes also called as ‘blood less surgery’. The linea alba approach is currently recommended for DHy and other peri-reticular lesions (Kumar et al., 2018) in cows and buffaloes.

Usually bovines have single hernia ring, however, two or more hernial rings have also been reported (Deshpande et al., 1977) and repaired successfully (Singh et al., 1979; Krishnamurthy et al., 1983; Saini et al., 2016). But, in such cases, limited diaphragmatic tissue leads to more tension and thus may predispose to post-surgical recurrence and pain. Such cases may be considered ideal for the use of prosthetic mesh. It will be necessary to oppose the hernial defect before using prosthetic mesh so that there is no air leakage through the mesh fenestrations. However, the authors never realised the need to use prosthesis grafts in clinical practice. The magnitude of recurrence of DH following herniorrhaphy in bovines need to be investigated to justify the need of adjuvants/prosthetic meshes in DHy. Earlier, autologous skin graft (Ramakumar et al., 1979), polypropylene and nylon mesh (Troutt et al., 1967; William et al., 2003) have also been tried to close the rent.

The size of the hernia ring may vary from 6 to 25 cm with the ring mostly 8cm above the xiphoid (Singh et al., 1977; Deshpande et al., 1981) and adhesions with pericardium, pleura, lungs and thoracic wall and fibrous tracts having metallic foreign bodies (60%) and reticular abscesses (20%) (Deshpande et al., 1981).

Surgery for DHy is not generally advised in advanced pregnant bovines (more than 9 month pregnant) as the mature fetus fills the abdominal cavity that reduces working space for the dissection of adhesions and suturing of the diaphragmatic rent (Singh et al., 2006).

A single stage approach to DHy in buffaloes has been described under xylazine sedation and local anaesthesia and in dorsal position. The rumenotomy for evacuation of ingesta and foreign body was done using McLintock’s rubber ring through post xiphoid semilunar incision followed by DHy (Ghanshym et al., 2020). 

The pleura is usually intact in DH; however, the herniating organ (usually reticulum) develops variable degree of adhesions, as per the chronicity, with the hernial ring and the thoracic structures such as parietal pleura. In buffaloes, generally the adhesions are so firm and extensive that these need to be severed with scissors to make the reticulum free and to pull it back into the abdominal cavity for DHy. This process, sometimes results in tear in the reticulum, pleura, lungs, liver and pericardium. The whole procedure is done through palpation as the visibility is not possible due to its anatomic position and surgical approach. Careful dissection of adhesions close to the herniated organ can prevent damage to the pleura. Use of rigid/flexible endoscope may aid in visualizing the herniated organ(s), diaphragmatic rent, extent of adhesions and neighbouring structures and thus avoiding major complications and improving the outcomes.

As pleural cavity (parietal and visceral pleura) has negative pressure (vacuum), so parietal pleural is in close association with the lung surface (visceral pleura). After the herniated organ is replaced into the abdominal cavity, the space remaining in the thoracic cavity (between the diaphragm and parietal pleura) is well defined up till the parietal pleura is intact. Pleura can rupture grossly or with minor damage with needle piercing and former is easy to diagnose, as the other thoracic structures will be palpable (lungs and heart). However, in the event of the minor tear in pleura, the air moves into the pleural sac resulting in pneumothorax and the potential space remaining in the thoracic cavity is less defined due to sagging of parietal pleura. Pleural rupture is considered one of the serious intraoperative complication and poor prognostic indicator and such cases require intensive care during and after surgery (Singh et al., 2023). Lungs are overinflated by positive pressure ventilation before closing the last suture and free air in the pleural cavity is suctioned out to manage the developing pneumothorax associated with pleural rupture (Singh et al., 1977).
 
