Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Impact of Climate Change on Animal Health and Mitigation Strategies: A Review

S.K. Sharma1,*, Garima Rathore2, Monika Joshi2
1College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Jodhpur-342 037, Rajasthan, India.
2College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Navania, Udaipur-313 601, Rajasthan, India.
Climate change, a global phenomenon of present time, has emerged as the greatest challenge of the world in the twenty-first century. The impact of climate change is multifaceted and affects various aspects of the ecosystems as human, animals and environment. Climate change is one among the major threat for the sustainability of livestock systems. The direct effects of climate change on animal health are mainly due to changes in environmental conditions such as air temperature, relative humility, precipitation, drought, and flood and reflect mainly in the form of heat stress and reproductive problems. Indirect effects lead to infectious, vector borne and parasitic diseases occurrence. The mitigation strategies should focus upon climate resilient breeding and shelter management practices along with sustainable disease surveillance, conservation of natural habitats and society awareness and education.
Climate change, a global phenomenon of present time, has emerged as the greatest challenge of the world in the twenty-first century. Rising earth’s surface temperature is one of the most threatening factors coming into view. The substantial changes in the earth’s climate have an impact on ecosystems, economics and societies in a variety of ways. Changes in weather patterns, melting of glaciers at the poles and an increase in sea levels, as well as modified precipitation patterns etc. are the consequences of climate change.
       
Various human activities like the combustion of fossil fuels, deforestation, industrialisation and rapid urbanisation are contributing to the transformation of the earth’s climate at an unprecedented rate by generation of greenhouse gases. The carbon dioxide is generated through uses of huge amount of fossil fuels as coal and oils. Methane and nitrous oxide are produced by city landfills, rice fields, use of nitrogen fertilizers in agriculture and livestock farming. Methane and nitrous oxide have shorter half-life in atmosphere therefore instead of powerful greenhouse gas effect carbon dioxide has major role for climate change. Agriculture, forestry and other land use contributes to 22 per cent of global emission out of which enteric fermentation (CH4) has only 5 per cent emission (IPCC, 2022).
 
Climate change scenario at global and national level
 
Human activities, principally through emissions of greenhouse gases, have unequivocally caused global warming, with global surface temperature increasing 1.1°C in 2011-2020. Rise in temperature is more over land (1.59°C) than over the ocean (0.88°C). Global greenhouse gas emissions have continued to increase. Global net anthropogenic GHG emissions have been estimated to be 59±6.6 GtCO2-eq9 in 2019, about 12% (6.5 GtCO2-eq) higher than in 2010 and 54% (21 GtCO2-eq) higher than in 1990, with the largest share and growth in gross GHG emissions occurring in CO2 from fossil fuels combustion and industrial processes (CO2-FFI) followed by methane, whereas the highest relative growth occurred in fluorinated gases (F-gases), starting from low levels in 1990. Average annual GHG emissions during 2010–2019 were higher than in any previous decade on record (IPCC, 2023).
 
In developing nations, like India, there is rapid population expansion, economic reform, rapid urbanization, industrial infrastructure development and environmental degradation; global warming and climate change is more challenging to manage. The Indian Meteorological Department recorded temperature increase over the Indian region is almost similar to the global average in its “Statement on Climate of India during 2018” report. India’s average temperature increased by roughly 0.7°C between 1901 and 2018 and it is anticipated to increase by approximately 4.4°C by the year 2100.
       
Over the Indian-Gangetic plains and the Western Ghats, monsoon rainfall decreased by around 6% between 1951 and 2015. In contrast, in central India, the intensity of heavy rainfall rose by over 75% over the same period. From 1951 to 2016, droughts’ frequency and geographic area greatly increased particularly regions across central India, the southwest coast, the southern peninsula and northeastern India. The east coast of India had more frequent and intense, very severe cyclonic storms than the west coast during 2000-2018 (Krishnan et al., 2020). These changes have far-reaching consequences, not only for human societies but also for the vast array of animal species inhabiting diverse ecosystems across the planet.
 