Anaesthetic protocols
 
Several innovations occurred in the anaesthetic protocols for DHy in bovines. Use of soda bicarb in the ruminal fluid and inj. Prednisolone (anti-oxidant) were recommended in DH bovines prior to anaesthesia for surgical repair. The 6% chloral hydrate was used as a pre-anaesthetic and the induction and maintenance was done with 5% Thiopentone sodium in earlier days (Singh et al., 1977). However, with large doses of chloral hydrate, oxygen extraction ratio of the tissue was critically low (Mirakhur et al., 1980) and a reduced dose of choral hydrate till the nystagmus appeared, was found helpful (Mirakhur et al., 1983). A 25 mm endotracheal tube (non-cuffed and locally made with a rubber pipe) was used and was attached to respirators (manual of positive pressure ventilators). The respirators were used to create negative pressure in the thoracic cavity by hyper ventilation just before the tightening of last lock stitch (Singh et al., 1977). Subsequently, air from abdomen was removed as it helped in early restoration of spontaneous breathing during recovery (Singh et al., 2006). Since, there are adhesions hanging in the thoracic cavity and there was formation of multiple air pockets in between the pleura and diaphragm, all the air was difficult to be removed by suction and the hyperventilation technique was more effective, even today. The assisted respiration was continued for 1.5-2 hrs and complete recovery would take 2-3 hrs after surgery (Singh et al., 1977). A need for good muscle relaxant, endotracheal tube with cuff and positive pressure ventilation for the repair of DH arise (Deshpande et al., 1977).

With the availability of inhalant anaesthesia, halothane was used for the maintenance during surgery along with intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), but it caused severe hypotension (Peshin et al., 1986) and A-V dissociation in several animals and was not recommended safe for DH repair in supine position (Gahlawat et al., 1986). Use of halothane also highlighted the problem of regurgitation during surgery (Saini et al., 2000). Other combinations like triflupromarine and low doses of choral hydrate (6%) followed by induction and maintenance with thiopentone (5%) (Krishnamuthy et al., 1998), diazepam-thiopentone and chloral hydrate, haloperidol-thiopentone- halothane were used (Saini et al., 2001). The total induction dose of the barbiturate varied from 2 g to 10 g in adult buffaloes (Krishnamuthy et al., 1998).

Later, the anaesthetic protocol of diazepam or midazolam as pre-anaesthetic and thiopentone as the induction agent and maintenance with halothane (Saini et al., 2007; Singh et al., 2013) was followed. Midazolam was considered better than diazepam for electrolyte balance. To prevent respiratory acidosis, mechanical ventilation was recommended throughout the surgical procedure (Singh et al., 2013). The use of isoflurane and sevoflurane for maintenance and premedication with Glycopyrolate-xylazine-butorphanol and thiopentone has also been reported in buffaloes, with faster recovery with sevoflurane (Choudhary et al., 2017).

The DHy had also been tried successfully using chloral hydrate sedation and local anaesthesia (2% lignocaine hydrochloride) through ventral approach in buffaloes and crossbred cows (Marudwar et al., 1986; Usturge and Bhokre, 1989; Singh et al., 1996; William et al., 2003, Talekar et al., 2018). The successful repair of DH under local anaesthesia is possible when the ring is not extensive and the pleura is intact, so that the bovine is breathing spontaneously throughout, but if during breaking of the adhesions, the pleura (Saini et al., 2001) or mediastinum (Prasad et al., 1980) ruptures, need for positive pressure ventilation arises (Singh et al., 2023). Half reticular resection has also been successfully advised to avoid adhesion breakage (Fazili et al., 1994; Fazili et al., 1998), but the excitatory and inhibitory receptors of vagus nerve responsible for reticulo-ruminal motility are located densely in the medial wall of the reticulum, the reticulo-ruminal fold, the reticular groove and the central part of the dorsal ruminal sac (Leek, 1969), which if resected will hinder the function. Reticular resection, may not be practically feasible as well later, the reticulum also need to be sutured and chances of infection increases many fold.
 
Post-operative care
 
Post-operative care with isotonic fluid therapy (NSS, DNS, RL), antibiotics and analgesics along with 3 days of hydrocortisone (Singh et al., 1977), B Complex, liver extract, stomachic preparations and yeast tablets (Behl et al., 1997; Singh, 1997; Tagra et al., 2001) was recommended in DHy bovines.

Chronic starvation in cases of DH leads to electrolyte imbalance and further to hypokalaemia and hypochloraemia, leading to either abomasal atony or achalasia of pylorus i.e. caudal functional disorder (Behl et al., 1997; Singh, 1997; Tagra et al., 2001). To correct this imbalance, 5 litres of hypertonic saline (2.7% NaCl) with 6-8 g of KC1, intravenously, was used (Behl et al., 1997; Singh, 1997; Tagra et al., 2001) on the first or subsequent days of surgery.

Use of Vitamin E as an antioxidant during DHy has been recommended (Bisla et al., 2002) and also had no effect in another study (Sahu et al., 2002). Further studies are recommended to justify the rational incorporation of the antioxidants in the treatment protocols.
 
Prognostic factors and outcome
 
The earlier studies (Singh et al., 1977) reported an uncomplicated recovery in 68.42% of bovines (13/19) with the major poor prognostic reason being the brisket oedema (3/19). However, the long term reproductive and productive outcome was 100% (Singh et al., 1977, Kumar et al., 2012). A success rate of up to 80% was reported (Singh et al., 1977; Prasad et al., 1977) in almost 200 bovines with DHy.

Twice reoccurrence of DH in a buffalo has been reported (Ramakumar et al., 1979). The second time ring was next to the first one repaired. This second-time re-occurrence was repaired using an autologous skin graft of full thickness from a free skin region, which was successful up to 8-month follow-up.

The poor prognostic factors for DHy in buffaloes are; advanced stage of pregnancy,  regurgitation,  brisket oedema, anaemia (low haemoglobin of less than 7 g/dl),  highly alkaline rumen pH of 9-9.5, foreign bodies, regurgitation during anaesthesia, cardiac or respiratory complications and severe adhesions with pleura and pericardium causing respiratory and cardiac compromise along with longer operative time (Saini et al., 2000). Singh et al., (2023) correlated the status of the pleural integrity with the survival of buffaloes undergoing DH. Majority report did not highlight assessment of pleural integrity because it is difficult to diagnose minor tear/needle puncture of the parietal pleura intraoperatively. However, in the opinion of the authors’ pleural integrity is one the major prognostic factors responsible for intraoperative mortality or morbidity in DH.

Favourable prognostic factors for DHy in buffaloes are; ruminal pH of 7-8, good haemoglobin, least fibrous tracts and absence of reticular abscess/nodule, minimum regurgitation and complications during anaesthesia, non-pregnancy or early pregnancy and absence of other accompanying disease (Saini et al., 2001; Sahu et al., 2003).
Despite much published literature on the DH in bovines; no definitive ethology could be identified which a still is worrying in formulating strategies to control this economically important condition. Establishment of genetic causes may help in screening of herd for identification of susceptible animals and their culling. Higher occurrence of DH in buffaloes as compared to cattle suggest that different genetic makeup or body conformation of these species might be playing an important role in the etio-pathogenesis of DH; however, there is lack of scientific documentation on this aspect. Besides, there is a scope for modifying the surgical technique; use of endoscope during surgery, designing of surgical instruments to facilitate dissection of tough adhesions and effective suturing of the diaphragm for favourable surgical outcomes.
Diaphragmatic hernia is an economically important surgical condition, most commonly reported in buffaloes and occasionally in cows. No definitive aetiology is reported and is a major hurdle in the prevention of the condition. Advancements in the diagnostic, anaesthetic and surgical techniques have improved the outcome. The review highlighted the gaps in the DH research on bovines and will serve a useful document to guide researchers working on it.
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  1. Abdelaal, A., Gouda, S., Ismail, A. and Gomaa, M. (2014). Reticular diaphragmatic hernia in Egyptian buffaloes: Clinical, hemato-biochemical and ultrasonographic findings. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 34(4): 541-544.

  2. Aneja, V., Sangwan, V., Kumar, A., Anand, A., Singh, T., and Bansal, N. (2022). Comparative ultrasonographic morphometry of reticulum from six windows in water buffaloes with diaphragmatic hernia. Large Animal Review. 28(2): 73-81.

  3. Angelo, S. J. and Joshi, B. P. (1969). Hernia (diaphragmatic) in a buffalo bullock. Indian Veterinary Journal. 46: 828-829.

  4. Athar, H., Mohindroo, J., Singh, K., Kumar, A. and Raghunath, M. (2010). Comparison of radiography and ultrasonography for diagnosis of diaphragmatic hernia in bovines. Veterinary Medicine International. Volume 2010, Article ID 939870, 7 pages doi:10.4061/2010/939870. 

  5. Attia, N.E. (2016). Evaluation of clinical, hemato-biochemical and ultrasonographic findings in Egyptian buffaloes with diaphragmatic hernia. International Journal of Veterinary Science. 5(4): 238-243. 