Effects of climate change
 
The impact of climate change is multifaceted and affects various aspects of the ecosystems as human, animals and environment. These are some key impacts:
· Temperature rise: Global temperatures have been rising, leading to more frequent and severe heat waves. This can result in health problems, heat stress and an increased demand for cooling infrastructure.
· Extreme weather events: Climate change is associated with an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, droughts, floods and wildfires. These events can cause widespread damage to infrastructure, agriculture and human settlements.
· Sea level rise: The melting of polar ice caps and glaciers, along with the thermal expansion of sea water, contributes    to rising sea levels. This poses a significant threat to low-lying coastal areas, leading to erosion, saltwater intrusion and the displacement of communities.
· Impact on agriculture: Agricultural productivity through changes in temperature, rainfall and the frequency of extreme events. Farmers face challenges in adapting their practices to the evolving climate conditions.
· Biodiversity loss: Climate change contributes to the loss of biodiversity, affecting ecosystems and the species that inhabit them.
· Health risks: Climate change can have direct and indirect impacts on human as well as animals health. Increased                        temperatures can exacerbate heat-related illnesses and changes in the distribution of vector-borne diseases.
 
Impact of climate change on animals
 
Climate change is one among the major threat for the sustainability of livestock systems. Climatic factors such as ambient temperature, relative humidity, direct and indirect solar radiation and rain fall influence on feed and water availability, fodder quality, heat stress, production, animal growth, reproduction and disease occurrence. These impacts are primarily due to an increase in temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, precipitation variation and a combination of these factors (Henry et al., 2012; Nardone et al., 2010 and Thornton et al., 2009).
       
Temperature affects most of the critical factors for livestock production, such as water availability, animal production, reproduction and health. Forage quantity and quality are affected by a combination of increases in temperature, CO2 and precipitation variation. Diseases occurrence is mainly affected by an increase in temperature and variation in rain fall pattern. The effects of climate change on animal health may be considered into two categories direct and indirect.
 
Direct effect of climate change on animal health
 
The direct effects are mainly due to changes in environmental conditions such as air temperature, relative humility, precipitation, drought and floods. These environmental conditions are responsible for temperature-related animal morbidity and mortality.
 
Heat stress
 
Animals have a range of ambient environmental temperatures that are optimal for their physiological processes, known as their thermal comfort zone. Animals experience heat stress when the temperature rises above the critical temperature of the range. Heat stress in animals is dependent on temperature, humidity, species, breed, age and physiological status.
       
Heat stress also affects their metabolism, physiology, hormones and immune system in animals. The physiological changes result in decreased rumen motility and rumination in ruminants (Nardone et al., 2010; Soriani et al., 2013). Decrease in thyroid activity resulting further lesser metabolic heat production (Helal et al., 2010). Feed intake and feed utilization efficiency of animal exposed to heat stress have decreased (Hooda et al., 2010).
       
Animals belonging to higher latitude area will be more affected by the rise of temperatures than the animals located in lower latitude area, because livestock in lower latitudes are usually well adapted to high environmental temperatures and droughts (Thornton et al., 2009). Intensive rearing systems having more control over climate exposure will be comparatively less affected by climate change.
       
The long-term impact of environmental transformation on animal health status can be physiologically assessed by monitoring various physiological processes such as rectal temperature, pulse and respiration rate, metabolic rate, endocrine status, oxidative status (Bernabucci et al., 2002). Metabolism of glucose, protein and lipid, liver functionality (reduced cholesterol and albumin), non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) also found in heat stressed animals. In severe cases mortality may be encountered due to heat stress. According to Nardone et al., (2010), temperature increases between 1-5°C may cause substantial mortality in grazing cattle.
 
Production and production diseases
 
Productivity from livestock is highly influenced by environmental factors mainly through production and metablic disorders. Best production is obtained from animals when they are living in optimal environmental conditions. The negative impacts on livestock productivity, health and animal performance are influenced and affected by various factors like increasing environmental temperatures followed by humidity, wind velocity and radiation. Among different climatic variables, ambient temperature fluctuations have the most drastic effect on production and animal welfare.
       
There have been estimated significant monetary losses of nearly 2% of the total milk production in India. Thermal stress due to climatic changes causes a reduction in feed intakes. It also reduces the feed conversion ratio (FCR) and utilization of feeds. Production disorders such as ketosis, milk fever, fat cow syndrome and various deficiency disorders may be outcome of changing climate and improper nutrition.
       
The poultry industry may also be compromised by low production at temperatures higher than 30°C (Esminger et al., 1990). Heat stress on birds will reduce body weight gain, feed intake and carcass weight and protein and muscle calorie content (Tankson et al., 2001).
 
Reproductive disorders
 
Reproduction efficiency of both male and female may be affected by heat stress. In male animals semen quality and libido get affected by higher environmental temperature. The sertoli cells are primary target for heat stress (Ahmad et al., 2022). Heat stress has also been associated with lower sperm concentration and quality in bulls, pigs and poultry (Karaca et al., 2002; Kunavongkrita et al., 2005).
       