  6. Behl, S.M., Singh, J. and Krishnamurthy, D. (1997). Functional disorder of the abomasum due to diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes: Implications in treatment. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 18: 94-93.

  7. Bellavance, A., Bonneville-Hébert, A., Desrochers, A. and Fecteau, G. (2010). Surgical correction of a diaphragmatic hernia in a newborn calf. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 51: 767-769.

  8. Bhargava, A.K. and Tyagi, R.P.S. (1975). The first report the radiological diagnosis of thoracic diseases in large animals-A review of 140 clinical cases. Indian Veterinary Journal. 52(9): 722-726.

  9. Bisla, R.S., Singh. J., Krishnamurthy, D. (2002). Assessment of oxidative stress in buffaloes suffering from diaphragmatic hernia. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 22: 77-80.

  10. Chaudhary, R.N., Tayal, R., Behl, S.M., Kumar A. and Sharma, S. (2017). Comparative evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia in buffaloes undergoing diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 87(6): 701-706.

  11. de Moor, A., Verschooten, F. and Desmet, P. (1969). Thoracic repair of diaphragmatic hernia in a heifer. Veterinary Record. 85(4): 87-88.

  12. Deshpande, K.S. (1965). A study on traumatic reticulo-peritonitis with special reference to surgical techniques. MVSc Thesis, Bombay University, Bombay.

  13. Deshpande, K.S., Krishnamurthy, D., Nigam, J.M., Chandna, I.S. (1977). Diaphragmatic (Reticular) hernia in bovine. A preliminary report. The Haryana Veterinarian. 16: 92-95.

  14. Deshpande, K.S., Krishnamurthy, D., Nigam, J.M., Sharma, D. (1981). Patho-anatomy of herniation of the reticulum through the diaphragm in the bovine. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 22: 234-236.

  15. Dhablania, D.C., Tyagi, R.P.S. and Nigam, J.M. (1971). A study on diaphragmatic hernia in bovines. Indian Veterinary Journal. 48: 91-98.

  16. Doere, P.A. and Jahagirdar, S.S. (197l). Incidence of diaphragmatic hernia in cattle and buffaloes. Indian Veterinary Journal. 48: 1172.

  17. Dollar, A.W. (1895). Mollers’ Operative Veterinary Surgery. David and Douglas, Edinburgh.

  18. Done, S.H. and Drew, R.A. (1972). Aperture in the diaphragm with protrusion of abnormal liver tissue: A report of three cases of ox. British Veterinary Journal. 128: 553-559.

  19. Farrow, C.S. (1999). Reticular foreign bodies (causative or coincidence). Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 15: 397-408.

  20. Fazili, M., Mogha, I.V. and Sengar, S.S. (1994). Some biochemical parameters in buffaloes following partial resection of reticulum. Journal of Veterinary Physiology and Allied Sciences. 13: 18-24.

  21. Fazili, M.R., Mogha, I.V., Singh, G.R. and Aithal, H.P. (1998). Clinical effects of partial reticular resection in buffalo calves: An experimental study. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 19: 22-24.

  22. Gahlawat, J.S., Singh, A.P., Singh, J. and Peshin, P.K. (1986). Evaluation of halothane anaesthesia with intermittent positive pressure ventilation in buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis). Archives of Experimental Veterinary Medicine. 40: 876- 880.

  23. Gahlot, T.K., Chawla. S.K., Peshin. P.K. and Krishnamurthy. D. (1989). Diverse rib resection thoracotomies for diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy in bovines. Indian Veterinary Journal. 66 (10): 971-973.

  24. Ghanshyam, P.G., Vinayak, S.R. and Hiroji, U.A. (2020). Comparative evaluation of single stage and double stage diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy for repair of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin. 39(4): 473-482.

  25. Hall, R.F. (1963). Repair of diaphragmatic hernia in a cow. Veterinary Medicine. 58: 328.

  26. Horney, F.D. and Cote, J. (1961). Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a calf. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2: 422-424.

  27. Hunter, R. (1980). Diaphragmatic hernia in a newborn calf. Veterinary Medicine Small Animal Clinicians. 75: 315. 

  28. Hussain, S.A., Uppal, S.K., Mahajan, S.K. and Sood, N.K. (2021). Reticular diaphragmatic hernia in water buffalo: Clinical characteristics, haematology, biochemical analytes and prognostic indicators. Comparative Clinical Pathology. 30: 605-615.