In females, follicular dynamics and expression of estrus sign are disturbed due to rising environmental temperatures and humidity. This may lead to a high incidence of silent heat in animals. (Barati et al., 2008) reported the alteration in oocyte growth and quality of cow and pig leading to impairment of embryo development and pregnancy as adverse effect of heat stress. Poor fertility may be attributed to increased energy deficits and heat stress in cows (De Rensis and Scaramuzzi, 2003; King et al., 2006).
       
In poultry, heat stress has detrimental effect on reproduction efficiency and consequently egg production because of reduced feed intake and interruption of ovulation (Nardone et al., 2010). Hot climate also have negative effect on egg quality, such as egg weight and shell weight and thickness etc. (Mashaly et al., 2004).
 
Indirect effects
 
Indirect effects of climate change on animal health and production are due to microbial density and distribution of vector-borne diseases, food and water shortages, or foodborne diseases (Lacetera, 2019).
 
Disease occurrence
 
The epidemiology of diseases will be influenced by any climate-related factor that modifies the interrelationship between hosts, pathogens and environment (triangle relationship). Under a changing climate scenario, there may be an increased probability of the emergence of many zoonotic and parasitic diseases. Climate change could change how diseases travel, outbreaks of serious illnesses or even the introduction of new diseases that could affect livestock that isn’t typically exposed to these kinds of illnesses
 
Vector borne diseases
 
The vector borne diseases, survival of the vector, its replication, distribution, density, the vector biting rate and the pathogen’s incubation rate within the vector are of particular importance. Arthropod vectors are affected by climatic variables such as precipitation, temperature, humidity and other environmental conditions that might influence their survival, reproduction, development, behaviour and population dynamics. Since vectors like cattle ticks (Boophilus microplus, Haemaphysalis bispinosa and Hyalomma anatolicum) are coldblooded, climate of atmosphere affects availability of their habitats, abundance, distribution and the severity and seasonal pattern of vector activity. Generally arthropod vectors are markedly increased in numbers during the hot, humid weather condition and animals are worst affected by them during these favrouable climatic conditions (Sridhar et al., 2020).
 
Climate change affects pathogens
 
The number of infectious cycles that may occur for diseases related to the warm or cold seasons within a year may grow or decrease depending on how long the warm season is maintained. Extreme weather conditions such as flooding cause pollution to runoff from the agricultural land to animal farms and this runoff mixed with the water supply in farms can be the source of entero-haemorrhagic Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium parasites. This threatens other livestock and because it contaminates water systems, it also puts people in danger of acquiring zoonotic diseases. Along with diseases that limit production, future challenges in controlling parasitic zoonoses such as those connected to climate change require further attention (Polley and Thompson, 2009).
 
Feed and water availability
 
Depending on the geographical and seasonal conditions fodder quantity and quality is affected. An increase in temperature will be harmful for pasture and livestock production in arid and semiarid climate. This continuous rise in biospheric temperature has altered the quantity and distribution of the average annual precipitation and the primary climate change drivers including carbon dioxide (CO2) to increase. Increased incidence of heat waves and droughts at different ecological regions, cause a detrimental impact on the vegetation of that zones. Climate change affects the length and timing of the forage’s availability, the duration of the growing season is also a crucial element in determining the quality and amount of forage (Cheng et al., 2022).
       
Water is scarce worldwide and the magnitude of water scarcity depends on the supply relative to the demand. Climate change contributed to water availability and water usage in animal production. Rising temperatures are likely to increase per animal and per land area animal water consumption and irrigation water use. Increased water salinity caused by sea-level rise is another concern. Competition for water between livestock, crops and non-agricultural uses will increase in the coming decades and it requires more efficient production systems to address water scarcity issue (Konapala et al., 2020).
 