  29. Hutchins. D.R., Blood, D.C. and Hyne, R. (1957). Residual defects in stomach motility after traumatic reticulo-peritonitis of cattle. Pyloric obstruction, diaphragmatic hernia and indigestion due to reticular adhesions. Australian Veterinary Journal. 33(4): 77-82.

  30. Ilijas, B. and Rapic, S. (1972). Diagnostic radiology and its limitations in large domestic animals. Acta Radiologica Supplement. 319: 39-41. 

  31. Iyer, G.R. (1969). Diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. Indian Veterinary Journal. 46(10): 918. 

  32. Jain, N. C. (1986). Veterinary Hematology. 4th edn. Lea and Febiger. Philadelphia.

  33. Kaur, T. and Singh, B. (1994). Clinico-pathological changes associated with diaphragmatic hernia and foreign body syndrome in buffalo. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 64(10): 1018-1021.

  34. Kohli, R.N. and Kumar. R. (1969). A case of DH in a she buffalo. Punjab Veterinarian. 8(3): 305-308.

  35. Kohli, R.N., Kumar, R., Sobti, V.K., Singh, J., Prasad, B. and Sharma, S.N. (1982). Diagnosis of foreign body syndrome in bovines. Modern Veterinary Practice. 63: 501-504. 

  36. Krishnamurthy, D., Deshpande K.S., Nigam J.M., Peshin P.K. and Singh, S.C. (1980). Repair of diaphragmatic hernia. Transthoracic approach. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 1: 7-11.

  37. Krishnamurthy, D., Nigam, J.M., Deshpande, K.S., Peshin, P.K., Singh, S.C. and Sharma, D.N. (1983). Bovine diaphragmatic hernia-analysis of 140 clinical cases. Indian Veterinary Journal. 60: 1011-1016.

  38. Krishnamurthy, D., Nigam, J.M., Peshin, P.K., Sharma, D.N. and Tyagi, R.P.S. (1985a). Monograph on diaphragmatic hernia in bovines. Directorate of Publications, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.

  39. Krishnamurthy, D., Nigam, J.M., Sharma, D.N. and Sobti, V.K. (1985b). Arterial supply of diaphragm in relation to reticular eventration in buffalo. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 55: 912-917.

  40. Krishnamurthy, D., Peshin, P.K., Chawala, S.K. and Tayal, R. (1998).  Surgical management of diaphragmatic and reticular lesions in buffaloes. Haryana Vet. 37: 89-99.

  41. Kumar, A., Saini, N.S., Mohindroo, J., Sangwan, V., Mahajan, S.K., Raghunath M and Singh, N. (2012). Long term outcomes of survivors of diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy in crossbred cows and buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 82(9): 971-975. 

  42. Kumar, A. and Saini, N.S. (2011). Reliability of ultrasonography at the fifth intercostal space in the diagnosis of reticular diaphragmatic hernia. Veterinary Record. 169(15): 391. doi: 10.1136/vr.d4694. 

  43. Kumar, A. and Saini, N.S. (2012). Diagnosis of a small-sized reticular diaphragmatic hernia in a buffalo. Veterinary Record. 171: 381-382.

  44. Kumar, A., Mahajan, S.K., Sangwan, V. and Anand, A. (2018). Diagnosis and surgical retrieval of extra reticular metallic foreign body in a buffalo. Buffalo Bulletin. 37(2): 273-278.

  45. Kumar, A., Sangwan V, Mohindroo, J., Saini, N.S., Singh, S.S. (2017). Comparison of four ultrasonographic approaches for the diagnosis of acquired reticular diaphragmatic hernia in Bovidae. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 41: 323-331.

  46. Kumar, R.V., Kohli, R.N., Prasad, B., Singh, J. and Sharma, S.N. (1980). Radiographic diagnosis of diaphragmatic hernia in cattle. Veterinary Medicine Small Animal Clinician. 75: 305-309.

  47. Leek, B.F. (1969). Reticuloruminal mechanoreceptors in sheep. Journal of Physiology. 207: 585-609.

  48. Lewis, A.M. (1974). Letter: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the calf. Veterinary Record. 94(5): 102. doi: 10.1136/vr.94. 5.102.