Climate change and zoonosis
 
It is currently accepted that 80% of all animal pathogens are zoonotic agents and that 75% of emerging animal pathogens are zoonotic. It follows that zoonotic animal pathogens tend to associate with emerging processes twice as often as non zoonotic animal pathogens. The environmental changes affect the breeding, development and proliferation of specific parasite species and their hosts as well as their capacity to transmit diseases. Some of the examples of parasitic diseases of animals and humans include leishmaniosis, cryptosporidiosis, giardiosis, trypanosomiosis, shistosomiasis, filariosis, onchocerciosis etc. The pattern of these parasitic diseases is affected by change in the climate and environmental conditions in different parts of the world (Patz et al., 2000). Various countries have identified the emergence of leishmaniosis as a zoonosis linked to climate and environmental change.  Climate change is believed to increase the risk of human exposure to cutaneous leishmaniosis in northern areas of the United States, by transforming the area into a more suitable habitat for the vector and reservoir species that transmit this disease. To the south of the American continent, the incidence, lethality and geographic distribution of visceral leishmaniosis has increased worryingly in recent years in Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, where a change in the epidemiology of the disease has been observed, becoming established in urban and peri-urban areas with aggravated virulence (Oyhantcabal et al., 2010). Cutaneous and visceral leishmaniosis is also frequently reported from India.
 
Mitigation strategies
 
Adaptation strategies can improve the resilience of animals towards climate change (USDA, 2013). Mitigation measures could significantly reduce the impact of livestock on climate change (Dickie et al., 2014). Adaptation and mitigation can make significant impacts if they become part of national and regional policies.
 
Climate-resilient animal breeding
 
Selective breeding programs play a pivotal role in developing animal breeds that can withstand the challenges posed by a changing climate. Through careful selection of traits such as heat tolerance, disease resistance and efficient resource utilization, scientists and farmers can create livestock varieties that are better adapted to rising temperatures and emerging diseases. These climate-resilient breeds not only ensure sustainable livestock production but also promote genetic diversity within animal populations, enhancing their overall resilience to environmental stressors Additionally, research into genomics and molecular biology allows for the identification of specific genes associated with desirable traits (Renaudeau et al., 2012). Genetic modification techniques can be employed responsibly to introduce beneficial traits into animal populations, fostering resilience in the face of climate-related challenges. Some breeds are less affected by heat stress, such as smaller, lighter-colored animals, or breeds can show great physical and physiological adaptation to heat stress. If such trait is heritable, selective breeding for heat tolerance could be used to improve animal adaptation to climatic stress. Producers can switch breeds, for example, using more Bos indicus cattle (Barendse, 2017).
 
Management modifications
 
The modification of production and management systems involves diversification of livestock animals and crops, integration of livestock systems with forestry and crop production and changing the timing and locations of farm operations (IFAD, 2010). Diversification of livestock and crop varieties can increase drought and heat wave tolerance and may increase livestock production when animals are exposed to temperature and precipitation stresses. In addition, this diversity of crops and livestock animals is effective in fighting against climate change-related diseases.
 
Robust surveillance
 
Improved veterinary surveillance systems are essential for tracking the diseases that are impacted by climate change. Veterinarians and researchers can more quickly and reliably identify new diseases by investing in cutting-edge diagnostic equipment and data analysis tools. Prompt reaction actions, including vaccination campaigns, treatment regimens and quarantines, are made possible by early discovery and contribute to the prevention of large-scale epidemics in animal populations. Working together to share surveillance data among nations and regions can yield a thorough understanding of disease dynamics and facilitate the quick implementation of preventative measures.
 
Effective preventive measures
 
The FAO Emergency Prevention System (EMPRES) (1994) has showed early warning, detection and response as the key to the prevention and control of both old and new infections and diseases in animals. Prevention and control of  spread of disease across country boundaries has become the credo of the FAO/World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) initiative, Global Framework for the Progressive Control of Transboundary Animal Diseases (GF-TAD). Progressive control pathways and regional roadmaps should be designed to counter the spread of high-impact infectious livestock diseases such as FMD, PPR and ASF. Similar, control pathways and roadmaps are needed for zoonotic diseases. Early detection and early response are key to the success of the Global Diseases Control Programme. Regular as well as blanket vaccinations are of utmost importance. The flare-up of new diseases and the persistence of chronic disease burden remain considerable, particularly in the developing world including India. Climate change-modulated vector- borne disease (VBD) complexes would appear to become more dynamic globally. In our country, the expertise in entomology and disease ecology within public veterinary services is inadequate to mount early warning and response mechanisms in the face of novel VBD emergencies. Improvements are required in integration of field veterinary work, laboratories and detection of critical control points. A “One Health” approach conveniently deals with the collective risk factors acting at the level of natural and farming landscapes, on-farm, in slaughter houses and processing and distribution circuits. “One Health” brings together health professionals engaged as veterinary practitioners, food inspectors, forest veterinarians, plant protection, natural resource management and, of course, food safety and public health. Removing the divides separating today disciplines, sectors, institutions and political boundaries, undoing the compartmentalization as prevailing in government organizational structures, presents the major challenge under the “One Health” umbrella. For FAO, the “One Health” notion extends to the Food Chain Crisis Management Framework, a platform for all health professionals within the Organization (Tekola et al., 2012).
 
Conservation of natural habitat
 
Two essential tactics for reducing the negative effects of climate change on animals are the preservation of natural habitats and the restoration of damaged ecosystems. Protected areas, animal corridors and forestry programs are examples of conservation measures that help to preserve biodiversity and guarantee the availability of vital habitats and food sources. In addition to removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, restoring damaged ecosystems like wetlands and forests also creates habitat for a variety of animal species. Governments, local communities and conservation organizations may work together to create and manage protected areas, which will shield delicate species and ecosystems from the effects of climate change.
 
Public awareness and education
 
Gaining support for mitigation initiatives requires educating the public about the complex relationship between animal health and climate change. Education campaigns aimed at farmers, lawmakers, the general public and others who care for animals can emphasize the value of sustainable living and appropriate environmental practices.
There has been a tendency to oversimplify the mechanisms by which climate change affects animal health and disease transmission as well as human health status. Indeed, only a limited number of studies present validation of the direct effects of climate change itself. The flare-up of insects and diseases of livestock origin and also the surge of food safety hazards, is likely to continue for decades to come. Risk analysis highlighting the implications of climate change in its broader context relies on the full consideration of the transmission ecology of insects, pests and diseases. Transmission involving prominent free-living parasite stages is arguably more likely to be modulated by environmental factors including temperature, humidity and weather conditions. Risk management of emerging disease complexes in which climate change plays a role is best addressed under a “One Health” umbrella.
There is no conflict of interest.

  1. Ahmad, R., Yu, Y.H., Hsiao, F.S.H., Su, C.H., Liu, H.C., Tobin, I., Zhang, G. and Cheng, Y.H. (2022). Influence of heat stress on poultry growth performance, intestinal inflammation  and immune function and potential mitigation by probiotics.  Animals. 12(17): 2297.

  2. Barati, F., Agung, B., Wongsrikeao, P., Taniguchi, M., Nagai, T. and Otoi, T. (2008). Meiotic competence and DNA damage of porcine oocytes exposed to an elevated temperature. Theriogenology. 69(6): 767-772.

  3. Barendse, W. (2017). Climate adaptation of tropical cattle. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 5: 133-150.

  4. Bernabucci, U., Ronchi, B., Lacetera, N. and Nardone, A. (2002). Markers of oxidative status in plasma and erythrocytes of transition dairy cows during hot season. Journal of Dairy Science. 85(9): 2173-2179.

  5. Cheng, M., McCarl, B. and Fei, C. (2022). Climate change and livestock production: A literature review. Atmosphere. 13(1): 140.

  6. De Rensis, F. and Scaramuzzi, R.J. (2003). Heat stress and seasonal effects on reproduction in the dairy cow-a review. Theriogenology. 60(6): 1139-1151.

  7. Dickie, A., Streck, C., Roe, S., Zurek, M., Haupt, F. and Dolginow, A. (2014). Strategies for Mitigating Climate Change in Agriculture: Abridged Report. Climate Focus and California Environmental Associates, Prifadred with the Support of the Climate and Land Use Alliance. 

  8. Ensminger, M.E., Oldfield, J.E. and Heinemann, W.W. (1990). Feeds and nutrition digest. Formerly Feeds and Nutrition, Complete. Ensminger Publishing Company, Clovis, CA.

  9. Helal, A., Hashem, A.L.S., Abdel-Fattah, M.S. and El-Shaer, H.M. (2010). Effect of heat stress on coat characteristics and physiological responses of Balady and Damascus goats in Sinai, Egypt. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science. 7(1): 60-69.

  10. Henry, B., Charmley, E., Eckard, R., Gaughan, J.B. and Hegarty, R. (2012). Livestock production in a changing climate: Adaptation and mitigation research in Australia. Crop and Pasture Science. 63(3): 191-202.

  11. Hooda, O.K. and Singh, G. (2010). Effect of thermal stress on feed intake, plasma enzymes and blood biochemicals in buffalo heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 27(2): 122-127.

  12. IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development), (2010). Livestock and climate change.

  13. IPCC (Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change), (2022).  Climate Change 2022, Mitigation of Climate Change: Technical Summary. 