  49. Makhdoomi, S.M., Sangwan, V. and Kumar, A. (2018). Effect of radiographic positioning on the morphometry of cranio-ventral abdomen in cows and buffaloes. International Journal of Livestock Research. 8(11): 172-181.

  50. Marudwar, S.S., Thakur, S.B., Dhakate, M.S., Narkhede, M.D. and Kulkarni, P.E. (1986). Successful repair of diaphragmatic hernia in bovine under local analgesia. Indian Veterinary Journal. 63(12): 1047-1050.

  51. Milne F.J. (1951). Diaphragmatic hernia in the cow. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 118: 374-6 

  52. Mirakhur, K.K., Singh. J., Sharma, S.N. and Kohli, R.N. (1980). Effects of chloral hydrate and its combination with thiopental sodium in buffalo calves. Zentralbl Veterinarmed  A. 27(9-10): 708-716.

  53. Mirakhur, K.K., Sobti, V.K., Prasad, B., Ramakumar, V., Sharma, S.N., Khanna, A.K. and Kohli, R.N. (1983). A modified combination of anaesthesia for diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes - clinical report. Indian Veterinary Journal. 60: 720-726.

  54. Misk, N.A. and Semieka M.A. (2001). The radiographic appearance of reticular diaphragmatic herniation and traumatic pericarditis in buffaloes and cattle. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound. 42(5): 426-430.

  55. Mitsuo, A.B.E., Hiraga, T., Iwasa, K. and Takehana, K. (1989). Parasternal congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a calf. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 51(1): 225- 227.

  56. Mohindroo, J., Kumar, M., Kumar, A. and Singh, S.S. (2007). Ultrasonographic diagnosis of reticular diaphragmatic hernias in buffaloes. Veterinary Record. 161: 757-758.

  57. Naik, P.V. and Mehendale, S.S. (1969). A case of diaphragmatic hernia in a buffalo. Indian Veterinary Journal. 46: 625-627.

  58. Nigam, J.M., Singh, A.P. and Mirakhur, K.K. (1980). Radiographic diagnosis of bovine thoracic disorders. Modern Veterinary Practice. 61(12): 1021-1025.

  59. Peshin, P.K., Krishnamurthy, D., Singh, K., Nassimi, M.N. and Nigam, J.M. (1986). Haemodynamic and blood gas changes in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in the supine position following thiopentone anaesthesia with premedication. Veterinary Research Communications. 2: 1-7.

  60. Prasad, B., Singh, J., Khanna, A.K., Khianey, N.K. and Kohli, R.N. (1979). Abomasal involvement in bovine diaphragmatic hernia and surgical management. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 20: 26-27.

  61. Prasad, B., Singh, J., Rama Kumar, V., Sharma, S.N., Rathor, S.S. and Kohli, R.N. (1977). Surgical repair of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. An analysis of 42 cases. Indian Veterinary Journal. 54: 656-660.

  62. Prasad, B., Singh. J., Kumar, R., Kohli, R.N. and Rathor, S.S. (1980). Management of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 1: 21-23.

  63. Ramakumar, V., Prasad, B., Singh, J., Sharma, S.N. and Kohli, R.N. (1979). Bovine diaphragmatic hernioplasty using autologous skin grafts. Modern Veterinary Practice. 60(11): 907-908.

  64. Rose, M. K., Puri, J. P., Gupta, M., Goyal R. L, Arya, S.C. and Kar, D. (2009). Plasma enzyme profiles in female buffaloes suffering from diaphragmatic hernia and traumatic reticuloperitonitis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 79(3): 288-289.

  65. Roy, K.S. and Das, L.N. (1983). Histopathological observations on the diaphragm in cases of diaphragmatic hernia in Indian buffalo. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 53(9): 1030-1032.

  66. Roy, K.S. (1980). Histomorphological and histochemical studies on diaphragm of Indian buffalo. Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.

  67. Sahil, Chaudhary, R.N., Kumar, A., Jangir, B.L., Kumar S and Dinesh. (2023). Evaluation of COUP-TF II and GATA-4 genes in causation of diaphragmatic hernia in buffalo. Paper presented in the 45th Annual Congress of Indian Society for Veterinary Surgery and National Symposium on “Emerging Trends in Farm, Companion and Wild Animal Surgery” held at OUAT, Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, December 6-8, 2023.

  68. Sahu, A., Chawla, S.K., Krishnamurthy, D., Tayal, R., Behl, S.M. and Singh, J. (2003). Diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy in buffaloes. Clinical evaluation of 72 cases. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 24: 33-34.

  69. Sahu, A., Chawla, S.K., Singh, J., Krishnamurthy, D., Tayal R. and Behl, S.M. (2002). Role of certain antioxidant combination in the management of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 23: 81-82.

  70. Saini N.S., Kumar A., Mahajan, S.K. Sood, A.C. (2007). The use of ultrasonography, radiography and surgery in the successful from diaphragmatic hernia in a cow. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 48: 757-759.

  71. Saini, N.S., Sobti, V.K., Mirakhur, K.K., Singh, S.S., Singh, K.I., Bansal, P.S., Simran, P.S. and Bhatia, R. (2001). Survivors of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 71(9): 839-840.

  72. Saini, N. S., Sobti, V. K., Mirakhur, K. K., Singh, S.S., Singh, K.I., Bansal, P. S., Singh, P. and Bhatia, R. (2000). Retrospective evaluation of 80 non-surviving buffaloes with diaphragmatic hernia. Veterinary Record. 147: 275-276.

  73. Saini, N.S., Kumar, A., Sangwan, V., Mahajan, S.K. and Anand, A. (2016). Radiographic versus ultrasonographic diagnosis and surgical management of double diaphragmatic hernia in cow (Abstract). Abstracts of the 2015 scientific conference of the International Veterinary Radiology Association, Fremantle, Western Australia and August 16-21, 2015. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound. 57(2): 221-222. doi: 10.1111/vru.12332.

  74. Saini, N.S., Sobti, V.K., Mirakhurm, K.K., Singh, S.S., Singh, K.I., Bansal, P.S., Simran, P.S. and Bhatia, R. (2001). Diaphragmatic hernia in cows: A study of 10 clinical cases. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 22: 52-53.

  75. Sangwan, V., Mohindroo, J., Kumar, A. and Gupta, A. (2019). B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography of cranial epigastric vein in healthy and diseased cattle and buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 89(3): 238-245.

  76. Sangwan, V., Mohindroo, J., Kumar, A. and Randhawa, C. (2018). Clinical, radiographic and ultrasonographic differences in cows and buffaloes suffering with pericarditis. International Journal of Livestock Research. 8(5): 255-263.

  77. Sangwan, V., Mohindroo, J., Kumar, A., Mukhopadhyay, C.S. and Saini, N.S. (2015). Doppler ultrasonography of common carotid artery and external jugular vein in healthy and reticulo-diaphragmatic hernia affected buffaloes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, India, Section B: Biological Sciences. 85(3): 859-865.

  78. Sharma, D.N., Barnwal, A.K. and Dhingra, L.D. (1981). Studies on the arterial supply to the diaphragm of buffalo. Haryana Agricultural University Journal Research. 11: 121-128.

  79. Sharma, K., Sangwan, V., Kumar, A., Singh, N., Singh, T. and Mohindroo, J. (2024). Diagnosis and surgical management of diaphragmatic hernia in cows. Large Animal Review. 30(1): 43-50.

  80. Singh, A.P., Eshone, S M., Rifat, J.F. and Fatehea, N.G. (1989). Hernias in Animals: A review of 59 cases. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 10: 28-31.

  81. Singh, H. (1997). Identification and treatment of functional abomasal disorder in cases of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. MV.Sc thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

  82. Singh, H., Singh, T., Raghunath, M., Mohindroo, J., Verma, P., Saini, N.S. and Singh, S.S. (2013). Blood gas, acid base and electrolyte changes during diazepam, midazolam premedication and halothane anaesthesia in buffaloes subjected to diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 83(7): 693-696. 

  83. Singh, J., Dhablania, D.C., Prasad, B. and Rathor, S.S. (1980a). On the etiology of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 42: 89-91.

  84. Singh, J., Fazili, M.R., Chawla, S.K., Tayal, R., Behl, S.M. and Singh, S. (2006). Current status of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes with special reference to etiology and treatment: A review. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 27(2): 73-79.