  14. IPCC (Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change), (2023). Climate Change 2023, Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers,  IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

  15. Karaca, A.G., Parker, H.M., Yeatman, J.B. and McDaniel, C.D. (2002). Role of seminal plasma in heat stress infertility of broiler breeder males. Poultry Science. 81(12): 1904-1909.

  16. King, J.M., Parsons, D.J., Turnpenny, J.R., Nyangaga, J., Bakari, P. and Wathes, C.M. (2006). Modelling energy metabolism of Friesians in Kenya smallholdings shows how heat stress and energy deficit constrain milk yield and cow replacement rate. Animal Science. 82(5): 705-716.

  17. Konapala, G., Mishra, A.K., Wada, Y. and Mann, M.E. (2020). Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation. Nature Communications. 11(1): 3044.

  18. Krishnan, R., Gnanaseelan, C., Sanjay, J., Swapna, P., Dhara, C., Sabin, T.P., Jadhav, J., Sandeep, N., Choudhury, A.D., Singh, M. and Mujumdar, M. (2020). Introduction to climate change over the Indian region. Assessment of climate change over the indian region: A report of the ministry of earth sciences (MoES), Government of India. 1-20.

  19. Kunavongkrit, A., Suriyasomboon, A., Lundeheim, N., Heard, T.W. and Einarsson, S. (2005). Management and sperm production of boars under differing environmental conditions. Theriogenology. 63(2): 657-667.

  20. Lacetera, N. (2019). Impact of climate change on animal health and welfare. Animal Frontiers. 9(1): 26-31.

  21. Mashaly, M.M., Hendricks 3rd, G.L., Kalama, M.A., Gehad, A.E., Abbas, A.O. and Patterson, P.H. (2004). Effect of heat stress on production parameters and immune responses of commercial laying hens. Poultry Science. 83(6): 889-894.

  22. Nardone, A., Ronchi, B., Lacetera, N., Ranieri, M.S. and Bernabucci, U. (2010). Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems. Livestock Science. 130(1-3): 57-69.

  23. Oyhantcabal, W., Vitale, E. and Lagarmilla, P. (2010). Climate change and links to animal diseases and production. Conf. OIE. pp. 179-186.

  24. Patz, J.A., Graczyk, T.K., Geller, N. and Vittor, A.Y. (2000). Effects of environmental changes on emerging parasitic diseases.  Int. J. Parasitol. pp. 1-11.

  25. Polley, L. and Thompson, R.A. (2009). Parasite zoonoses and climate change: molecular tools for tracking shifting boundaries. Trends in Parasitology. 25(6). 285-291.

  26. Renaudeau, D., Collin, A., Yahav, S., De Basilio, V., Gourdine, J.L. and Collier, R.J. (2012). Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal. 6(05): 707-728.

  27. Soriani, N., Panella, G. and Calamari, L.U.I.G.I. (2013). Rumination time during the summer season and its relationships with metabolic conditions and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science. 96(8): 5082-5094.

  28. Sridhar, J., Kumar, K.K., Murali-Baskaran, R.K., Senthil-Nathan, S., Sharma, S., Nagesh, M., Kaushal, P. and Kumar, J. (2020). Impact of climate change on communities, response and migration of insects, nematodes, vectors and natural enemies in diverse ecosystems. Global Climate Change: Resilient and Smart Agriculture. pp. 69-93.

  29. Tankson, J.D., Vizzier-Thaxton, Y., Thaxton, J.P., May, J.D., Cameron, J.A. (2001). Stress and nutritional quality of broilers. Poultry Science. 80(9): 1384-1389.

  30. Tekola, B., Lubroth, J., Slingenbergh, J., de Balogh, K., Morzaria, S., Newman, S., Subasinghe, R., El Idrissi, A., Ankers, P., Douglas, I., Kaeslin, E. and Poirson, J.M. (2012). The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is advancing the One Health approach. GRF One Health Summit 2012. (unpublished). Rome, FAO.

  31. Thornton, P.K., van de Steeg, J., Notenbaert, A. and Herrero, M. (2009). The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review of what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems. 101(3): 113-127.

  32. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2013). Climate Change and Agriculture in the United States: Effects and Adaptation. USDA technical bulletin, Washington, DC. http://www.usda.gov/oce/climate_change/effects_2012/ CC%20and%20Agriculture%20Report%20%2802-04- 2013%29b.pdf.

Editorial Board

View all (0)