  85. Singh, J., Krishnamurthy, D., Chawla, S.K., Tayal, R. and Behl, S.M. (2002). Clinical evaluation of diversified ventral approaches to abdomen in buffaloes for diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy. Indian Veterinary Journal 79: 1149-1151.

  86. Singh, J., Prasad, B. and Khianey, N.K. (1979). Diaphragmatic hernia with double hernial rings in a buffalo. Indian Veterinary Journal. 56: 141-143.

  87. Singh, J., Prasad, J., Kumar, R., Kohli, R.N. and Rathor, S.S. (1977). Treatment of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes. Australian Veterinary Journal. 53: 473-475.

  88. Singh, J., Ramakumar, V., Kohli, R.N., Prasad, B., Khainey, N.K. and Sharma, S.N. (1980b). Post xiphoid surgical approach the repair of bovine diaphragmatic hernia. Veterinary Medicine Small Animal Clinician. 75(1): 106-109.

  89. Singh, S. (1974). Clinical and experimental studies on foreign body syndrome in buffaloes with special reference to diaphragmatic hernia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.

  90. Singh, S.S., Mirakhur, K.K., Singh, K.I. and Sharma, S.N. (1996). Standing thoracotomy and diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy in a cow. Veterinary Record. 139(10): 240. doi: 10.1136/ vr.139.10.240.

  91. Singh, T., Sangwan, V., Sharma, K., Kumar, A., Verma, A., Singh, N., Jena, B. and Khosa, J.S. (2023). Peri-operative monitoring of general anaesthesia in buffaloes undergoing diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy in relation to pleural integrity and survivability. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 93(3): 267-271.

  92. Sobti, V.K., Sharma, S.N., Singh, K., Rathor, S.S. (1989). Diaphragmatic hernia in buffalo bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal. 66: 866.

  93. Suryawanshi, R.V., Ulemale, A.H., Jadhav, Y.B. and Ubhare, G. (2023). Clinico-haematobiochemical evaluation of diaphragmatic hernia and its surgical management in cattle and buffaloes- A retrospective study of 32 cases. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 57(3): 345-352. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B- 4406.

  94. Tagra, S.K., Sharma, D.K., Singh, J., Krishnamurthy, D., BehI, S.M. and Gupta, S.L. (2001). Correction of critical electrolytes deficit in cases of diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes with abomasal reflux. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 22: 92-96.

  95. Talekar, S.H., Chaudhary, M.P., Gamiti, K.S., Katara, K.P. and Soni, M. (2018). Surgical management of diaphragmatic hernia in four Jaffarabadi buffaloes and two Gir cows. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology. 7(2): 684-688. 

  96. Troutt, H.F., Fessler, J.F., Page, E.H. and Amstutz, H.E. (1967). Diaphragmatic defects in cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 151: 1421-1429.

  97. Tubbs, C.R. (1953). Diaphragmatic hernia in the cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 123: 371-372.

  98. Usturge, S.M. and Bhokre, A.P. (1989). Repair of diaphragmatic hernia under sedation and local anaesthesia in bovines. Indian Veterinary Journal. 66(10): 967-970.

  99. Venkataravanappa, N. and Krishnamurthy, D. (1984a). Intrapleural and intraperitoneal pressures in relation to etiology of diaphragmatic hernia in bovines. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 5: 43-46.

  100. Venkataravanappa, N. and Krishnamurthy, D. (1984b). Biochemical constituents of diaphragm in cows and buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 54: 319-323.

  101. Verma, A., Sangwan, V., Anand, A. and Kaur, K. (2022). Comparative radiographic morphometry of thorax in upto one month old healthy buffalo and cow calves. Large Animal Review. 28(5): 255-263.

  102. Vig, M.M. and Tyagi, R.P.S. (1973). Experimental diaphragmatic hernia in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis): Barium-meal and contrast pleurographic studies. Veterinary Radiology. 14(2): 93-97. 

  103. Vig, M.M. and Tyagi, R.P.S. (1974). Diaphragmatic herniation and hernioplasty in bovines- an experimental study. Indian Veterinary Journal. 51(6): 461-465.

  104. William, B.J., Dharmaceelan, S., Arunprasad, A., Rajendran, N. and George, R.S. (2003). Diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy/plasty under xylazine/detomidine sedation and local analgesia in bovines: A review of 11 cases. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 24: 16-18.

Editorial Board

View all (0)